Re: RFS: hexer (adopted updated package)

2009-04-03 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi

Dne Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:50:09 +0300
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net napsal(a):

 I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.4c-3
 of my package hexer.  This is an adoption - ITA #520635.
 The changelog entry describing my update to the Debian packaging of
 hexer is included a bit further down.
 
 There's just one binary package:
 hexer  - An interactive binary editor with a Vi-like interface

Have you checked how does it compare to bvi?

 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
 - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hexer/hexer_0.1.4c-3.dsc

Besides two overrides, which were already brought to attention, I don't
see anything problematic in there.

-- 
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: warning messages

2009-04-03 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:34:01PM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
  Od: Chow Loong Jin hyper...@gmail.com
  ^^ Refer to the thread about -Wl,--as-needed in debian-mentors.
 
 I can't find this thread .. can you send a link please

It started with message 49c1af19.30...@gmail.com

Cheers,
Hauke


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: RFS: hexer (adopted updated package)

2009-04-03 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:17:05AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
 On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net wrote:
 
  - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hexer/hexer_0.1.4c-3.dsc
 
 I'm unable to sponsor at the moment, but I took a look at the diff.gz.
 
 Please remove the lintian overrides, you should only override lintian
 complaints when the lintian test is wrong and it isn't possible to fix
 the test for your case, not when you just want to ignore it or the
 test has a bug. In this case there isn't an upstream homepage or
 changelog yet, which are both valid complaints that you intend to fix
 by taking over upstream.

Good point.  Thanks!

 The rest of the diff.gz looks fine, I suggest someone else do a deeper
 review and upload this package.

I've built and uploaded a new version of hexer-0.1.4c-3 to mentors.d.n
at the same URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hexer/hexer_0.1.4c-3.dsc

The changes are:
- removed the lintian overrides
- reworded the last line in the changelog entry; 5:30am does not for
  good grammar make!

Thanks to you and Michal both for taking a look!

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
Peter Pentchev  r...@ringlet.netr...@space.bgr...@freebsd.org
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
because I didn't think of a good beginning of it.


pgpKDGaQzhEBX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: /doc and/or manpage

2009-04-03 Thread Grammostola Rosea

Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 08:39:58PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
  
My package does have an /doc folder. Does it mean that there is some  
documentation which I should include in the package? How?



Do the contents look useful to a user? If so, they should be installed
into /usr/share/doc/package.

  

Besides that, should each package have an manpage? How should I create one?



Policy: Each program, utility, and function should have an associated
manual page included in the same package.

See section 12, http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html.

To create one, try an editor like manedit, which will give you a
skeleton and a graphical editor to get your started.

  

What if an package has an documentation, should there also be an manpage?



Yes.

  
I have included a rumor.1 file in my /debian folder, but when building 
it and install it, I got no manpage...


http://pastebin.com/m4310090d

\r


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



RFS: fftw3 3.2.1-1

2009-04-03 Thread Paul Brossier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

I would need a sponsor for fftw3. The package is available here:

dget http://goyave.piem.org/~piem/debian/fftw3_3.2.1-1.dsc

Source: pyrex
Binary: python-pyrex pyrex-mode
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.8.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Paul Brossier p...@debian.org
Changed-By: Paul Brossier p...@debian.org
Description:
 pyrex-mode - emacs-lisp pyrex-mode for pyrex
 python-pyrex - compile native-code modules for Python from
Python-like syntax
Closes: 483035
Changes:
 pyrex (0.9.8.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * Acknowledge non-maintainer upload (closes: #483035).
   * Bump Standards-version to 3.8.1
   * Add ${misc:Depends} for debhelper
   * Complete debian/copyright

Long description:
 Pyrex lets you write code that mixes Python and C data types any way
you want,
 and compiles it into a C extension for Python.
 .
 You can get very large speedups for tasks that don't need all the dynamic
 features of Python, with very small differences in syntax and much less
 hassle than writing your modules from scratch in C.

For info, I am a developer, but my key needs replacement.

Thanks in advance, piem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAknWSqIACgkQkuC958YALL2dEwCdGTiwTLXgxCH+z4w0nm4IFhn3
LfIAoIbq6Y3djkMyoIgtjLkH6zSn16bo
=upDk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



RFS: pyrex 0.9.8.5-1

2009-04-03 Thread Paul Brossier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

