Re: Undocumented binary
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:00:31AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > can't file a bug, since the package is not in debian[1] not true; you can file bugs against non-existent packages. IIRC. hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: uploading to stable
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 03:45:55PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote: > Hi people, > > One of my packages (ibrazilian & brazilian-conjugate), as in stable currently, > is buggy. The version in unstable gracefully fixes them, while it doesn't > include any new features (it's a new upstream version, but there is nothing > that would screw things up just because of the code changes). What I want to > know is, how can I get the package in stable (proposed-updates, at least..), > since I'm not supposed to release for both unstable & stable? > Do any of the bugs in the stable package pose a security risk? Is the package uninstallable as it is in stable? Ask these questions before you consider uploading to stable. Simply uploading to stable usually has the package going to proposed-updates. The release manager of the next point release will consider inclusion of packages in proposed-updates in the next point release (currently it will be 2.2r3). See http://master.debian.org/~joey/2.2r3/ for a summary of requirements. Gopal. -- Gopal Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux Developer Dept. of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
uploading to stable
Hi people, One of my packages (ibrazilian & brazilian-conjugate), as in stable currently, is buggy. The version in unstable gracefully fixes them, while it doesn't include any new features (it's a new upstream version, but there is nothing that would screw things up just because of the code changes). What I want to know is, how can I get the package in stable (proposed-updates, at least..), since I'm not supposed to release for both unstable & stable? Thanks, Carlos -- Carlos Laviola - ICQ 55799523 pub 1024D/3516D372 2000-06-05 Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Key fingerprint = 3BE1 6591 C78C 2AA4 31DD AEEF 6406 0227 3516 D372 I have a solar vocal ail! pgpbmdUAdNXEq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: uploading to stable
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 03:45:55PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote: > Hi people, > > One of my packages (ibrazilian & brazilian-conjugate), as in stable currently, > is buggy. The version in unstable gracefully fixes them, while it doesn't > include any new features (it's a new upstream version, but there is nothing > that would screw things up just because of the code changes). What I want to > know is, how can I get the package in stable (proposed-updates, at least..), > since I'm not supposed to release for both unstable & stable? > Do any of the bugs in the stable package pose a security risk? Is the package uninstallable as it is in stable? Ask these questions before you consider uploading to stable. Simply uploading to stable usually has the package going to proposed-updates. The release manager of the next point release will consider inclusion of packages in proposed-updates in the next point release (currently it will be 2.2r3). See http://master.debian.org/~joey/2.2r3/ for a summary of requirements. Gopal. -- Gopal Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux Developer Dept. of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uploading to stable
Hi people, One of my packages (ibrazilian & brazilian-conjugate), as in stable currently, is buggy. The version in unstable gracefully fixes them, while it doesn't include any new features (it's a new upstream version, but there is nothing that would screw things up just because of the code changes). What I want to know is, how can I get the package in stable (proposed-updates, at least..), since I'm not supposed to release for both unstable & stable? Thanks, Carlos -- Carlos Laviola - ICQ 55799523 pub 1024D/3516D372 2000-06-05 Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Key fingerprint = 3BE1 6591 C78C 2AA4 31DD AEEF 6406 0227 3516 D372 I have a solar vocal ail! PGP signature
Sponsor needed: python-happydoc - Python Documentation Extraction Tool
Hello, I am looking for a sponsor for a package I have put together of HappyDoc, a python documentation generator. The package is lintian clean, the ITP (including more detailed description) can be found at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=92225&repeatmerged=yes . The package can be gotten from http://members.home.net/hgebel/ I would also like someone who could be an advocate for the NM process once they have sponsored the package. I already have had my key signed by a Debian developer. -- Harry Henry Gebel West Dover Hundred, Delaware GPG encrypted email gladly accepted. Key ID: B853FFFE Fingerprint: 15A6 F58D AEED 5680 B41A 61FE 5A5F BB51 B853 FFFE pgpXlfVAAmZqH.pgp Description: PGP signature
