Bug#885106: marked as done (lintian: Please update dh_commands for scour 0.36)

2018-01-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jan 2018 07:43:51 +0530
with message-id 
<1517105631.181194.1250484120.194d5...@webmail.messagingengine.com>
and subject line Fixed in 2.5.69
has caused the Debian Bug report #885106,
regarding lintian: Please update dh_commands for scour 0.36
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
885106: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885106
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.65

Please update data/debhelper/dh_commands since dh_scour is now
provided by python3-scour only as of scour 0.36-1 published today.

This fixes this wrong lintian error:
missing-build-dependency-for-dh-addon scour => python-scour

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.5.69


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   ` End Message ---


Bug#885106: marked as done (lintian: Please update dh_commands for scour 0.36)

2017-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2017 15:49:27 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#885106: fixed in lintian 2.5.66
has caused the Debian Bug report #885106,
regarding lintian: Please update dh_commands for scour 0.36
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
885106: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885106
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.65

Please update data/debhelper/dh_commands since dh_scour is now
provided by python3-scour only as of scour 0.36-1 published today.

This fixes this wrong lintian error:
missing-build-dependency-for-dh-addon scour => python-scour

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lintian
Source-Version: 2.5.66

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lintian, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 885...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Lamb  (supplier of updated lintian package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 14:59:29 +
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.5.66
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers 
Changed-By: Chris Lamb 
Description:
 lintian- Debian package checker
Closes: 637473 741071 782277 806237 833613 837548 864999 884503 884676 884678 
884683 884699 884785 884798 884817 884848 885042 885096 885106 885327
Changes:
 lintian (2.5.66) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   Merry Christmas!
 .
   * Summary of tag changes:
 + Added:
   - autotools-pkg-config-macro-not-cross-compilation-safe
   - bugs-field-does-not-refer-to-debian-infrastructure
   - mismatched-python-substvar
   - missing-notice-file-for-apache-license
   - override_dh_clean-does-not-call-dh_clean
   - package-contains-python-doctree-file
   - pkg-config-unavailable-for-cross-compilation
   - portable-executable-missing-security-features
   - python-package-depends-on-package-from-other-python-variant
   - vcs-fields-use-more-than-one-vcs
 .
   * checks/*.desc:
 + [CL] Standardise on capital-L "Lintian" in package descriptions.
   Thanks to Adam D. Barratt for the suggestion.
   * checks/cruft.{pm,desc}:
 + [CL] Check for packages that invoke AC_PATH_PROG without considering
   cross-compilation. Thanks to Helmut Grohne for the idea and
   proof-of-concept implementation.  (Closes: #884798)
   * checks/fields.{pm,desc}:
 + [CL] Emit a wishlist warning for packages that mix-and-match more
   than one version control system in Vcs-* headers.  (Closes: #884503)
 + [CL] Warn when packages specify a "Bugs" field in debian/control that
   does not refer to official Debian infrastructure as this can make
   reportbug unable to report bugs.  (Closes: #741071)
   * checks/files.{pm,desc}:
 + [CL] Warn maintainers about packages that ship pkg-config files under
   /usr/lib/pkgconfig as they are unavailable under cross-compilation.
   Thanks to Helmut Grohne for the idea.  (Closes: #885096)
 + [CL] Warn about packages that ship non-reproducible Python .doctree
   files.  (Closes: #885327)
 + [CL] Factor out simple filename checks into a Lintian::Data variable.
   * checks/init.d.{pm,desc}:
 + [CL] Don't emit init.d-script-needs-depends-on-lsb-base if the
   package ships a Systemd service file.  (Closes: #864999)
   * checks/lintian.desc:
 + [CL] Also note that unused-override can be triggered if Lintian
   adds/modifies supplementary tag metadata.
   * checks/obsolete-sites.pm:
 + [CL] Ignore commented-out lines to avoid false-positives where the
   maintainer references the old location.  (Closes: #806237)
   * checks/pe.{pm,desc}:
 + [CL] Check for Microsoft Windows Portable Executable (PE) files that
   are missing security hardening features. Thanks to Petter
   Reinholdtsen for the report.  (Closes: