Re: RFS: Tunapie

[James Stone]

On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:08:31 +0100, James Stone wrote:

> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tunapie".
> 
> * Package name: tunapie
>   Version : 1.0-2
>   Upstream Author : James Stone
> * URL : http://tunapie.sourceforge.net 
> * License : GPL
>   Section : sound
> 
> It builds these binary packages:
> tunapie- Lists audio and video streams from shoutcast and icecast

Just noticed that the previous version was not debian native.. just fixed
this on version 1.0-3:

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tunapie
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tunapie/tunapie_1.0-3.dsc

Best wishes,

James


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: Tunapie

[James Stone]

On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:02:39 +0100, James Stone wrote:

> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:08:31 +0100, James Stone wrote:
> 
>> Dear mentors,
>> 
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tunapie".
>> 
>> * Package name: tunapie
>>   Version : 1.0-2
>>   Upstream Author : James Stone
>> * URL : http://tunapie.sourceforge.net * License :
>> GPL
>>   Section : sound
>> 
>> It builds these binary packages:
>> tunapie- Lists audio and video streams from shoutcast and icecast
> 
> Just noticed that the previous version was not debian native.. just fixed
> this on version 1.0-3:

D'oh I meant it was Debain native and now it is not!

Anyway, have now also fixed all the lintian warnings..

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tunapie
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tunapie/tunapie_1.0-4.dsc

Sorry for spamming list.

James


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: inotail -- inotify enhanced tail (updated package)

[Tobias Klauser]

Hi,

On 2006-09-22 at 20:56:02 +0200, Tobias Klauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "inotail".
> 
> * Package name: inotail
>   Version : 0.1-1
>   Upstream Author : Tobias Klauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://distanz.ch/inotail
> * License : GPL
>   Section : utils
> 
> It builds these binary packages:
> inotail- inotify enhanced tail

inotail - tail replacement using inotify

> The package is lintian and linda clean and was tested in piuparts and 
> pbuilder.
> 
> The upload would fix these bugs: 388512
> 
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/inotail
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 
> contrib non-free
> - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/inotail/inotail_0.1-1.dsc
> 
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

I uploaded an updated package incorporating the changes that were
suggested here (and also in private):

- Better short description
- Removed call to dh_installexamples from debian/rules as not needed

The watch file was not added as I really see no need for it.

Thanks,
Tobias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reassigning Bugs

[Benjamin Mesing]

Hello,

I have a bug which is not a bug in my package (packagesearch). However,
reassigning it to the package that causes that bug (apt-file), would
leave it no longer visible for my package, and thus probably result in
the bug to be posted again.
Is there a way to leave the bug visible for my package, but reassign it
to apt-file?

Options I have thought about, but found not to be optimal:
  * File a bug report against apt-file, and block the bug against
packagesearch by the new one - close the bug against
packagesaerch as soon as the bug in apt-file is closed. This
option does not reflect reality: I could not specify the version
of packagesearch this bug is closed in. Besides it requires me
to notice when the bug in apt-file is closed.
  * File a bug report against apt-file, (force)-merge the bug in
packagesearch with that one. Again this is not a truthful
reflection of reality, but might be a way to go.

Any help is appreciated!

Regards,

Ben


-- 
Please do not send any email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- all email not
originating from the mailing list will be deleted. Use the reply to
address instead.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Reassigning Bugs

[Sam Morris]

On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:00:12 +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have a bug which is not a bug in my package (packagesearch). However,
> reassigning it to the package that causes that bug (apt-file), would
> leave it no longer visible for my package, and thus probably result in
> the bug to be posted again.
> Is there a way to leave the bug visible for my package, but reassign it
> to apt-file?

Reassign it to "packagesearch,apt-file" ?

-- 
Sam Morris
http://robots.org.uk/

PGP key id 1024D/5EA01078
3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B  C869 B219 7FDB 5EA0 1078


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Reassigning Bugs

[George Danchev]

On Sunday 24 September 2006 14:00, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a bug which is not a bug in my package (packagesearch). However,
> reassigning it to the package that causes that bug (apt-file), would
> leave it no longer visible for my package, and thus probably result in
> the bug to be posted again.
> Is there a way to leave the bug visible for my package, but reassign it
> to apt-file?
>
> Options I have thought about, but found not to be optimal:
>   * File a bug report against apt-file, and block the bug against
> packagesearch by the new one - close the bug against
> packagesaerch as soon as the bug in apt-file is closed. This
> option does not reflect reality: I could not specify the version
> of packagesearch this bug is closed in. Besides it requires me
> to notice when the bug in apt-file is closed.
>   * File a bug report against apt-file, (force)-merge the bug in
> packagesearch with that one. Again this is not a truthful
> reflection of reality, but might be a way to go.
>
> Any help is appreciated!

