Distribution (without usage) of shall be used for Good, not Evil-licensed software

2010-06-08 Thread David Paleino
Hello people,
the openlayers package, which I'm reviewing for sponsorship (mentoree CCed),
has a couple of files with the following license:

---8---
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of
this software and associated documentation files (the Software), to deal in
the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to
use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies
of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do
so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.

The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED AS IS, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.
---8---

While I agree this license fails to meet DFSG #6 (No Discrimination Against
Fields of Endeavor), I fail to see a reason why I/my mentoree should repackage
the original tarball to remove them.
I believe it's sufficient to patch the sources to avoid using those files, or
even touching them during the build process: I see a restriction on *usage*,
not on *distribution* (this would be clearly stated in debian/copyright,
though).

Any opinions?

Kindly,
David

-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Distribution (without usage) of shall be used for Good, not Evil-licensed software

2010-06-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:30 PM, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote:

 the openlayers package, which I'm reviewing for sponsorship (mentoree CCed),
 has a couple of files with the following license:
...
 While I agree this license fails to meet DFSG #6 (No Discrimination Against
 Fields of Endeavor), I fail to see a reason why I/my mentoree should 
 repackage
 the original tarball to remove them.

You might want to read the thread started by this mail:

http://lists.debian.org/20100124144741.gd13...@kunpuu.plessy.org

Basically, everything in main needs to be DFSG-free. If you want to
change that, I'd suggest you re-attempt Charles Plessy's proposed GR.

BTW, I presume you are talking about jsmin, in that case just remove
them and use yui-compressor.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimvgedcgqvjjqivscqzdfnk8c2ucqsabynfo...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Distribution (without usage) of shall be used for Good, not Evil-licensed software

2010-06-08 Thread David Paleino
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:43:14 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:

 On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:30 PM, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote:
 
  the openlayers package, which I'm reviewing for sponsorship (mentoree
  CCed), has a couple of files with the following license:
 ...
  While I agree this license fails to meet DFSG #6 (No Discrimination Against
  Fields of Endeavor), I fail to see a reason why I/my mentoree should
  repackage the original tarball to remove them.
 
 You might want to read the thread started by this mail:
 
 http://lists.debian.org/20100124144741.gd13...@kunpuu.plessy.org

I'll do, thanks.

 [..]
 BTW, I presume you are talking about jsmin, in that case just remove
 them and use yui-compressor.

Yes, I am.
However, I sent my mail to clarify a doubt, and possibly avoid the overhead
of repacking the tarball -- not because of the lack of alternatives ;)

Kindly,
David

-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature