Re: Upgrade version of lostirc and pharmacy, need support
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 07:17:55AM +0200, Amaya wrote: > Martin Braure de Calignon wrote: > > http://www.enseirb.fr/~braurede/deb_dev/pharmacy > > I used to maintain pharmacy, i'll take a look at it if no one has helped > you yet. Oh, and could you please not put the word 'pharmacy' in the subject? I see I fed the original mail to 'learn as spam', and did the same with this mail too, but I just in time saw 'Amaya' as From:, and rescued myself from blacklisting her :). I might not be the only one who is trigger-happy on the word 'pharmacy', especially if it says 'needs support'. A subject of something like: | RFS: pharmacy -- Program to do foo and bar would be quite fine, though. Feel free to ignore me by the way, I'm just another, nowadays unfortunately only, lurker of this list. --Jeroen Who now ponders whether it's actually a good idea to have a single keystroke for 'feed to bayes and delete this message, and add to list of potential to-be-blacklisted people'. -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: irrtoolset and/or flare
Hello, 1) Package name : irr-tools RTP: #189359 Version : 4.8.2 Upstream Author : Internet Routing Registry Toolset Project * URL : http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/pub-services/db/irrtoolset/index.html ftp://ftp.ripe.net/tools/IRRToolSet/IRRToolSet-4.8.2/IRRToolSet-4.8.2.tar.gz * License : Unknown for now, RTP claims it is BSD-ish. Description : IRRToolSet is a suite of policy analysis tools to operate with routing policies in RPSL [RFC 2622] format, registered in Internet Routing Registry(IRR). The main goal of the project is to make routing information more convenient and useful for network engineers, by providing tools for automated router configuration, routing policies analysis, and maintenance. Preliminary package: ftp://ftp.logos-bg.net/debian/ 2) Package name : flare Version: 20040804 Upstream Author: Berke Durak * URL : http://abaababa.ouvaton.org/ara/ http://abaababa.ouvaton.org/ara/flare-20040804.tar.gz * License: GPL Description : Flare is an experimental GTK2 interface for ara. In fact it does what ara does (already in debian archive), but does not depend on it. It has now much improved syntax. You can specify a default search field pattern for a group of expressions (which is by default and quite conveniently, "Description"). For example it is now possible to type : section=utils and (backup* or archive or /cop\(y\|ies\)/iw) and depends: (xlibs or /gnome/ or *gtk) instead of section=utils & (/\bbackup.*/ | /archive/iw | /cop\(y\|ies\)/iw) & (depends=~/xlibs/ | depends=~/gnome/ | depends=~/.*gtk/iw) Please note that Flare is in a quite experimental stage. However it is really useful right now, and as Debian still lacks a good and fast (ara lacking a GUI or a proper CLI reloads the database at every invocation and so is dog slow) sophisticated search tool so I thought I'd share it. Preliminary package: ftp://ftp.logos-bg.net/debian/ 3) Package Issues: * Sorry, for the lame question, but I can not figure out of how to split the diff.gz file out of the tarball files. Have to resolve that. Any help will be attended. * The first one (irr-tools) is rather complicated for me, an not so familiar with the Routing Registry stuff. Will see how to handle it. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: commenting out lines
Hallo ron, * ron r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-28 20:51]: > would it be possiable for you to explain to me how to comment out lines? > thank you. ron for example,because all non upstream source lines become included in the .diff.gz file and it can become very large. regards nico -- Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de GPG: FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69 C739 1D87 E549 7364 7CFF Is there life after /sbin/halt -p? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Need a sponsor
Hallo Cai, * Cai Qian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-28 20:51]: > I am not sure if there is any people want to help, because I asked this > few days ago. I worked hard to test these packages, and did a lot of > bugs fixed. However, it make me quite sad that there seems no one to > help. > > Anyway, my packages are, > cce (console/X11 CJK environment) -- new upstream version > ftp-ssl > ftpd-ssl -- bugs fixed, new maintainer nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package and the sources. url? regards nico -- Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de GPG: FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69 C739 1D87 E549 7364 7CFF Is there life after /sbin/halt -p? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Re: Need a sponsor
""nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package and the sources. url?"" I am sorry to miss the urls to the packages, because I haven't found a place (10-15M) for them. However, I can send them to you if you want. Sorry for inconvient. Regards, Cai Qian -- Mail inviata tramite i servizi gratuiti di X-Privat.org - http://www.x-privat.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Need a sponsor
* Nico Golde [Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:05:44 +0200]: > nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package > and the sources. url? From http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/09/msg00163.html: "I have no place for these packages, so please reply me and I'll sent them to you." Cai, have a look at http://mentors.debian.net. -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple. -- Oscar Wilde -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need a sponsor
Hello Adeodato, * Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-29 16:36]: > * Nico Golde [Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:05:44 +0200]: > > nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package > > and the sources. url? > > From http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/09/msg00163.html: > > "I have no place for these packages, so please reply me and I'll > sent them to you." may be right, but not everyone will have the time to search in his old mails for information. regards nico -- Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de GPG: FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69 C739 1D87 E549 7364 7CFF Is there life after /sbin/halt -p? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Re: Need a sponsor
> what sizes have the packages got? i am a modem user. Its orig is 6.9M and Deb pack is 4.3M. I am sorry for these big size. Regards, Cai Qian -- Mail inviata tramite i servizi gratuiti di X-Privat.org - http://www.x-privat.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Need a sponsor
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 17:15, Cai Qian wrote: > ""nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package > and the sources. url?"" > > I am sorry to miss the urls to the packages, because I haven't found a > place (10-15M) for them. However, I can send them to you if you want. > Sorry for inconvient. Hello Cai, Try here: http://mentors.debian.net/signup.php -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help: Packaging Error
Hi,
Apologies if I'm being lame, this is my first Debian package.
I'm running lintian -i to check my built package, but I'm getting the
error:
binary-without-manpage
The software does not come with a manpage, but I've edited the
{app}/debian/manpage.1.ex file adding in the content, then renamed it
manpage.1.
What am I missing?
Cheers,
Ben
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.seigan.org
GPG Fingerprint: 4309 1C58 5143 AFAC F69E 11CD 76FD 56D4 1223 E387
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help: Packaging Error
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 05:41:22PM +0100, Ben Hill wrote:
> Apologies if I'm being lame, this is my first Debian package.
>
> I'm running lintian -i to check my built package, but I'm getting the
> error:
>
> binary-without-manpage
>
> The software does not come with a manpage, but I've edited the
> {app}/debian/manpage.1.ex file adding in the content, then renamed it
> manpage.1.
>
> What am I missing?
Did you also modify debian/rules file to include this file?
Change:
# dh_installman
To:
dh_installman debian/manpage.1
Also change the name of the manpage to the .1
regards
fEnIo
--
_ Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo
_|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska
(0 0) phone:+48602383548 | Slackware - the weakest link
ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
debuild: producing diff.gz and signing issues
Hello, I have two probs using debuid, which I can not resolve from the sections of devscripts.conf: * I do not figure out why diff.gz file in not produced, but the tar.gz file content the debian/ directory. * I am always asked twice to provide my passphrase when signing the .dsc and other files after the build. Thanks. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help: Packaging Error
Ben Hill wrote:
> Apologies if I'm being lame, this is my first Debian package.
>
> I'm running lintian -i to check my built package, but I'm getting the
> error:
>
> binary-without-manpage
>
> The software does not come with a manpage, but I've edited the
> {app}/debian/manpage.1.ex file adding in the content, then renamed it
> manpage.1.
>
> What am I missing?
If your rules include a call of dh_installman, then a file called
.manpages is missing. The content of this file is the
location of the manpages: e.g.
debian/binary1.1
debian/binary2.8
and so on. Or use dh_installman with parameters. See man dh_installman.
