Re: plastimatch/1.6.4+dfsg1-1 follow-up

2016-12-05 Thread Andreas Tille 
Hi Gregory,

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 06:52:07PM -0500, Gregory Sharp wrote:
> 
> > I admit if there was an explicit reason I simply forgot it (but its also
> > for amd64, right).
> 
> The architectures are amd64 and i386 because libinsighttoolkit4-dev
> is only available on those platforms.  If there is a more elegant 
> way to represent this constraint I would be happy to remove.

The more elegant way is to simply specify "any".  Autobuilders will
notice themselves whether a Build-Dependency exists or not and simply do
nothing if a Build-Dependency is missing.

Hope this helps

  Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Re: plastimatch/1.6.4+dfsg1-1 follow-up

2016-12-01 Thread Andreas Tille 
Hi Gregory,

could you possibly answer this question:

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 10:35:39AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> I did not notice this yesterday. May I ask why plastimatch is enabled for
> x86 only? Is there a specific constrain for it?

I admit if there was an explicit reason I simply forgot it (but its also
for amd64, right).

Gregory, I hope you noticed that Ghislain managed to fix the open RC
but in the run of our advent calendar bug squashing party. :-)

Kind regards

   Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de