SUPERVISORES EFICACES - NO LO DEJE PASAR - publicidad
SUPERVISORES EFICACES - MEJORANDO EL DESEMPEÑO DE LOS SUPERVISORES Agosto 06 y 07, 2008 - 17:00 a 21:30 hrs. Centro de Convenciones Hotel María Angola OBJETIVOS Actualizar la preparación de los participantes para modernizar su desempeño como Supervisores Eficaces, dotándoles de las nuevas filosofías, tendencias, técnicas, herramientas y casuística del Proceso de Supervisión Eficaz, para optimizar sus resultados laborales, dentro de un marco de competitividad, efectividad y empleabilidad empresarial. METODOLOGÍA Se aplicará el Método MOTA, que combina adecuada y permanentemente la Motivación, Teoría y Aplicación; a través de un proceso interactivo, participativo y técnico. TEMARIO Se trataran contenidos referidos a los siguientes temas: 1. GLOBALIZACION Y SUPERVISION MODERNA - El Nuevo Entorno Global del Siglo XXI. - Impacto de la Globalización en la Supervisión. - Enfoque Sistémico de las Organizaciones.- Perfil de las Organizaciones Modernas. - Perfil de Potencial Humano Competente 2. GENERALIDADES DEL SUPERVISOR EFICAZ - Papel del Supervisor Moderno.-Funciones Principales.-Responsabilidades.- - Tareas Principales del Supervisor de Primer Nivel.- - Perfil integral del Supervisor.- - Decálogo del Supervisor 3. LA SUPERVISION EFICAZ - Conceptualización.- Importancia de la Supervisión en el mundo de hoy.- - Objetivos.- Características.- Estilos de Supervisión.- - La Supervisión y el Equilibrio Dinámico.- - La Supervisión y los Procesos Organizacionales: - Relaciones Humanas y Supervisión - Motivación y Supervisión - Trabajo en Equipo y Supervisión - Liderazgo y Supervisión - Disciplina y Supervisión - Mejoramiento del Trabajo y Supervisión - La Supervisión y la Evaluación del Grupo de Trabajo 4. HERRAMIENTAS MODERNAS DE LA SUPERVISION EFICAZ - Ejercicios y Manejo de Herramientas Modernas EXPOSITOR Lic. Carlos Pérez Gavidia Profesional en Ciencias de la Comunicación Social, Relaciones Públicas, Relaciones Industriales y Administración de Empresas. Con postgrado en Consultoría y Asesoramiento Empresarial. Estudios de Maestría en Educación. Con estudios y experiencias profesionales en Perú, Alemania, Francia, Inglaterra, España, Estados Unidos de Norteamérica, Brasil, México, países de la Comunidad Andina e Israel. Ha sido Consultor de la Konrad Adenauer Stiftug de la República Federal de Alemania, de la Sociedad Alemana de Medicina e Higiene Ocupacional Limitada y del Programa de Fomento de la Pequeña y Mediana Empresa de América Latina. Actualmente se desenvuelve como Facilitador para Latinoamérica de los Programas de Alta Gerencia de CRESTCOM INTERNATIONAL. (Una de las franquicias más grandes del mundo en capacitación de ejecutivos). Es Consultor Empresarial, Conferencista y Docente Universitario. INVERSIÓN: US$ 120.00 (S/. 360.00) + I.G.V. - Si se inscribe hasta el 25 de julio US$ 155.00 (S/. 450.00) + I.G.V. - Si se inscribe después del 25 de julio Si desea inscribirse, responda este mensaje solictando la ficha de inscripción. Organiza: ThaisBor S.A.C. Pasaje Mártir Olaya 169 Of. 302 - Miraflores Tel: 241-9885 Fax: 446-4950 Mensaje enviado por Silvio Chilindano Jr. Huacavelica 641 - 4to. Piso Este mensaje cumple con todas las normas que regula la ley Nº28493 Si desea darse de baja escríbanos a [EMAIL PROTECTED] y al cabo de 48 horas lo realizaremos. CODIGO NUMERO: 84459138833 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: scim-python: python bindings and input methods for scim
Hi Bas, I may have made confusing statement for casual observer... On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 01:09:02PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:06:27AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: In License, you have: This should have been In copyright file describing license term in the package, you (Mr. Li) have: LGPL-2+ can also be treated as version 2.1 of GNU Lesser General Public License. On Debian systems, the complete text may be found in /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1. LGPL-2+ can also be treated as version 3 of GNU Lesser General Public License. On Debian systems, the complete text may be found in /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-3. --- These are missleading. cut out stuff about GPL-3 I do not think you need these additional (and very misleading when mentioning GPL3) text here. They are properly addressed in respective license or in source code as or (at your option) any later version. You seem to have misread the license file (I didn't check, but only read what you quoted). It talks about LGPL-3, not about GPL-3. It's not misleading, just complete. I clearly made you confused. If you read packager's copyright file, you should have understood my comment. The files are distributed with multiple licenses, namely LGPL-2, LGPL-2.1, and LGPL-3. Later versions are automatically added to that list as they are released. Yep. As always when receiving multiple licensed files, debian/copyright should list them all. Listing licenses which aren't released yet isn't possible of course, but listing all currently available options is a good idea IMO. That's what the part you quoted does. Yep. The issue I complained is authogonal to what you are telling us. Thanks, Thanks, Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: scim-python: python bindings and input methods for scim
