Re: Seeking replacement for some Java icons in package mauve-aligner
Re-posting, initial reply didn't go the list(s): * Andreas Tille: " Seeking replacement for some Java icons in package mauve-aligner" (Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:49:04 +0200): > Hi, > > the package mauve-aligner containes some images[1] that are copyrighted > > Copyright 2000 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > DarkHand16.gif > > so ftpmaster has rejected the upload[2]. Upstream says about these icons: > > Several of these icons were supplied by Sun as 'stock icons' to be used > in Java interfaces, and although I'm pretty sure they were intended for > redistribution I do not have a copy of the license. At least some of the > other icons were definitely scraped from online sources without careful > thought about licenses. A few were created by me. If you have > suggestions for a good place to find freely licensed user interface > icons it would be very helpful indeed! I would be happy to put in > replacements with favourable licensing. > > While I'm seriously wondering about the fact whether 16x16 and 24x24 > icons are copyrightable I'd be happy about any hints for replacent > suggestions by free icons for the files > > Back16.gif > Down16.gif > Forward16.gif > Home16.gif > Up16.gif > Zoom16.gif > ZoomIn16.gif > ZoomIn24.gif > ZoomOut16.gif > ZoomOut24.gif > > Any help would be really welcome. Since it seems to be possible to use png icons I would recommend to use those from e.g. gnome-desktop-theme or tango-icon-theme. Cheers, Mathias > [1] > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/mauve-aligner.git/tree/src/images > [2] > https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/2015-June/032563.html > -- Mathias Behrle PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0x8405BBF6 pgpVqD_P49c2Q.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
[MoM] Re: Help with Debian packaging of DCMTK++
Hi Julien, in the future I will not CC you any more since it is the list policy to not CC single persons but just write to the list. In other words I assume you are subscribed. :-) On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 05:36:26PM +0200, Julien Lamy wrote: > Hi Andreas, > Thanks for the warm welcome! We made this a tradition in the Debian Med team. > That sounds perfect: I'd indeed like to participate. I read Debian Med > policy and the MoM description, and submitted a join request on Alioth > to Debian Med. I have added you to the project. Please make sure you follow the link in the policy under chapter "SSH tips" literally to enable you to ssh git.debian.org Just let us know in case of any problem and report it here using [MoM] in the start of the subject line. Welcome in the Debian Med team Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150715161743.gm17...@an3as.eu
Re: Help with Debian packaging of DCMTK++
Hi Andreas, Thanks for the warm welcome! Le 15/07/2015 16:22, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi Julien, > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:27:57PM +0200, Julien Lamy wrote: >> Dear all, >> We have been developing in the past few months a DICOM library called >> DCMTK++ [1] that wraps the oldish API of DCMTK to a shiny new C++11 >> based API, allowing an easier access to DICOM objects, especially >> regarding the network services. In our minds (probably very biased), the >> library has reached a usable point, and we believe it would benefit the >> community of DICOM developers and could be submitted for inclusion in >> Debian. > > Sounds good and really interesting for team maintenance in Debian Med. > Thanks for contacting us. > >> We have generated packages for our own usage [2] for Debian (7 and 8) >> and Ubuntu (12.04 and 14.04) 32 bits and 64 bits, but they are probably >> not following the guidelines and policies. Since the process of becoming >> a Debian developer seems a bit daunting from an outside point of view, >> would somebody here be willing to help us with the packaging and >> inclusion in Debian? > > Definitely. We have quite a record to get newcomers involved and I hope > I'll be able to proove that things are not that hard to do. We have a > team policy[3] describing the necessary steps to become a Debian Med > member and how to work with our packaging git repository. Moreover we > are running a Mentoring of the Month[4] project which is probably exactly > what you want to do. > > If you agree I'll add you for the month July (well, we are in the middle > of July - if you need longer assistance this is granted for sure) and > you could start with creating a login on alioth.debian.org (as described > in [3]) That sounds perfect: I'd indeed like to participate. I read Debian Med policy and the MoM description, and submitted a join request on Alioth to Debian Med. Best regards, -- Julien Lamy >> [1] https://github.com/lamyj/dcmtkpp/ >> [2] https://github.com/lamyj/dcmtkpp/tree/debian/debian > > [3] http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/docs/policy.html > [4] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMed/MoM > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: #777765 : activiz.net: ftbfs with GCC-5
Just to ask the obvious : in your pbuilder environment is the gcc v5 from experimental? On July 15, 2015 5:17:39 AM CDT, Corentin Desfarges wrote: >Hi, > >I'm trying to fix the bug #65, but I can't reproduce it with : > >pbuilder create >pdebuild > >The build finish with success (excepted some lintian errors and >warnings). >But nothing about gcc... > >And I wish have a small explanation, I'm not sure to understand : > > Fix blocked by 791508: gccxml doesn't produce a gcc-5 compatible code. >Blocking fix for 777868: gdcm: ftbfs with GCC-5 > >What do these lines mean ? > > >Thank you for your help > >Corentin > >[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=65 -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: Help with Debian packaging of DCMTK++
Hi Julien, On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:27:57PM +0200, Julien Lamy wrote: > Dear all, > We have been developing in the past few months a DICOM library called > DCMTK++ [1] that wraps the oldish API of DCMTK to a shiny new C++11 > based API, allowing an easier access to DICOM objects, especially > regarding the network services. In our minds (probably very biased), the > library has reached a usable point, and we believe it would benefit the > community of DICOM developers and could be submitted for inclusion in > Debian. Sounds good and really interesting for team maintenance in Debian Med. Thanks for contacting us. > We have generated packages for our own usage [2] for Debian (7 and 8) > and Ubuntu (12.04 and 14.04) 32 bits and 64 bits, but they are probably > not following the guidelines and policies. Since the process of becoming > a Debian developer seems a bit daunting from an outside point of view, > would somebody here be willing to help us with the packaging and > inclusion in Debian? Definitely. We have quite a record to get newcomers involved and I hope I'll be able to proove that things are not that hard to do. We have a team policy[3] describing the necessary steps to become a Debian Med member and how to work with our packaging git repository. Moreover we are running a Mentoring of the Month[4] project which is probably exactly what you want to do. If you agree I'll add you for the month July (well, we are in the middle of July - if you need longer assistance this is granted for sure) and you could start with creating a login on alioth.debian.org (as described in [3]) Kind regards and thanks for your interest in Debian Med Andreas. > [1] https://github.com/lamyj/dcmtkpp/ > [2] https://github.com/lamyj/dcmtkpp/tree/debian/debian [3] http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/docs/policy.html [4] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMed/MoM -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150715142202.gk17...@an3as.eu
Re: #777765 : activiz.net: ftbfs with GCC-5
Hi Corentin, On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 02:42:04PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote: > Ok I get it. But by reading the bug report, I understand that the bug is > into the gccxml package. > Fix blocked by 791508: gccxml doesn't produce a gcc-5 compatible code. > Am I wrong about it ? No, that's correct. However, the according gccxml bug is #792280 while #791508 is rather the clone of this bug for gdcm. I'm afraid all will be resolved only if gccxml will be replaced by its successor castxml (#787407). Seems like a lengthy chain of dependencies and working on castxml might be the most sustainable solution for these problems. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150715141313.gi17...@an3as.eu
Re: #777765 : activiz.net: ftbfs with GCC-5
2015-07-15 16:03 GMT+02:00 Steve Robbins : > You are right. Either gccxml needs to be updated or replaced. I don't know > if the latter is possible for activiz but gccxml is dead upstream. ITK is > moving to castxml next release. Incidentally I uploaded the castxml package > last night. Right now in NEW queue. > Yes I've just seen it. I suppose that activiz will be updated with castxml when it is available in unstable.
Re: #777765 : activiz.net: ftbfs with GCC-5
2015-07-15 15:58 GMT+02:00 Steve Robbins : > Just to ask the obvious : in your pbuilder environment is the gcc v5 from > experimental? > Yes it is. But now I get the error, by adding CC=gcc-5 CXX=g++-5 before debuild.
Re: #777765 : activiz.net: ftbfs with GCC-5
You are right. Either gccxml needs to be updated or replaced. I don't know if the latter is possible for activiz but gccxml is dead upstream. ITK is moving to castxml next release. Incidentally I uploaded the castxml package last night. Right now in NEW queue. On July 15, 2015 7:42:04 AM CDT, Corentin Desfarges wrote: >Hi Andreas > >Ok I get it. But by reading the bug report, I understand that the bug >is >into the gccxml package. > Fix blocked by 791508: gccxml doesn't produce a gcc-5 compatible code. >Am I wrong about it ? > > >Thanks, > >Corentin > > >2015-07-15 13:22 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille : > >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:17:39PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I'm trying to fix the bug #65, but I can't reproduce it with : >> > >> > pbuilder create >> > pdebuild >> >> As in the bug report you need to >> >> apt-get -t experimental install g++ >> CC=gcc-5 CXX=g++-5 debuild >> >> I'd suggest to do this in a chroot or some virtual machine you can >throw >> away afterwards. >> >> Hope this helps >> >> Andreas. >> >> -- >> http://fam-tille.de >> >> >> -- >> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org >> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact >> listmas...@lists.debian.org >> Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150715112201.ga17...@an3as.eu >> >> -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: #777765 : activiz.net: ftbfs with GCC-5
In fact, I think the problem is that gcc-xml isn't compatible with gcc5. Last year, there was a similar report [1]. But this time, it seems that gcc-xml will not be supported anymore, and that it will be replaced by CastXML, which is in the new queue [2] for 6 hours. So I guess that there is nothing I can do except wait for it, right ? Corentin [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746846 [2] https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/castxml_0.1+git20150630-1.html 2015-07-15 14:42 GMT+02:00 Corentin Desfarges < corentin.desfarges@gmail.com>: > Hi Andreas > > Ok I get it. But by reading the bug report, I understand that the bug is > into the gccxml package. > Fix blocked by 791508: gccxml doesn't produce a gcc-5 compatible code. > Am I wrong about it ? > > > Thanks, > > Corentin > > > 2015-07-15 13:22 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille : > >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:17:39PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I'm trying to fix the bug #65, but I can't reproduce it with : >> > >> > pbuilder create >> > pdebuild >> >> As in the bug report you need to >> >> apt-get -t experimental install g++ >> CC=gcc-5 CXX=g++-5 debuild >> >> I'd suggest to do this in a chroot or some virtual machine you can throw >> away afterwards. >> >> Hope this helps >> >> Andreas. >> >> -- >> http://fam-tille.de >> >> >> -- >> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org >> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact >> listmas...@lists.debian.org >> Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150715112201.ga17...@an3as.eu >> >> >
Help with Debian packaging of DCMTK++
Dear all, We have been developing in the past few months a DICOM library called DCMTK++ [1] that wraps the oldish API of DCMTK to a shiny new C++11 based API, allowing an easier access to DICOM objects, especially regarding the network services. In our minds (probably very biased), the library has reached a usable point, and we believe it would benefit the community of DICOM developers and could be submitted for inclusion in Debian. We have generated packages for our own usage [2] for Debian (7 and 8) and Ubuntu (12.04 and 14.04) 32 bits and 64 bits, but they are probably not following the guidelines and policies. Since the process of becoming a Debian developer seems a bit daunting from an outside point of view, would somebody here be willing to help us with the packaging and inclusion in Debian? [1] https://github.com/lamyj/dcmtkpp/ [2] https://github.com/lamyj/dcmtkpp/tree/debian/debian Best regards, -- Julien Lamy, Ph.D. Research engineer University of Strasbourg, ICube laboratory signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Seeking replacement for some Java icons in package mauve-aligner
Hi, the package mauve-aligner containes some images[1] that are copyrighted Copyright 2000 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. DarkHand16.gif so ftpmaster has rejected the upload[2]. Upstream says about these icons: Several of these icons were supplied by Sun as 'stock icons' to be used in Java interfaces, and although I'm pretty sure they were intended for redistribution I do not have a copy of the license. At least some of the other icons were definitely scraped from online sources without careful thought about licenses. A few were created by me. If you have suggestions for a good place to find freely licensed user interface icons it would be very helpful indeed! I would be happy to put in replacements with favourable licensing. While I'm seriously wondering about the fact whether 16x16 and 24x24 icons are copyrightable I'd be happy about any hints for replacent suggestions by free icons for the files Back16.gif Down16.gif Forward16.gif Home16.gif Up16.gif Zoom16.gif ZoomIn16.gif ZoomIn24.gif ZoomOut16.gif ZoomOut24.gif Any help would be really welcome. Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/mauve-aligner.git/tree/src/images [2] https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/2015-June/032563.html -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150715124904.gf17...@an3as.eu
Re: #777765 : activiz.net: ftbfs with GCC-5
Hi Andreas Ok I get it. But by reading the bug report, I understand that the bug is into the gccxml package. Fix blocked by 791508: gccxml doesn't produce a gcc-5 compatible code. Am I wrong about it ? Thanks, Corentin 2015-07-15 13:22 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille : > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:17:39PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to fix the bug #65, but I can't reproduce it with : > > > > pbuilder create > > pdebuild > > As in the bug report you need to > > apt-get -t experimental install g++ > CC=gcc-5 CXX=g++-5 debuild > > I'd suggest to do this in a chroot or some virtual machine you can throw > away afterwards. > > Hope this helps > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150715112201.ga17...@an3as.eu > >