You are probably looking for the 'clone' [1].

clone 12345 -1
reassign -1 apt-file
retitle -1 apt-file: known to break packagesearch ...
thanks

[1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control

-- 
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: libapp-info-perl (updated package)

[Nacho Barrientos Arias]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.50-1 of my package
"libapp-info-perl".

It builds these binary packages:
libapp-info-perl - Provide metadata about software packages installed

The package is lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 372597

Formal resources:

 - http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapp-info-perl
 - deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 

Or simply dget it!

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapp-info-perl/libapp-info-perl_0.50-1.dsc

Thank you!.

Notes:
 - Don't worry, it's true that this package crashes linda (see #385891)

-- 
bye,
- Nacho


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: aria2 [sponsored again]

[Daniel Baumann]

Patrick Ruckstuhl wrote:
> version 0.8.0 of aria2 is out and I put the package on mentors

I can do permanent sponsoring of your package if you want, but this
would require the following changes to your package:

  * remove the useless empty line at the end of debian/changelog.
  * remove useless ${misc:Depends} in debian/control.
  * place an empty line before Homepage in debian/control.
  * format the debian/copyright a bit different, look at e.g.
libextractor (it's about the license stanza).
  * remove the useless NEWS from docs.
  * remove the useless comments at the beginning of debian/rules, and
not used commented commands at build:. additionally, don't do
two empty lines at the same time, one is enough.
  * remove the useless commented stuff in and the empty lines at the end
of debian/watch. an remove the not required 'debian uupdate' suffix.
  * remove useless debian/dirs.

> The upstream release now includes the openssl exemption clause and I
> have updated the copyright file, I hope I did it right.
> In addition I changed my email address, I hope I did this right as well.

jup. both correct.

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: inotail -- inotify enhanced tail (updated package)

[James Westby]

On (24/09/06 12:00), Tobias Klauser wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2006-09-22 at 20:56:02 +0200, Tobias Klauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "inotail".
> > 
> > * Package name: inotail

Hi,

I cannot sponsor either I am afraid, but I have a couple more small
comments.

  * You use a - prefix for $(MAKE) clean in debian/rules, but I don't
think that is right. clean should always succeed if the Makefile is
there (you rm -f everything), and if the Makefile isn't there then
there is a serious problem, and you don't really want to mask it.
This is used for autotools packages where it is possible the
Makefile is not there, and that should be ignored.
  * You have missed the copyright info for inotify.h in
debian/copyright. There is also no license information for this
file, can you get it and add it?

James

-- 
  James Westby   --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
  seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: inotail -- inotify enhanced tail (updated package)

[Tobias Klauser]

Hi,

On 2006-09-24 at 17:19:13 +0200, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On (24/09/06 12:00), Tobias Klauser wrote:
> > On 2006-09-22 at 20:56:02 +0200, Tobias Klauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "inotail".
> > > 
> > > * Package name: inotail
> 
> I cannot sponsor either I am afraid, but I have a couple more small
> comments.
> 
>   * You use a - prefix for $(MAKE) clean in debian/rules, but I don't
> think that is right. clean should always succeed if the Makefile is
> there (you rm -f everything), and if the Makefile isn't there then
> there is a serious problem, and you don't really want to mask it.
> This is used for autotools packages where it is possible the
> Makefile is not there, and that should be ignored.

Oh, sorry I didn't pay attention to this. It is fixed now.

>   * You have missed the copyright info for inotify.h in
> debian/copyright. There is also no license information for this
> file, can you get it and add it?

This file was taken from the Linux Kernel source tree and slightly
altered (Dropped everything in #ifdef __KERNEL__ as not needed and
useful in userspace). So this is licensed under the GPL. Would it
suffice to add a notice about this to debian/copyright (plus the
copyright information for the same file)? Or might it be better to
depend on linux-kernel-headers and take the file from there
(/usr/include/linux/inotify.h)?

