Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 14:22:21 +0800 LUK ShunTim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As you said, there is no secret at all. :-) I noticed - that's why I responded through the list. > Your opinion is noted and this will be the last you hear (directly) > from me on this topic. Thank you for your patience and Just a clarification (you might have understood already :-) ): I am quite interested in your reporting bugs. That's an important part of the development proces. Just do in through open lists and the open BTS rather than privately (except for the rare cases of security-related bugs that may need special care before revealed to the public). So thanks alot for your help :-) - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDvlBhn7DbMsAkQLgRAmkzAJ9l3dXAWKYdIniZTpC8iJ6cZAxKYQCdGs5b vYlCgyK03XS0pFlDw/egqWk= =yeBm -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again
Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:55:07 +0800 > LUK ShunTim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>I did *not* cc the bug list as the email is quite large, over 100k. > > > Please do not post me privately about non-secret bugs. I have a strong > interest in working in the open. Hello Jonas, As you said, there is no secret at all. :-) > > I understand if this can be confusing: Some get furious when you "make > too much noise" in bugreports, others (like me) when you don't. > > > Besides, I did not request those lengthy details - on the contrary I > suggested this to be a non-bug. Thanks for your opinion but that's something I, as an ordinary user and reporter of (probable) bugs, not fully competent to judge. > > And if you were to play nice with lengthy details for bugreports you > could either compress it or put it somewhere on the web and only refer > to it with a URL. I *have* thought about all these options and I've chosen this course action which IMO is reasonable, under the current circumstances. And I'm sure package maintainers would provide sufficient information to the bug list after the investigation. Your opinion is noted and this will be the last you hear (directly) from me on this topic. Thank you for your patience and good day, ST -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:55:07 +0800 LUK ShunTim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did *not* cc the bug list as the email is quite large, over 100k. Please do not post me privately about non-secret bugs. I have a strong interest in working in the open. I understand if this can be confusing: Some get furious when you "make too much noise" in bugreports, others (like me) when you don't. Besides, I did not request those lengthy details - on the contrary I suggested this to be a non-bug. And if you were to play nice with lengthy details for bugreports you could either compress it or put it somewhere on the web and only refer to it with a URL. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDvToPn7DbMsAkQLgRAr/RAKCCwg/vyGsJYxhG5Vu0pK79MUglNACgnxCy ao5PNUFeBecfkyWspgsOxA4= =86+S -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 15:28:04 +0100 Maximilian Attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:50:15PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote: > > > > This is triggered when I try to use reportbug to report a kernel > > bug. > > ok reportbug checks if there are debsums for a packet, > currently we don't add them so i'm still curious where do you get them > from? > > please post the output of > apt-cach show linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 > cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686.postint > dpkg -L linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 > > maybe than we have a hint of how you got that? The output of "debconf-show debsums" is probably more interesting. And perhaps read the description associated with the question asked when running "dpkg-reconfigure debsums". I suspect this to be a non-bug... - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDu98Gn7DbMsAkQLgRAjDIAKCS+973LQFA6a1dNXvQ30QF9JpgTACfRfcX D4VYt2m9fOmAIriFr6/sORo= =N8S7 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again
hello luk! On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:50:15PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote: > > This is triggered when I try to use reportbug to report a kernel bug. ok reportbug checks if there are debsums for a packet, currently we don't add them so i'm still curious where do you get them from? please post the output of apt-cach show linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686.postint dpkg -L linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 maybe than we have a hint of how you got that? regards -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again
Maximilian Attems wrote: > severity 343686 normal > tags 343686 moreinfo > tags 343686 unreproducible > stop > > downgrading severity as kernel-package doesn't yet build with debsums. > > can you please tell how you hooked debsums into your image? > perhaps you are invoking debsums in apt's post install hook? > or in the kernels post install hook? > > -- > maks > Hello Maks, This is triggered when I try to use reportbug to report a kernel bug. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/00sys/deb$ reportbug Please enter the name of the package in which you have found a problem, or type 'other' to report a more general problem. > linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 *** Welcome to reportbug. Use ? for help at prompts. *** Using 'LUK ShunTim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' as your from address. Detected character set: ISO-8859-1 Please change your locale if this is incorrect. Getting status for linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686... Verifying package integrity... There may be a problem with your installation of linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686; the following files appear to be missing or changed: debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.pcimap debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.dep debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.ieee1394map debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.usbmap debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.isapnpmap debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.inputmap debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.seriomap debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.alias debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.symbols Do you still want to file a report [y|N|q|?]? q Regards, ST -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again
