Re: Help: Please seek for sources of some JS files in GNUmed [Was: Bug#685351: src:gnumed-client: Missing source code for *.js files]
Hi Sebastian, first I want to say that I will check later which JS we are really using - I remember that I injected Debian replacements and so we can safely drop the sources. Need to check this when I find some couple of minutes spare time. On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 06:29:26AM +0200, Sebastian Hilbert wrote: > I was not aware those js files are somehow compressed. I was under the > impression these files are pure source files. These are for sure ASCII files which you might be able to edit but it is not considered as "source" because comments and blanks are removed and probably some other optimisations. If you have time you might like to read the longish thread about this on debian-devel list (I only browsed a small amount of it). > If not please drop the js files as > the doc packge will work without them. Output will just look a bit uglier but > I don't care. So before dropping content please consider dropping styling. OK, message taken. I hope to have this ready at beginning of next week. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120907061019.gb4...@an3as.eu
Re: Help: Please seek for sources of some JS files in GNUmed [Was: Bug#685351: src:gnumed-client: Missing source code for *.js files]
Hi Andreas, On Thursday, September 06, 2012 09:53:19 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 08:20:14PM +0200, Sebastian Hilbert wrote: > > > after reading the bug report twice I noticed that the problem is > > > actually not comparable to the issue discussed currently on > > > debian-devel@l.d.o, because the files are actually used in the > > > package and not replaced. So if you want to help Debian Med you > > > can do some research and find the sources of the following files > > > > > > inside the gnumed-doc package: > > > user-manual/rsrc/System/JSTreeContrib/jquery.jstree.js > > > > http://www.jstree.com/documentation > > MIT or GPL2 > > > > > user-manual/rsrc/System/JQueryPlugin/plugins/foswiki/jquery.foswiki.js > > > > http://foswiki.org/Extensions/JQueryPlugin > > GPL > > > > > user-manual/rsrc/System/PatternSkin/pattern.js > > > > http://trac.foswiki.org/browser/trunk/PatternSkin/lib/Foswiki/Contrib/Patt > > ernSkin.pm?rev=14650 > > > > part of PatterSkin > > > > GPL > > I tried to check these links. I think it needs some clarification: > There is no real doubt that the code is GPL. The main problem is that > we need to have the source code of the files that were used and which > could be used to reproduce the compressed *.js files. I did not found > those very files which we could include as copy into the package. > > > > user-manual/rsrc/System/JavascriptFiles/foswikiForm.js > > > > http://www.koders.com/javascript/fid7DAA754986238FA7FE093BDE7031C706AB24FB > > E2.aspx?s=form#L6 > > > > Apache Version 2 > > > > > user-manual/rsrc/System/JavascriptFiles/foswikiString.js > > > > http://trac.foswiki.org/browser/trunk/core/pub/System/JavascriptFiles/fosw > > ikiString_src.js > > > > GPL > > > > > user-manual/rsrc/System/JavascriptFiles/foswikiPref.js > > > > http://trac.foswiki.org/browser/trunk/core/pub/System/JavascriptFiles/fosw > > ikiPref_src.js > > > > GPL > > > > All files stem from a default install of Foswiki > > It seems these *.js files could be fetched from VCS and these are OK. > > In short: If we do not find the real source files of the part above > we should probably remove them from the gnumed-client tarball and > drop the gnumed-doc package (which would be a shame IMHO). > I was not aware those js files are somehow compressed. I was under the impression these files are pure source files. If not please drop the js files as the doc packge will work without them. Output will just look a bit uglier but I don't care. So before dropping content please consider dropping styling. Regards, Sebastian > Kind regards > > Andreas. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/7705403.v4zv1ch...@linux.fritz.box
Re: Help: Please seek for sources of some JS files in GNUmed [Was: Bug#685351: src:gnumed-client: Missing source code for *.js files]
Hi Sebastian, On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 08:20:14PM +0200, Sebastian Hilbert wrote: > > after reading the bug report twice I noticed that the problem is > > actually not comparable to the issue discussed currently on > > debian-devel@l.d.o, because the files are actually used in the > > package and not replaced. So if you want to help Debian Med you > > can do some research and find the sources of the following files > > inside the gnumed-doc package: > > > > user-manual/rsrc/System/JSTreeContrib/jquery.jstree.js > > http://www.jstree.com/documentation > MIT or GPL2 > > > user-manual/rsrc/System/JQueryPlugin/plugins/foswiki/jquery.foswiki.js > > http://foswiki.org/Extensions/JQueryPlugin > GPL > > > user-manual/rsrc/System/PatternSkin/pattern.js > > http://trac.foswiki.org/browser/trunk/PatternSkin/lib/Foswiki/Contrib/PatternSkin.pm?rev=14650 > > part of PatterSkin > > GPL I tried to check these links. I think it needs some clarification: There is no real doubt that the code is GPL. The main problem is that we need to have the source code of the files that were used and which could be used to reproduce the compressed *.js files. I did not found those very files which we could include as copy into the package. > > user-manual/rsrc/System/JavascriptFiles/foswikiForm.js > > http://www.koders.com/javascript/fid7DAA754986238FA7FE093BDE7031C706AB24FBE2.aspx?s=form#L6 > > Apache Version 2 > > > user-manual/rsrc/System/JavascriptFiles/foswikiString.js > > http://trac.foswiki.org/browser/trunk/core/pub/System/JavascriptFiles/foswikiString_src.js > > GPL > > > user-manual/rsrc/System/JavascriptFiles/foswikiPref.js > > > > http://trac.foswiki.org/browser/trunk/core/pub/System/JavascriptFiles/foswikiPref_src.js > > GPL > > All files stem from a default install of Foswiki It seems these *.js files could be fetched from VCS and these are OK. In short: If we do not find the real source files of the part above we should probably remove them from the gnumed-client tarball and drop the gnumed-doc package (which would be a shame IMHO). Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120906195319.ga13...@an3as.eu
Re: libsnappy1.0.3 and picard-tools ok
Le 9/6/12 6:59 AM, Charles Plessy a écrit : > Le Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 08:53:39AM +0200, Olivier Sallou a écrit : >> I have just uploaded libsnappy1.0.3-java_1.0.3-rc3~dfsg-3 which does >> not conflict anymore on maven repo. >> >> I use it against picard-tools, with additiona patches for jbzip2 usage >> and classpath issue and it seems to work. >> >> Charles, >> follows test output. I do not know if it is ok (at least no error). >> Git repo is up-to-date if you want to build the package. >> >> If ok, do you upload the package or do you want I do it? > Hi Olivier, > > I tested picard-tools further and found no problem. Do you think you would > have time to upload it ? Done! > > Many thanks again. Picard-tools has a couple of unique functionalities, and > it > is good to have it up to date in Debian. > > Cheers, > > > -- > gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) > Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50484d53.3030...@codeless.fr
