Re: lintian warning: debconf-is-not-a-registry

2003-02-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
Martin Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am packaging the MCBSAM package, for managing a squid proxy server.
 This package uses configuration files which must be set up at install
 time, so I have a script /usr/sbin/mcbsam-configure which is run by my
 postinst to do the setting up.  When I run lintian on the .deb, I get
 the following warning:
 W: mcbsam: debconf-is-not-a-registry ./usr/sbin/mcbsam-configure
 Should I simply ignore it?

Just appending to the other sugggestions: You should _ask_ the questions
in the config script and use the answers to generate the configuration
file in the postinst.

See debconf-devel(8).
   cu andreas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



expiring gpg key, how do I update it?

2003-02-24 Thread Jörgen Hägg

(I'm asking this because I want to be really sure that my key
still works after the current expire date, there has been a lot
of key-discussions, expiration date and such.)


My key is about to expire in a few months, is it
enough to update the expiration date and submit it to the key server?

Do I have to get my key re-signed?


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: expiring gpg key, how do I update it?

2003-02-24 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Jörgen,

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:16:06PM +0100, Jörgen Hägg wrote:

 (I'm asking this because I want to be really sure that my key
 still works after the current expire date, there has been a lot
 of key-discussions, expiration date and such.)

 My key is about to expire in a few months, is it
 enough to update the expiration date and submit it to the key server?

Yes.

 Do I have to get my key re-signed?

No.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Ciao Stella

2003-02-24 Thread Marianna
un bacio


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DH_COMPAT=2 and dh_shlibdeps

2003-02-24 Thread Joshua Kwan
Hi all,

Using DH_COMPAT=2 in my rules and calling dh_shlibdeps -a.. however, it 
does nothing! It creates a single substvars file if DH_COMPAT is unset. 
I don't think this is default dh_shlibdeps behavior. My package is 
multiple-binary. Right now i have just forgone dh_shlibdeps and I'm 
using this instead (pasted verbatim from debian/rules)

# this replaces dh_shlibdeps until i get it to work
dpkg-shlibdeps debian/tmp/usr/ircd-hybrid/bin/*
mv debian/substvars debian/ircd-hybrid.substvars

Anyone have a clue why this behavior is happening? I'm pretty sure it is 
my problem, and I've looked at other similar packages but haven't 
figured out the difference

Any help you can provide will be greatly appreciated ... :)

Regards
Josh

-- 
New PGP public key: 0x27AFC3EE


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: DH_COMPAT=2 and dh_shlibdeps

2003-02-24 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hi all,

 Using DH_COMPAT=2 in my rules and calling dh_shlibdeps -a.. however, it 

This may be a stupid question, but why do you use such a low DH_COMPAT
setting?

Andy
-- 
Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint  | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: sponsor for btn4ws gimp-perl plug-in needed

2003-02-24 Thread Jonas Meurer
On 22/02/2003 Jan Dittberner wrote:
 I packaged my gimp-perl plugin btn4ws.pl and need a sponsor to include
 it in the debian distribution. The package is available at
 
 http://www.dittberner.info/file/btn4ws_0.6-1_all.deb

Normally a sponsor doesn't need the .deb. He needs .orig.tar.gz,
.diff.gz and .dsc. You should _never_ only provide a .deb.
According to the debian free software guidelines, you have to provide
always the sources. And the sources are .orig.tar.gz (which should be
the original source package), .diff.gz and .dsc (both are created at
dpkg-buildpackage).

bye
 mejo

-- 
Efficiency and progess is ours one more
Now that we have the Neutron bomb
It's nice and quick and clean and gets things done
Kill kill kill kill kill the poor tonight


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DH_COMPAT=2 and dh_shlibdeps

2003-02-24 Thread Joey Hess
Joshua Kwan wrote:
 Using DH_COMPAT=2 in my rules and calling dh_shlibdeps -a.. however, it 
 does nothing! It creates a single substvars file if DH_COMPAT is unset. 

The first thing to do is show us what it says in verbose mode with -v.

At a guess you may not have any elf binaries installed into
debian/package/; maybe you're installing into debian/tmp instead.

-- 
see shy jo


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: How to detect if Sendmail/Postfix/Qmail is installed

2003-02-24 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:41:18AM +0100, Xavier Roche wrote:
  In this case, should the package just document what the use
  should do (it will be different for each MTA) or at least
  detect which MTA is installed and copy an example config file
 
 Ensure that the depends: field in control has something like
 Depends: (sendmail | qmail | postfix)

It should be
Depends: sendmail | postfix
. You cannot depend on a non-free package if you are in main. Is this
package free? I could not find a license anywhere.

It would be even better if you could make it work with a generic
mail-transport-agent.