Trying to run build time tests using nosetest for python-pysam
Hi, I tried to add build-time tests for python-pysam[1]. I admit I'm a bit confused about the fact that this involves compiler calls like: ... warning: no files found matching 'tests/tabix_data' writing manifest file 'pysam.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' skipping 'pysam/csamtools.c' Cython extension (up-to-date) building 'pysam.csamtools' extension x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -pthread -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 - fPIC -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_USE_KNETFILE= -Isamtools -Ipysam -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/python2.7 -c pysam/csamtools.c -o build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.7/pysam/csamtools.o -Wno- error=declaration-after-statement -DSAMTOOLS=1 ... and that it finally ends with ... In file included from pysam/cfaidx.c:261:0: pysam/htslib_util.h:12:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes] int hts_get_verbosity(); ^ x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -pthread -shared -Wl,-O1 -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -fstack- protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wl,-z,relro -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.7/pysam/cfaidx.o -Lpysam -lz -lhts -o build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7/pysam/cfaidx.so -- Ran 0 tests in 0.010s OK (same result with python3). I wonder what I'm missing here and how the build time test could be properly runned. Kind regards Andreas. [1] git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/python-pysam.git -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150715122148.gc17...@an3as.eu
Re: #777765 : activiz.net: ftbfs with GCC-5
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:17:39PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to fix the bug #65, but I can't reproduce it with : > > pbuilder create > pdebuild As in the bug report you need to apt-get -t experimental install g++ CC=gcc-5 CXX=g++-5 debuild I'd suggest to do this in a chroot or some virtual machine you can throw away afterwards. Hope this helps Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150715112201.ga17...@an3as.eu
#777765 : activiz.net: ftbfs with GCC-5
Hi, I'm trying to fix the bug #65, but I can't reproduce it with : pbuilder create pdebuild The build finish with success (excepted some lintian errors and warnings). But nothing about gcc... And I wish have a small explanation, I'm not sure to understand : Fix blocked by 791508: gccxml doesn't produce a gcc-5 compatible code. Blocking fix for 777868: gdcm: ftbfs with GCC-5 What do these lines mean ? Thank you for your help Corentin [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=65
[ROM] clinica - unmaintained and RC buggy
reassign 753854 ftp.debian.org retitle 753854 ROM: clinia - please remove from Debian thanks Hi ftpmasters, I did not received any response from the author and the Uploader of clinica that might create any hope for the fix of below problem. So please remove this package from Debian. Kind regards and thanks for your ftpmaster work Andreas. - Forwarded message from Andreas Tille - Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 18:37:06 +0200 From: Andreas Tille To: Leonardo Robol , Gianmarco Brocchi , 753...@bugs.debian.org Cc: Debian Med Project List Subject: Clinica is in danger to be removed from Debian (Was: Bug#753854: clinica: depends on libgee2 which is deprecated) Hi again, I applied the patch for the other RC bug of clinica but this one needs adapting at least the cmake files and I do not feel competent enough for this. Since I have not heard anything from you since 2015-05-11 I would consider clinica as unmaintained and RC buggy. This means it should be removed from the Debian distribution. If I do not hear anything from you I will request the removal of clinica at 2015-07-11 (or later depending whether I will remember :-)). If you want to safe clinica in Debian please provide a patch that enables building against a supported libgee. Kind regards Andreas. On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 10:07:06PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Leonardo, > > I guess this is a last call to save clinica in Debian. It would be nice > to get some status response from you. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > - Forwarded message from Michael Biebl - > > Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 15:31:31 +0200 > From: Michael Biebl > To: 753...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Bug#753854: clinica: depends on libgee2 which is deprecated > X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 753854 > X-Debian-PR-Package: src:clinica > X-Debian-PR-Keywords: > X-Debian-PR-Source: clinica > > Hi > > On Sat, 05 Jul 2014 20:07:06 +0200 po...@debian.org wrote: > > Source: clinica > > Severity: important > > User: pkg-vala-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Usertags: oldlibs libgee-0.6 > > > > src:clinica builds a binary which depends on libgee2 (libgee-dev), > > which is deprecated in favor of libgee-0.8-2 (libgee-0.8-dev). Please > > test your package against the new libgee and update to it. > > This is another friendly reminder, that we want to get rid of libgee2 > and that your package needs to be updated accordingly. > This bug has been open for almost a year. I plan to request the removal > of libgee2 in about two months. This means, your package should be > updated by then or it will have to be removed. I will bump the severity > of this bug accordingly then. > > Regards, > Michael > > -- > Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the > universe are pointed away from Earth? > > > > > ___ > Debian-med-packaging mailing list > debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging > > > - End forwarded message - > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > > ___ > Debian-med-packaging mailing list > debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging > -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150703163706.gn3...@an3as.eu - End forwarded message - -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150715085133.gy17...@an3as.eu
