Bug#796845: marked as done (Uses gcc-4.8 on s390x and m68k)

2015-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:00:16 +
with message-id <e1zwmoy-0003st...@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#796845: fixed in linux 4.2-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #796845,
regarding Uses gcc-4.8 on s390x and m68k
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
796845: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796845
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux
Severity: important

On s390x and m68k, gcc-4.8 is used which will not be released with
stretch (#765380), so the severity of this bug will be bumped when we
get closer to the release (m68k isn't RC of course).

On a related note, ia64 used gcc-4.6, which was removed from the
archive a few days ago. Since ia64 has been dropped entirely and
no porters are left in Debian, maybe simply drop it from the
architectures list of src:linux?

Cheers,
Moritz
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux
Source-Version: 4.2-1~exp1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 796...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> (supplier of updated linux package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 02:08:19 +0100
Source: linux
Binary: linux-source-4.2 linux-doc-4.2 linux-manual-4.2 
linux-support-4.2.0-trunk linux-libc-dev linux-headers-4.2.0-trunk-all 
linux-headers-4.2.0-trunk-all-alpha kernel-image-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
nic-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
nic-wireless-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
nic-shared-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
serial-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
usb-serial-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
ppp-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
pata-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
cdrom-core-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
scsi-core-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
scsi-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
scsi-common-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
scsi-extra-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
loop-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
btrfs-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
ext4-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
isofs-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
jfs-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di
 xfs-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
fat-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
md-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
multipath-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
usb-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
usb-storage-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
fb-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
input-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
event-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
mouse-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
nic-pcmcia-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
pcmcia-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
nic-usb-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
sata-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
core-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
crc-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
crypto-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
crypto-dm-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
ata-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
nbd-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
squashfs-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
virtio-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di
 zlib-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
fuse-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di 
srm-modules-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic-di linux-headers-4.2.0-trunk-common 
linux-image-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic linux-headers-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-generic 
linux-image-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-smp linux-headers-4.2.0-trunk-alpha-smp 
linux-headers-4.2.0-trunk-all-amd64 kernel-image-4.2.0-trunk-amd64-di 
nic-modules-4.2.0-trunk-amd64-di nic-wireless-modules-4.2.0-trunk-amd64-di 
nic-shared-modules-4.2.0-trunk-amd64-di serial-modules-4.2.0-trunk-amd64-di 
usb-serial-modules-4.2.0-trunk-amd64-di ppp-modules-4.2.0-trunk-amd64-di 
pata-modules-4.2.0-trunk-amd64-di cdrom-core-modules-4.2.0-trunk-amd64-di 
firewire-core-modules-4.2.0-trunk-amd64-di 
scsi-core-modules-4.2.0-trunk-amd64-di scsi-modules-4.2.0-trunk-am

Bug#796845: Uses gcc-4.8 on s390x and m68k

2015-08-24 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Source: linux
Severity: important

On s390x and m68k, gcc-4.8 is used which will not be released with
stretch (#765380), so the severity of this bug will be bumped when we
get closer to the release (m68k isn't RC of course).

On a related note, ia64 used gcc-4.6, which was removed from the
archive a few days ago. Since ia64 has been dropped entirely and
no porters are left in Debian, maybe simply drop it from the
architectures list of src:linux?

Cheers,
Moritz



Re: Bug#765380: don't ship gcc-4.8 with jessie

2014-10-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 20:24 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
 Am 17.10.2014 um 19:44 schrieb Steve Cotton:
  On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 05:25:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
  Package: src:gcc-4.8
  Version: 4.8.3-11
  Severity: serious
  Tags: sid jessie
 
  The current default for GCC (4.9) is good enough for jessie. Don't ship 
  legacy
  compilers with jessie.
  
  Hi Matthias,
  
  Removing GCC 4.8 will need Linux kernel ABI transitions.
  
  I haven't seen any discussion on the debian-kernel list, and the
  latest of the Linux package (uploaded to sid this week) still has
  it generating linux-compiler-* packages depending on gcc-4.8, so
  I think the Linux maintainers are expecting GCC 4.8 to be in
  Jessie.
 
 This was communicated to Ben Hutching at DebConf, so plenty of time to prepare
 the change.  Are there known showstoppers?

Bastian said it was generating invalid code for some parts of the kernel
on s390x, and I relayed that to you then.  He says this is unfixed.

