Re: Contacting maintainers about no-dsa
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:48:24AM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > A few days passed, I assume we reached consensus :) :) indeed. > I rephrased to explain this is not required. Also added the "no-dsa" > keyword in the previous section and clarified that one can fix a no-dsa > if they want to. nice, thank you. -- tschau, Holger --- holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Contacting maintainers about no-dsa
Hi, On 08/03/2019 15:54, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 12:22:40PM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote: >> I was about do contact the nettle and gnutls maintainers, but after >> discussing with Emilio on IRC it appears that we do not contact >> maintainers for this anymore. >> >> Should we delete the section? > yes, please. Maybe it should however mention that its possible to fix > non-dsa issues if one wants to? A few days passed, I assume we reached consensus :) I rephrased to explain this is not required. Also added the "no-dsa" keyword in the previous section and clarified that one can fix a no-dsa if they want to. Cheers! Sylvain
Re: Contacting maintainers about no-dsa
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 12:22:40PM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > I was about do contact the nettle and gnutls maintainers, but after > discussing with Emilio on IRC it appears that we do not contact > maintainers for this anymore. > > Should we delete the section? yes, please. Maybe it should however mention that its possible to fix non-dsa issues if one wants to? > (incidentally I fixed the remaining wheezy references in the template) Thanks! -- tschau, Holger --- holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C signature.asc Description: PGP signature