-- 
Brian M. Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0x560553e7
Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable. Let us prepare
 to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it
 after all. --Douglas Adams


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: sponsor for btn4ws gimp-perl plug-in needed

2003-02-24 Thread Jan Dittberner
Am Mon, 2003-02-24 um 22.56 schrieb Jonas Meurer:
 On 22/02/2003 Jan Dittberner wrote:
  I packaged my gimp-perl plugin btn4ws.pl and need a sponsor to include
  it in the debian distribution. The package is available at
  
  http://www.dittberner.info/file/btn4ws_0.6-1_all.deb
 
 Normally a sponsor doesn't need the .deb. He needs .orig.tar.gz,
 .diff.gz and .dsc. You should _never_ only provide a .deb.
 According to the debian free software guidelines, you have to provide
 always the sources. And the sources are .orig.tar.gz (which should be
 the original source package), .diff.gz and .dsc (both are created at
 dpkg-buildpackage).

Thanks, for the information. I'm very new with debian. I'm the upstream
developer/maintainer of the mentioned package too and I'm willing to
provide the sources in the required form.

I'll study the debian free software guidelines during the week. I'd also
like to contribute to other packages with open bugs.

I just uploaded the files at the following location:

http://www.dittberner.info/files/debian/btn4ws_0.6-1.diff.gz
http://www.dittberner.info/files/debian/btn4ws_0.6-1.dsc
http://www.dittberner.info/files/debian/btn4ws_0.6-1_all.deb
http://www.dittberner.info/files/debian/btn4ws_0.6-1_i386.changes
http://www.dittberner.info/files/debian/btn4ws_0.6.orig.tar.gz

It would be nice if someone would review it ... lintian likes the deb
:-)

Regards
Jan

-- 
Jan Dittberner [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DH_COMPAT=2 and dh_shlibdeps

2003-02-24 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 05:37:09PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
 At a guess you may not have any elf binaries installed into
 debian/package/; maybe you're installing into debian/tmp instead.

No, if you were watching #debian-devel you know what I did wrong :)
(ran shlibdeps/strip before dh_install.)

Regards
Josh

-- 
New PGP public key: 0x27AFC3EE


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: How to detect if Sendmail/Postfix/Qmail is installed

2003-02-24 Thread John H. Robinson, IV
Brian M. Carlson wrote:
 On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:41:18AM +0100, Xavier Roche wrote:
   In this case, should the package just document what the use
   should do (it will be different for each MTA) or at least
   detect which MTA is installed and copy an example config file
  
  Ensure that the depends: field in control has something like
  Depends: (sendmail | qmail | postfix)
 
 It would be even better if you could make it work with a generic
 mail-transport-agent.

to throw even more monkeywrenches in the gearbox, some people may have
compiled an MTA outside of the packaging system, and be using qmail/
sendmail/postfix (the uspported MTA's) but not have it registered with
apt/dpkg at all.

it is at your discretion to not support such a setup, of course.

-john


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: How to detect if Sendmail/Postfix/Qmail is installed

2003-02-24 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, correct me if I am wrong...

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:37:25PM -0800, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
 Brian M. Carlson wrote:
  On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:41:18AM +0100, Xavier Roche wrote:
In this case, should the package just document what the use
should do (it will be different for each MTA) or at least
detect which MTA is installed and copy an example config file
   
   Ensure that the depends: field in control has something like
  ^^^
   Depends: (sendmail | qmail | postfix)

There are nullmailer and ssmtp

  It would be even better if you could make it work with a generic
  mail-transport-agent.

Yes :-)  Something along (exim | mail-transport-agent)
 ^
 to throw even more monkeywrenches in the gearbox, some people may have
 compiled an MTA outside of the packaging system, and be using qmail/
 sendmail/postfix (the uspported MTA's) but not have it registered with
 apt/dpkg at all.

What?  Why this needs to be supported in depends: field.

This is user issue.  Use equives to fake it or build a local package with 
Provide: mail-transport-agent in terms of dependancies.

 it is at your discretion to not support such a setup, of course.

Package should not do funky thing for dependancies, I thought.

Osamu
-- 
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Cupertino CA USA, GPG-key: A8061F32
 .''`.  Debian Reference: post-installation user's guide for non-developers
 : :' : http://qref.sf.net and http://people.debian.org/~osamu
 `. `'  Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software --- Social Contract


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: lintian warning: debconf-is-not-a-registry

2003-02-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
Martin Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am packaging the MCBSAM package, for managing a squid proxy server.
 This package uses configuration files which must be set up at install
 time, so I have a script /usr/sbin/mcbsam-configure which is run by my
 postinst to do the setting up.  When I run lintian on the .deb, I get
 the following warning:
 W: mcbsam: debconf-is-not-a-registry ./usr/sbin/mcbsam-configure
 Should I simply ignore it?

