Processed: Bug#932870 marked as pending in lintian
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #932870 [lintian] lintian: check that there are some autopkgtests that don't have Restrictions: superficial Added tag(s) pending. -- 932870: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932870 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#932870: marked as pending in lintian
On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 22:15 +, Felix Lechner wrote: > The new tag resembles, pursuant to the filers request, the existing > tag testsuite-autopkgtest-missing (which has since been renamed) to > the extent that it is likewise issued with an 'info' visibility. This seems to miss part of my request: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932870#17 In addition I think this superficial-only-tests tag should be of a different severity to testsuite-autopkgtest-missing, perhaps raised to info or warning level instead of pedantic. The missing testsuite tag is now at info level, so the superficial tests tag should be raised to warning level. I'll commit a fix. $ grep -hrC20 testsuite-autopkgtest-missing /usr/share/lintian Tag: missing-tests-control Severity: info Check: testsuite Renamed-From: testsuite-autopkgtest-missing Explanation: The source package declares the generic Testsuite: autopkgtest field but provides no debian/tests/control file. . The control file is not needed when a specialized test suite such as autopkgtest-pkg-perl is being used. See-Also: https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/tree/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#932870: marked as pending in lintian
Hi Paul, On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 4:39 PM Paul Wise wrote: > > This seems to miss part of my request: Which part, please? For the level, 'warning' is too high for a peripheral matter like tests, which are optional. Kind regards, Felix Lechner
Bug#932870: marked as pending in lintian
On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 17:55 -0800, Felix Lechner wrote: > Which part, please? For the level, 'warning' is too high for a > peripheral matter like tests, which are optional. From my previous mail: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932870#17 In addition I think this superficial-only-tests tag should be of a different severity to testsuite-autopkgtest-missing, perhaps raised to info or warning level instead of pedantic. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part