Re: biopython 1.81 in experimental
Am Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:32:08PM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > Not sure why this was caught only on arm64, as amd64 turned out > to be affected as well when I ran rebuild tests. Anyway, this > is fixed by the newer python-bcbio-gff version 0.7.0, which has > the good taste of being compatible with biopython 1.80 as well. > > I uploaded the new python-bcbio-gff, and once python-biopython > 1.80+dfsg-6 migrates to testing (tomorrow or Friday if all goes > well), v1.81 can migrate to unstable and the version bump should > overall be a breeze. Good job Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: biopython 1.81 in experimental
Andreas Tille, on 2023-07-12: > Am Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 07:56:30AM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > > Pseudo-excuses for experimental only caught an arm64 issue in > > python-bcbio-gff. Migration to biopython 1.81 should be pretty > > painless. > > Cool. Thanks a lot Not sure why this was caught only on arm64, as amd64 turned out to be affected as well when I ran rebuild tests. Anyway, this is fixed by the newer python-bcbio-gff version 0.7.0, which has the good taste of being compatible with biopython 1.80 as well. I uploaded the new python-bcbio-gff, and once python-biopython 1.80+dfsg-6 migrates to testing (tomorrow or Friday if all goes well), v1.81 can migrate to unstable and the version bump should overall be a breeze. Have a nice day, :) -- .''`. Étienne Mollier : :' : gpg: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity `-on air: Spock's Beard - Edge Of The In Between signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: biopython 1.81 in experimental
Am Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 07:56:30AM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > Étienne Mollier, on 2023-07-10: > > In any case, thanks for the offer, build of 1.81 for amd64 and a > > couple of other architectures concluded[1], and experimental > > pseudo-excuses[2] are ready to run (and they already caught > > #1040776[3]). > > Pseudo-excuses for experimental only caught an arm64 issue in > python-bcbio-gff. Migration to biopython 1.81 should be pretty > painless. Cool. Thanks a lot Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: biopython 1.81 in experimental
Étienne Mollier, on 2023-07-10: > In any case, thanks for the offer, build of 1.81 for amd64 and a > couple of other architectures concluded[1], and experimental > pseudo-excuses[2] are ready to run (and they already caught > #1040776[3]). Pseudo-excuses for experimental only caught an arm64 issue in python-bcbio-gff. Migration to biopython 1.81 should be pretty painless. > [1]: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=python-biopython&suite=experimental > [2]: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=python-biopython > [3]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040776 Have a nice day, :) -- .''`. Étienne Mollier : :' : gpg: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/1, please excuse my verbosity `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: biopython 1.81 in experimental
Andreas Tille, on 2023-07-09: > Am Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 09:30:11PM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > > I pushed python-biopython 1.81 in experimental. We should be > > able to begin investigate changes needed in reverse dependencies > > before migrating it to unstable. > > Thanks a lot. I'm currently busy with r-cran stuff but if you need > help on the BioPython migration just let me know. Hm, looks like I'd have to first get right the changes in biopython 1.80 to allow python-reportlab migration. (: In any case, thanks for the offer, build of 1.81 for amd64 and a couple of other architectures concluded[1], and experimental pseudo-excuses[2] are ready to run (and they already caught #1040776[3]). [1]: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=python-biopython&suite=experimental [2]: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=python-biopython [3]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040776 Have a nice day, :) -- .''`. Étienne Mollier : :' : gpg: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity `-on air: Rush - Tom Sawyer signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: biopython 1.81 in experimental
Hi Étienne, Am Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 09:30:11PM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > I pushed python-biopython 1.81 in experimental. We should be > able to begin investigate changes needed in reverse dependencies > before migrating it to unstable. Thanks a lot. I'm currently busy with r-cran stuff but if you need help on the BioPython migration just let me know. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