I would need a sponsor for pyrex. The package is available here:

dget http://goyave.piem.org/~piem/debian/pyrex_0.9.8.5-1.dsc

Source: fftw3
Binary: libfftw3-3 libfftw3-dev libfftw3-doc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 3.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Paul Brossier p...@debian.org
Changed-By: Paul Brossier p...@debian.org
Description:
 libfftw3-3 - library for computing Fast Fourier Transforms
 libfftw3-dev - library for computing Fast Fourier Transforms
 libfftw3-doc - documentation for fftw version 3
Closes: 478376 486046 502247 505842 515223
Changes:
 fftw3 (3.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release (closes: #502247, #505842, #515223)
   * Patch from #486046 was included upstream (closes: #486046)
   * Acknowledge non-maintainer upload (closes: #478376)
   * Add build-depends on quilt and switch to patches
   * Switch from gs-gpl to ghostscript ( 8.63)
   * Add 03_fix_manpages to add missing backslash in manpages
   * Add Homepage and bump Standards-Version to 3.8.1
   * Bump debhelper depends to =5.0.0
   * Update debian/copyright

Long description:
 The FFTW library computes Fast Fourier Transforms (FFT) in one or more
 dimensions. It is extremely fast. This package contains the shared
library
 versions of the fftw libraries in single, double and long double
precisions.
 Note that on some architectures double is the same as long double in
which
 case there is no long double library.

For info, I am a developer, but my key needs replacement.

Thanks! piem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAknWSTYACgkQkuC958YALL1SUgCgiVP+BypuG3j1FIMu6Jm0PrjQ
kz8AoKYF3Gl+z1PH2Hs3+VM0S8dadNkv
=eTNE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: /doc and/or manpage

2009-04-03 Thread Grammostola Rosea

Jan Beyer wrote:

Und es begab sich am 03.04.2009 17:55, dass Grammostola Rosea schrieb:
  

I have included a rumor.1 file in my /debian folder, but when building
it and install it, I got no manpage...


You're also calling dh_installman in debian/rules?

Jan

  

I use cdbs, so I don't know how it is managed...

\r


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: /doc and/or manpage

2009-04-03 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 20:35 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
 Jan Beyer wrote:
  Und es begab sich am 03.04.2009 17:55, dass Grammostola Rosea schrieb:

  I have included a rumor.1 file in my /debian folder, but when building
  it and install it, I got no manpage...
  
  You're also calling dh_installman in debian/rules?
 
  Jan
 

 I use cdbs, so I don't know how it is managed...
 
 \r
 
 
You need a package.manpages file listing all your manpages.
-- 
Chow Loong Jin


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: /doc and/or manpage

2009-04-03 Thread Grammostola Rosea

Chow Loong Jin wrote:

On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 20:35 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
  

Jan Beyer wrote:


Und es begab sich am 03.04.2009 17:55, dass Grammostola Rosea schrieb:
  
  

I have included a rumor.1 file in my /debian folder, but when building
it and install it, I got no manpage...



You're also calling dh_installman in debian/rules?

Jan

  
  

I use cdbs, so I don't know how it is managed...

\r




You need a package.manpages file listing all your manpages.
  

How does such a file look like and where to place it and how to use it?

\r


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: hexer (adopted updated package)

2009-04-03 Thread Tony Mancill
Uploaded.  You can contact me directly for future uploads of this
package. 

On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 15:24 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
 On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:17:05AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
  On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net wrote:
  
   - dget 
   http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hexer/hexer_0.1.4c-3.dsc
  
  I'm unable to sponsor at the moment, but I took a look at the diff.gz.
  
  Please remove the lintian overrides, you should only override lintian
  complaints when the lintian test is wrong and it isn't possible to fix
  the test for your case, not when you just want to ignore it or the
  test has a bug. In this case there isn't an upstream homepage or
  changelog yet, which are both valid complaints that you intend to fix
  by taking over upstream.
 
 Good point.  Thanks!
 
  The rest of the diff.gz looks fine, I suggest someone else do a deeper
  review and upload this package.
 
 I've built and uploaded a new version of hexer-0.1.4c-3 to mentors.d.n
 at the same URL:
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hexer/hexer_0.1.4c-3.dsc
 
 The changes are:
 - removed the lintian overrides
 - reworded the last line in the changelog entry; 5:30am does not for
   good grammar make!
 
 Thanks to you and Michal both for taking a look!
 
 G'luck,
 Peter
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: bindfs (updated package)

2009-04-03 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 02 April 2009 20:59:08 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
 Dear mentors,

Hi,

 I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8.3-1
...
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bindfs/bindfs_1.8.3-1.dsc

Uploaded. Thanks!

-- 
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: /doc and/or manpage

2009-04-03 Thread Grammostola Rosea

Chow Loong Jin wrote:

On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 20:50 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
  

Chow Loong Jin wrote:


On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 20:35 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
  
  

Jan Beyer wrote:



Und es begab sich am 03.04.2009 17:55, dass Grammostola Rosea schrieb:
  
  
  

I have included a rumor.1 file in my /debian folder, but when building
it and install it, I got no manpage...




You're also calling dh_installman in debian/rules?

Jan

  
  
  

I use cdbs, so I don't know how it is managed...