reassign kernel-package stop On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:48:55PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 > Version: 2.6.14+2.6.15-rc5-0experimental.1 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > > After installing linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 and rebooting, I got errors > similar > to that reported in bug #343048, that is > > > /bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/dev: No such file or directory > Waiting 1 seconds for /sys/block/hda/dev to show up > /bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/dev: No such file or directory > Waiting 2 seconds for /sys/block/hda/dev to show up" > > well that yaird bug is known and we'll hopefully soon see a fix for that crack. so not sure if that severity is right. > However, the strange thing is when I invoke reportbug to report it, I got > these > bunch of checksum errors > > > Getting status for linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686... > Verifying package integrity... > There may be a problem with your installation of linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686; > the following files appear to be missing or changed: > debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file > /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.pcimap > debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file > /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.dep > debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file > /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.ieee1394map > debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file > /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.usbmap > debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file > /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.isapnpmap > debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file > /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.inputmap > debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file > /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.seriomap > debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file > /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.alias > debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file > /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.symbols > cool so the newer k-p adds md5sums support :) reassigning to you Manoj. woow thanks!! -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again
This one time, at band camp, LUK ShunTim said: > However, the strange thing is when I invoke reportbug to report it, I got > these > bunch of checksum errors > > > Getting status for linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686... > Verifying package integrity... > There may be a problem with your installation of linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686; > the following files appear to be missing or changed: > debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file > /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.pcimap > debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file > /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.dep > debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file > /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.ieee1394map > debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file > /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.usbmap > debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file > /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.isapnpmap > debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file > /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.inputmap > debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file > /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.seriomap > debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file > /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.alias > debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file > /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.symbols > These files are, as far as I know, all altered by the kernel install process. The fact that they are altered is fine, but they probably shouldn't be shipping md5sums for them, since they are expected to be altered. Take care, -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 Version: 2.6.14+2.6.15-rc5-0experimental.1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system After installing linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 and rebooting, I got errors similar to that reported in bug #343048, that is /bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/dev: No such file or directory Waiting 1 seconds for /sys/block/hda/dev to show up /bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/dev: No such file or directory Waiting 2 seconds for /sys/block/hda/dev to show up" However, the strange thing is when I invoke reportbug to report it, I got these bunch of checksum errors Getting status for linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686... Verifying package integrity... There may be a problem with your installation of linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686; the following files appear to be missing or changed: debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.pcimap debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.dep debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.ieee1394map debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.usbmap debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.isapnpmap debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.inputmap debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.seriomap debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.alias debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.symbols which persists after linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 is *reinstalled* a couple of times. Of course, linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 does not boot. Please take a look. Regards, ST -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 depends on: ii initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.44 tools for generating an initramfs ii module-init-tools 3.2.2-1tools for managing Linux kernel mo Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 recommends: ii libc6-i6862.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i -- debconf information: linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/preinst/abort-install-2.6.15-rc5-686: linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.15-rc5-686: true linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.15-rc5-686: false linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory: linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.15-rc5-686: true linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.15-rc5-686: true linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.15-rc5-686: true linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.15-rc5-686: false linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.15-rc5-686: linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.15-rc5-686: true linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.15-rc5-686: linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.15-rc5-686: true linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/preinst/initrd-2.6.15-rc5-686: linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk: linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.15-rc5-686: true linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.15-rc5-686: linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.15-rc5-686: linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.15-rc5-686: true linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.15-rc5-686: linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.15-rc5-686: true linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.15-rc5-686: true -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
