Re: Please unblock linux-2.6/2.6.26-11, linux-modules-extra-2.6/2.6.26-5, redhat-cluster/2.20081102-1
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 02:30:51AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Bastian Blank [Sat, 29 Nov 2008 00:39:45 +0100]: Please unblock linux-modules-extra-2.6/2.6.26-5. It is a schedules rebuild to introduce new images and build against new modules sources. I already unblocked it on 2008-11-19, and I already told you on IRC that it can't migrate because it's uninstallable: Then force it. This is going to be fixed by a new linux-latest upload. Please unblock redhat-cluster/2.20081102-1. It is necessary to have working modules on 2.6.26. This is source for l-m-e-2.6. I realize what the problem is: l-m-e-2.6 uses -source packages from unstable to build the modules; if then the modules migrate but the -source package does not, and we release, we have a license compliance problem, right? Sure. The problem is not new. I tried to start a discussion[1], but noone was interrested. So for now you have no other possibility. Bastian [1]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]. -- I'm frequently appalled by the low regard you Earthmen have for life. -- Spock, The Galileo Seven, stardate 2822.3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Please unblock linux-2.6/2.6.26-11, linux-modules-extra-2.6/2.6.26-5, redhat-cluster/2.20081102-1
Hi! On Sunday 30 November 2008 02:30:51 Adeodato Simó wrote: Please unblock redhat-cluster/2.20081102-1. It is necessary to have working modules on 2.6.26. This is source for l-m-e-2.6. I'm very unhappy about this. It's a new upstream version with quite a lot of changes AFAICS. I am sorry we are kind of forcing this now, this was absolutely not intended. When I was looking what to cherrypick for the old version in Debian, I should have backported more than 3/4 of the commits, all being bugfixes relevant for normal operation, among them security issues (CVE-2008-4579, CVE-2008-4580 and others found via code audit) and grave functionality bugs like not working noatime support (what you really want on a shared filesystem, to avoid exclusive write locks on every file access). I should have asked on this list first, before uploading. GFS still has problems on high load, not fixed yet upstream, caused by DLM changes in linux-2.6 2.6.26 (2.6.25 works), which probably need to be addressed there. Best regards Frederik Schüler -- ENOSIG signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Please unblock linux-2.6/2.6.26-11, linux-modules-extra-2.6/2.6.26-5, redhat-cluster/2.20081102-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi folks Please unblock linux-2.6/2.6.26-11. It introduces another stable update and fixes several other problems. Please unblock linux-modules-extra-2.6/2.6.26-5. It is a schedules rebuild to introduce new images and build against new modules sources. Please unblock redhat-cluster/2.20081102-1. It is necessary to have working modules on 2.6.26. This is source for l-m-e-2.6. No objection - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkkxsXgACgkQLqiZQEml+FXaMACfajplEkhbtXw4pyVRG8x8mYGT y/8An3xjIheeyJYJGOWMf0kJPV+X8OZO =aAHJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please unblock linux-2.6/2.6.26-11, linux-modules-extra-2.6/2.6.26-5, redhat-cluster/2.20081102-1
* Bastian Blank [Sat, 29 Nov 2008 00:39:45 +0100]: Hi folks Hi, Bastian. Please unblock linux-2.6/2.6.26-11. It introduces another stable update and fixes several other problems. Unblocked, will migrate when it ages. Please unblock linux-modules-extra-2.6/2.6.26-5. It is a schedules rebuild to introduce new images and build against new modules sources. I already unblocked it on 2008-11-19, and I already told you on IRC that it can't migrate because it's uninstallable: trying: linux-modules-extra-2.6 skipped: linux-modules-extra-2.6 (0 - 14) got: 11+0: i-0:a-0:a-11 * amd64: aufs-modules-2.6-xen-amd64, btrfs-modules-2.6-xen-amd64, drbd8-modules-2.6-xen-amd64, iscsitarget-modules-2.6-xen-amd64, loop-aes-modules-2.6-xen-amd64,+lzma-modules-2.6-xen-amd64, nilfs2-modules-2.6-xen-amd64, redhat-cluster-modules-2.6-xen-amd64, speakup-modules-2.6-xen-amd64, squashfs-modules-2.6-xen-amd64, tp-smapi-+modules-2.6-xen-amd64 Please unblock redhat-cluster/2.20081102-1. It is necessary to have working modules on 2.6.26. This is source for l-m-e-2.6. I'm very unhappy about this. It's a new upstream version with quite a lot of changes AFAICS. I realize what the problem is: l-m-e-2.6 uses -source packages from unstable to build the modules; if then the modules migrate but the -source package does not, and we release, we have a license compliance problem, right? In a way, -source packages can be considered as a kind of libraries during the freeze: they prevent the ability of other packages to migrate. We want a better handling of libraries during the freeze for squeeze; I've made a note that -source packages could use the same mechanisms. This doesn't solve the current problem, though. -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org If you want the holes in your knowledge showing up try teaching someone. -- Alan Cox -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please unblock linux-2.6/2.6.26-11, linux-modules-extra-2.6/2.6.26-5, redhat-cluster/2.20081102-1
Hi folks Please unblock linux-2.6/2.6.26-11. It introduces another stable update and fixes several other problems. Please unblock linux-modules-extra-2.6/2.6.26-5. It is a schedules rebuild to introduce new images and build against new modules sources. Please unblock redhat-cluster/2.20081102-1. It is necessary to have working modules on 2.6.26. This is source for l-m-e-2.6. Bastian -- Yes, it is written. Good shall always destroy evil. -- Sirah the Yang, The Omega Glory, stardate unknown signature.asc Description: Digital signature
