Re: Bug#685351: Bug#685351: Help: Please seek for sources of some JS files in GNUmed [Was: Bug#685351: src:gnumed-client: Missing source code for *.js files]

2012-09-07 Thread Sebastian Hilbert
Hi

On Friday, September 07, 2012 01:21:41 PM Andreas Tille wrote:
 
> This leaves us with two options:
> 
>   1. Bother FowWiki upstream what they did really used (they must somehow
>  have these files!)
>   2. Replace the installed JS script by what we get via yui-compressor
>  from the sources above (which might most probably work as well
>  ... hopefully.
> 
> Finally there are the remaining files in
> 
>doc/user-manual/rsrc/System/JavascriptFiles/foswiki*.js
> 
> were I also failed finding the source.
> 
I will contact the Foswiki authors.

Sebastian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5251214.2gmaskl...@linux.fritz.box



Re: New upstream version of velvet contains debian/ dir

2012-09-07 Thread Scott Smith
Hi Andreas,

I wanted to be clear on what you're asking.

We install everything on our cluster using Debian packages, and when packaging 
isn't done elsewhere we do it for internal use, and offer it to the public for 
use at their leisure from our apt repo.

For key bioinformatics software we re-package them specially so that all 
executables contain version numbers, and different versions result in different 
packages.  This is part of our reproducibility system, and may be of use to 
some, but certainly not all users.

Are you telling me that we're doing the packaging incorrectly, or that we 
shouldn't make an apt repository available?

Thanks for any advice you have..

Scott

-- 
Scott Smith
Manager, Application Programming and Development
Analysis Pipeline
The Genome Institute
Washington University School of Medicine


On Sep 7, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Andreas Tille  wrote:

> Hi Scott,
> 
> when I downloaded thesource tarball of new upstream version of velvet I
> noticed that it contains a debian/ directory.  This is usually a bad idea
> and should not be done (feel free to ask for a detailed explanation why
> and I spend some time to pick links and give more detailed reasons.)
> 
> It would be really great if you would drop this from your next source
> release.  If you really like to maintain the debian/ directory I would
> suggest you join the Debian Med team which maintains a lot of medical
> and micro-biological software in its version control system.  We would
> be really happy to see you in our team and you can trust on kind
> guidance in case of some Debian related issues.  You can also influence
> the soonish release of new versions if you ask for sponsoring your work
> to official Debian mirrors.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>   Andreas.
> 
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/f616305f-c6bf-43ec-8659-909c1bfc4...@genome.wustl.edu



New upstream version of velvet contains debian/ dir

2012-09-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Scott,

when I downloaded thesource tarball of new upstream version of velvet I
noticed that it contains a debian/ directory.  This is usually a bad idea
and should not be done (feel free to ask for a detailed explanation why
and I spend some time to pick links and give more detailed reasons.)

It would be really great if you would drop this from your next source
release.  If you really like to maintain the debian/ directory I would
suggest you join the Debian Med team which maintains a lot of medical
and micro-biological software in its version control system.  We would
be really happy to see you in our team and you can trust on kind
guidance in case of some Debian related issues.  You can also influence
the soonish release of new versions if you ask for sponsoring your work
to official Debian mirrors.

Kind regards

Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120907115212.gc31...@an3as.eu



Bug#686938: ITP: libvm-ec2-perl

2012-09-07 Thread olivier.sal...@codeless.fr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Olivier Sallou 
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-med@lists.debian.org

 * Package name: libvm-ec2-perl
  Version : 1.17
  Upstream Author : Lincoln D. Stein 
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~lds/VM-EC2-1.02/
* License : Artistic 1 and GPL-1
  Programming Lang: Perl
  Description : limited interface to Amazon EC2 REST tools

This is an interface to Amazon EC2 REST tools that follows the
2011-05-15 API. Author created it because he needed access to the
Tag and TagSet interfaces.
The core Amazon API is supported, but support for
VPC, clusters, spot instances and reserved instances is incomplete.

This package is a dependency for gbrowse package.

-- 
gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438  (keyring.debian.org)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335  D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438



Re: Bug#685351: Bug#685351: Help: Please seek for sources of some JS files in GNUmed [Was: Bug#685351: src:gnumed-client: Missing source code for *.js files]

2012-09-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Olivier,

On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:17:30AM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote:
> 
> >> MIT or GPL2
> Should be available here:
> https://github.com/vakata/jstree/tree/v.1.0/dist (there are 2 branches
> available, should check which branch match)
> >>
> >>>   user-manual/rsrc/System/JQueryPlugin/plugins/foswiki/jquery.foswiki.js
> >> http://foswiki.org/Extensions/JQueryPlugin
> >> GPL
> Could be
> https://github.com/foswiki/JQueryPlugin/tree/master/pub/System/JQueryPlugin/plugins/foswiki
> (branch should be checked too)

Those links are looking pretty close (I also checked the branches) and
after conversion using yui-compressor (which is used according to the
makefiles) the result smells somehow like the code in GNUmed but is
different enough to tell for sure that this is not the exact source file
which was used.

This leaves us with two options:

  1. Bother FowWiki upstream what they did really used (they must somehow
 have these files!)
  2. Replace the installed JS script by what we get via yui-compressor
 from the sources above (which might most probably work as well
 ... hopefully.

Finally there are the remaining files in

   doc/user-manual/rsrc/System/JavascriptFiles/foswiki*.js

were I also failed finding the source.

Kind regards and thanks for checking

  Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120907112141.ga31...@an3as.eu



Re: Help: Please seek for sources of some JS files in GNUmed [Was: Bug#685351: src:gnumed-client: Missing source code for *.js files]

2012-09-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again,

I grepped the source of

   https://github.com/foswiki/JQueryPlugin/downloads

but failed to grep for typical strings inside the JS files in question.
Would you mind asking the FosWiki authors for the uncompressed JS files?

If this fails we might give up and simply remove the files in question
and accept the more ugly user documentation.

Kind regards

   Andreas.

On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 08:10:19AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
> 
> first I want to say that I will check later which JS we are really using
> - I remember that I injected Debian replacements and so we can safely drop
> the sources.  Need to check this when I find some couple of minutes spare
> time.
> 
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 06:29:26AM +0200, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
> > I was not aware those js files are somehow compressed. I was under the 
> > impression these files are pure source files.
> 
> These are for sure ASCII files which you might be able to edit but it is
> not considered as "source" because comments and blanks are removed and
> probably some other optimisations.  If you have time you might like to
> read the longish thread about this on debian-devel list (I only browsed
> a small amount of it).
> 
> > If not please drop the js files as 
> > the doc packge will work without them. Output will just look a bit uglier 
> > but 
> > I don't care. So before dropping content please consider dropping styling.
> 
> OK, message taken.  I hope to have this ready at beginning of next week.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>Andreas. 
> 
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120907061019.gb4...@an3as.eu
> 
> 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120907082059.gd4...@an3as.eu