Bug#600846: Definitely: The problem started with kernel 2.6.32

2010-11-03 Thread maximilian attems
please let upstream know the 2.6.36 trouble, so that they can work on it.

On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:41:54PM +0100, hu...@online.de wrote:
> I downloaded three versions of the 2.6.30 kernel from snapshot.debian.org
> and installed them on my notebook - without doing any other changes to
> the system.
>
> And the Suspend-To-RAM of all of the three 2.6.30 kernels worked  
> perfectly well !

so other datapoints would be 2.6.31-* and the first 2.6.32-[1-4]-amd64
linux packages.

thanks.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101103213937.gk15...@vostochny.stro.at



Bug#600846: Definitely: The problem started with kernel 2.6.32

2010-11-03 Thread hu...@online.de

I downloaded three versions of the 2.6.30 kernel from snapshot.debian.org
and installed them on my notebook - without doing any other changes to
the system.

And the Suspend-To-RAM of all of the three 2.6.30 kernels worked 
perfectly well !


So from my point of view the problem started definitely with the 2.6.32 
kernel version.


The 2.6.30 kernel packages were:
linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64_2.6.30-1_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.30-2-amd64_2.6.30-7_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.30-2-amd64_2.6.30-8squeeze1_amd64.deb (the latest I found)

With the 2.6.30 kernel there is the same effect of additional processes 
coming up

after the first Suspend-To-RAM . These are:
> root  3092 2  0 20:22 ?00:00:00 [migration/1]
> root  3093 2  0 20:22 ?00:00:00 [ksoftirqd/1]
> root  3094 2  0 20:22 ?00:00:00 [watchdog/1]
> root  3095 2  0 20:22 ?00:00:00 [kconservative/1]
> root  3096 2  0 20:22 ?00:00:00 [ata/1]
> root  3097 2  0 20:22 ?00:00:00 [crypto/1]
> root  3098 2  0 20:22 ?00:00:00 [aio/1]
> root  3099 2  0 20:22 ?00:00:00 [kondemand/1]
> root  3100 2  0 20:22 ?00:00:00 [kblockd/1]
> root  3101 2  0 20:22 ?00:00:00 [kintegrityd/1]
> root  3102 2  0 20:22 ?00:00:00 [events/1]
> root  3103   718  0 20:22 ?00:00:00 udevd --daemon
> root  3104   718  0 20:22 ?00:00:00 udevd --daemon

As can be seen the 2 processes
> root  3109 2  0 11:40 ?00:00:00 [radeon/1]
> root  3110 2  0 11:40 ?00:00:00 [ext4-dio-unwrit]
coming up in kernel 2.6.32 are missing.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cd1bb02.7030...@online.de