\r





You need a package.manpages file listing all your manpages.
  
  

How does such a file look like and where to place it and how to use it?

\r


It's placed in debian/packagename.manpages. The format is one path per
line, can include wildcards (*). Refer to 'man dh_installmanpages' for
more information.
  

I don't get it.

I placed the path of the file in rumor.manpages:

/home/d/debian_pakketbouw/rumor-1.0.3b/debian/rumor.1


I get:
dh_installman -prumor
/home/d/debian_pakketbouw/rumor-1.0.3b/debian/rumor.1: No such file or 
directory at /usr/bin/dh_installman line 125.

make: *** [binary-install/rumor] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit 
status 2



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: /doc and/or manpage

2009-04-03 Thread Grammostola Rosea

Grammostola Rosea wrote:

Chow Loong Jin wrote:

On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 20:50 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
 

Chow Loong Jin wrote:
   

On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 20:35 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
   

Jan Beyer wrote:
   
Und es begab sich am 03.04.2009 17:55, dass Grammostola Rosea 
schrieb:
 
I have included a rumor.1 file in my /debian folder, but when 
building

it and install it, I got no manpage...


You're also calling dh_installman in debian/rules?

Jan

  

I use cdbs, so I don't know how it is managed...

\r




You need a package.manpages file listing all your manpages.


How does such a file look like and where to place it and how to use it?

\r


It's placed in debian/packagename.manpages. The format is one path per
line, can include wildcards (*). Refer to 'man dh_installmanpages' for
more information.
  

I don't get it.

I placed the path of the file in rumor.manpages:

/home/d/debian_pakketbouw/rumor-1.0.3b/debian/rumor.1


I get:
dh_installman -prumor
/home/d/debian_pakketbouw/rumor-1.0.3b/debian/rumor.1: No such file or 
directory at /usr/bin/dh_installman line 125.

make: *** [binary-install/rumor] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error 
exit status 2




solved it:

only
debian/rumor.1   in the file...


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: how to support 32- 64-bit versions of libraries

2009-04-03 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca writes:

 On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
 Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca writes:

  I've run into a roadblock, however, in that the header gmp.h is
  generated by configure.  It has some parameters (size of a limb) that
  depend on whether compiled for 32 or 64 bits.  So on amd64, for
  example, I have two incompatible gmp.h files.  Matthias provided a
  gmp.h wrapper from Redhat that selects between architecture variants
  based on preprocessor symbols, e.g.
 
  #if defined(__i386__)
  #include gmp-i386.h
  #elif defined(__ia64__)
  #include gmp-ia64.h
  ...
 
  However, in the case at hand it is the same architecture.  One
  variant is compiled with -m32 and the other with -m64.  Is there a
  symbol that can distinguish the two so that I can use the Redhat
  trick?  Other solutions?
 
 -m32 defines __i386__ while -m64 defined __x86_64__ and so on for each
 architecture. So just use the architecture defines. The Redhat trick
 already does the job.

 Hey, that's great!  My next question is: how can I discover the suffix
 programmatically?  Is there something like dpkg-architecture
 -qDEB_HOST_GNU_CPU or gcc -dumpmachine that will spit out the right
 suffix when given -m32 or -m64, etc?

 Thanks,
 -Steve

Unfortunately gcc does not care:

% gcc -m32 -dumpmachine
x86_64-linux-gnu

Best I can think is

dpkg-architecture -adebian arch -qDEB_HOST_GNU_CPU

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: pyrex 0.9.8.5-1 (or RFS: fftw3 3.2.1-1)

2009-04-03 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In 49d64936.2070...@debian.org, Paul Brossier wrote:
Hi all,

I would need a sponsor for pyrex. The package is available here:

dget http://goyave.piem.org/~piem/debian/pyrex_0.9.8.5-1.dsc

Source: fftw3
Binary: libfftw3-3 libfftw3-dev libfftw3-doc

In 49d64aa3.1020...@debian.org, Paul Brossier wrote:
Hi all,

I would need a sponsor for fftw3. The package is available here:

dget http://goyave.piem.org/~piem/debian/fftw3_3.2.1-1.dsc

Source: pyrex
Binary: python-pyrex pyrex-mode

How'd you get those mixed up!?
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net  ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


RFS: grcm (ITA)

2009-04-03 Thread Luca Niccoli
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package grcm.
The packaged is orphaned, and I filed an ITA around two weeks ago.
It's a small program to make it quicker to initiate connection to
remote machines; new connection types can be easely reated by the
user. It's useful for the newbie, but it also comes handy when you
have to connect to the same computer often, with the same program.

