Re: About backports.

2015-08-10 Thread Afif Elghraoui
On الأحد  9 آب 2015 16:21, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 03:59:17PM -0700, Afif Elghraoui a écrit :
>>
>> Like you indicated, that's not the only concern. On behalf of stable
>> release users, I think making a recent version of samtools available in
>> stable-backports is important-- I think the backports repository is a
>> huge reason why Debian stable is usable for everyday purposes (and it's
>> the main reason why I switched to Debian from Ubuntu for my own machines).
> 
> Backports are definitely great, and the requirement that a backported package
> must have been in Testing is both an asset for the quality and a limitation 
> for
> the logistics.  In some cases, Testing migration is completely out of our
> control, for instance with the GCC5 migrations currently.
>
> I sometimes wonder if it would be better to have a separate repository for
> providing Debian Med packages to Stable users.  Ideally it would be a Debian
> PPA, but these are not developed yet.
>
> The big advantage that a separate repository would have over the traditional
> backports, is that it would allow us to also distribute some packages for
> Stable without rebuidling them, when they pass their regression tests on
> Stable.  This would make such a backport archive much more comprehensive.
>

I'm not sure I understand enough about the workings of Debian yet to
suggest anything helpful, but I'd prefer to support something to improve
the current backports/release system. The issues you bring up seem to be
more general than for any single maintainer or team and dealing with it
at the top level would maybe improve the entire release system. As I
said, though, I don't have a better alternative in mind.


Thanks and regards
Afif

-- 
Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي
http://afif.ghraoui.name


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55c979da.1060...@ghraoui.name



Re: python-cobra 0.4.0b2 ready for upload

2015-08-10 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 07:39:22PM -0700, Afif Elghraoui a écrit :
> Many thanks to everyone for taking care of this. I'll make sure to use a
> more recent lintian before requesting upload. I would have overridden
> the irrelevant warnings if I saw them.
> 
> Charles, I see the emails with all your commit messages, but I only see
> that your tag is showing up in the alioth repository. Your changelog
> update and d/copyright revision are not there.

Sorry, I always forget that `git push --tags` only pushes the tags !

By the way, I do not understand why python-cobra does not show up on
ci.debian.net, despite it seems to have every control field needed.

Have a nice day,

-- 
Charles


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150811033933.gb1...@falafel.plessy.net



Re: python-cobra 0.4.0b2 ready for upload

2015-08-10 Thread Afif Elghraoui
Many thanks to everyone for taking care of this. I'll make sure to use a
more recent lintian before requesting upload. I would have overridden
the irrelevant warnings if I saw them.

Charles, I see the emails with all your commit messages, but I only see
that your tag is showing up in the alioth repository. Your changelog
update and d/copyright revision are not there.

Thanks again; the sponsorship is much appreciated.
Afif

-- 
Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي
http://afif.ghraoui.name


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55c9605a.9030...@ghraoui.name



Re: python-cobra 0.4.0b2 ready for upload

2015-08-10 Thread Charles Plessy
> >> Le Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:28:37AM -0700, Afif Elghraoui a écrit :
> >>> 
> >>> I've completed packaging the latest upstream release of python-cobra.
> >>> Would you be able to upload to unstable, please?

Le Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 04:33:32PM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr a écrit :
> 
> There are also 2 warnings with lintian on timestamped gzip, might worth
> having a look next time.

Hi Olivier,

the second warning is a false positive that has been corrected in latest
versions of Lintian.

To make a build reproducible, the process of producing a binary pakcages should
not create gzipped files with a timestamp on, otherwise each build will produce
a slightly different package (unless something like faketime is used).

Here, the files are part of the upstream source, which means that they will
not change when the packages are rebuilt.  So there is not problem.

Have a nice day,

-- 
Charles


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150810210034.ge31...@falafel.plessy.net



Re: MOM: Probe

2015-08-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Malihe,

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 06:15:18PM +0430, Malihe Asemani wrote:
> > I think there is just hybrid_36_c.o missing in the list of linked object
> > files.  (This is just an assumption - please try.)
> 
> You're right. I checked the making process using the Makefile not the
> Makefile.linux :P
> 
> > You need to use
> >quilt new fix_build_issue.patch
> >quilt edit Makefile.linux
> > if this does not work please ask Michael - he previously confirmed that
> > he was able to build the program.
> >
> > The patch is added and It is built correctly :)
> Although, I don't know why there are 2 makefile-s (Makefile and
> Makefile.linux) which are not considerably different.

That's a question only upstream can answer.  Generally if you find
manually craftet Makefiles (in contrast to automake or cmake) you need
to prepare for some trouble.  Sometimes it can be easier for the Debian
maintainer to provide a modern build system to upstream and hope they
will take this over (I did so in the past in a few projects).
 
> One of the differences was related to hybrid_36_c, which is added to
> Makefile.linux using the fix_build_issue.patch, And the other is "-static"
> flag at the top. I don't know how much important is a flag to create a
> separate Makefile for it? OR, maybe I've missed some points about the
> Makefile-s.

I guess its not your fault.  It is simply that upstream is to lazy to
check how to craft modern build system - but may be this project itself
is simple enough that it is not worth any additional effort.  Sometimes
reading upstreams installation documentation clarifies things a bit.
 
> Hints for the rename:
> >I'd recommend to move the git repository on git.debian.org:
> > /git/debian-med.
> >Please also look into the *metadata *of this repository to reflect the
> >changed name.
> >
> Editing the config file is enough?

In principle yes.
 
> The renaming inside d/control and d/changelog should be clear.
> > The tricky part is that also the binary needs to be renamed since it is
> > taken in the Debian name space which you can check via
> > $ apt-file search /usr/bin/probe
> > mirmon: /usr/bin/probe
> > So providing the binary as /usr/bin/king-probe is probably also simple
> > but I recently implemented a method to keep the original binary name
> > for users who explicitly declare themselves as Debian Med users.  You can
> > find an example in the *plink package.  *Since this is also maintained in
> > SVN and you seem to have trouble to check this out I'd recommend to use
> >apt-get source plink
> > to have a look into the way how this is done.
> 
> Thanks for the hint. I think the Iran IP range is blocked! I pulled plink
> using a server outside Iran :)

Grrr, I hate such filters ...  Good you found some workaround.
 

I think the last missing bit to enable a `gbp buildpackage` to me is the
pristine-tar branch which I wrote in my last mail to the list.

Kind regards

 Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150810172521.gb13...@an3as.eu



Re: [MoM] regarding rename_binary_result.patch

2015-08-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Malihe,

I noticed another issue.  In the pristine-tar branch the old tarball name
remains.  I'd recommend to reimport the new tarball name

   gbp  import-orig --pristine-tar /king-probe_2.13.110909.orig.tar.xz

it might be needed to delete the upstream tag but might be it works
without this.

Hope this helps

Andreas.


On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 01:47:23PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Malihe,
> 
> I observed your commits (without trying to build since I' just sitting
> in the train to debconf).  I noticed that for the binary rename you
> decided for a patch to the makefile.  At first I'd say that this is
> perfectly OK since everything that works is OK here.   However, when I
> did similar things I instead decided to do the rename inside
> debian/rules in something like
> 
> override_dh_install:
>   dh_install
>   mv debian/$(DEBPKGNAME)/usr/bin/probe 
> debian/$(DEBPKGNAME)/usr/bin/king-probe
> 
> like way.  While it is simply a matter of tast and there is no right or
> wrong way I'd like to express this option to let you know.
> 
> I might send further remarks when I try to build the package later but
> it looks like you are easily making your way which makes me really
> happy. :-)
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Andreas.
> 
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150810114723.gq25...@an3as.eu
> 
> 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150810152529.ga13...@an3as.eu



