Bug#872611: marked as done (lintian: Please warn for package using sensible-utils w/o relationship)

2018-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jul 2018 12:49:16 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#872611: fixed in lintian 2.5.94
has caused the Debian Bug report #872611,
regarding lintian: Please warn for package using sensible-utils w/o relationship
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
872611: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872611
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.52
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: Clint Adams 

Hi!

As part of the long transition to split sensible-utils out from
debianutils, the remaining Depends from debianutils was removed
recently in version 4.8.2.

I asked Clint whether he could send a mail with the current callers
so that they'd be aware of the change and they could fix it, but
thinking about it, it seems more effective and easier to let lintian
check this, as this should be a local and trivial (?) thing to check
for.

Any package that contains references to one of the sensible-utils
binary in non-documentation pathnames/filenames, and does not have any
kind of relationship (Pre-Depends/Depends/Recommends/Suggests) would
get a warning.

This way we do not need to care whether the program is using it
conditionally or not. :)

Thanks,
Guillem
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lintian
Source-Version: 2.5.94

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lintian, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 872...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Lamb  (supplier of updated lintian package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 12:11:14 +
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.5.94
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers 
Changed-By: Chris Lamb 
Description:
 lintian- Debian package checker
Closes: 872611 904140 904414 904420 904522
Changes:
 lintian (2.5.94) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Summary of tag changes:
 + Added:
   - spelling-error-in-rules-requires-root
 + Renamed:
   - missing-depends-on-sensible-utils =>
 script-needs-depends-on-sensible-utils
 .
   * checks/control-file.desc:
 + [CL] Raise the severity of the debian-control-has-empty-field tag
   from "P:" to "I:" and explicitly test the "whitespace" cases.
   (Closes: #904420)
 + [CL] Warn about mispellings of Rules-Requires-Root.  Thanks to Axel
   Beckert for the idea.  (Closes: #904522)
   * checks/cruft.{desc,pm}:
 + [CL] Correctly warn about packages using sensible-utils without a
   relationship by checking all files instead of just maintainer
   scripts.  Thanks to Guillem Jover.  (Closes: #872611)
   * checks/scripts.pm:
 + [CL] Policy 10.4 states that Perl scripts must use /usr/bin/perl
   directly and not via /usr/bin/env, etc.  (Closes: #904414)
 .
   * data/scripts/interpreters:
 + [CL] Add the Julia language as a known interpreter via
   #!/usr/bin/julia.  (Closes: #904140)
   * data/spelling/corrections:
 + [PW] Add a number of corrections.
Checksums-Sha1:
 d62616b39cb4daf764c159cba6934d5eea5e561a 3511 lintian_2.5.94.dsc
 e9b047a0c5b736fe82cc63fb103c0975b74517e0 1569680 lintian_2.5.94.tar.xz
 5d68df1ebfaceed03df82e812ee577c42a414a3d 1126888 lintian_2.5.94_all.deb
 0d8be5bc4f737d284a84cf189f2ffafb71561662 16261 lintian_2.5.94_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 528bf0f8790b97f5dcbcb7cb9468c0a8d32bfe1bcb337eff1ad662995d992cbf 3511 
lintian_2.5.94.dsc
 f885f4de8b4a6877e311dc3fa175e32b761a9bd11b272b4d33a14ce1b78a4652 1569680 
lintian_2.5.94.tar.xz
 1b63311990c307ef9546a214b5c982bd1ba3c9807833dd804cdb4f9d17369b62 1126888 
lintian_2.5.94_all.deb
 5a4699b94f8aa822459f3aa1624d57486c7aef07b1d4056243649b3a14bae60a 16261 
lintian_2.5.94_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 7b7d4a41bc9fc3d5c60a39aff86319a8 3511 devel optional lintian_2.5.94.dsc
 3ca9beac0b504a4c6c06223fd99cba1b 1569680 devel optional lintian_2.5.94.tar.xz
 98a3c5f40e248c07430ab7e1d1aaefd0 1126888 devel optional lintian_2.5.94_all.deb

Bug#872611: marked as done (lintian: Please warn on package using sensible-utils w/o relationship)

2017-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:34:47 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#872611: fixed in lintian 2.5.53
has caused the Debian Bug report #872611,
regarding lintian: Please warn on package using sensible-utils w/o relationship
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
872611: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872611
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.52
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: Clint Adams 

Hi!

As part of the long transition to split sensible-utils out from
debianutils, the remaining Depends from debianutils was removed
recently in version 4.8.2.

I asked Clint whether he could send a mail with the current callers
so that they'd be aware of the change and they could fix it, but
thinking about it, it seems more effective and easier to let lintian
check this, as this should be a local and trivial (?) thing to check
for.

Any package that contains references to one of the sensible-utils
binary in non-documentation pathnames/filenames, and does not have any
kind of relationship (Pre-Depends/Depends/Recommends/Suggests) would
get a warning.

This way we do not need to care whether the program is using it
conditionally or not. :)

Thanks,
Guillem
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lintian
Source-Version: 2.5.53

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lintian, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 872...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Lamb  (supplier of updated lintian package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:25:06 +0100
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.5.53
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers 
Changed-By: Chris Lamb 
Description:
 lintian- Debian package checker
Closes: 681713 762956 779675 814599 835120 847144 849622 857123 865531 868897 
869541 869587 869750 869788 870069 870199 870272 870649 870681 870722 870730 
870758 870822 871575 871767 871957 872042 872076 872611 872843 873096 873211 
873323 873434 873458 873701 873702 874078 874121 874381 875509 875985 876003
Changes:
 lintian (2.5.53) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   The "we are all Perl developers now" release.
 .
   * Summary of tag changes:
 + Added:
   - alternatively-build-depends-on-python-sphinx-and-python3-sphinx
   - build-depends-on-python-sphinx-only
   - dependency-on-python-version-marked-for-end-of-life
   - maintainer-script-interpreter
   - missing-call-to-dpkg-maintscript-helper
   - node-package-install-in-nodejs-rootdir
   - override-file-in-wrong-package
   - package-installs-java-bytecode
   - python-foo-but-no-python3-foo
   - script-needs-depends-on-sensible-utils
   - script-uses-deprecated-nodejs-location
   - transitional-package-should-be-oldlibs-optional
   - unnecessary-testsuite-autopkgtest-header
   - vcs-browser-links-to-empty-view
 + Removed:
   - debug-package-should-be-priority-extra
   - missing-classpath
   - transitional-package-should-be-oldlibs-extra
 .
   * checks/apache2.pm:
 + [CL] Fix an apache2-unparsable-dependency false positive by allowing
   periods (".") in dependency names.  (Closes: #873701)
   * checks/binaries.pm:
 + [CL] Apply patches from Guillem Jover & Boud Roukema to improve the
   description of the binary-file-built-without-LFS-support tag.
   (Closes: #874078)
   * checks/changes.{pm,desc}:
 + [CL] Ignore DFSG-repacked packages when checking for upstream
   source tarball signatures as they will never match by definition.
   (Closes: #871957)
 + [CL] Downgrade severity of orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature
   from "E:" to "W:" as many common tools do not make including the
   signatures easy enough right now.  (Closes: #870722, #870069)
 + [CL] Expand the