RFS: dtc (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.11-1 of my package sbox-dtc. It builds these binary packages: sbox-dtc - A CGI wrapper script for chrooted environment for hosting The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 431673 429072 Also, the package now features a new config file so it's not needed to recompile the package to change options. The package can be found on one of our mirros: USA: ftp://ftp.gplhost.com/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/sbox-dtc_1.11-1.dsc Singapore: ftp://ftp.gplhost.sg/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/sbox-dtc_1.11-1.dsc France: ftp://ftp.gplhost.fr/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/sbox-dtc_1.11-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Thomas Goirand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RSF: dtc (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.0-1 of my package dtc-xen. It builds these binary packages: dtc-xen - SOAP daemon and scripts to allow control panel management for Xen VMs The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs (many are updated translations): 418254, 424882, 423609, 422514, 422326, 422332, 422126, 421517, 419213 Also, the package now is updated for the newest Xen kernel, it should work with up to 3.0.4-1. There's still an RC bug that I couldn't fix #431705, as I was not able to reproduce it. It has been said that there was a problem calling htpasswd, but as far as I know, this doesn't happen, so I don't really know what to do with that one (maybe just close the bug). I did purge the package, then dpkg-reconfigure debconf to set it as non-interactive, then reinstalled the package, and there was no problem (done under an updated SID VPS). Help would be appreciated on that one, but it's still important that the package is uploaded asap to have the translation uploaded. The package can be found on one of our mirros: USA: ftp://ftp.gplhost.com/debian/dists/etch/main/binary-i386/dtc-xen_0.3.0-1.dsc Singapore: ftp://ftp.gplhost.sg/debian/dists/etch/main/binary-i386/dtc-xen_0.3.0-1.dsc France: ftp://ftp.gplhost.fr/debian/dists/etch/main/binary-i386/dtc-xen_0.3.0-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Thomas Goirand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RSF: dtc (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.26.2-1 of my package dtc. It builds these binary packages: dtc - web control panel for admin and accounting hosting services dtc-package-installer - Adds package installer apps to DTC dtc-stats-daemon - dtc-xen VM statistics for the dtc web control panel dtc-toaster - web control panel for admin and accounting hosting services (meta package) dtc-postfix-courier - web control panel for admin and accounting hosting services (more depends) dtc-common - web control panel for admin and accounting hosting services (common files) The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 429214 417248 The package can be found on one of our mirros: USA: ftp://ftp.gplhost.com/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/dtc_0.26.2-1.dsc Singapore: ftp://ftp.gplhost.sg/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/dtc_0.26.2-1.dsc France: ftp://ftp.gplhost.fr/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/dtc_0.26.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Thomas Goirand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: btrfs packages: reviews appreciated
Hi Kel, Thanks a lot for your time. [ btrfs packages ] Had a quick look, some comments: * these also need to be removed by upstream's clean target: .*.o.cmd .tmp_versions/ Module.symvers Will pass that on to upstream. * btrfs-modules-source should have a versioned dependency on debhelper (=0.5.37) to ensure that dh_installmodules will always be useful 5.0.37, I guess. * kdist_clean: should call upstream's clean target, not the debian/rules clean target That's from dh-make, so I'll need to file another bug on that :-) - #432816 As far as I understand, kdist_clean is called while building btrfs-modules-_KVERS_ (with module-assistant, or however). Should it only call upstream make clean, or does it also need to clear up the leftovers from the package building process, so it'd need to call dh_clean and upstream make clean? * debian/rules would be easier to parse if all the commented/example stuff were stripped True. * README.Debian summary is confusing. If the summary is Do not use btrfs. then who is the crazy person that packaged it? and why? Wouldn't it be better to explain why you are packaging it just as you did in email sent to this list? New summary: Do not use for real work. * README.Debian typo - modules-assistang auto-install btrfs ... and some other typos as well :-) cheers -- vbi -- get my gpg key here: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Wrong subject in my previous posts
Sorry, I just post 3 requests with the same subject. Please have a look in the body of the message. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: Spout, a tiny but wonderful black and white game (ITP with Bug#356492)
