Re: Candidates for longterm 2.6.32.y
From: Ben Hutchings Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 05:27:24 +0100 > On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 14:59 -0700, David Miller wrote: >> From: Ben Hutchings >> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 23:55:51 +0100 >> >> > The following changes are present in Debian's kernel based on 2.6.32, >> > but not yet in 2.6.32.y. I would like to send these to >> > sta...@kernel.org but I know you prefer to pick which networking changes >> > go into stable/longterm updates. Please could you have a look over the >> > log and let me know if you think any of these are not suitable. >> > >> > The complete set of changes I'm intending to send to stable for 2.6.32.y >> > are on this branch: >> > >> > git://git.debian.org/kernel/linux-2.6.git squeeze-to-stable >> >> Looks good, feel free to send these off to Andi Kleen for longterm >> stable as I'm personally not making submissions to that tree, >> the other two or three -stable trees are enough to keep track of >> :-) > > I'm primarily concerned with longterm 2.6.32.y, not whichever series > Andi Kleen is looking after. So should I submit these or will you? Please do it, I'm already overloaded like. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110412.224423.183037158.da...@davemloft.net
Re: Candidates for longterm 2.6.32.y
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 14:59 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Ben Hutchings > Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 23:55:51 +0100 > > > The following changes are present in Debian's kernel based on 2.6.32, > > but not yet in 2.6.32.y. I would like to send these to > > sta...@kernel.org but I know you prefer to pick which networking changes > > go into stable/longterm updates. Please could you have a look over the > > log and let me know if you think any of these are not suitable. > > > > The complete set of changes I'm intending to send to stable for 2.6.32.y > > are on this branch: > > > > git://git.debian.org/kernel/linux-2.6.git squeeze-to-stable > > Looks good, feel free to send these off to Andi Kleen for longterm > stable as I'm personally not making submissions to that tree, > the other two or three -stable trees are enough to keep track of > :-) I'm primarily concerned with longterm 2.6.32.y, not whichever series Andi Kleen is looking after. So should I submit these or will you? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Candidates for longterm 2.6.32.y
From: Ben Hutchings Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 23:55:51 +0100 > The following changes are present in Debian's kernel based on 2.6.32, > but not yet in 2.6.32.y. I would like to send these to > sta...@kernel.org but I know you prefer to pick which networking changes > go into stable/longterm updates. Please could you have a look over the > log and let me know if you think any of these are not suitable. > > The complete set of changes I'm intending to send to stable for 2.6.32.y > are on this branch: > > git://git.debian.org/kernel/linux-2.6.git squeeze-to-stable Looks good, feel free to send these off to Andi Kleen for longterm stable as I'm personally not making submissions to that tree, the other two or three -stable trees are enough to keep track of :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110412.145921.229748276.da...@davemloft.net
