Bug#914500: lintian: False positive package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc for file readMesh_off.m

2018-11-25 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 914500 + pending
thanks

Thanks for the report. I've fixed in Git, pending upload:

  
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/e35d7381a9beee8665f2ed5184cda55dbf6dcefc

  data/files/documentation-file-regex | 3 ++-
  debian/changelog| 6 ++
  t/tests/files-package-contains-foo/debian/rules | 9 +
  t/tests/files-package-contains-foo/tags | 5 +
  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-



Processed: Re: lintian: False positive package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc for file readMesh_off.m

2018-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 914500 + pending
Bug #914500 [lintian] lintian: False positive 
package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc for file readMesh_off.m
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #914500 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
914500: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914500
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Bug #914500 in lintian marked as pending

2018-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #914500 [lintian] lintian: False positive 
package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc for file readMesh_off.m
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
914500: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914500
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#914500: lintian: False positive package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc for file readMesh_off.m

2018-11-25 Thread Chris Lamb
Control: found -1 2.5.92

Hi Rafael,

> Package: lintian
> Version:
> Severity: normal

Whoops ;)


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-



Processed: Re: Bug#914500: lintian: False positive package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc for file readMesh_off.m

2018-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> found -1 2.5.92
Bug #914500 [lintian] lintian: False positive 
package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc for file readMesh_off.m
Marked as found in versions lintian/2.5.92.

-- 
914500: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914500
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#914562: lintian: please decide on Debian Enhancement Proposal spelling (harmonise)

2018-11-25 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Chris Lamb dixit:

>I believe Lintian should treat dep.debian.net as the canonical
>acronymisation at this point and adopt that. If there is a
>consensus and enough hunger for this to change "upstream" then
>Lintian will very adopt to it.
>
>In that light, I've (at least) made it consistent here:

Agreed, thanks!

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
„Cool, /usr/share/doc/mksh/examples/uhr.gz ist ja ein Grund,
mksh auf jedem System zu installieren.“
-- XTaran auf der OpenRheinRuhr, ganz begeistert
(EN: “[…]uhr.gz is a reason to install mksh on every system.”)



Processed: Re: lintian: false positives with make prefixes on dh

2018-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 914538 + pending
Bug #914538 [lintian] lintian: false positives with make prefixes on dh
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
914538: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914538
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#914538: lintian: false positives with make prefixes on dh

2018-11-25 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 914538 + pending
thanks

Stephen Kitt wrotE:

> When debian/rules includes a make prefix in front of dh, the use of dh
> isn’t recognised and lintian reports package-does-not-use-debhelper-or-cdbs

Thanks for the report and patch which I have applied in Git (see
below).

FYI I could simplify your patch by removing the control.in files
(preventing any tags from being emitted) as well as the boilerplate at
the top of the debian/rules files. In addition, I had to move the
files under "debian/debian" to just "debian/" due to testsuite
reorganisation work.

Thanks again.


  
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/134c687ef93a076238165b713db12495ad4f8477

  checks/debhelper.pm | 4 ++--
  debian/changelog| 4 
  .../debhelper-package-uses-debhelper-with-prefix-minus/debian/rules | 4 
  t/tests/debhelper-package-uses-debhelper-with-prefix-minus/desc | 6 ++
  t/tests/debhelper-package-uses-debhelper-with-prefix-minus/tags | 0
  .../debhelper-package-uses-debhelper-with-prefix-plus/debian/rules  | 4 
  t/tests/debhelper-package-uses-debhelper-with-prefix-plus/desc  | 6 ++
  t/tests/debhelper-package-uses-debhelper-with-prefix-plus/tags  | 0
  8 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-



Bug#505857: debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version doesn't detect dversionmangle=auto

2018-11-25 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Control: found -1 2.5.112
Control: notfound -1 2.5.113
Control: close -1 2.5.113

On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:46:19AM +0100, Bertrand Marc wrote:
> Indeed, this is fixed with lintian 2.5.113.

Then please try to pay attention to the bug metadata you write while
filing bugs, you explicitly wrote "Version: 2.5.113".

I'm closing this bug as fixed in 2.5.113.  I see it was open ten years
ago, and many things changed since then.  I believe the original report
was also taken care of, and if there are still false positives for this
specific tag I recommend people to open new bugs clarifying what syntax
they are using.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Processed: Re: Bug#505857: debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version doesn't detect dversionmangle=auto

2018-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> found -1 2.5.112
Bug #505857 [lintian] [checks/watch-file] false positive 
debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version
Marked as found in versions lintian/2.5.112.
> notfound -1 2.5.113
Bug #505857 [lintian] [checks/watch-file] false positive 
debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #505857 to the same values 
previously set
> close -1 2.5.113
Bug #505857 [lintian] [checks/watch-file] false positive 
debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version
Marked as fixed in versions lintian/2.5.113.
Bug #505857 [lintian] [checks/watch-file] false positive 
debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version
Marked Bug as done

-- 
505857: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505857
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Re: Bug#505857: debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version doesn't detect dversionmangle=auto

2018-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> found -1 2.5.112
Bug #505857 {Done: Mattia Rizzolo } [lintian] 
[checks/watch-file] false positive debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #505857 to the same values 
previously set
> notfound -1 2.5.113
Bug #505857 {Done: Mattia Rizzolo } [lintian] 
[checks/watch-file] false positive debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #505857 to the same values 
previously set
> close -1 2.5.113
Bug #505857 {Done: Mattia Rizzolo } [lintian] 
[checks/watch-file] false positive debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #505857 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #505857 {Done: Mattia Rizzolo } [lintian] 
[checks/watch-file] false positive debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version
Bug 505857 is already marked as done; not doing anything.

-- 
505857: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505857
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Re: lintian: please decide on Debian Enhancement Proposal spelling (harmonise)

2018-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 914562 + pending
Bug #914562 [lintian] lintian: please decide on Debian Enhancement Proposal 
spelling (harmonise)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
914562: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914562
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#914562: lintian: please decide on Debian Enhancement Proposal spelling (harmonise)

2018-11-25 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 914562 + pending
thanks

Thorsten Glaser wrote:

> Personally I’d prefer DEP-3, but the http://dep.debian.net/ site
> uses “DEP 3” spelling (with ASCII space in between), except in
> the URLs which have “dep3”.

I believe Lintian should treat dep.debian.net as the canonical
acronymisation at this point and adopt that. If there is a
consensus and enough hunger for this to change "upstream" then
Lintian will very adopt to it.

In that light, I've (at least) made it consistent here:

  
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/26ac5017d3e18ab9bdd0b8bafee9dd38a878f3be

  checks/patch-systems.desc   | 6 +++---
  checks/source-copyright.desc| 4 ++--
  checks/source-copyright.pm  | 4 ++--
  debian/changelog| 4 
  .../patch-systems-dpatch-description/debian/patches/05_dep3.diff| 2 +-
  t/tests/source-copyright-boilerplate-uri/desc   | 2 +-
  t/tests/source-copyright-dep5-general/desc  | 2 +-
  t/tests/source-copyright-dep5-syntax-error/desc | 2 +-
  t/tests/source-copyright-ood-uri/desc   | 2 +-
  t/tests/source-copyright-typo-field/desc| 2 +-
  t/tests/source-copyright-unknown-uri/desc   | 2 +-
  t/tests/source-copyright-unversioned-uri/desc   | 2 +-
  t/tests/source-copyright-wiki-uri/desc  | 2 +-
  13 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)


Best wishes,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-



Bug#505857: debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version doesn't detect dversionmangle=auto

2018-11-25 Thread Bertrand Marc
Hi Chris,

Le 25/11/2018 à 09:42, Chris Lamb a écrit :
> Hi Bertrand,
>
>> Lintian also doesn't detect dversionmangle=auto in debian/watch and 
>> reports a warning for this (see [2]).
> Hm, can you quickly confirm you are using the latest Lintian? This should
> have been fixed via #913761 in:
>
>   
> https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/b1308b369b98985c46d050fb7604f4272abd066b
>
> … which should probably be merged into this bug too (unless I'm
> missing something).
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
Indeed, this is fixed with lintian 2.5.113.

Cheers,
Bertrand



Bug#505857: debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version doesn't detect dversionmangle=auto

2018-11-25 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Bertrand,

> Lintian also doesn't detect dversionmangle=auto in debian/watch and 
> reports a warning for this (see [2]).

Hm, can you quickly confirm you are using the latest Lintian? This should
have been fixed via #913761 in:

  
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/b1308b369b98985c46d050fb7604f4272abd066b

… which should probably be merged into this bug too (unless I'm
missing something).


Best wishes,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-