Re: [MoM] dwv

2015-03-11 Thread Yves
Hi list,

Getting there...
* ssh is all set,
* I created the repository (
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/dwv-orthanc-plugin.git) using the
setup-repository script,
* I had troubles with uscan and the watch file, uscan stops, complaining
about the missing changelog file so I downloaded the tar.gz manually from
github,
* I ran a: git import-orig --pristine-tar
/path/to/dwv-orthanc-plugin-0.3.0.tar.gz
* and pushed it all on the server

So what's next?


On 10 March 2015 at 10:25, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:

 Hi Yves,

 On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:58:36AM +0100, Yves wrote:
  Password-less access: I attached my public key to my alioth account. Will
  see at my first commit if I did it properly.

 In principle yes.  A `ssh alioth.debian.org` before might show any
 potential problems - specifically if something occures the '-v' option
 might be enlightening.

  When you say 'use the http://git.debian.org/git/debian-med', do you mean
  create a dwvexplorer folder in the debian-med repo? Are they any naming
  rules? From what I read it seams I can do it, should I?
  I'm not sure I get the paragraph about 'social git' (
 
 http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/docs/policy.html#git-repository-structures
 ),
  is it possible to use git submodules to avoid having to copy the github
  repo?

 Its advisable to use the script /git/debian-med/setup-repository which
 is mentioned in the link above.  I can not give an educated answer about
 submodules since I never used this and thus can not give proper advise.
 I personally strongly relay on the workflow to obtain a tarball from a
 github first using the template for a watch file given here:


 https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/package_template/watch?view=markup

 Simply remove everything except

   version=3
   https://github.com/#GITHUBUSER#/#PACKAGE#/releases
 .*/archive/#PREFIX#(\d[\d.-]+)\.(?:tar(?:\.gz|\.bz2)?|tgz)

 fill in the placeholders and fetch a tarball using

   uscan --verbose --force-download

 Once you have the tarball you can import it into the Debian packaging
 Git repository using

   git import-orig --pristine-tar /path/to/package_version.orig.tar.gz

 I know that from a Git perspective it sounds a bit cumbersome since you
 have the code in Git yet.  However, the idea behind this is that you are
 maintaining *packaging* code here - not upstream code - and this
 approach also works for all kind of software (even what is not (yet ;-))
 maintained in Git).

 I hope that this advise is clear enouth and does not tweak your mind too
 much from an upstream maintainers perspective on his own source code.

 Kind regards

  Andreas.

 --
 http://fam-tille.de


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150310092520.gd31...@an3as.eu




Re: best practice to move a package to team maintainership

2015-03-11 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Ghis,

I do completely support your intention to push packages under a team
maintenance. Several times I contacted maintainer directly and
proposed him to move the package under the team. Usually people are agreed
to do it.

You just have to say to maintainer, that he will be able to work on a
package
as before not to scare him to loose the control under the package.

Cheers


Anton

2015-03-11 10:34 GMT+01:00 Ghislain Vaillant ghisv...@gmail.com:

 Hi everyone,

 I'd like your opinion regarding the following matter. There is a package I
 need an update for (h5py), which is now particularly outdated. It is
 currently being maintained by a solo Debian maintainer, who I contacted
 regarding this but has yet to reply. So I worked on my own, fixed the
 packaging for the latest upstream version and tested locally on my work
 machines.

 My understanding is that, If the package were team-maintained (like hdf5
 for instance), I could provide these changes and contribute to updating the
 package in an easier way. I am not even sure how I can forward my changes
 to the Debian maintainer, I am just so used to the comfort of working in
 Debian-science / Debian-med I guess.

 My question is the following: is there a good practice for suggesting a
 move to team-maintainership to a solo Debian maintainer ? Via a bug report
 ? Mailing-list ? Direct email contact ?

 Also, would that actually make sense, or am I just plain silly here ?

 Cheers,
 Ghis



best practice to move a package to team maintainership

2015-03-11 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Hi everyone,

I'd like your opinion regarding the following matter. There is a package I
need an update for (h5py), which is now particularly outdated. It is
currently being maintained by a solo Debian maintainer, who I contacted
regarding this but has yet to reply. So I worked on my own, fixed the
packaging for the latest upstream version and tested locally on my work
machines.

My understanding is that, If the package were team-maintained (like hdf5
for instance), I could provide these changes and contribute to updating the
package in an easier way. I am not even sure how I can forward my changes
to the Debian maintainer, I am just so used to the comfort of working in
Debian-science / Debian-med I guess.

My question is the following: is there a good practice for suggesting a
move to team-maintainership to a solo Debian maintainer ? Via a bug report
? Mailing-list ? Direct email contact ?

Also, would that actually make sense, or am I just plain silly here ?

Cheers,
Ghis


Re: best practice to move a package to team maintainership

2015-03-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Ghislain,

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 09:34:33AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
 Hi everyone,
 
 I'd like your opinion regarding the following matter. There is a package I
 need an update for (h5py), which is now particularly outdated. It is
 currently being maintained by a solo Debian maintainer, who I contacted
 regarding this but has yet to reply. So I worked on my own, fixed the
 packaging for the latest upstream version and tested locally on my work
 machines.

Thanks for working on this.
 
 My understanding is that, If the package were team-maintained (like hdf5
 for instance), I could provide these changes and contribute to updating the
 package in an easier way. I am not even sure how I can forward my changes
 to the Debian maintainer, I am just so used to the comfort of working in
 Debian-science / Debian-med I guess.
 
 My question is the following: is there a good practice for suggesting a
 move to team-maintainership to a solo Debian maintainer ? Via a bug report
 ? Mailing-list ? Direct email contact ?

I guess this is your example case:

   https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2015/02/msg7.html

You might replace collab-maint by debian-science (since the package
belongs to Debian Sciense as you correctly noticed above).  When you
write a comparable mail please also mention:  If I do not hear from you
in time - I'd suggest one week I assume your accept the team
maintenance in Debian Science.  Thus you are not blocked by no answer.

I know the maintainer Soeren Sonnenburg (not in person but from his work
in Debian Med).  He is nice and I think he will most probably agree -
just a bit busy and thus I team-hijacked an other package from him
into Debian Med (seqan).

 Also, would that actually make sense, or am I just plain silly here ?

This makes perfectly sense and is not silly at all.

Thanks for your effort

   Andreas.

PS: Feel free to quote me if you prefer to hide behind an older DD. :-)

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150311094409.gh28...@an3as.eu



Re: Tried to create libcolt-free-java.git (Was: Please help freeing libcolt-java)

2015-03-11 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 10/03/2015 18:23, Andreas Tille a écrit :

 So I obviously did not understand the description of your experiment.

As I said, I removed the files from src/hep/aida/bin and made the
necessary changes to ensure the package still compiles. I didn't try to
replace the other files under src/hep/aida with the ones properly
licensed from jaida.

 Would you mind sending me the source package of your experiment to
 enable me understanding / reproducing what you really did.  I could
 continue with testing the reverse dependencies.  I simply want to
 push this forward even with my limited skills.

Here it is:

https://github.com/ebourg/colt-debian

Emmanuel Bourg


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55002d72.8080...@apache.org