Just appending to the other sugggestions: You should _ask_ the questions
in the config script and use the answers to generate the configuration
file in the postinst.

See debconf-devel(8).
   cu andreas



expiring gpg key, how do I update it?

2003-02-24 Thread Jörgen Hägg

(I'm asking this because I want to be really sure that my key
still works after the current expire date, there has been a lot
of key-discussions, expiration date and such.)


My key is about to expire in a few months, is it
enough to update the expiration date and submit it to the key server?

Do I have to get my key re-signed?



Re: expiring gpg key, how do I update it?

2003-02-24 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Jörgen,

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:16:06PM +0100, Jörgen Hägg wrote:

 (I'm asking this because I want to be really sure that my key
 still works after the current expire date, there has been a lot
 of key-discussions, expiration date and such.)

 My key is about to expire in a few months, is it
 enough to update the expiration date and submit it to the key server?

Yes.

 Do I have to get my key re-signed?

No.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


pgpSeSpjTJ7VA.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Ciao Stella

2003-02-24 Thread Marianna
un bacio



DH_COMPAT=2 and dh_shlibdeps

2003-02-24 Thread Joshua Kwan
Hi all,

Using DH_COMPAT=2 in my rules and calling dh_shlibdeps -a.. however, it 
does nothing! It creates a single substvars file if DH_COMPAT is unset. 
I don't think this is default dh_shlibdeps behavior. My package is 
multiple-binary. Right now i have just forgone dh_shlibdeps and I'm 
using this instead (pasted verbatim from debian/rules)

# this replaces dh_shlibdeps until i get it to work
dpkg-shlibdeps debian/tmp/usr/ircd-hybrid/bin/*
mv debian/substvars debian/ircd-hybrid.substvars

Anyone have a clue why this behavior is happening? I'm pretty sure it is 
my problem, and I've looked at other similar packages but haven't 
figured out the difference

Any help you can provide will be greatly appreciated ... :)

Regards
Josh

-- 
New PGP public key: 0x27AFC3EE


pgptGrGHi5VGw.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: DH_COMPAT=2 and dh_shlibdeps

2003-02-24 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hi all,

 Using DH_COMPAT=2 in my rules and calling dh_shlibdeps -a.. however, it 

This may be a stupid question, but why do you use such a low DH_COMPAT
setting?

Andy
-- 
Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint  | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62



Re: DH_COMPAT=2 and dh_shlibdeps

2003-02-24 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:45:51PM +0100, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
 This may be a stupid question, but why do you use such a low DH_COMPAT
 setting?

I read somewhere that it was good for multiple binary packages, but I 
just read the debhelper manpage and I'm using DH_COMPAT=4 now. Still the 
same problem though.

Just FYI this is how i invoke each of the concerned debhelper programs:
dh_shlibdeps -a
dh_strip -a

the affected package in debian/control is ircd-hybrid which is marked as 
architecture-dependent. (Architecture: any)

hope you can help.. -Josh

-- 
New PGP public key: 0x27AFC3EE


pgpdDXWofLysI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: sponsor for btn4ws gimp-perl plug-in needed

2003-02-24 Thread Jonas Meurer
On 22/02/2003 Jan Dittberner wrote:
 I packaged my gimp-perl plugin btn4ws.pl and need a sponsor to include
 it in the debian distribution. The package is available at
 
 http://www.dittberner.info/file/btn4ws_0.6-1_all.deb

Normally a sponsor doesn't need the .deb. He needs .orig.tar.gz,
.diff.gz and .dsc. You should _never_ only provide a .deb.
According to the debian free software guidelines, you have to provide
always the sources. And the sources are .orig.tar.gz (which should be
the original source package), .diff.gz and .dsc (both are created at
dpkg-buildpackage).

bye
 mejo

-- 
Efficiency and progess is ours one more
Now that we have the Neutron bomb
It's nice and quick and clean and gets things done
Kill kill kill kill kill the poor tonight



Re: DH_COMPAT=2 and dh_shlibdeps

2003-02-24 Thread Joey Hess
Joshua Kwan wrote:
 Using DH_COMPAT=2 in my rules and calling dh_shlibdeps -a.. however, it 
 does nothing! It creates a single substvars file if DH_COMPAT is unset. 

The first thing to do is show us what it says in verbose mode with -v.

At a guess you may not have any elf binaries installed into
debian/package/; maybe you're installing into debian/tmp instead.

-- 
see shy jo


pgprVzRBM9L0E.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: How to detect if Sendmail/Postfix/Qmail is installed

2003-02-24 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:41:18AM +0100, Xavier Roche wrote:
  In this case, should the package just document what the use
  should do (it will be different for each MTA) or at least
  detect which MTA is installed and copy an example config file
 
 Ensure that the depends: field in control has something like
 Depends: (sendmail | qmail | postfix)

It should be
Depends: sendmail | postfix
. You cannot depend on a non-free package if you are in main. Is this
package free? I could not find a license anywhere.