Hi, On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 08:27:32AM +0800, Zhengpeng Hou wrote: 2008/6/22 LI Daobing (李道兵) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, 2008/6/22 ZhengPeng Hou [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:43:18AM +0800, LI Daobing (李道兵) wrote: Hi, Would u mind tell me how to use it? after I built the packge with your source tarball(built with updated sid sbuild), and installed those binary packages, except the dbg one, re-login, I could not have it in skim. so is there anything wrong? or it can not work with skim? I does not test with skim, and it should does NOT work, please test with scim. skim is just a kde fronted of scim, I don't think there is anything specific to skim. if scim-python can not work with skim, then we'd firstly check what's wrong with scim-python. Cheers Zhengpeng Hou What I know as a part of SCIM package team: * The KDE libraries were behind Gnome ones to support immodule. * Some SCIM package seems to disable skim support by the maintainer patch. If you think skim support is important and these are unjustly removing support, please povide patch+test result report to us. This is volunteer work. Please do not tell people you should be able to do this if you learn how If you know better, tell us the answer. Quite honestly, I feel the same way for skim support but I do not have time to test unfamiliar programs. Thanks, Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: scim-python: python bindings and input methods for scim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://getfiregpg.org iEYEARECAAYFAkiHOYcACgkQJrhDLBNiZtw5+QCfVeiHOqWYnSkMZYj3xkjD2mqk FhEAn2qZ5vs+wJMgXD10oJrXBi73ciQg =YT0o -END PGP SIGNATURE- What I know as a part of SCIM package team: * The KDE libraries were behind Gnome ones to support immodule. * Some SCIM package seems to disable skim support by the maintainer patch. this is not what I'm talking about, I know what you are talking is something like skim-scim-pinyin. If you think skim support is important and these are unjustly removing support, please povide patch+test result report to us. AFAIK: every SCIM engine module can work well with skim, even they haven't provide a kde set up fronted for skim, like scim-pinyin, scim-chewing, etc can work just out-of-the-box with skim. I don't know why scim-python can not work with skim. This is volunteer work. Please do not tell people you should be able to do this if you learn how If you know better, tell us the answer. Quite honestly, I feel the same way for skim support but I do not have time to test unfamiliar programs. As I've said above, every modules of scim can work with skim, but not scim-python. I raised up this issue just wanna feedback, but not complann here. Just like a bug report, the difference is scim-python is not in archive, I happened know it, wanna have a try, and then feedback. Cheers Zhengpeng Hou -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: scim-python: python bindings and input methods for scim
2008/7/23 Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:59:41PM +0800, Zhengpeng Hou wrote: Hi all, What I know as a part of SCIM package team: * The KDE libraries were behind Gnome ones to support immodule. * Some SCIM package seems to disable skim support by the maintainer patch. this is not what I'm talking about, I know what you are talking is something like skim-scim-pinyin. scim-tables has 90_disable-skim.dpatch So I assume it disables skim come on, please look at the source in scim-tables-0.5.7/skim and try to figure out what on earth those code for. these just for set up UI, but not others. and the following patch: @DPATCH@ diff -urNad scim-tables-0.5.7~/Makefile.am scim-tables-0.5.7/Makefile.am --- scim-tables-0.5.7~/Makefile.am 2005-12-05 01:13:12.0 -0600 +++ scim-tables-0.5.7/Makefile.am 2007-04-28 01:50:35.0 -0500 @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ SKIM_SUBDIR=skim endif -SUBDIRS= docs intl icons m4 po src tables $(SKIM_SUBDIR) +SUBDIRS= docs intl icons m4 po src tables MAINTAINERCLEANFILES = Makefile.in aclocal.m4 configure $(AUX_DIST) diff -urNad scim-tables-0.5.7~/Makefile.in scim-tables-0.5.7/Makefile.in --- scim-tables-0.5.7~/Makefile.in 2006-10-08 10:57:57.0 -0500 +++ scim-tables-0.5.7/Makefile.in 2007-04-28 01:50:35.0 -0500 @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ uninstall-recursive ETAGS = etags CTAGS = ctags -DIST_SUBDIRS = docs intl icons m4 po src tables skim +DIST_SUBDIRS = docs intl icons m4 po src tables DISTFILES = $(DIST_COMMON) $(DIST_SOURCES) $(TEXINFOS) $(EXTRA_DIST) distdir = $(PACKAGE)-$(VERSION) top_distdir = $(distdir) is just to disable build the set up UI for skim, without this, scim-table can also work with skim, but without the set up in skim. If you think skim support is important and these are unjustly removing support, please povide patch+test result report to us. AFAIK: every SCIM engine module can work well with skim, even they haven't provide a kde set up fronted for skim, like scim-pinyin, scim-chewing, etc can work just out-of-the-box with skim. I don't know why scim-python can not work with skim. I do not know either. This is volunteer work. Please do not tell people you should be able to do this if you learn how If you know better, tell us the answer. Quite honestly, I feel the same way for skim support but I do not have time to test unfamiliar programs. As I've said above, every modules of scim can work with skim, but not scim-python. I raised up this issue just wanna feedback, but not complann here. Just like a bug report, the difference is scim-python is not in archive, I happened know it, wanna have a try, and then feedback. Please also give us feed back on good old scim-tables. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Osamu -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://getfiregpg.org iEYEARECAAYFAkiHPcEACgkQJrhDLBNiZtx/eQCeNF+3xmzMzHkNidsY9VJze81A o2MAn0Qv/UTlsd4OqpVAS6h3d87bxGUT =XcgY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: scim-python: python bindings and input methods for scim
