Re: pychopper has switched to a non-free license in new upstream version
Hi, Am Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:44:51PM +0200 schrieb Michael R. Crusoe: > That's a shame. The 2.7.3 release (which is quite small) is still under the > original license > > https://github.com/epi2me-labs/pychopper/compare/v2.7.2...v2.7.3 > https://github.com/epi2me-labs/pychopper/releases/tag/v2.7.3 > > > ''' > > 1.10. "Research Purposes" means use for internal research and not intended > > for or directed towards commercial advantages or monetary compensation; > > provided, however, that monetary compensation does not include sponsored > > research of research funded by grants. > > ''' What about opening an upstream to the consequence that this change of the license will remove the package from Debian. At the bottom of our libieration page[1] there is a nice link to some upstream opinion. Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMed/SoftwareLiberation -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: pychopper has switched to a non-free license in new upstream version
That's a shame. The 2.7.3 release (which is quite small) is still under the original license https://github.com/epi2me-labs/pychopper/compare/v2.7.2...v2.7.3 https://github.com/epi2me-labs/pychopper/releases/tag/v2.7.3 On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 5:54 PM Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi, > > I'm dropping this mail to draw the attention of anyone who's interested in > updating pychopper. > While going through the list of outdated packages, I found pychopper as a > candidate. Unfortunately > upstream seems to have modified the license in a way that makes in > non-dfsg compliant. > In the commit > > > https://github.com/epi2me-labs/pychopper/commit/445bde1611ae2024c50f87e89dfe8c53bc039a32 > > It says: > > ''' > 1.10. "Research Purposes" means use for internal research and not intended > for or directed towards commercial advantages or monetary compensation; > provided, however, that monetary compensation does not include sponsored > research of research funded by grants. > ''' > > Best, > Nilesh > >