Re: [Resolution of] Re: Maxima: Difficult US export restriction issue
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 01:14:44PM +1200, Adam Warner wrote: Dave Turner, the FSF's ``GPL Compliance Engineer'' suggests including the DOE text in the SAME FILE as the GPL will be sufficient to honour the DOE's requirement while also not modifying the GPL. The text should note that it is not part of the licence. Thanks a lot for researching and getting a resolution on this that the FSF is happy with. This issue is likely to come up again. -- G. Branden Robinson| Suffer before God and ye shall be Debian GNU/Linux | redeemed. God loves us, so He [EMAIL PROTECTED] | makes us suffer Christianity. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Aaron Dunsmore pgpsG6kYikQME.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Resolution of] Re: Maxima: Difficult US export restriction issue
On Tue, 2003-05-20 at 19:42, Branden Robinson wrote: On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 01:14:44PM +1200, Adam Warner wrote: Dave Turner, the FSF's ``GPL Compliance Engineer'' suggests including the DOE text in the SAME FILE as the GPL will be sufficient to honour the DOE's requirement while also not modifying the GPL. The text should note that it is not part of the licence. Thanks a lot for researching and getting a resolution on this that the FSF is happy with. This issue is likely to come up again. Thanks Branden! As James Amundson (the upstream maintainer) is also happy with the outcome I've just filed bug #193976: http://bugs.debian.org/193976 Regards, Adam
