Re: Sponsoring gcc-h8300-hms
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > Ok, finally it's done. You can find the binutils-h8300-hms packages at > > > > http://www.model.in.tum.de/~tautschn/debian/ > > Ok, but as you used the Sid package's stuff, better say that in the > changelog. And better make them urgency=medium if the target is Etch. > Oh, sure, will do that in a few hours. It was a bit late for me then... > I happen to have some h8s coff code, so I can test your packages, > but please upload a sane version of the source package first. The > orig.tar.gz there does not match. > Tests would be great; but I don't really get what you meant by "The orig.tar.gz" there does not match. Thanks, Michael pgpXEIxhmpKrY.pgp Description: PGP signature
RFS: kodos - A visual regular expression editor - (updated package)
Dear friends, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.4.9-4 of a package I am adopting called "kodos". I use this program and since it was recently orphaned, I decided to adopt it. It builds this binary packages: kodos - A visual regular expression editor The package is lintian/linda clean and builds just fine in pbuilder sid. I've tested the update and it works as you would expect. The upload would close this ITA bug: #394936 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kodos - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kodos/kodos_2.4.9-4.dsc Long description: Kodos is an application to aid in the creation and debugging of regular expressions in python. The GUI for Kodos should eliminate the need for using the python interpreter for regex design in most instances. Changelog from this update: kodos (2.4.9-4) * New maintainer. Closes: #394936. * Updated Standards-Version to 3.7.2.2. No changes. * Changed Build-Depends from python-dev to python-all-dev. * Updated debian/compat to 5. * Updated debian/watch to version 3. * Updated debian/copyright with correct FSF address and to proper Debian policy. * Wrote and added a basic man page. * Converted menu icon from .png to .xpm format. * Added homepage to debian/control. Many thanks in advance! Kevin -- Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Sponsoring gcc-h8300-hms
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Ok, finally it's done. You can find the binutils-h8300-hms packages at > > http://www.model.in.tum.de/~tautschn/debian/ Ok, but as you used the Sid package's stuff, better say that in the changelog. And better make them urgency=medium if the target is Etch. I happen to have some h8s coff code, so I can test your packages, but please upload a sane version of the source package first. The orig.tar.gz there does not match. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How can I contribute??
Thanks a lot you all!! Surelly I will join in some needed task in the project and as I´m doing what I really love, I´ll do my best. Thanks On 10/24/06, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Eduardo,On Tuesday 24 October 2006 17:08, eduardo.oliva barruzi wrote:> Hi mentor, I joined this list to make some needed work to the project. > If any of you knows something that I can help, please let me know, cause> I really want to join.>> I have expert skills in PHP, good skills in ShellScript and Python,> basic in C and a good knowledge in Linux. Thanks for your offer. Of course your contributions are welcome. Please seehttp://www.de.debian.org/devel/join/ for ways to help Debian.RegardsChristoph --Famous coworker quote: "I'm still confused - just on a higher level now."--To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sponsoring gcc-h8300-hms
[...] > > > whether it is worth trying to upgrade to binutils 2.16.x and gcc-4.x, > > because > > this very outdated version of binutils and gcc just works for this very > > special > > application. > > I don't know about gcc, but to binutils 2.16.x, yes, it is worth it. It is > also dead easy: get the latest binutils packages in sid, apply the > debian/ directory to 2.16.x, and tweak debian/rules a bit to instead of the > normal build, do a crosscompiler build. > Ok, finally it's done. You can find the binutils-h8300-hms packages at http://www.model.in.tum.de/~tautschn/debian/ I have not yet made any attempt to build newer gcc-h8300-hms packages, though. Cheers, Michael pgpbeEaphX8yk.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Sponsoring gcc-h8300-hms
Hi Michael! On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > > Ok, I'm working on that one - I've succeeded to build the package, but a > > > proper Debian package still requires a bit of work, I'll try to manage > > > that by tomorrow. > > > > Ok. You did notice that debian/rules has a special entrypoint for > > crosscompiling builds, and also one for cleaning the result of that up? > > > Sure, this is what I've used, but I've not yet tweaked the rules to do that > automagically. > > Thanks a lot for the pointers, > Michael > > PS.: Do you think binutils-h8300-hitachi-coff is an appropriate package name? binutils-h8300-coff is the proper name. But don't rename the packages yet, generate them with the old names in sid or you will get stuck in the NEW queue, and that means *no* chance for Etch. So, use binutils-h8300-hms and gcc-h8300-hms for now. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sponsoring gcc-h8300-hms
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > Ok, I'm working on that one - I've succeeded to build the package, but a > > proper Debian package still requires a bit of work, I'll try to manage > > that by tomorrow. > > Ok. You did notice that debian/rules has a special entrypoint for > crosscompiling builds, and also one for cleaning the result of that up? > Sure, this is what I've used, but I've not yet tweaked the rules to do that automagically. Thanks a lot for the pointers, Michael PS.: Do you think binutils-h8300-hitachi-coff is an appropriate package name? pgpTqQSLYATR7.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Sponsoring gcc-h8300-hms
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Ok, I'm working on that one - I've succeeded to build the package, but a > proper Debian package still requires a bit of work, I'll try to manage > that by tomorrow. Ok. You did notice that debian/rules has a special entrypoint for crosscompiling builds, and also one for cleaning the result of that up? -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sponsoring gcc-h8300-hms
[...] > > > whether it is worth trying to upgrade to binutils 2.16.x and gcc-4.x, > > because > > this very outdated version of binutils and gcc just works for this very > > special > > application. > > I don't know about gcc, but to binutils 2.16.x, yes, it is worth it. It is > also dead easy: get the latest binutils packages in sid, apply the > debian/ directory to 2.16.x, and tweak debian/rules a bit to instead of the > normal build, do a crosscompiler build. > Ok, I'm working on that one - I've succeeded to build the package, but a proper Debian package still requires a bit of work, I'll try to manage that by tomorrow. Best, Michael pgpe7vkbolDpG.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Sponsoring gcc-h8300-hms
Re: Michael Tautschnig 2006-10-25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Furthermore, I'd like to add some notes: Probably brickos and the Lego > Mindstorms Kit is the only use of this and related packages. As such I wonder > whether it is worth trying to upgrade to binutils 2.16.x and gcc-4.x, because > this very outdated version of binutils and gcc just works for this very > special > application. As seen on [1], brickos (still) doesn't build on amd64. It looks like a porting problem in binutils, so that might be fixed by upgrading. [1] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=brickos Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Sponsoring gcc-h8300-hms
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Furthermore, I'd like to add some notes: Probably brickos and the Lego > Mindstorms Kit is the only use of this and related packages. As such I wonder Some embedded controller firmware out there are h8300-coff as well, so no, Lego Mindstorms is not the only user. But it is probably the major one. > whether it is worth trying to upgrade to binutils 2.16.x and gcc-4.x, because > this very outdated version of binutils and gcc just works for this very > special > application. I don't know about gcc, but to binutils 2.16.x, yes, it is worth it. It is also dead easy: get the latest binutils packages in sid, apply the debian/ directory to 2.16.x, and tweak debian/rules a bit to instead of the normal build, do a crosscompiler build. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sponsoring gcc-h8300-hms
Hi guys, sorry for replying that late, I've been too busy to do anything about your offers. However, Christoph has been as kind as to upload a new version of the package. I'm still interested in maintaining these packages, but I'm not a DD and thus I've got to rely on sponsorship. Furthermore, I'd like to add some notes: Probably brickos and the Lego Mindstorms Kit is the only use of this and related packages. As such I wonder whether it is worth trying to upgrade to binutils 2.16.x and gcc-4.x, because this very outdated version of binutils and gcc just works for this very special application. The reason for an upgrade is probably #392957, but solving this one some other way might save a lot of time and pain. Thanks again, Michael pgpEe0lNykDLz.pgp Description: PGP signature
RFS: yarp - Yet Another Robot Platform
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yarp". * Package name: yarp * Version : 2.1.0 * Upstream Author : Paul Fitzpatrick * URL : http://eris.liralab.it/yarp/ * License : GPL * Section : devel It builds these binary packages: yarp - communication and device interfaces for humanoid robots The package is lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yarp - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yarp/yarp_2.1.0.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Paul Fitzpatrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: webfs (updated package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.21-3 of my package "webfs". It builds these binary packages: webfs - lightweight http server for static content The upload would fix these bugs: 283466, 284951, 379253, 379552 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/webfs - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/webfs/webfs_1.21-3.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Iñaki Rodriguez -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFP02cIbV2YszwD1YRAl7dAJ9/kLnZlY4Cu0oY4rVXbLNPpMaxbQCglVrh aYFUW34YAa3Y4S9E/McKtaY= =Dkvt -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