Thanks for your help,
Tobias

-- 
  .''`. Tobias Klauser - Debian enthusiast
 : :'  :<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 `. `'` GPG-Key: 0x3A445520
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: spcaview

[Kel Modderman]

On Sunday 24 September 2006 00:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> Luca bedogni a écrit :
> > Il giorno Fri, 22 Sep 2006 22:36:52 +1000
> >
> > Kel Modderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> >> I would like to see it maintained at least collectively, as we have
> >> the gpsca rewrite coming up, that will take a team effort to prepare
> >> imho.
> >>
> >> There are currently three different packaging efforts existing, we
> >> need to decide on the way forward. Any ideas on how to proceed?
> >>
> >> There is an existing alioth project, with SVN + mailing list. Should
> >> we build upon that effort and lobby Otavio with hard work?
> >
> > I've contacted Adam for merging our work. I'm waiting news about that..
>
> Yep sorry still not done. But we should have a look to what is available
> at pkg-spca5xx on alioth too.
> Kel is from pkg-spca5xx team. Maybe he could tell us why nobody uploads
> spcaview tools ?

I can only say that I've tried to get it reviewed and uploaded some time ago 
[1,2], and my requests were unsuccessful. I gave up on it since then.

The time that I spotted your effort to get spcaview into debian, I immediately 
contacted you in regards to sharing our already existing effort[3].

HTH

Thanks, Kel.

[1] 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-spca5xx-devel/2006-March/99.html
[2] 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-spca5xx-devel/2006-April/000133.html
[3]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-spca5xx-devel/2006-May/000150.html

RFS: png2html (updated package)

[Jack Grahams]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-5
of my package "png2html". This package was previously orphaned.

It builds these binary packages:
png2html   - transforms a PNG image to a web page

The package is lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 338971, 387477, 388602

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/png2html
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 
contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/png2html/png2html_1.1-5.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
 Jack Grahams


GET FREE 5GB EMAIL - Check out spam free email with many cool features!
Visit http://www.inbox.com/email to find out more!

Re: RFS: png2html (updated package)

[Nacho Barrientos Arias]

Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:43:08 -0800
Jack Grahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Jack,

> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-5
> of my package "png2html". This package was previously orphaned.

I took a look to your package and it looks nice, i only caught the
following minor mistakes:

 - Consider deleting all the obvious comments in debian/rules like:
* # Build commands.
* # Nothing to do.
* and more.
 - debian/control
* s/pixer/pixel
 - You can use this upload to close fixed in NMU bugs like #343915 :)

That's all folks.

-- 
bye,
- Nacho


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: png2html (updated package) - new upload

[Jack Grahams]

Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
>  - Consider deleting all the obvious comments in debian/rules like:
> * # Build commands.
> * # Nothing to do.
> * and more.
>  - debian/control
> * s/pixer/pixel
>  - You can use this upload to close fixed in NMU bugs like #343915 :)

Thank you very much for checking the package. I've incorporated your 
corrections, and uploaded a new copy.

The upload would now fix these bugs: 338971, 387477, 388602, 343915, 335659

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:

- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/png2html
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 
contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/png2html/png2html_1.1-5.dsc

Once again, I would be grateful if someone uploaded this package for me.

Regards, Jack




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Обновленные информационные архивы по внешnеэконо мической деятельности для [EMAIL PROTECTED] ebian.org

[abeu gulukota]

Обновленные информационные архивы по внещнеэкономической деятельности от Sat, 
23 Sep 2006 20:05:45

Россия - все экспортно-импортные операции
--пмжбоофняя
а) 22 июля 2006 года 1 DVD или 3 СД - 3000 руб
б) 2005 год 1 DVD или 5 СД - 2500 руб
в) 2004 год 1 DVD или 6 СД - 1500 руб
г) Комплект с 1998 по 22 июля 2006 года - 8000 руб (поставка на СД или ДВД)

Украина - все экспортно-импортные операции (содержимое банков на Украинском 
языке)

а) 1 сентября 2006 года - 2000 руб (1 сд или 1 двд)
б) 2005 год - 2000 руб (2 сд или 1 двд)
в) 2004 год - 1000 руб 
г) Комплект с 2002 по 1 сентября 2006 года - 6000 руб 


В наличие имеются другие информационные архивы

Для заказа звоните по телефону /Ч95/7Ч1^98^27

Доставка по Москве бесплатно
В регионы отправка почтой с оплатой при получении
94263343295124



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: aria2 [sponsored again]

