Re: Access to collab-maint

2015-04-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Ghislain,

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:06:49PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> >I vaguely remember that creating a repository on collab-maint need
> >to be
> >done by a DD and requires manual intervention.
> 
> The description in [1] does not explicitly mentioned this is
> restricted to DD usage.
> 
> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/CollabMaint

It is not restricted regarding *usage* but a DD has to ask for getting
anybody else added.
 
> 
> >Please give proper why
> >you prefer collab-maint which requires extra work with no visible
> >profit
> >over debian-med/debian-science.
> 
> I thought only packages or deps related to scientific packages were
> welcome in
> d-science.

Is there any doc that supports your thought? ;-)
I'm to lazy to find counter examples to what you think but I'd find
five packages very quickly if it wouldn't be so late.

> Since some packages I work on seemed to fit the
> description in [1], I
> thought about using collab-maint instead.
> 
> >We have previously packaged non-med /
> >non-science software as preconditions for our target packages and
> >I see
> >no point to derive from this habit for cosmetic reasons.
> 
> The one package I had in mind at the moment was bitstring [2], which
> is more of a
> general purpose module but may become an install-dep of future
> scientific packages.
> 
> [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781540
> Bottom line is I should stick to d-science for this one ?

Yes.  This would simplify things.

> Thanks for your very much for your comments,

You are welcome

 Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150415205011.ga14...@an3as.eu



Re: Access to collab-maint

2015-04-15 Thread Ghislain Vaillant

Hi Andreas,

On Wed, 15 Apr, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Andreas Tille  wrote:

Hi Ghislain,

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:16:07PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:

 Dear all,

 Is there anyone in the team who can grant me access to collab-maint 
? I
 have sent a enquiry email via the Alioth page a while back and 
never got
 any reply. I have got some non-science related packages that I'd 
like to

 host on collab-maint instead of d-science / d-med.


I vaguely remember that creating a repository on collab-maint need to 
be

done by a DD and requires manual intervention.


The description in [1] does not explicitly mentioned this is restricted 
to DD usage.


[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/CollabMaint



Please give proper why
you prefer collab-maint which requires extra work with no visible 
profit

over debian-med/debian-science.


I thought only packages or deps related to scientific packages were 
welcome in
d-science. Since some packages I work on seemed to fit the description 
in [1], I

thought about using collab-maint instead.


We have previously packaged non-med /
non-science software as preconditions for our target packages and I 
see

no point to derive from this habit for cosmetic reasons.


The one package I had in mind at the moment was bitstring [2], which is 
more of a
general purpose module but may become an install-dep of future 
scientific packages.


[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781540
Bottom line is I should stick to d-science for this one ?


Thanks for your very much for your comments,

Ghis


Re: Access to collab-maint

2015-04-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Ghislain,

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:16:07PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> Is there anyone in the team who can grant me access to collab-maint ? I
> have sent a enquiry email via the Alioth page a while back and never got
> any reply. I have got some non-science related packages that I'd like to
> host on collab-maint instead of d-science / d-med.

I vaguely remember that creating a repository on collab-maint need to be
done by a DD and requires manual intervention.  Please give proper why
you prefer collab-maint which requires extra work with no visible profit
over debian-med/debian-science.  We have previously packaged non-med /
non-science software as preconditions for our target packages and I see
no point to derive from this habit for cosmetic reasons.

Kind regards

  Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150415141446.gj...@an3as.eu