Re: Is Churchill revolutionary?

2015-02-12 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:36:40AM +0100, Roland Fehrenbacher wrote:
> > "Andreas" == Andreas Tille  writes:
> 
> Andreas> Hi, On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:24:35AM -0600, Scott
> Andreas> Christley wrote:
>  
> >> These are essentially data-parallel solutions. What I’ve found is
> >> that most of these workflows utilizing existing software,
> >> e.g. BWA for alignment and GATK for variant calling, ...
> 
> Andreas> Anybody interested in packaging GATK
> 
> Andreas>https://github.com/broadgsa/gatk
> 
> Not sure whether their licensing permits redistribution within Debian.
> Check https://github.com/broadgsa/gatk/tree/master/licensing

Without checking I was assuming we are free to distribute the public
part which should be covered by

   https://github.com/broadgsa/gatk/blob/master/licensing/public_license.txt

I admit I have not checked all details but if there is some vital
interest by some team members we could try to negotiate with the
authors.

Kind regards

  Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150212105148.gc30...@an3as.eu



Re: Is Churchill revolutionary?

2015-02-12 Thread Roland Fehrenbacher
> "Andreas" == Andreas Tille  writes:

Andreas> Hi, On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:24:35AM -0600, Scott
Andreas> Christley wrote:
 
>> These are essentially data-parallel solutions. What I’ve found is
>> that most of these workflows utilizing existing software,
>> e.g. BWA for alignment and GATK for variant calling, ...

Andreas> Anybody interested in packaging GATK

Andreas>https://github.com/broadgsa/gatk

Not sure whether their licensing permits redistribution within Debian.
Check https://github.com/broadgsa/gatk/tree/master/licensing

-- 
Roland

---
http://www.q-leap.com / http://qlustar.com
  --- HPC / Storage / Cloud Linux Cluster OS ---


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/21724.6.690063.758...@gargle.gargle.howl



Re: Is Churchill revolutionary?

2015-02-12 Thread Roland Fehrenbacher
> "Gert" == Gert Wollny  writes:

Gert> On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 17:31 +, Jorge Sebastião Soares
Gert> wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> Maybe this is one more of those articles that have been published
>> lately with the intent to verify the attention reviewers and
>> journals pay to submissions:
Gert> I don't think so, the paper appears in a BMC journal, and so
Gert> far all review I got from other journals from this publisher
Gert> were quite thorough. Besides, they really applied for a patent
Gert> for the method:

Gert> http://www.google.com/patents/US20130311106

Gert> I skimmed the paper, and what they claim is that they found a
Gert> parallelization strategy that gives close to optimal scaling
Gert> which really seems to make a difference when using *lots* of
Gert> processors. It's not my field of work, so I can't comment on
Gert> the details.

Since I'm not a Bioinformtician, I ask myself: Are there tools in DebMed
(or otherwise free) to achieve the same results, even if currently not as
performing? If so, I'd be interested to look at them and see how they can
be optimized to achieve similar performance. If their tasks are
data-parallel a lot of the performance gain might come from a great HW setup.
What would be needed is some kind of benchmark everyone in the field is
familiar with.

Cheers,

Roland

---
http://www.q-leap.com / http://qlustar.com
  --- HPC / Storage / Cloud Linux Cluster OS ---


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/21724.32876.213381.965...@gargle.gargle.howl



Re: Is Churchill revolutionary?

2015-02-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:24:35AM -0600, Scott Christley wrote:
 
> These are essentially data-parallel solutions. What I’ve found is that
> most of these workflows utilizing existing software, e.g. BWA for
> alignment and GATK for variant calling, ...

Anybody interested in packaging GATK

   https://github.com/broadgsa/gatk

Kind regards

 Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150212072111.ga28...@an3as.eu



Re: Is Churchill revolutionary?

2015-02-11 Thread Scott Christley

On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:32 AM, Roland Fehrenbacher  wrote:

> 
> Anyone can judge the real impact of this?
> 

Other groups have worked on similar capability.

http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/02/12/bioinformatics.btu071.abstract

These are essentially data-parallel solutions. What I’ve found is that most of 
these workflows utilizing existing software, e.g. BWA for alignment and GATK 
for variant calling, but they take different approaches to splitting the large 
data set, running the tools on that data in parallel, and then merging the 
results.  Churchill does look to be pretty fast though.

cheers
Scott


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/f6e05551-75ba-4619-93f1-4924b071e...@me.com



Re: Is Churchill revolutionary?

2015-02-11 Thread Gert Wollny
On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 17:31 +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> Maybe this is one more of those articles that have been published
> lately with the intent to verify the attention reviewers and journals
> pay to submissions:
I don't think so, the paper appears in a BMC journal, and so far all
review I got from other journals from this publisher were quite
thorough. Besides, they really applied for a patent for the method: 

http://www.google.com/patents/US20130311106

I skimmed the paper, and what they claim is that they found a
parallelization strategy that gives close to optimal scaling which
really seems to make a difference when using *lots* of processors. It's
not my field of work, so I can't comment on the details.  