I expect that x86, arm*, arm64, and powerpc* kernels have been well-
tested with gcc 4.9.  Out of our release architectures, that would leave
mips and mipsel as unknown.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
[W]e found...that it wasn't as easy to get programs right as we had thought.
... I realized that a large part of my life from then on was going to be spent
in finding mistakes in my own programs. - Maurice Wilkes, 1949


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Bug#765380: don't ship gcc-4.8 with jessie

2014-10-17 Thread Steve Cotton
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 05:25:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
 Package: src:gcc-4.8
 Version: 4.8.3-11
 Severity: serious
 Tags: sid jessie
 
 The current default for GCC (4.9) is good enough for jessie. Don't ship legacy
 compilers with jessie.

Hi Matthias,

Removing GCC 4.8 will need Linux kernel ABI transitions.

I haven't seen any discussion on the debian-kernel list, and the
latest of the Linux package (uploaded to sid this week) still has
it generating linux-compiler-* packages depending on gcc-4.8, so
I think the Linux maintainers are expecting GCC 4.8 to be in
Jessie.

(CC'ing the debian-kernel list for comments)

Regards,
Steve


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2014101717.ga2...@s.cotton.clara.co.uk



Re: Bug#765380: don't ship gcc-4.8 with jessie

2014-10-17 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 17.10.2014 um 19:44 schrieb Steve Cotton:
 On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 05:25:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
 Package: src:gcc-4.8
 Version: 4.8.3-11
 Severity: serious
 Tags: sid jessie

 The current default for GCC (4.9) is good enough for jessie. Don't ship 
 legacy
 compilers with jessie.
 
 Hi Matthias,
 
 Removing GCC 4.8 will need Linux kernel ABI transitions.
 
 I haven't seen any discussion on the debian-kernel list, and the
 latest of the Linux package (uploaded to sid this week) still has
 it generating linux-compiler-* packages depending on gcc-4.8, so
 I think the Linux maintainers are expecting GCC 4.8 to be in
 Jessie.

This was communicated to Ben Hutching at DebConf, so plenty of time to prepare
the change.  Are there known showstoppers?

Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54415eca.6030...@debian.org



Bug#691576: [reverse-bisected] GDB stops with SIGTRAP at 0 address fixed with GCC 4.8

2014-07-25 Thread Émeric MASCHINO
Hi,

Please have a look at upstream bug report:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61799

I was asked to test GCC 4.8 and found this issue go away with
locally-recompiled GCC 4.8.2 (upstream source, as ia64 is no more
supported by Debian).

Whether this was expected or not, I don't know.

Feel free to discuss more in details with ia64/GCC gurus in upstream bug.

Thanks,

 Émeric


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAA9xbM5o+1pey8ju6y+pJBWLvw9nfD3m==LS=9+azq+c2zq...@mail.gmail.com



Re: gcc 4.8

2013-09-05 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:55:23PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:27:24PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
  I did a first build of Linux 3.9 with gcc 4.8. It works fine on s390x,
  however I found a weird not longer reproducible bug in s390. I think
  about using it as default pretty fast for all architectures.
 I think Arnaud said it was generating unbootable kernels for some
 ARM configurations.  I don't remember any details, though.

Any news?

Bastian

-- 
Intuition, however illogical, is recognized as a command prerogative.
-- Kirk, Obsession, stardate 3620.7


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130905110058.ga16...@mail.waldi.eu.org



Re: gcc 4.8

2013-06-26 Thread Rtp
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:

Hi,

 On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:27:24PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
 Hi
 
 I did a first build of Linux 3.9 with gcc 4.8. It works fine on s390x,
 however I found a weird not longer reproducible bug in s390. I think
 about using it as default pretty fast for all architectures.

 I think Arnaud said it was generating unbootable kernels for some
 ARM configurations.  I don't remember any details, though.

Yeah. The day we talked about switching to 4.8 for arm*, this mail got
sent to linux-arm-kernel:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-June/176334.html

But no answer so far.

Arnaud


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k3lh8few@lebrac.rtp-net.org



gcc 4.8

2013-06-24 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi

I did a first build of Linux 3.9 with gcc 4.8. It works fine on s390x,
however I found a weird not longer reproducible bug in s390. I think
about using it as default pretty fast for all architectures.

Bastian

-- 
Change is the essential process of all existence.
-- Spock, Let That Be Your Last Battlefield, stardate 5730.2


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130624172724.gb10...@mail.waldi.eu.org



Re: gcc 4.8

2013-06-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:27:24PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
 Hi
 
 I did a first build of Linux 3.9 with gcc 4.8. It works fine on s390x,
 however I found a weird not longer reproducible bug in s390. I think
 about using it as default pretty fast for all architectures.

I think Arnaud said it was generating unbootable kernels for some
ARM configurations.  I don't remember any details, though.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
  - Albert Camus


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130624185523.gd4...@decadent.org.uk