[Patrick Ruckstuhl]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

>
>> version 0.8.0 of aria2 is out and I put the package on mentors
>
> I can do permanent sponsoring of your package if you want, but this
> would require the following changes to your package:
>
>   * remove the useless empty line at the end of debian/changelog.
>   * remove useless ${misc:Depends} in debian/control.
>   * place an empty line before Homepage in debian/control.
>   * format the debian/copyright a bit different, look at e.g.
> libextractor (it's about the license stanza).
>   * remove the useless NEWS from docs.
>   * remove the useless comments at the beginning of debian/rules, and
> not used commented commands at build:. additionally, don't do
> two empty lines at the same time, one is enough.
>   * remove the useless commented stuff in and the empty lines at the end
> of debian/watch. an remove the not required 'debian uupdate' suffix.
>   * remove useless debian/dirs.

I did the changes. Would it maybe make sense to have dh_make directly
generate "correct" files (except the sample lines which still need to
be deleted if they are not used)? For example the double newlines in
rules and the layout of the copyright file was generated like this by
dh_make when I originally created the package.

I also extended the rules to automatically generate the man page
instead of manually generating it with help2man.


Patrick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFFvTCaA/ofYi4EMoRAku1AJ9GbXrwtXniw389AHi6vaYp9T3+VgCdFHpg
f9ItAIZg3LhDzsd7RilyJ/o=
=+85Q
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

How to request binNMUs?

[Daniel Leidert]

Hello,

I would like to know, how a binNMU can be requested? I ran into
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=375868 and found, that
e.g. libgoffice-0-dev, libgoffice-0-3, libgoffice-1-2, gthumb
contain .la-files, that contain references to libgnomeprint-2-2.la. IMHO
a binNMU should fix this issue, but I don't know, how I shall request
them. I can of course file bug-reports against these packages (which I
will do, if the issue is not solved via binNMU).

Regards, Daniel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: aria2 [sponsored again]

[Daniel Baumann]

Patrick Ruckstuhl wrote:
> I did the changes. Would it maybe make sense to have dh_make directly
> generate "correct" files (except the sample lines which still need to
> be deleted if they are not used)? For example the double newlines in
> rules and the layout of the copyright file was generated like this by
> dh_make when I originally created the package.

yes, of course. Feel free to submit bug reports...

> I also extended the rules to automatically generate the man page
> instead of manually generating it with help2man.

Good, but you forgot to remove it in clean:

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: How to request binNMUs?

[Daniel Baumann]

Daniel Leidert wrote:
> I would like to know, how a binNMU can be requested?

by asking on -release.

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: aria2 [sponsored again]

[Daniel Baumann]

Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Good, but you forgot to remove it in clean:

oh, and there are two other things:

  * it should be 'Copyright Holder', not 'Copyright Holders'.
  * wrapp after 80 chars in long description, not earlier.

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: inotail -- inotify enhanced tail (updated package)

[James Westby]

On (24/09/06 18:43), Tobias Klauser wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2006-09-24 at 17:19:13 +0200, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >   * You have missed the copyright info for inotify.h in
> > debian/copyright. There is also no license information for this
> > file, can you get it and add it?
> 
> This file was taken from the Linux Kernel source tree and slightly
> altered (Dropped everything in #ifdef __KERNEL__ as not needed and
> useful in userspace). So this is licensed under the GPL. Would it
> suffice to add a notice about this to debian/copyright (plus the
> copyright information for the same file)? Or might it be better to
> depend on linux-kernel-headers and take the file from there
> (/usr/include/linux/inotify.h)?
> 

It is fine to lift this file and keep it in your package, but if you do
then it needs appropriate license information. This must then be
documented in debian/copyright.

The other alternative is to use the header file from /usr/include, in
which case you don't need to worry about this issue. 

It is up to you down which route you go. Maybe someone else can say what
would suffice to allow you to go down the first route. Perhaps just a
note about where the file came from and so what license it is under
would suffice.