* Package name: grcm
  Version : 0.1.6-1
  Upstream Author : Stephen M. Przepiora st...@przepiora.org
* URL : http://grcm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPLv2
  Section : interpreters

It builds these binary packages:
grcm   - GNOME application to initiate connections to remote machines

The package has the following lintian --pedantic problems:
.svn subdirectories are included in the source tree, and there's no
upstream changelog.
I will talk to upstream about these problems for the next release.
It builds fine with pbuilder.

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/grcm
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/grcm/grcm_0.1.6-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
 Luca Niccoli


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



RFS: magicfilter (QA update of the package)

2009-04-03 Thread Rogério Brito
Dear mentors,

The package magicfilter, a print filter for spoolers like lpr/lprng/etc,
in Debian had some issues (dependencies on nonexistent packages)
since it had not been updated in the last 3 years (according to the
changelog, its last updated was in 2006).

Since I use the package regularly and care about it, I would love to see
it uploaded to Debian and I plan on taking care of it (it is currently
RFA'ed, as said in Bug #176737).

I am, thus, looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-60.1 of
magicfilter.

Here is the relevant part of the changelog:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 magicfilter (1.2-60.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Do some QA work, since I care about this package and the current
 maintainer issued an RFA bug (176737).
   * debian/control: revamp the file:
 + replace tetex-bin with texlive.
 + replace gs with ghostscript.
 + remove gzip dependency  build-dependency (it's essential).
 + remove dvips nonexistent dependency (dvips is included in texlive).
 + remove libjpeg-gif dependency (nonexistent).
 + add poppler-utils in front of xpdf-utils (the first is more updated).
 + add autotools-dev to build-deps.
 + wrap the build-deps and deps fields.
 + add Homepage: field.
   * debian/watch: create from scratch.
   * debian/rules:
 + don't ignore make errors.
 + don't ignore make errors (-i).
 + soon to use a patch system (quilt).
 + soon to use debhelper (it's homebrew for now).
 + add upstream changelog.
   * debian/{postinst,postrm,prerm}:
 + use set -e.
   * debian/copyright:
 + refer to GPL-2, not GPL.
 + added upstream copyright notice.
   * debian/menu:
 + change section to Applications/System/Administration.
   * debian/control:
 + change Standards-Version to 3.8.1.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


The source builds this binary package:
magicfilter - automatic printer filter

The package appears to be lintian clean (only one pedantic lintian
warning, but that's all).

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/magicfilter
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 
contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/magicfilter/magicfilter_1.2-60.1.dsc


I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.


Thanks in advance, Rogério Brito.

-- 
Rogério Brito : rbr...@{mackenzie,ime.usp}.br : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8
http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito : http://meusite.mackenzie.com.br/rbrito
Projects: algorithms.berlios.de : lame.sf.net : vrms.alioth.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: magicfilter (QA update of the package)

2009-04-03 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 10:23:37PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
 Dear mentors,
 
 The package magicfilter, a print filter for spoolers like lpr/lprng/etc,
 in Debian had some issues (dependencies on nonexistent packages)
 since it had not been updated in the last 3 years (according to the
 changelog, its last updated was in 2006).
 
 Since I use the package regularly and care about it, I would love to see
 it uploaded to Debian and I plan on taking care of it (it is currently
 RFA'ed, as said in Bug #176737).
 
 I am, thus, looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-60.1 of
 magicfilter.
 
 Here is the relevant part of the changelog:
 
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  magicfilter (1.2-60.1) unstable; urgency=low
  .
* Non-maintainer upload.

If you're planning on adopting the package and becoming the new maintainer,
then it's not a non-maintainer upload, it's a new maintainer upload.  You
can also close the RFA bug.

Beyond that, not knowing anything about the package or it's surrounding use
cases, I'm probably not the best person to review it, but if you haven't had
an upload from someone else by mid next week, ping me and I'll
review/upload.

Thanks for taking care of an aging package, too...

- Matt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: fftw3 3.2.1-1

2009-04-03 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Dear Paul,

On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 07:42:59PM +0200, Paul Brossier wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I would need a sponsor for fftw3. The package is available here:

I am aware that you maintain fftw3. So, I built the package and
checked it briefly, and it seems all right. In any case, I trust your
judgement, so I have uploaded it to unstable.

I hope your key is updated real soon!

Thanks.

Kumar
-- 
Kumar Appaiah


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: RFS: pyrex 0.9.8.5-1 (or RFS: fftw3 3.2.1-1)

2009-04-03 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 05:58:17PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
 I would need a sponsor for fftw3. The package is available here:
 
 dget http://goyave.piem.org/~piem/debian/fftw3_3.2.1-1.dsc
 
 Source: pyrex
 Binary: python-pyrex pyrex-mode
 
 How'd you get those mixed up!?

Copy pasting error?

In any case, I have uploaded this as well.

Kumar
-- 
Kumar Appaiah


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature