Re: MIA upload
Hi Gert, On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 05:09:54PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: I've added two patches to the upload, a regression fix and some change a colleague of mine needed in some experimental code. If I interpreted the messaged correctly the other version is not yet uploaded to ftp-master, but to avoid any complications if it happens while I'm writing this I tagged the debian/2.0.9-1 version before adding the patches and I did a dch -i which changed the 2.0.9-1 changelog entry to 2.0.9-2, so I guess that this is not really correct. I reverted this to 2.0.9-1 because I do not see any reason for bumping to 2.0.9-2 as long as there is no 2.0.9-1 inside the archive. I have no idea whether this answers your question and whether you want me to sponsor the current status in Git. Please ping me explicitly about sponsering. Kind regards and thanks for your work on mia Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130508065119.gc6...@an3as.eu
Re: MIA upload
Hello Andreas, On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 08:51 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: I reverted this to 2.0.9-1 because I do not see any reason for bumping to 2.0.9-2 as long as there is no 2.0.9-1 inside the archive. I have no idea whether this answers your question Yes, it does. and whether you want me to sponsor the current status in Git. Please ping me explicitly about sponsering. Sponsoring would be nice, especially since the other version didn't make it to the archives and there are some FTBFS Bugs in 2.0.8-1. many thanks, Gert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1368003192.13770.39.ca...@febe.die.upm.es
Re: MIA upload
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 10:53:12AM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: and whether you want me to sponsor the current status in Git. Please ping me explicitly about sponsering. Sponsoring would be nice, especially since the other version didn't make it to the archives and there are some FTBFS Bugs in 2.0.8-1. Done. Thanks for preparing Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130508111519.ga13...@an3as.eu
Orthanc 0.5.2
Dear all, I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest upstream version of Orthanc (0.5.2) [1,2]. Mathieu, please would you kindly upload it to unstable? Thanks in advance! Cheers, Sébastien- [1] https://code.google.com/p/orthanc/ [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/orthanc/trunk/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/518a5759.10...@chu.ulg.ac.be
Re: [u...@debian.org: Bug#705382: flexbar: FTBFS on unsupported architectures]
Hi Tony, sorry for the longish (vacation associated) delay. On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 02:51:20PM +0100, Tony Travis wrote: On 23/04/13 17:16, Tony Travis wrote: [..] I've changed the Architecture and updated the package to use your new upstream source tarball as Andreas recommended. I'm testing it locally, and it all seems to be working OK. I'll commit the debian files to the svn repository that we are using and ask Andreas' advice about how to submit an updated flexbar package to Debian-Med correctly. Hi, Andreas. I've built and tested the new Flexbar v2.33 package locally, and committed my changes to the svn trunk/debian for flexbar. Regarding your changelog entry: Please do NOT replace old changelog entries. You should use the command dch -i to create new changelog entries for new package versions. I have fixed this in SVN. You also changed the debian/control file to close bug #705382. This needs to be mentioned in debian/changelog and the bug should be closed (done in SVN and commited). I also documented the change in debian/copyright properly in debian/changelog. I'm not yet convinced about your change of debian/flexbar.1. Looking at http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/flexbar/trunk/debian/flexbar.1?r1=13068r2=13414 I see the following problems of the new file: NAME section just says nothing in the new version while the old one has a proper description. What should be the content of the NAME section is given in DESCRIPTION which is plain wrong (just try `man ls` for comparison) SYNOPSIS is lacking the .SH flag DESCRIPTION (the *real* description) is also lacking the .SH flag (as most of the other following section) SEE ALSO is a boilerplate of help2man if you forget to add the --no-info option (I really wished this option would be the default - seems FSF is never giving up advertising their info format) I'm not really sure but if I remember correctly how I created the manpage in Kiel than I think to remember that I did (more or less) heavy manual changes to the file after using a draft from help2man. If you try to rerun help2man blindly this will not lead to a better manpage. I have no idea whether it is easier to maintain the once existing manpage manually or create s script that fixes help2man output afterwards. Kind regards Andreas. PS: Did you talked with upstream author about 32-bit builds and if yes would you include i386 and powerpc into the list of available architectures because libtbb-dev exists on all these architectures? -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130508150522.gi13...@an3as.eu
Desperately searching for a scientific programmer
Dear colleagues, sorry for being a bit off-topic: We are desperately searching for a good bioinformatics programmer who can help us during the next 3 weeks to implement a software package. We already have a prototype but need a working program within very short time. In addition to good payment there will be, in case of success, a scientific publication in a high ranking journal (and fame and glory ;-). The topic is in the field of NGS sequence data analysis. Best wishes, Antje Krause -- Prof. Dr. Antje Krause FH Bingen, Bioinformatik Berlinstr. 109 55411 Bingen am Rhein, Germany Email: a.kra...@fh-bingen.de Tel: +49 +6721 409 253 Fax: +49 +6721 409 158 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/518aafd1.8050...@fh-bingen.de