Damyan Ivanov wrote: -=| Javier Candeira, Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:37:08 +1000 |=- Damyan, Thanks so much for answering, and thanks especially for agreeing to work with me on the package. Work is a bit strong :) I'll just review/upload. You are supposed to do the work :) Thanks for reviewing and uplading my work, then. I could hound him to put the header in every source file, I suppose, but I have the email exchange proving that he really meant to license the game this way. I hope this is enough. It could be if you put it in debian/copyright, preferably as a temporary solution. You could prepare the necessary changes and send them upstream (in form he prefers) so they can be included in the next upstream release. Ok, I will do that, though I am ready to bet that the only changes upstream will ever make to this game will be to add my licensing wordings, if that. The game writes its HiScores file (spout.sco) in the current working directory. Can you make it use /var/games for that? Or at least ~/.spout.sco? Fixed it so now hi scores go in ~/.spout.sco Thank you for your work so far. Thank *you*!. Finally, please make the source package available somewhere. I had to search the list archives to find the location for the last package and it appears it is still not updated. http://mentors.debian.net is often used these days (and gives you some uploading experience). Ok. First, I apologise for forgetting to upload after making the changes. Second, I have uploaded it to mentors.debian.net: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spout Thanks again. Javier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: btrfs packages: reviews appreciated
Adrian von Bidder wrote: http://fortytwo.ch/debian/btrfs if you want them, in future, integrated into l-m-e-2.6, you have to name your package 'foo-source', not 'foo-modules'-source. also, you should not depend on 'linux-image-_KVERS_', but on 'linux-modules-_KVERS_ | linux-image-_KVERS_'. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: btrfs packages: reviews appreciated
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 06:33:47 pm Adrian von Bidder wrote: Hi Kel, Thanks a lot for your time. [ btrfs packages ] Had a quick look, some comments: * these also need to be removed by upstream's clean target: .*.o.cmd .tmp_versions/ Module.symvers Will pass that on to upstream. * btrfs-modules-source should have a versioned dependency on debhelper (=0.5.37) to ensure that dh_installmodules will always be useful 5.0.37, I guess. Yeah, that one. Sorry. * kdist_clean: should call upstream's clean target, not the debian/rules clean target That's from dh-make, so I'll need to file another bug on that :-) - #432816 As far as I understand, kdist_clean is called while building btrfs-modules-_KVERS_ (with module-assistant, or however). Should it only call upstream make clean, or does it also need to clear up the leftovers from the package building process, so it'd need to call dh_clean and upstream make clean? Nope, no debian specific stuff need be cleaned at all. Just call upstreams clean target. By this time, the debian package has been built, uploaded, downloaded and installed. The rest of debian/rules is completely superfluous when it comes to just building the kernel module from the debianized tarball. For example, in all kernel module packages I maintain, i have debian/rules and debian/rules.modules. Each have specific tasks: debian/rules: responsible for package building tasks debian/rules.modules: responsible for module building tasks Only debian/rules.modules is installed to the module tarball (as /usr/src/modules/$pkgname/debian/rules). One gotcha: I recommend also supplying kernel version variables when calling the upstream makefile's clean target, in your case KERNELDIR=$(KSRC). This is required sometimes for when compiling for kernel version != `uname -r`, depending on what sanity checking/cleaning and other actions are performed. Thanks, Kel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: libapache2-authenntlm-perl (updated package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.02-4 of my package libapache2-authenntlm-perl. It builds these binary packages: libapache2-authenntlm-perl - Perform Microsoft NTLM and Basic User Authentication The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 432809 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-authenntlm-perl - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-authenntlm-perl/libapache2-authenntlm-perl_0.02-4.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Hendrik Frenzel - -- I am chaos. I am the substance from which your artists and scientists build rhythms and rhimes. I am the spirit with which your children and clowns laugh in happy anarchy. I am chaos. I am alive, and I tell you that you are free. - Eris, Goddess Of Chaos, Discord Confusion. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGlgWLjWcQfAgCZA8RCO+SAKC+nZBe4VsVKUbUyrSP873QgZr83wCgrJsR goign+r0PDuMBrq+JMWnJ4M= =4ZMJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another revision of the d-m FAQ
In my last update of the FAQ, I forgot to include a substantial rework of the difference between native and non-native packages from Thijs Kinkhorst. The rework also split the discussion on why debian dirs in upstream tarballs is bad, which should help in the future when people ask about it -- now you've got something to point them at. Thanks Thijs, and thanks also to everyone else who has contributed material to the FAQ in the past. - Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: mailscanner (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.61.7-1 of my package mailscanner. It builds these binary packages: mailscanner - email virus scanner and spam tagger The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 412883, 425861, 429954 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mailscanner - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mailscanner/mailscanner_4.61.7-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Simon Walter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Another revision of the d-m FAQ