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:59:41PM +0800, Zhengpeng Hou wrote: Hi all, What I know as a part of SCIM package team: * The KDE libraries were behind Gnome ones to support immodule. * Some SCIM package seems to disable skim support by the maintainer patch. this is not what I'm talking about, I know what you are talking is something like skim-scim-pinyin. scim-tables has 90_disable-skim.dpatch So I assume it disables skim If you think skim support is important and these are unjustly removing support, please povide patch+test result report to us. AFAIK: every SCIM engine module can work well with skim, even they haven't provide a kde set up fronted for skim, like scim-pinyin, scim-chewing, etc can work just out-of-the-box with skim. I don't know why scim-python can not work with skim. I do not know either. This is volunteer work. Please do not tell people you should be able to do this if you learn how If you know better, tell us the answer. Quite honestly, I feel the same way for skim support but I do not have time to test unfamiliar programs. As I've said above, every modules of scim can work with skim, but not scim-python. I raised up this issue just wanna feedback, but not complann here. Just like a bug report, the difference is scim-python is not in archive, I happened know it, wanna have a try, and then feedback. Please also give us feed back on good old scim-tables. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: Katapult
Hi there. I'm in the process of releasing a new version of Katapult - which I'd like to get into Debian before the freeze... If anyone can help me with this, It's on mentors.debian.net (or will be once it's finished uploading) http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=katapult Please contact me off list, as I am not subscribed. Regards, Martin Mez Meredith -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: libctl
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package libctl, that I would like to adopt (it is orphaned since May). * Package name: libctl Version : 3.0.3-1 Upstream Author : Steven G. Johnson URL : http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Libctl * License : LGPL Section : devel It builds these binary packages: libctl-dev - library for flexible control files, development version libctl-doc - libctl documentation in HTML format libctl3- library for flexible control files The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 481039 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libctl - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libctl/libctl_3.0.3-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Best regards Thorsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: desktop-data-model
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package desktop-data-model. Originally part of the Mugshot client, desktop-data-model is a program which track application activity (like Rhythmbox) and update your profile on mugshot.org. This is the first part of the Online-Desktop and Mugshot client. The package is maintained in the Online-Desktop maintainers team (http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/online-desktop/trunk/desktop-data-model/?rev=0sc=0) Description : * Package name : desktop-data-model Version : 1.2.4-1 Upstream Author : Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] and other Mugshot Developers (http://developer.mugshot.org) * URL : http://mugshot.org * License : LGPL-2+ Section : gnome It builds these binary packages: libddm-1-0 - Desktop Data Model library libddm-dev - Desktop Data Model library - development files The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 474016 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/desktop-data-model - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/desktop-data-model/desktop-data-model_1.2.4-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Julien Lavergne -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changing source package name
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I would like to change the name of a source package; is there anything non-package-specific thing to do apart from simply using the new name in debian/changelog? I mean adding new header fields, etc. Thanks, - -- cc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkiHjsgACgkQGJRwVVqzMkMgigCeJCyL0fk+a2RPf8y8BQ4c5KFG W3AAn2rvpsfFhqAGFCva1BWmfHsx6YNc =fL+D -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: joystick (updated package)
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:45:56 +0200, Stephen Kitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:04:41 +, Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for picking this up and for your work on it. Just a few comments: 0 - There's a priority mismatch, you should change it to extra to match the override file. 1 - You should move to a newer debhelper version, v4 is really old at this point. Thanks for the suggestions! These are easy enough... 