James

-- 
  James Westby   --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
  seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: drapes (updated)

[James Westby]

On (23/09/06 15:40), Francesco Namuri wrote:
> > * debian/copyright
> >  - you missed to insert copyright notes for many files: (apart from
> > Makefiles and other generated configure scripts)
> >+ ./po/{de,es,fr,it,ko,nl,pl,pt_BR,sv}.po are copyrighted by Canonical
> >+ ./drapes/panelapplet/PanelAppletFactory.cs by Novell
> >+ ./drapes/Traylib.cs is copyrighted by three different entities,
> > and is under MIT license.
> >  I know it's boring execute " find . -type f -exec less '{}' \; " but
> > you _have to_ do it, and report in debian/copyright every copyright
> > notice for files in your package.
> 
> I've added the copyright information for these files, but I have one
> doubt: do I have to add copyright informations also to Makefiles and
> other generated configure scripts?
> 

No, this is usually left out unless there is something special about it.

> > * NEWS
> >  - this seems to be the upstream changelog, and it has to be treated
> > so: called changelog, and installed (after gzip -9 ) into
> > /usr/share/doc/drapes/changelog.gz . Give a look at
> > dh_installchangelogs
> 
> I think it's already done, because in /usr/share/doc/drapes/ there is
> the file NEWS.gz which is the gziped copy of the NEWS file of the tarball

Sandro was suggesting you install it as changelog.gz rather than
NEWS.gz, but I'm not sure that is necessary.

> 
> >  - dh_install debian/pixmap/drapes.xpm /usr/share/pixmaps/
> >it's better if you install it locally, $(CURDIR)/debian/drapes/usr/
> ok, fixed the first two issues, but I thought dh_install makes already the
> copy locally... I'm wrong?

If your method works then that's ok.

> > * config.{guess,sub}
> >  - take care of those files: they can create many problems. you can
> > look at /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz
> 
> I have applied config.dpatch because debian/rules, based on the template
> of dh_make, makes a copy of these files from /usr/share/misc, alterating 
> the original tarball, with the side effect of including the updated 
> config.guess and config.sub in the diff.gz.
> In this manner, I hope to have followed correctly the
> /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz guidelines...

Your solution is interesting, but it is not the normal way of doing it.

Also if you are not using the lines in debian/rules, then delete them,
don't leave them commented out.

> 
> > * debian/watch
> >  - as of now it's missing: please evaluate to add it: it will easy
> > noticing of new upstream releases. Upstream tarball patch is rather
> > funny: maybe you can contact him and ask to change in something more
> > easy to manage.
> 
> added, hoping it's ok...
> 
> > * debian/patches
> >  - please include description for patch 01_data_Makefile.in.dpatch
> >  - 02_config.dpatch is provided by Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > should he be mentioned in debian/copyright? Some DDs can comment on
> > this?
> 
> the first issue is fixed, but I don't know  what to do with the second one...

If copyright has been asserted on the file then it must be mentioned in
debian/rules, along with its distribution license. If there isn't one
you should find out what it is and add it, or drop the file.

> two questions:
> 
> during the build of the package, I got these warnings:
> 1) warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid
> of process (1234)

This is normal, annoying, but normal. It is a documented problem in
pbuilder.

> 2) WARNING: failed to install schema
> `/schemas/apps/drapes/enable_timed_shuffle' locale `fr': Unable to store
> a value at key '/schemas/apps/drapes/enable_timed_shuffle', as the
> configuration server has no writable databases. There are some common
> --CUT--
> 

Depends what you mean by normal. It seemd to be something in the build
of your package, and as such probably wont have been seen in any other
packages. You should find out what it means and if it is a problem.

James

-- 
  James Westby   --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
  seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: eqonomize -- personal accounting software for the small household economy

[James Westby]

On (23/09/06 10:20), Frank S. Thomas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the eqonomize package. The description is:

Hi,

I cannot sponsor I'm afraid, but I have a few comments,

  * Your debian/copyright file does not mention all the copyright
holders in the package. Also it seems the docs are under the FDL, is
that correct. If so this should be documented in debian/copyright as
well. See 
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html
  * Consider splitting out a -doc package to save some archive space.
  * You are missing a dependency on khelpcenter for the docs to be
viewable.

James


P.S. I see you use bzr for versioning your packaging, do you know about
bzr-builddeb for automating the task of building packages from a bzr
branch? See http://jameswestby.net/bzr/bzr-builddeb/ if you are
interested. 

