Bug#574523: igb backport

2010-05-23 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 08:26:01PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 11:49:57PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 20:49 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > Package: linux-2.6
> > > Version: 2.6.32-10
> > > Severity: important
> > > 
> > > see in git ubuntu lucid
> > > git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-lucid.git
> > > git shortlog 5f78f17a5b5518120eaa28021e76a267a3ad27d0.. -- drivers/net/igb
> > > depends also on followup fix 97a21d3ae6477ef00e39f21e47ce767a8ca1a22a
> > > x86: Avoid race condition in pci_enable_msix()
> > > 
> > > 
> > > seems worthwile to debian too, anyone against adding that backport?
> > 
> > I have no specific objection.  However, I thought that as a general rule
> > we cherry-pick fixes and new hardware support rather than completely
> > updating drivers.  I'm aware that we've broken that rule for sfc and for
> > DRM, but in those cases we have a commitment from upstream to support
> > the backport.  Can we get that for igb?
> 
> Maks, what's the status?

no time currently to clear upstream status.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100524032229.gc19...@baikonur.stro.at



Bug#574523: igb backport

2010-05-22 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 11:49:57PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 20:49 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.32-10
> > Severity: important
> > 
> > see in git ubuntu lucid
> > git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-lucid.git
> > git shortlog 5f78f17a5b5518120eaa28021e76a267a3ad27d0.. -- drivers/net/igb
> > depends also on followup fix 97a21d3ae6477ef00e39f21e47ce767a8ca1a22a
> > x86: Avoid race condition in pci_enable_msix()
> > 
> > 
> > seems worthwile to debian too, anyone against adding that backport?
> 
> I have no specific objection.  However, I thought that as a general rule
> we cherry-pick fixes and new hardware support rather than completely
> updating drivers.  I'm aware that we've broken that rule for sfc and for
> DRM, but in those cases we have a commitment from upstream to support
> the backport.  Can we get that for igb?

Maks, what's the status?

Cheers,
Moritz



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100522182601.ga32...@galadriel.inutil.org



Bug#574523: igb backport

2010-04-03 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 20:49 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-10
> Severity: important
> 
> see in git ubuntu lucid
> git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-lucid.git
> git shortlog 5f78f17a5b5518120eaa28021e76a267a3ad27d0.. -- drivers/net/igb
> depends also on followup fix 97a21d3ae6477ef00e39f21e47ce767a8ca1a22a
> x86: Avoid race condition in pci_enable_msix()
> 
> 
> seems worthwile to debian too, anyone against adding that backport?

I have no specific objection.  However, I thought that as a general rule
we cherry-pick fixes and new hardware support rather than completely
updating drivers.  I'm aware that we've broken that rule for sfc and for
DRM, but in those cases we have a commitment from upstream to support
the backport.  Can we get that for igb?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#574523: igb backport

2010-03-18 Thread maximilian attems
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-10
Severity: important

see in git ubuntu lucid
git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-lucid.git
git shortlog 5f78f17a5b5518120eaa28021e76a267a3ad27d0.. -- drivers/net/igb
depends also on followup fix 97a21d3ae6477ef00e39f21e47ce767a8ca1a22a
x86: Avoid race condition in pci_enable_msix()


seems worthwile to debian too, anyone against adding that backport?




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100318194929.gf24...@baikonur.stro.at