Re: Sponsorship request: snap-aligner

2015-11-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

this and libcereal uploaded.

Thanks for your work on this

   Andreas.

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 08:50:49PM +, Michael Crusoe wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:31 AM Andreas Tille  wrote:
> 
> > Uploaded
> >
> >  Andreas.
> >
> 
> The ftp team rejected this for a copyright issue; I have uploaded a fix.
> 
> Can I get sponsored again? Thank you.
> 
> -- 
> Michael R. Crusoe

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Re: Bug#800335: cereal: source package name conflicts

2015-11-28 Thread Michael Crusoe
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:36 AM Andreas Tille  wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 03:24:25PM -0700, Michael Crusoe wrote:
> > Oops, I thought I had renamed the source package to libcereal.
> >
> > What's the best way to correct this situation? The package is already in
> > the NEW queue: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/cereal_1.1.2-1.html
>
> Ask ftpmaster for rejection and ask for sponsoring again.
>

The ftp team has rejected the package as requested.

Can I get a (re-)sponsorship of git+ssh://
git.debian.org/git/debian-med/libcereal.git ?

Thanks!

-- 
Michael R. Crusoe


Re: Sponsorship request: snap-aligner

2015-11-28 Thread Michael Crusoe
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:31 AM Andreas Tille  wrote:

> Uploaded
>
>  Andreas.
>

The ftp team rejected this for a copyright issue; I have uploaded a fix.

Can I get sponsored again? Thank you.

-- 
Michael R. Crusoe


Re: Shark / libshark packaging status

2015-11-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

from my outsiders perspective I would assume that if you checked whether
Goswins work contains something that might be relevant for the packaging
and is not yet in your repository and upload as team upload in Debian
Science things should be fine.  I'd recommend to drop a note in the
repository inside Debian Med about the new location.

Surely Goswin as owner of the ITP has a last word but from the Debian
Med teams point of view any progress that leads to an upload of the
package is welcome.

Kind regards

  Andreas.

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 09:32:56AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> I recently pushed a candidate source package for Shark [1] to the d-science
> package repositories [2]. After more careful reading of the different ITP /
> RFP bugs filed for Shark [3][4], I just realized that someone had already
> started working on it a while back (Goswin).
> 
> Please correct if I am wrong but it seems that no upload to the main archive
> has been done so far for Shark. And rightfully so, since there are some
> licensing issues in the distributed files (bug filed upstream) and quite a
> bit of patching had to be done to fix the build system (PR sent upstream).
> So as of today, I would advise against sponsoring an upload for it just yet,
> although the packaging is ready (lintian-free, upstream metdata,
> autopkgtest...).
> 
> I don't know how you guys want to handle the duplication, but I wanted to
> confirm that I am happy to join force with Goswin should he want to
> co-maintain this package with me.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/Shark-ML/Shark
> [2] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/shark.git
> [3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595485
> [4] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777043
> 
> Best regards,
> Ghislain
> 
> 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Shark / libshark packaging status

2015-11-28 Thread Ghislain Vaillant

Dear all,

I recently pushed a candidate source package for Shark [1] to the 
d-science package repositories [2]. After more careful reading of the 
different ITP / RFP bugs filed for Shark [3][4], I just realized that 
someone had already started working on it a while back (Goswin).


Please correct if I am wrong but it seems that no upload to the main 
archive has been done so far for Shark. And rightfully so, since there 
are some licensing issues in the distributed files (bug filed upstream) 
and quite a bit of patching had to be done to fix the build system (PR 
sent upstream). So as of today, I would advise against sponsoring an 
upload for it just yet, although the packaging is ready (lintian-free, 
upstream metdata, autopkgtest...).


I don't know how you guys want to handle the duplication, but I wanted 
to confirm that I am happy to join force with Goswin should he want to 
co-maintain this package with me.


[1] https://github.com/Shark-ML/Shark
[2] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/shark.git
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595485
[4] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777043

Best regards,
Ghislain