-- 
  James Westby   --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
  seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: drapes (updated)

[Russ Allbery]

James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On (23/09/06 15:40), Francesco Namuri wrote:

>>> * NEWS
>>>  - this seems to be the upstream changelog, and it has to be treated
>>> so: called changelog, and installed (after gzip -9 ) into
>>> /usr/share/doc/drapes/changelog.gz . Give a look at
>>> dh_installchangelogs

>> I think it's already done, because in /usr/share/doc/drapes/ there is
>> the file NEWS.gz which is the gziped copy of the NEWS file of the
>> tarball

> Sandro was suggesting you install it as changelog.gz rather than
> NEWS.gz, but I'm not sure that is necessary.

See Policy 12.7.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])   


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: drapes (updated)

[Francesco Namuri]

On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:15:22PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > > * NEWS
> > >  - this seems to be the upstream changelog, and it has to be treated
> > > so: called changelog, and installed (after gzip -9 ) into
> > > /usr/share/doc/drapes/changelog.gz . Give a look at
> > > dh_installchangelogs
> > 
> > I think it's already done, because in /usr/share/doc/drapes/ there is
> > the file NEWS.gz which is the gziped copy of the NEWS file of the tarball
> 
> Sandro was suggesting you install it as changelog.gz rather than
> NEWS.gz, but I'm not sure that is necessary.

ok, I understand, but in the upstream tarball there are two files
similar to a changelog file (changelog and NEWS), so I preferred to
consider the file named changelog as the official changelog.
sorry for the play on words. :)

> > > * config.{guess,sub}
> > >  - take care of those files: they can create many problems. you can
> > > look at /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz
> > 
> > I have applied config.dpatch because debian/rules, based on the template
> > of dh_make, makes a copy of these files from /usr/share/misc, alterating 
> > the original tarball, with the side effect of including the updated 
> > config.guess and config.sub in the diff.gz.
> > In this manner, I hope to have followed correctly the
> > /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz guidelines...
> 
> Your solution is interesting, but it is not the normal way of doing it.

> > > * debian/patches
> > >  - please include description for patch 01_data_Makefile.in.dpatch
> > >  - 02_config.dpatch is provided by Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > should he be mentioned in debian/copyright? Some DDs can comment on
> > > this?
> > 
> > the first issue is fixed, but I don't know  what to do with the second 
> > one...
> 
> If copyright has been asserted on the file then it must be mentioned in
> debian/rules, along with its distribution license. If there isn't one
> you should find out what it is and add it, or drop the file.

It's not my solution, :)
I have found it taking a look in the dpatch examples
(/usr/share/doc/dpatch/examples/dpatch/01_config.dpatch.gz).
considering that it is among the examples of dpatch, I have thought that
it is released under GPL, your opinion?

kind regards
francesco

-- 
Francesco Namuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.namuri.it/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: drapes (updated)

[Russ Allbery]

Francesco Namuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> ok, I understand, but in the upstream tarball there are two files
> similar to a changelog file (changelog and NEWS), so I preferred to
> consider the file named changelog as the official changelog.  sorry for
> the play on words. :)

Yeah, that's generally what I do as well, and install NEWS as NEWS.gz.  So
it sounds like you're doing things the right way.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])   


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: aria2 [sponsored again]

[Patrick Ruckstuhl]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
>> Good, but you forgot to remove it in clean:
>
> oh, and there are two other things:
>
>   * it should be 'Copyright Holder', not 'Copyright Holders'.
>   * wrapp after 80 chars in long description, not earlier.
>
All fixed, thx.

I checked the bug page of dh_make and it looks like there are already
some reports about the same problem.

Patrick

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFFx6YaA/ofYi4EMoRAnpqAJ0QAg4DR5kgHMn2ha6V6sHtQ8yLJgCfRNiX
zD5o1X0TM6RiicRScc2Uf1w=
=40AK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: drapes (updated again)

[Francesco Namuri]

On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:15:22PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > 2) WARNING: failed to install schema
> > `/schemas/apps/drapes/enable_timed_shuffle' locale `fr': Unable to store
> > a value at key '/schemas/apps/drapes/enable_timed_shuffle', as the
> > configuration server has no writable databases. There are some common
> > --CUT--
> > 
> 
> Depends what you mean by normal. It seemd to be something in the build
> of your package, and as such probably wont have been seen in any other
> packages. You should find out what it means and if it is a problem.

