Re: Bug#523093: undetermined copyright/license violation
On 04/09/2009 06:13 PM, Francesco Poli wrote: I think the clean way is adding a note that explicitly states that the file is a (possibly modified) translation into of code originally written in and that the original code is Copyright © Then the note would explicitly state that the translation (and the modifications, if any) are Copyright © Except that the original files don't have any notice. For those that did, the notice has been kept. Hub -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#523093: undetermined copyright/license violation
On 04/09/2009 03:57 PM, Robert Millan wrote: If you add new function to a LGPL file, and your changes are GPL only, > *practically* the file is only GPL, but the original code is still LGPL, > so better to explicit write also the LGPL. Sounds reasonable. Hubert, can we do that? Let me know if I can help. Given that the original code is in a different language, I don't see where this even make sense. Hub -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