I just joined this list (although I haven't packaged anything yet, etc. I fully intend to). Thus, I haven't been following this discussion. Any chance you could provide a link to the page about why debian dirs in upstream tarballs is bad? Curiosity kills the cat, every time... Thanks! Sincerely, Jack Mudge [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thursday 12 July 2007 07:28, Matthew Palmer wrote: In my last update of the FAQ, I forgot to include a substantial rework of the difference between native and non-native packages from Thijs Kinkhorst. The rework also split the discussion on why debian dirs in upstream tarballs is bad, which should help in the future when people ask about it -- now you've got something to point them at. Thanks Thijs, and thanks also to everyone else who has contributed material to the FAQ in the past. - Matt pgpDdS7c3p8Oa.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Another revision of the d-m FAQ
Hi, On 12/07/07, Jack T Mudge III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just joined this list (although I haven't packaged anything yet, etc. I fully intend to). Thus, I haven't been following this discussion. Any chance you could provide a link to the page about why debian dirs in upstream tarballs is bad? http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html Curiosity kills the cat, every time... Thanks! Sincerely, Jack Mudge [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thursday 12 July 2007 07:28, Matthew Palmer wrote: In my last update of the FAQ, I forgot to include a substantial rework of the difference between native and non-native packages from Thijs Kinkhorst. The rework also split the discussion on why debian dirs in upstream tarballs is bad, which should help in the future when people ask about it -- now you've got something to point them at. Thanks Thijs, and thanks also to everyone else who has contributed material to the FAQ in the past. - Matt -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Say NO to Microsoft Office broken standard. See http://www.noooxml.org/petition -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: mailscanner (updated package)
On 12/07/07 at 19:26 +0200, Simon Walter wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.61.7-1 of my package mailscanner. It builds these binary packages: mailscanner - email virus scanner and spam tagger The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 412883, 425861, 429954 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mailscanner - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mailscanner/mailscanner_4.61.7-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Hi Simon, diff -burN mailscanner-4.58.9/debian/changelog n/mailscanner-4.61.7/debian/changelog --- mailscanner-4.58.9/debian/changelog 2007-07-12 20:28:35.0 +0200 +++ n/mailscanner-4.61.7/debian/changelog 2007-07-12 20:29:01.0 +0200 @@ -1,4 +1,12 @@ -mailscanner (4.58.9-2) unstable; urgency=low +mailscanner (4.61.7-1) unstable; urgency=low + + * New upstream version (Closes: #425861, #429954) + * Add portuguese debconf translation. (Closes: #412883) + * Removed f-prot location patch, f-prot-installer package has been removed + + -- Simon Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 07 Jul 2007 13:24:36 +0200 + +mailscanner (4.58.9-2) unstable; urgency=high * Exim.pm: Fix serious problem with patch for #346212, MailScanner couldn't read any address please fix that: it *might* confuse the BTS's version-tracking. And you don't want to confuse the BTS version-tracking. ;) Other comments: - please consider making clamav a Recommends, or (more likely) clamav-daemon. - please consider including the ubuntu patch. It won't hurt, especially if /var/run is cleaned up. (/var/run is on /tmpfs in Ubuntu, so that's probably the reason for that patch) - please consider fixing bug #432881 now that I filed it ;) -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: LiDIA: How to split up a library?
On 10/07/07, Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So a good place for the library [LiDIA] and hopefully a team which could help you would be the the Debian science team Thanks, I'll try them. - Jordi G. H. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: lwatch, rrdcollect
Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for the new version of my two packages: - lwatch 0.4.1-2 - rrdcollect 0.2.3-3 Packages are lintian and linda clean. There are some small bugfixes (#348434, #424562) and updates to current standard version. Packages are available on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lwatch - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lwatch/lwatch_0.4.1-2.dsc - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rrdcollect - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rrdcollect/rrdcollect_0.2.3-3.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Thanks in advance Regards Artur -- - God, root, what's the difference? - God has mercy /Illiad, User friendly/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: btrfs packages: reviews appreciated
[cc: me please, or I will break proper threading again] [Daniel] if you want them, in future, integrated into l-m-e-2.6, you have to name your package 'foo-source', not 'foo-modules'-source. Ok. Not sure if the package should be part of l-m-e, though. I'd not want anybody to use btrfs without having read the huge warning I put in the package description. Perhaps is it stabilises to a point where it at least won't eat your data. cheers -- vbi -- Of course I can keep secrets. It's the people I tell them to that can't keep them. -Anthony Haden-Guest signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