Best 
Gert 






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1423677504.5513.8.ca...@gmail.com



Re: Is Churchill revolutionary?

2015-02-11 Thread Jorge Sebastião Soares
Hey,

Maybe this is one more of those articles that have been published lately
with the intent to verify the attention reviewers and journals pay to
submissions:

http://www.fastcompany.com/3041493/body-week/why-a-fake-article-cuckoo-for-cocoa-puffs-was-accepted-by-17-medical-journals

Best,

Jorge

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Roland Fehrenbacher  wrote:

> > "Andreas" == Andreas Tille  writes:
>
> Andreas> Hi Roland, On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:51:21PM +0100, Roland
> Andreas> Fehrenbacher wrote:
> >>
> Andreas> I did not found any download or even any project page of
> Andreas> the software.
> >>
> >> The link is at the very end of the article. Here for reference:
> >> http://churchill.nchri.org/
>
> Andreas> Ahh, my bad to do a simple web search instead of reading.
> Andreas> However, I can confirm that nothing happens after
> Andreas> "Agree"-ing to the license terms ... :-(
>
> Thanks for checking. Hmm, seems to be some quickly hacked up page then ...
>
> Andreas> Somebody who has some vital interest should probably
> Andreas> contact the authors.
>
> Anyone can judge the real impact of this?
>
> Roland
>
> ---
> http://www.q-leap.com / http://qlustar.com
>   --- HPC / Storage / Cloud Linux Cluster OS ---
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive:
> https://lists.debian.org/21723.30221.23789.120...@gargle.gargle.howl
>
>


Re: Is Churchill revolutionary?

2015-02-11 Thread Roland Fehrenbacher
> "Andreas" == Andreas Tille  writes:

Andreas> Hi Roland, On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:51:21PM +0100, Roland
Andreas> Fehrenbacher wrote:
>>
Andreas> I did not found any download or even any project page of
Andreas> the software.
>>
>> The link is at the very end of the article. Here for reference:
>> http://churchill.nchri.org/

Andreas> Ahh, my bad to do a simple web search instead of reading.
Andreas> However, I can confirm that nothing happens after
Andreas> "Agree"-ing to the license terms ... :-(

Thanks for checking. Hmm, seems to be some quickly hacked up page then ...

Andreas> Somebody who has some vital interest should probably
Andreas> contact the authors.

Anyone can judge the real impact of this?

Roland

---
http://www.q-leap.com / http://qlustar.com
  --- HPC / Storage / Cloud Linux Cluster OS ---


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/21723.30221.23789.120...@gargle.gargle.howl



Re: Is Churchill revolutionary?

2015-02-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Roland,

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:51:21PM +0100, Roland Fehrenbacher wrote:
> 
> Andreas> I did not found any download or even any project page of
> Andreas> the software.
> 
> The link is at the very end of the article. Here for reference:
> http://churchill.nchri.org/

Ahh, my bad to do a simple web search instead of reading.  However, I
can confirm that nothing happens after "Agree"-ing to the license terms
... :-( 

Somebody who has some vital interest should probably contact the
authors.

Kind regards

 Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150211131614.gh29...@an3as.eu



Re: Is Churchill revolutionary?

2015-02-11 Thread Roland Fehrenbacher
> "Andreas" == Andreas Tille  writes:

Andreas> Hi Roland, On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:39:30PM +0100, Roland
Andreas> Fehrenbacher wrote:
>> To the DebMed sequencing experts out there:
>>
>> Is this (
>> http://www.gizmag.com/churchill-fast-human-genome-analysis/35944/
>> ) just marketing fuzz or really as much of a breakthrough as it
>> sounds?

Andreas> I personally can't say.
 
>> PS: I can't download the code, but you guys could check.

Andreas> I did not found any download or even any project page of
Andreas> the software.

The link is at the very end of the article. Here for reference:
http://churchill.nchri.org/

Cheers,

Roland

---
http://www.q-leap.com / http://qlustar.com
  --- HPC / Storage / Cloud Linux Cluster OS ---


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/21723.16953.736654.378...@gargle.gargle.howl



Re: Is Churchill revolutionary?

2015-02-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Roland,

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:39:30PM +0100, Roland Fehrenbacher wrote:
> To the DebMed sequencing experts out there:
> 
> Is this (
> http://www.gizmag.com/churchill-fast-human-genome-analysis/35944/ ) just
> marketing fuzz or really as much of a breakthrough as it sounds?

I personally can't say.
 
> PS: I can't download the code, but you guys could check.

I did not found any download or even any project page of the software.

Kind regards

  Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150211103456.gc29...@an3as.eu