2 - It doesn't look like it'd take too much to accomodate #475049 -- just a quick change and the writing of a short manpage. See if you can do this. I thought about handling this one as well, but evtest is also shipped in lineakd (with a manpage), so adding it would require some coordination. I suppose I could just add a Conflicts: and see if anyone complains, but it seems a bit late in the game to get this particular change done correctly and still have an updated package in Lenny, doesn't it? Actually lineakd diverts evtest and its manpage, so I can ship them in joystick without conflicting. Thanks! I'll upload a new version with 0 and 1 fixed as well as Ben's updated short description. In the end I've uploaded version -4 with 0, 1 and 2 fixed as well as Ben's updated short description. The changelog is: * Update short description as suggested by Ben Finney. * Set priority to extra to match the override file, as suggested by Joe Nahmias. * Use debhelper 7, as hinted by Joe Nahmias and the debhelper documentation. * Remove versioned dependency on cdbs since even oldstable has a new enough version. * Ship evtest and associated manpage; lineakd diverts them so this package need not conflict with lineakd, but it does need to conflict with dvb-utils (which will not ship with Lenny). Closes: #475049 Regards, Stephen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: scim-python: python bindings and input methods for scim
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:05:25PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: Hi Bas, Hi, I may have made confusing statement for casual observer... On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 01:09:02PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:06:27AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: In License, you have: This should have been In copyright file describing license term in the package, you (Mr. Li) have: LGPL-2+ can also be treated as version 2.1 of GNU Lesser General Public License. On Debian systems, the complete text may be found in /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1. LGPL-2+ can also be treated as version 3 of GNU Lesser General Public License. On Debian systems, the complete text may be found in /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-3. --- These are missleading. cut out stuff about GPL-3 I do not think you need these additional (and very misleading when mentioning GPL3) text here. They are properly addressed in respective license or in source code as or (at your option) any later version. You seem to have misread the license file (I didn't check, but only read what you quoted). It talks about LGPL-3, not about GPL-3. It's not misleading, just complete. I clearly made you confused. If you read packager's copyright file, you should have understood my comment. I did read it now, but I still don't understand it. The copyright file doesn't talk about the GPL anywhere (except in the python part about compatibility, but that's not about versions), it only talks about LGPL versions. You quoted this part of the copyright file (it's still quoted above). Do I understand correctly that your problem is Mr. Li talks about GPL, but the files are licensed LGPL? I would agree that he should not do this; I'm just saying that you seem to have misread the file, because de doesn't talk about the GPL. ;-) Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: libctl
Thorsten Alteholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It builds these binary packages: libctl-dev - library for flexible control files, development version libctl-doc - libctl documentation in HTML format libctl3- library for flexible control files For consistency and clear correlation, perhaps the three synopses should be: library for flexible control files, development version library for flexible control files, documentation library for flexible control files -- \“I washed a sock. Then I put it in the dryer. When I took it | `\ out, it was gone.” —Steven Wright | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: desktop-data-model
Julien Lavergne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It builds these binary packages: libddm-1-0 - Desktop Data Model library libddm-dev - Desktop Data Model library - development files Rather than saying what the name is, the synopsis should say what the package is (briefly). Can you give the full package description here in this thread so we can see? -- \ “If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all | `\others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking | _o__) power called an idea” —Thomas Jefferson | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: qmmp
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package qmmp. * Package name: qmmp Version : 0.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Ilya Kotov [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://qmmp.ylsoftware.com/ * License : GPLv2+ Section : sound It builds these binary packages: libqmmp-dev - development files for libqmmp libqmmp-misc - plugins and auxiliary libraries for qmmp libqmmp0 - library that provides core functionality of qmmp libqmmpui-dev - development files for libqmmpui libqmmpui0 - library that provides user interface of qmmp qmmp - xmms-like audio player with support of many formats This package can be the replacement of xmms or audacious for Qt or KDE users. The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 492106 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qmmp - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qmmp/qmmp_0.2.0-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: qmmp
