Re: Final decision, please vote ... Re: SVN layout
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 07:09:36PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 11:10:19PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > No reply? > > Bastian Was there something to reply ? I didn't get the impression that you gave any valuable reason, and "read again" is not something which i understand as is. I prefer to abstain from commenting until i get more clear explanations, and i guess this is similar for others. Notice though, that apart from you, all those that participated in this thread where in favour for that move. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Final decision, please vote ... Re: SVN layout
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 11:10:19PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: No reply? Bastian -- We do not colonize. We conquer. We rule. There is no other way for us. -- Rojan, "By Any Other Name", stardate 4657.5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Final decision, please vote ... Re: SVN layout
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 07:12:57PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Ok, explain me why you want to have it part of the kernel subdir then, if we > are going to empty it of any further content ? Why exists arch and utils? Just move anything up. > I really don't get why you are opposing this move, so how can we come to any > concensus if you don't explain yourself ? Read again. Bastian -- Vulcans do not approve of violence. -- Spock, "Journey to Babel", stardate 3842.4
Re: Final decision, please vote ... Re: SVN layout
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 07:11:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:07:02PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Thanks, we can now go ahead and do the cleanup. > > The linux-2.6 move was not part of this dicision. Ok, explain me why you want to have it part of the kernel subdir then, if we are going to empty it of any further content ? I really don't get why you are opposing this move, so how can we come to any concensus if you don't explain yourself ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Final decision, please vote ... Re: SVN layout
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:07:02PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Thanks, we can now go ahead and do the cleanup. The linux-2.6 move was not part of this dicision. Bastian -- Totally illogical, there was no chance. -- Spock, "The Galileo Seven", stardate 2822.3
Re: Final decision, please vote ... Re: SVN layout
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:15:56PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:43:24AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Waldi, i would like your express comment on this, but i believe from your > > previous comments that this should suite you. > > And please rename tags to releases or so. We only have release sources > in it and this makes that clear. Ok. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Final decision, please vote ... Re: SVN layout
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:43:24AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Waldi, i would like your express comment on this, but i believe from your > previous comments that this should suite you. And please rename tags to releases or so. We only have release sources in it and this makes that clear. Bastian -- Immortality consists largely of boredom. -- Zefrem Cochrane, "Metamorphosis", stardate 3219.8 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Final decision, please vote ... Re: SVN layout
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:06:15PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:43:24AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > We then can add a : > > dists/common > > For stuff common to all distributions, like the utils and so on, but which > > can > > live also under the the individual distribs if we need them. > > We don't have anything really common. The versions between stable and > unstable (if applicable) will differ anyway. Well, it can be empty, it was just to have a place to put stuff there in case we needed it, it could as well go into dists/trunk though. > > Waldi, i would like your express comment on this, but i believe from your > > previous comments that this should suite you. > > dists/trunk looks a little bit odd but I won't argue against. Thanks, we can now go ahead and do the cleanup. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Final decision, please vote ... Re: SVN layout
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:43:24AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > We then can add a : > dists/common > For stuff common to all distributions, like the utils and so on, but which can > live also under the the individual distribs if we need them. We don't have anything really common. The versions between stable and unstable (if applicable) will differ anyway. > Waldi, i would like your express comment on this, but i believe from your > previous comments that this should suite you. dists/trunk looks a little bit odd but I won't argue against. Bastian -- Well, Jim, I'm not much of an actor either. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Final decision, please vote ... Re: SVN layout
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:43:24AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:49:59PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > Hi, > > > > with the advent of the unified kernel package for 2.6 some of the > > original SVN layout has become irrelevant. As a background here is > > how things used to look. > > Ok, this mess can no longer continue, since it is paralizing us all, and i am > going to make now a proposal, which should satisfy each side, i believe. > > Currently most important stuff is under branches/dist, and i think it would be > best to make this dist to the toplevel, and kill the superficial branch part. > > So, we would have : > > dists > dists/sarge > dists/sarge-security > dists/sid > dists/experimental or dist/trunk > > And we move stuff there. > > We then can add a : > > dists/common > > For stuff common to all distributions, like the utils and so on, but which can > live also under the the individual distribs if we need them. > > Waldi, i would like your express comment on this, but i believe from your > previous comments that this should suite you. > > All others, i would like your explicit vote on this, so we can reach concensus > officially and finally start working again. I am comfortable with this layout. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