Regards, Daniel
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debuild: producing diff.gz and signing issues
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:47:46PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > Hello, > > I have two probs using debuid, which I can not resolve from the sections of > devscripts.conf: > * I do not figure out why diff.gz file in not produced, but the tar.gz file > content the debian/ directory. Common source of error is a missnamed orig.tar.gz, watch for dashes and underscores. > * I am always asked twice to provide my passphrase when signing the .dsc and > other files after the build. I think this is normal (but if someone has a way around this, I'm interested). -- Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France). http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Help: Packaging Error
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 16:41, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > Did you also modify debian/rules file to include this file? Perfect, thanks! :-) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.seigan.org GPG Fingerprint: 4309 1C58 5143 AFAC F69E 11CD 76FD 56D4 1223 E387 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debuild: producing diff.gz and signing issues
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 05:58:52PM +0200, Alexandre wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:47:46PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > > * I am always asked twice to provide my passphrase when signing the .dsc and > > other files after the build. > > I think this is normal (but if someone has a way around this, I'm > interested). It happens because the md5sum of the signed .dsc has to be included in the .changes, so two separate gpg runs are required. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: pharmacy -- Frontend for CVS
Amaya a écrit : Martin Braure de Calignon wrote: http://www.enseirb.fr/~braurede/deb_dev/pharmacy I used to maintain pharmacy, i'll take a look at it if no one has helped you yet. No one has helped me yet :-), Thank you very much. -- Martin Braure de Calignon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RFS] xfce4-goodies
I'm looking for help on get new revisions and versions of some xfce4-goodies packages into the archive. They are ready at mentors and I've tested them both on i386 and powerpc. Some of them are having a libtool issue on ARM, I've worked to fix them, I'd like to have these specially uploaded since I didn't had the chance to get this fix tested on an ARM box. Packages are: nwe revisions: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfce4-battery-plugin/ new versions: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfce4-clipman-plugin/ http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfce4-diskperf-plugin/ http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfce4-showdesktop-plugin/ http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfce4-systemload-plugin/ http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfce4-weather-plugin/ new package: ITP #273731 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfce4-wavelan-plugin/ thanks, -Rudy -- ++ | Somos libres, seamoslo con software libre * http://debian.org | ++ | http://www.apesol.org.pe -*- http://stone-head.org | | GPG FP: 0D12 8537 607E 2DF5 4EFB 35A7 550F 1A00 3433 BD21 | ++ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: debuild: producing diff.gz and signing issues
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 19:08, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 05:58:52PM +0200, Alexandre wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:47:46PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > > > * I am always asked twice to provide my passphrase when signing the > > > .dsc and other files after the build. > > > > I think this is normal (but if someone has a way around this, I'm > > interested). > > It happens because the md5sum of the signed .dsc has to be included in > the .changes, so two separate gpg runs are required. Alexandre, Colin, Thank you very much for your explantions. Now I know what is going on. I really tried hard to find out why gpg is ran twice, but got lost in the perl sources of debuild. P.S. wo, the help provided here is really fast and highly qualified. I like that feature of Debian. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: GTorrentViewer - a BitTorrent MetaFiles viewer/editor.
Hi, I would like to ask for a mentor for a program i am woking on. I named it GTorrentViewer. Pakage: gtorrentviewer. Version: 0.1 Upstream Author: Alejandro Claro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gtorrentviewer/ (the src and the deb package) License: GPL Description: This is a GTK2-based Viewer/Editor for BitTorrent meta files for UNIX operating systems. It is able to get information from tracker(s), check file(s), show detailed information and modify some of it inside .torrent files. similar software: It do the same job of TorrentSpy for Windows (made by knowboddy), just in case you know that program. -- Alejandro Claro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: GTorrentViewer - a BitTorrent MetaFiles viewer/editor.
В сообщении от Четверг 30 Сентябрь 2004 08:10 Ap0lly0n Source Forge написал(a): > Hi, I would like to ask for a mentor for a program i am woking on. I > named it GTorrentViewer. Try to show the packages that you've prepared. -- Respectfully Alexey Nezhdanov
Re: Suggestions On Getting A Sponsor
