Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Hi Thiago,
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:25:50PM -0200, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote:
Thanks for your preparation. I downloaded this and tried to build it in
a clean chroot. This seemed to reveal some missing Build-Depends from
libvtk5-dev. After adding this the build failed as well and unfortunately
I'm a bit short in time to check this in detail.
I would like to suggest that you inject the packaging either in SVN or
Git at your preference according to Debian Med team policy[1] to enable
more easy. Given that your final target invesalius is just in Debian
Med SVN I guess this should be no real problem for you and it would help
more simple cooperation (I would have simply added the Build-Depends and
some other polishing).
Injected.
Fine thanks. I had a look into this and fixed several things in the
packaging specifically I now got the Build-Depends right - at least the
binary package is created now.
It would be perfectly fine to switch the Debian packaging from SVN to
Git as well. Just tell me if I should give you a kickstart into this
and move the packaging accroding to the layout as described in our
policy[1].
Injected using svn-inject. Not without doing some local testing
before. I think I did it in the right way.
The injection was perfectly fine - as I said I fixed some things - just
do `svn up; svn log` .
Thanks for your help!
To continue with this I would really like you to consider releasing some
kind of versioned source tarball to enable us writing a watch file. As
far as I was told even proper tagging at github might do the trick. In
case you create the tarball please make sure that it untars into a
directory like python-casmoothing-version and not just simply throws
all its content into the current directory.
Done. I tagged the version 0.1 in github. Ah, To get a tarball that
matches python-casmoothing-version pattern I had to rename the
github repository to python-casmoothing. I updated this information in
control and changelog files from debian packaging.
I also think that the package deserves a bit better long description -
some cut-n-pasted phrases from the paper abstract might do the trick.
Done. I think it's better now.
Kind regards and thanks for your work on this
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121120081609.gb27...@an3as.eu
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAMmoLX8P3=t280-wltjwzoao9sdr_tmv_-+opzwuufk0u9m...@mail.gmail.com