Re: python-cobra 0.4.0b2 ready for upload

2015-08-10 Thread olivier.sal...@codeless.fr


On 08/10/2015 02:50 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 09:16:26PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> Le Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:28:37AM -0700, Afif Elghraoui a écrit :
>>> Hi, Andreas,
>>> I've completed packaging the latest upstream release of python-cobra.
>>> Would you be able to upload to unstable, please?
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> I am on it, if you do not mind :)
> Cool.  I never mid if anybody else beats me in doing some work.
>
> Uploading from train to DebConf is also not a good idea.
sorry, I just released someone did it before.
>
> Greatings to all
>
>Andreas. 
>
>
> -- 
> gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438  (keyring.debian.org)
> Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335  D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55c8b698.4020...@codeless.fr



Re: python-cobra 0.4.0b2 ready for upload

2015-08-10 Thread olivier.sal...@codeless.fr


On 08/10/2015 02:50 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 09:16:26PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> Le Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:28:37AM -0700, Afif Elghraoui a écrit :
>>> Hi, Andreas,
>>> I've completed packaging the latest upstream release of python-cobra.
>>> Would you be able to upload to unstable, please?
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> I am on it, if you do not mind :)
> Cool.  I never mid if anybody else beats me in doing some work.
>
> Uploading from train to DebConf is also not a good idea.
I am uploading it.
Please update changelog to set to unstable instead of UNRELEASED (I made
it locally for upload).
There are also 2 warnings with lintian on timestamped gzip, might worth
having a look next time.

Olivier
>
> Greatings to all
>
>Andreas. 
>
>
> -- 
> gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438  (keyring.debian.org)
> Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335  D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55c8b63c.8060...@codeless.fr



Re: python-cobra 0.4.0b2 ready for upload

2015-08-10 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 09:16:26PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:28:37AM -0700, Afif Elghraoui a écrit :
> > Hi, Andreas,
> > I've completed packaging the latest upstream release of python-cobra.
> > Would you be able to upload to unstable, please?
> 
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> I am on it, if you do not mind :)

Cool.  I never mid if anybody else beats me in doing some work.

Uploading from train to DebConf is also not a good idea.

Greatings to all

   Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150810125053.gv25...@an3as.eu



Re: python-cobra 0.4.0b2 ready for upload

2015-08-10 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:28:37AM -0700, Afif Elghraoui a écrit :
> Hi, Andreas,
> I've completed packaging the latest upstream release of python-cobra.
> Would you be able to upload to unstable, please?

Hi Andreas,

I am on it, if you do not mind :)

Cheers,

-- 
Charles


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150810121626.gc31...@falafel.plessy.net



[MoM] regarding rename_binary_result.patch

2015-08-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Malihe,

I observed your commits (without trying to build since I' just sitting
in the train to debconf).  I noticed that for the binary rename you
decided for a patch to the makefile.  At first I'd say that this is
perfectly OK since everything that works is OK here.   However, when I
did similar things I instead decided to do the rename inside
debian/rules in something like

override_dh_install:
dh_install
mv debian/$(DEBPKGNAME)/usr/bin/probe 
debian/$(DEBPKGNAME)/usr/bin/king-probe

like way.  While it is simply a matter of tast and there is no right or
wrong way I'd like to express this option to let you know.

I might send further remarks when I try to build the package later but
it looks like you are easily making your way which makes me really
happy. :-)

Kind regards

Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150810114723.gq25...@an3as.eu



python-cobra 0.4.0b2 ready for upload

2015-08-10 Thread Afif Elghraoui
Hi, Andreas,
I've completed packaging the latest upstream release of python-cobra.
Would you be able to upload to unstable, please?

Thanks for all your support.

regards
Afif

-- 
Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي
http://afif.ghraoui.name


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55c86ec5.7080...@ghraoui.name