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:49:52PM -0400, Michael MacFadden wrote: > Brian, > > Point taken. But I happen to be the upstream author for this project. > So it's not like I just picked this out of a hat, and it's not like I am > in the position to say, "Well maybe I should just pick something easier > to package". The only reason I am looking into packaging this is > because several people have emailed me and asked about the availability > of Debian packages. Since Debian happens to be my platform of choice I > figured I would try to learn the ropes of package maintenance. > > Granted, I am a complete newbie and don't understand the technical or > philosophical issues behind some of these issues. But if I am > passionate and committed to getting this packaged and into Debian, then > there must be some avenue. I suppose the trick is finding a developer > who is both experienced with Web App packaging and also interested in my > package. If I were you, I'd just put the packages you create on the upstream site and add a note saying you're looking for a sponsor for the packages. That way, users will be able to download the packages, and if an interested developer finds them, the packages should find an easy path into Debian. I don't think it's worth trying to force the package into Debian if you can't easily find a sponsor. There's a general feeling with developers that Debian is already far too big and there are too many packages that are of very little interest. The testing release managers, of whom Steve is one, probably especially feel this way since the bigger Debian is, the more they have to get it released. -- Blast you and your estrogenical treachery! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
still need a sponsor
Hi, I completed upload my maintained packages to mentors.net, so you can get them here http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cce/ http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/linux-ftpd-ssl/ http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/netkit-ftp-ssl/ For ftp*-ssl, You need get orig.tar.gz from official apt source. So please check them. Regards -- Cai Qian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: AFD9 4841 D33D 182B C45D 84B8 C48C 244A 3AA1 6670 -- Mail inviata tramite i servizi gratuiti di X-Privat.org - http://www.x-privat.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[antlr] need help for debian/watch syntax
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yo! I'd like to add a debian/watch file to antlr but it seems I badly did it!: debian/watch version=2 http://www.antlr.org/download/antlr-(.*)\.tar\.gz debian uupdate But it's not good: http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=antlr I did try to remove the 'debian uupdate' (because it seems useful only for ftp? correct me if I'm wrong...) But uscan does not want it. You can see downloadable files here: http://www.antlr.org/download/ Thanks for your time and help, - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBW63W4vzFZu62tMIRAiW0AJ9H87i+5zn1y7nzIVLkvzkPsS0qrgCePFt/ naWX0/f2EqgCLAH87OhTaWQ= =vtc+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrade version of lostirc and pharmacy, need support
Martin Braure de Calignon wrote: > http://www.enseirb.fr/~braurede/deb_dev/pharmacy I used to maintain pharmacy, i'll take a look at it if no one has helped you yet. -- .''`. Somewhere in Texas there is a village without its idiot : :' : `. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.6 Ext3) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
Re: Upgrade version of lostirc and pharmacy, need support
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 07:17:55AM +0200, Amaya wrote: > Martin Braure de Calignon wrote: > > http://www.enseirb.fr/~braurede/deb_dev/pharmacy > > I used to maintain pharmacy, i'll take a look at it if no one has helped > you yet. Oh, and could you please not put the word 'pharmacy' in the subject? I see I fed the original mail to 'learn as spam', and did the same with this mail too, but I just in time saw 'Amaya' as From:, and rescued myself from blacklisting her :). I might not be the only one who is trigger-happy on the word 'pharmacy', especially if it says 'needs support'. A subject of something like: | RFS: pharmacy -- Program to do foo and bar would be quite fine, though. Feel free to ignore me by the way, I'm just another, nowadays unfortunately only, lurker of this list. --Jeroen Who now ponders whether it's actually a good idea to have a single keystroke for 'feed to bayes and delete this message, and add to list of potential to-be-blacklisted people'. -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
RFS: irrtoolset and/or flare
Hello, 1) Package name : irr-tools RTP: #189359 Version : 4.8.2 Upstream Author : Internet Routing Registry Toolset Project * URL : http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/pub-services/db/irrtoolset/index.html ftp://ftp.ripe.net/tools/IRRToolSet/IRRToolSet-4.8.2/IRRToolSet-4.8.2.tar.gz * License : Unknown for now, RTP claims it is BSD-ish. Description : IRRToolSet is a suite of policy analysis tools to operate with routing policies in RPSL [RFC 2622] format, registered in Internet Routing Registry(IRR). The main goal of the project is to make routing information more convenient and useful for network engineers, by providing tools for automated router configuration, routing policies analysis, and maintenance. Preliminary package: ftp://ftp.logos-bg.net/debian/ 2) Package name : flare Version: 20040804 Upstream Author: Berke Durak * URL : http://abaababa.ouvaton.org/ara/ http://abaababa.ouvaton.org/ara/flare-20040804.tar.gz * License: GPL Description : Flare is an experimental GTK2 interface for ara. In fact it does what ara does (already in debian archive), but does not depend on it. It has now much improved syntax. You can specify a default search field pattern for a group of expressions (which is by default and quite conveniently, "Description"). For example it is now possible to type : section=utils and (backup* or archive or /cop\(y\|ies\)/iw) and depends: (xlibs or /gnome/ or *gtk) instead of section=utils & (/\bbackup.*/ | /archive/iw | /cop\(y\|ies\)/iw) & (depends=~/xlibs/ | depends=~/gnome/ | depends=~/.*gtk/iw) Please note that Flare is in a quite experimental stage. However it is really useful right now, and as Debian still lacks a good and fast (ara lacking a GUI or a proper CLI reloads the database at every invocation and so is dog slow) sophisticated search tool so I thought I'd share it. Preliminary package: ftp://ftp.logos-bg.net/debian/ 3) Package Issues: * Sorry, for the lame question, but I can not figure out of how to split the diff.gz file out of the tarball files. Have to resolve that. Any help will be attended. * The first one (irr-tools) is rather complicated for me, an not so familiar with the Routing Registry stuff. Will see how to handle it. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB
Re: commenting out lines
Hallo ron, * ron r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-28 20:51]: > would it be possiable for you to explain to me how to comment out lines? > thank you. ron for example,because all non upstream source lines become included in the .diff.gz file and it can become very large. regards nico -- Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de GPG: FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69 C739 1D87 E549 7364 7CFF Is there life after /sbin/halt -p? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Need a sponsor
Hallo Cai, * Cai Qian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-28 20:51]: > I am not sure if there is any people want to help, because I asked this > few days ago. I worked hard to test these packages, and did a lot of > bugs fixed. However, it make me quite sad that there seems no one to > help. > > Anyway, my packages are, > cce (console/X11 CJK environment) -- new upstream version > ftp-ssl > ftpd-ssl -- bugs fixed, new maintainer nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package and the sources. url? regards nico -- Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de GPG: FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69 C739 1D87 E549 7364 7CFF Is there life after /sbin/halt -p? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Re: Need a sponsor
""nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package and the sources. url?"" I am sorry to miss the urls to the packages, because I haven't found a place (10-15M) for them. However, I can send them to you if you want. Sorry for inconvient. Regards, Cai Qian -- Mail inviata tramite i servizi gratuiti di X-Privat.org - http://www.x-privat.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Need a sponsor
* Nico Golde [Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:05:44 +0200]: > nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package > and the sources. url? From http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/09/msg00163.html: "I have no place for these packages, so please reply me and I'll sent them to you." Cai, have a look at http://mentors.debian.net. -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple. -- Oscar Wilde
Re: Need a sponsor
Hello Adeodato, * Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-29 16:36]: > * Nico Golde [Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:05:44 +0200]: > > nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package > > and the sources. url? > > From http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/09/msg00163.html: > > "I have no place for these packages, so please reply me and I'll > sent them to you." may be right, but not everyone will have the time to search in his old mails for information. regards nico -- Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de GPG: FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69 C739 1D87 E549 7364 7CFF Is there life after /sbin/halt -p? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Re: Need a sponsor
> what sizes have the packages got? i am a modem user. Its orig is 6.9M and Deb pack is 4.3M. I am sorry for these big size. Regards, Cai Qian -- Mail inviata tramite i servizi gratuiti di X-Privat.org - http://www.x-privat.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Need a sponsor
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 17:15, Cai Qian wrote: > ""nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package > and the sources. url?"" > > I am sorry to miss the urls to the packages, because I haven't found a > place (10-15M) for them. However, I can send them to you if you want. > Sorry for inconvient. Hello Cai, Try here: http://mentors.debian.net/signup.php -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB
Help: Packaging Error
Hi,
Apologies if I'm being lame, this is my first Debian package.
I'm running lintian -i to check my built package, but I'm getting the
error:
binary-without-manpage
The software does not come with a manpage, but I've edited the
{app}/debian/manpage.1.ex file adding in the content, then renamed it
manpage.1.
What am I missing?
Cheers,
Ben
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.seigan.org
GPG Fingerprint: 4309 1C58 5143 AFAC F69E 11CD 76FD 56D4 1223 E387
Re: Help: Packaging Error
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 05:41:22PM +0100, Ben Hill wrote:
> Apologies if I'm being lame, this is my first Debian package.
>
> I'm running lintian -i to check my built package, but I'm getting the
> error:
>
> binary-without-manpage
>
> The software does not come with a manpage, but I've edited the
> {app}/debian/manpage.1.ex file adding in the content, then renamed it
> manpage.1.
>
> What am I missing?
Did you also modify debian/rules file to include this file?
Change:
# dh_installman
To:
dh_installman debian/manpage.1
Also change the name of the manpage to the .1
regards
fEnIo
--
_ Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 |
IRC:fEnIo
_|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska
(0 0) phone:+48602383548 | Slackware - the weakest link
ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
debuild: producing diff.gz and signing issues
Hello, I have two probs using debuid, which I can not resolve from the sections of devscripts.conf: * I do not figure out why diff.gz file in not produced, but the tar.gz file content the debian/ directory. * I am always asked twice to provide my passphrase when signing the .dsc and other files after the build. Thanks. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB
Re: Help: Packaging Error
Ben Hill wrote:
> Apologies if I'm being lame, this is my first Debian package.
>
> I'm running lintian -i to check my built package, but I'm getting the
> error:
>
> binary-without-manpage
>
> The software does not come with a manpage, but I've edited the
> {app}/debian/manpage.1.ex file adding in the content, then renamed it
> manpage.1.
>
> What am I missing?
If your rules include a call of dh_installman, then a file called
.manpages is missing. The content of this file is the
location of the manpages: e.g.
debian/binary1.1
debian/binary2.8
and so on. Or use dh_installman with parameters. See man dh_installman.
Regards, Daniel
--
Re: debuild: producing diff.gz and signing issues
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:47:46PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > Hello, > > I have two probs using debuid, which I can not resolve from the sections of > devscripts.conf: > * I do not figure out why diff.gz file in not produced, but the tar.gz file > content the debian/ directory. Common source of error is a missnamed orig.tar.gz, watch for dashes and underscores. > * I am always asked twice to provide my passphrase when signing the .dsc and > other files after the build. I think this is normal (but if someone has a way around this, I'm interested). -- Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France). http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Help: Packaging Error
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 16:41, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > Did you also modify debian/rules file to include this file? Perfect, thanks! :-) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.seigan.org GPG Fingerprint: 4309 1C58 5143 AFAC F69E 11CD 76FD 56D4 1223 E387
Re: debuild: producing diff.gz and signing issues
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 05:58:52PM +0200, Alexandre wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:47:46PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > > * I am always asked twice to provide my passphrase when signing the .dsc > > and > > other files after the build. > > I think this is normal (but if someone has a way around this, I'm > interested). It happens because the md5sum of the signed .dsc has to be included in the .changes, so two separate gpg runs are required. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: pharmacy -- Frontend for CVS
Amaya a écrit : Martin Braure de Calignon wrote: http://www.enseirb.fr/~braurede/deb_dev/pharmacy I used to maintain pharmacy, i'll take a look at it if no one has helped you yet. No one has helped me yet :-), Thank you very much. -- Martin Braure de Calignon
[RFS] xfce4-goodies
I'm looking for help on get new revisions and versions of some xfce4-goodies packages into the archive. They are ready at mentors and I've tested them both on i386 and powerpc. Some of them are having a libtool issue on ARM, I've worked to fix them, I'd like to have these specially uploaded since I didn't had the chance to get this fix tested on an ARM box. Packages are: nwe revisions: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfce4-battery-plugin/ new versions: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfce4-clipman-plugin/ http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfce4-diskperf-plugin/ http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfce4-showdesktop-plugin/ http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfce4-systemload-plugin/ http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfce4-weather-plugin/ new package: ITP #273731 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfce4-wavelan-plugin/ thanks, -Rudy -- ++ | Somos libres, seamoslo con software libre * http://debian.org | ++ | http://www.apesol.org.pe -*- http://stone-head.org | | GPG FP: 0D12 8537 607E 2DF5 4EFB 35A7 550F 1A00 3433 BD21 | ++ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: debuild: producing diff.gz and signing issues
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 19:08, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 05:58:52PM +0200, Alexandre wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:47:46PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > > > * I am always asked twice to provide my passphrase when signing the > > > .dsc and other files after the build. > > > > I think this is normal (but if someone has a way around this, I'm > > interested). > > It happens because the md5sum of the signed .dsc has to be included in > the .changes, so two separate gpg runs are required. Alexandre, Colin, Thank you very much for your explantions. Now I know what is going on. I really tried hard to find out why gpg is ran twice, but got lost in the perl sources of debuild. P.S. wo, the help provided here is really fast and highly qualified. I like that feature of Debian. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB
RFS: GTorrentViewer - a BitTorrent MetaFiles viewer/editor.
Hi, I would like to ask for a mentor for a program i am woking on. I named it GTorrentViewer. Pakage: gtorrentviewer. Version: 0.1 Upstream Author: Alejandro Claro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gtorrentviewer/ (the src and the deb package) License: GPL Description: This is a GTK2-based Viewer/Editor for BitTorrent meta files for UNIX operating systems. It is able to get information from tracker(s), check file(s), show detailed information and modify some of it inside .torrent files. similar software: It do the same job of TorrentSpy for Windows (made by knowboddy), just in case you know that program. -- Alejandro Claro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: GTorrentViewer - a BitTorrent MetaFiles viewer/editor.
В сообщении от Четверг 30 Сентябрь 2004 08:10 Ap0lly0n Source Forge написал(a): > Hi, I would like to ask for a mentor for a program i am woking on. I > named it GTorrentViewer. Try to show the packages that you've prepared. -- Respectfully Alexey Nezhdanov