Eugene V. Lyubimkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It builds these binary packages: libqmmp-dev - development files for libqmmp libqmmp-misc - plugins and auxiliary libraries for qmmp libqmmp0 - library that provides core functionality of qmmp libqmmpui-dev - development files for libqmmpui libqmmpui0 - library that provides user interface of qmmp qmmp - xmms-like audio player with support of many formats These synopses don't actually describe much. What does XMMS-like mean here? Can you say what that is in a synopsis without referring to a package the reader might not be familiar with? Of the form: audio player that frotzes and spangulates where frotzes and spangulates are the description of what you mean by XMMS-like, so that I don't need to know what XMMS is to understand. The libqmmp library synopses are inconsistent, and don't do much except refer to qmmp, which isn't much help. How about: qmmp audio player runtime library development files qmmp audio player plugins and auxiliary libraries qmmp audio player runtime library qmmp audio player user interface development files qmmp audio player user interface library Much the same principles apply to the full description: it's good to have an identical qmmp is an audio player that frotzes and spangulates section in the description of every one of these packages, leaving the rest of the description to say what makes this package unique compared to the others. -- \ “Pleasure's a sin, and sometimes sin's a pleasure.” —“Lord” | `\ George Gordon Noel Byron, _Don Juan_ | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: joystick (updated package)
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:11:48AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:45:56 +0200, Stephen Kitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:04:41 +, Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] 2 - It doesn't look like it'd take too much to accomodate #475049 -- just a quick change and the writing of a short manpage. See if you can do this. I thought about handling this one as well, but evtest is also shipped in lineakd (with a manpage), so adding it would require some coordination. I suppose I could just add a Conflicts: and see if anyone complains, but it seems a bit late in the game to get this particular change done correctly and still have an updated package in Lenny, doesn't it? Actually lineakd diverts evtest and its manpage, so I can ship them in joystick without conflicting. Thanks! I'll upload a new version with 0 and 1 fixed as well as Ben's updated short description. In the end I've uploaded version -4 with 0, 1 and 2 fixed as well as Ben's updated short description. However, you don't mention evtest in the long description... Also, the manpage for inputattach seems very out of date, or just plain deficient. Finally, there are a bunch of lintian warnings that you should address. I fixed the first and uploaded. I'll leave the rest to you ;-) --Joe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: t1lib (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.1.2-3 of the package t1lib which I am adopting. It builds these binary packages: libt1-5- Type 1 font rasterizer library - runtime libt1-5-dbg - Type 1 font rasterizer library - runtime libt1-dev - Type 1 font rasterizer library - development libt1-doc - Type 1 font rasterizer library - developers documentation t1lib-bin - Type 1 font rasterizer library - user binaries The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 430611 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/t1lib - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/t1lib/t1lib_5.1.2-3.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Ruben Molina signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
Re: RFS: t1lib (updated package)
Ruben Molina [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: libt1-5- Type 1 font rasterizer library - runtime libt1-5-dbg - Type 1 font rasterizer library - runtime These two synopses are identical, and should instead be disambiguated by saying why 'libt1-5-dbg' differs from 'libt1-5'. Possible improvement: Type 1 font rasterizer library - runtime with debugging symbols or: Type 1 font rasterizer library - debugging runtime -- \ “We are not gonna be great; we are not gonna be amazing; we are | `\ gonna be *amazingly* amazing!” —Zaphod Beeblebrox, _The | _o__)Hitch-Hiker's Guide To The Galaxy_, Douglas Adams | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: t1lib (updated package)
El jue, 24-07-2008 a las 13:20 +1000, Ben Finney escribió: libt1-5- Type 1 font rasterizer library - runtime libt1-5-dbg - Type 1 font rasterizer library - runtime These two synopses are identical, and should instead be disambiguated Fixed and reuploaded. Thanks a lot Ben! Ruben signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
Re: RFS: joystick (updated package)
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:31:35 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph Nahmias) wrote: However, you don't mention evtest in the long description... Also, the manpage for inputattach seems very out of date, or just plain deficient. Finally, there are a bunch of lintian warnings that you should address. I fixed the first and uploaded. I'll leave the rest to you ;-) Thank you very much! I'll tackle the rest, as well as the remaining bugs and getting the patches upstream... Regards, Stephen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Changing source package name
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:04 AM, SZÉKELYI Szabolcs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to change the name of a source package; is there anything non-package-specific thing to do apart from simply using the new name in debian/changelog? I mean adding new header fields, etc. Also need to change the source package name in debian/control -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