It would be even better if you could make it work with a generic
mail-transport-agent.

-- 
Brian M. Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0x560553e7
Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable. Let us prepare
 to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it
 after all. --Douglas Adams


pgpFfHCPfNZlN.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: sponsor for btn4ws gimp-perl plug-in needed

2003-02-24 Thread Jan Dittberner
Am Mon, 2003-02-24 um 22.56 schrieb Jonas Meurer:
 On 22/02/2003 Jan Dittberner wrote:
  I packaged my gimp-perl plugin btn4ws.pl and need a sponsor to include
  it in the debian distribution. The package is available at
  
  http://www.dittberner.info/file/btn4ws_0.6-1_all.deb
 
 Normally a sponsor doesn't need the .deb. He needs .orig.tar.gz,
 .diff.gz and .dsc. You should _never_ only provide a .deb.
 According to the debian free software guidelines, you have to provide
 always the sources. And the sources are .orig.tar.gz (which should be
 the original source package), .diff.gz and .dsc (both are created at
 dpkg-buildpackage).

Thanks, for the information. I'm very new with debian. I'm the upstream
developer/maintainer of the mentioned package too and I'm willing to
provide the sources in the required form.

I'll study the debian free software guidelines during the week. I'd also
like to contribute to other packages with open bugs.

I just uploaded the files at the following location:

http://www.dittberner.info/files/debian/btn4ws_0.6-1.diff.gz
http://www.dittberner.info/files/debian/btn4ws_0.6-1.dsc
http://www.dittberner.info/files/debian/btn4ws_0.6-1_all.deb
http://www.dittberner.info/files/debian/btn4ws_0.6-1_i386.changes
http://www.dittberner.info/files/debian/btn4ws_0.6.orig.tar.gz

It would be nice if someone would review it ... lintian likes the deb
:-)

Regards
Jan

-- 
Jan Dittberner [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DH_COMPAT=2 and dh_shlibdeps

2003-02-24 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 05:37:09PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
 At a guess you may not have any elf binaries installed into
 debian/package/; maybe you're installing into debian/tmp instead.

No, if you were watching #debian-devel you know what I did wrong :)
(ran shlibdeps/strip before dh_install.)

Regards
Josh

-- 
New PGP public key: 0x27AFC3EE


pgpQj5OJvciYd.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: How to detect if Sendmail/Postfix/Qmail is installed

2003-02-24 Thread John H. Robinson, IV
Brian M. Carlson wrote:
 On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:41:18AM +0100, Xavier Roche wrote:
   In this case, should the package just document what the use
   should do (it will be different for each MTA) or at least
   detect which MTA is installed and copy an example config file
  
  Ensure that the depends: field in control has something like
  Depends: (sendmail | qmail | postfix)
 
 It would be even better if you could make it work with a generic
 mail-transport-agent.

to throw even more monkeywrenches in the gearbox, some people may have
compiled an MTA outside of the packaging system, and be using qmail/
sendmail/postfix (the uspported MTA's) but not have it registered with
apt/dpkg at all.

it is at your discretion to not support such a setup, of course.

-john



Re: How to detect if Sendmail/Postfix/Qmail is installed

2003-02-24 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, correct me if I am wrong...

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:37:25PM -0800, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
 Brian M. Carlson wrote:
  On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:41:18AM +0100, Xavier Roche wrote:
In this case, should the package just document what the use
should do (it will be different for each MTA) or at least
detect which MTA is installed and copy an example config file
   
   Ensure that the depends: field in control has something like
  ^^^
   Depends: (sendmail | qmail | postfix)

There are nullmailer and ssmtp

  It would be even better if you could make it work with a generic
  mail-transport-agent.

Yes :-)  Something along (exim | mail-transport-agent)
 ^
 to throw even more monkeywrenches in the gearbox, some people may have
 compiled an MTA outside of the packaging system, and be using qmail/
 sendmail/postfix (the uspported MTA's) but not have it registered with
 apt/dpkg at all.

What?  Why this needs to be supported in depends: field.

This is user issue.  Use equives to fake it or build a local package with 
Provide: mail-transport-agent in terms of dependancies.

 it is at your discretion to not support such a setup, of course.

Package should not do funky thing for dependancies, I thought.

Osamu
-- 
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Cupertino CA USA, GPG-key: A8061F32
 .''`.  Debian Reference: post-installation user's guide for non-developers
 : :' : http://qref.sf.net and http://people.debian.org/~osamu
 `. `'  Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software --- Social Contract