I have found the error, I had to add
GCONF_DISABLE_MAKEFILE_SCHEMA_INSTALL=1 to debian/rules.
Now it's fixed, I have uploaded a new revision to mentors.

kind regards
francesco

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/drapes
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 
contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/drapes/drapes_0.4.97-3.dsc

-- 
Francesco Namuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.namuri.it/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

spelled Try different

[AOL IM]

provide well constrict blood vessels limit bleeding. Many now obsolete due safer drugs. years after entered into variation substance emerged. This crack became popular mids part almost immediate high fact that produce buy.
And wasnt implying anything said hard assume blogland beast harder track record. guess partially fault. That apology necessary didnt wrong. More assuming. wish luck whatever winds
Cards eBooks Literary Place Worldwide Industry ITI Agent Robert Berkman OPL Solo Small Judith Siess Today Inc. Marlton Pike Medford Phone: Fax: fde Counter A:hover AMUST Registry Cleaner Hemi Sync Store Software Testing Offshore Webmaster Visitors Custom Site Design Free Counters WebPage Graphical Hit counter place Simple Very original styles expire cost
Nexis Keynote Govt Computers Libraries D.C. April PALS Day Utica Homer Township Chamber Commerce Glen Long Island thth Syndicate PubSub August Resources Council Central Syracuse Atlantic Sciences Annual Hartford CT Internet Monterey CA Hampshire Concord NH Harvey Hay Whitney Medical Yale Haven Texas Austin SLA Upstate Chapter LILRC Adelphi Garden System Lakeville
news beautiful Perth. Sunday Amazon informed morning Stephen King Joyce Carol Oates books coming October. Added LT ordered library. authors. Couldnt Journal animal Sigh. Need Feed discuss feeds available internet. Things changing world school Canada. purpose changes. Lots Simon Fraser Jersey Girl Librarian Hi My Sherry working Charlotte North Carolina. recently moved area Jersey. title shows wherever goes pride. Zen Welcome Garrett LIS Wayne West Branch Manager. Really just make computers running wont bore anyone today. summer Childrens Summer Reading Program. doing tasks mentioned above reference ILL
biennial All news beautiful Perth. Sunday Amazon informed morning Stephen King Joyce Carol Oates books coming October. Added LT ordered library. authors. Couldnt Journal animal Sigh. Need Feed discuss feeds available internet. Things changing world school Canada. purpose changes. Lots Simon Fraser Jersey Girl Librarian Hi My Sherry working Charlotte North Carolina. recently moved area Jersey. title shows wherever goes pride. Zen Welcome Garrett LIS Wayne West Branch Manager. Really just make computers running wont bore anyone today.
calling looks linked alot week always start. Wyoming Authors Wiki Wow probably slickest wiki Ive seen libary Center Wymoming extensive plus contact Slick Mojeek suwet allws create personal topical engine Firefox issue. RSS Now cool. Flickr Humor evening Morris County

Re: RFS: blacs-mpi (updated package)

[Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez]

On 9/22/06, Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-27
of my package "blacs-mpi".

It builds these binary packages:
blacs-lam-dev - Basic Linear Algebra Comm. Subprograms - Dev. files for LAM
blacs-lam-test - Basic Linear Algebra Comm. Subprograms - Test files for LAM
blacs-mpich-dev - Basic Linear Algebra Comm. Subprograms - Dev. files for MPICH
blacs-mpich-test - Basic Linear Algebra Comm. Subprograms - Test files for MPICH
blacs-test-common - Test data for BLACS testers
blacs1-lam - Basic Linear Algebra Comm. Subprograms - Shared libs. for LAM
blacs1-mpich - Basic Linear Algebra Comm. Subprograms - Shared libs. for MPICH

The package is lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 335008

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/blacs-mpi
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/blacs-mpi/blacs-mpi_1.1-27.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Thanks for reading and regards,

--
Muammar El Khatib.
Linux user: 403107.
Key fingerprint = 90B8 BFC4 4A75 B881 39A3  1440 30EB 403B 1270 29F1
http://muammarelkhatib.net | http://www.teorex.org
 ,''`.
 : :' :
 `. `'
  `-



I don't know who uploaded blacs-mpi, but I would like to say thanks
for who did it. I feel glad :D


Regards and have a nice day :-)

--
Muammar El Khatib.
Linux user: 403107.
Key fingerprint = 90B8 BFC4 4A75 B881 39A3  1440 30EB 403B 1270 29F1
http://muammarelkhatib.net | http://www.teorex.org
 ,''`.
: :' :
`. `'
  `-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS to fix RC bug: rssreader.app [sponsored]

[Yavor Doganov]

The package is in NEW, many thanks to Margarita Manterola.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]