Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] RFS: ttf-aoyagi-soseki (Japanese brush font package)
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:41:16 +0100 Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: It builds these binary packages: ttf-aoyagi-soseki - Brush-style Japanese font I hope someone from the Debian Fonts Task Force picks this up! I'm swamped currently. Yep. I did put this in my pile of things to do. Thanks! :) -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/iijmio-mail.jp http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
RFS: gtml (QA upload)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.5.4-3 of my package gtml. It builds these binary packages: gtml - HTML pre-processor The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtml - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtml/gtml_3.5.4-3.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Vincent Legout -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: gtml (QA upload)
* Vincent Legout vinc...@legout.info, 2010-02-11, 19:56: - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtml/gtml_3.5.4-3.dsc Your *.orig.tar.gz is not the same as the one which is in the archive. -- Jakub Wilk signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: zynjacku
Od: Asheesh Laroia ashe...@asheesh.org * Package name: zynjacku It looks like a cool package -- I hope you get a sponsor! If not, I'll be freer in a fortnight. Re-ping the list then. Hello, It would be great if you can upload zynjacku for me ... best regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
RFS: mailscanner (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.79.11-1 of my package mailscanner. It builds these binary packages: mailscanner - email gateway for virus scanning, spam and phishing detection The upload would fix these bugs: 498208, 520288, 529358, 529712, 542233, 542821 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mailscanner - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mailscanner/mailscanner_4.79.11-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Simon Walter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[debian-mentors] question regarding rejected uploads
Hello, I recently adopted the eagle package, and with the help of the previous maintainer was able to upload a new version (I've received multiple requests through BTS and direct contact asking for this version from users). My sponsor uploaded for i386 (i386.deb and i386.changes.) However, since it is non-free, the package won't be autobuilt on amd64, which is the only other architecture needed for this package. Another DD tried to upload the package for amd64 so it could migrate to testing, but it was rejected: Reject Reasons: eagle-data_5.7.0-2_all.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in the archive. md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of eagle-data_5.7.0-2_all.deb. md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of eagle_5.7.0-2.diff.gz. md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of eagle_5.7.0-2.dsc. eagle_5.7.0-2.dsc: old version (5.7.0-2) in unstable = new version (5.7.0-2) targeted at unstable. can not overwrite existing copy of 'eagle_5.7.0-2.diff.gz' already in the archive. What is the proper procedure for uploading additional binaries to non-free so it can be available to users and migrate to testing? Thank you. Regards, Scott Howard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [debian-mentors] question regarding rejected uploads
Scott Howard wrote: Hello, I recently adopted the eagle package, and with the help of the previous maintainer was able to upload a new version (I've received multiple requests through BTS and direct contact asking for this version from users). My sponsor uploaded for i386 (i386.deb and i386.changes.) However, since it is non-free, the package won't be autobuilt on amd64, which is the only other architecture needed for this package. Another DD tried to upload the package for amd64 so it could migrate to testing, but it was rejected: Reject Reasons: eagle-data_5.7.0-2_all.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in the archive. md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of eagle-data_5.7.0-2_all.deb. md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of eagle_5.7.0-2.diff.gz. md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of eagle_5.7.0-2.dsc. eagle_5.7.0-2.dsc: old version (5.7.0-2) in unstable = new version (5.7.0-2) targeted at unstable. can not overwrite existing copy of 'eagle_5.7.0-2.diff.gz' already in the archive. What is the proper procedure for uploading additional binaries to non-free so it can be available to users and migrate to testing? Thank you. Regards, Scott Howard Hi I think your sponsor should have built it with -B (binary arch-dependent only). All the source and arch-independent packages have already been uploaded (with the original upload) and cannot be overwritten (except by a higher version). That being said - IANADD. ~Niels signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [debian-mentors] question regarding rejected uploads
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com wrote: I recently adopted the eagle package, and with the help of the previous maintainer was able to upload a new version (I've received multiple requests through BTS and direct contact asking for this version from users). My sponsor uploaded for i386 (i386.deb and i386.changes.) However, since it is non-free, the package won't be autobuilt on amd64, which is the only other architecture needed for this package. Another DD tried to upload the package for amd64 so it could migrate to testing, but it was rejected: If the license allows it, the package can be whitelisted for building on the non-free autobuilders: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/11/msg00012.html -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [debian-mentors] question regarding rejected uploads
Thank you all! Niels Thykier comment worked, my sponsor has uploaded it! I think your sponsor should have built it with -B (binary arch-dependent only). On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: If the license allows it, the package can be whitelisted for building on the non-free autobuilders: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/11/msg00012.html I have applied twice, but have not heard back yet. That would be ideal since I cannot upload. Regards, Scott -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: ceph
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Sage Weil wrote: On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Asheesh Laroia wrote: On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Sage Weil wrote: I'm having trouble getting pbuilder working; trying on another machine now. And it's not clear to me from the output you sent where those warnings are coming from. I'll continue to play with in. rebuilding! I'll go to sleep now, though, I think. Hopefully I'll say something about this in the morning. Ok, the build is fixed (man_MANS vs dist_man_MANS in the man/Makefile.am), and pbuilder is behaving fine on my other box. The updated .dsc is at http://ceph.newdream.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/source/ceph_0.18git20100209082702-1.dsc eek, have no spare time while prepping for a PyCon talk and conference.freeculture.org this weekend. Ping me in 10 days? Sorry to disappear. -- Asheesh. -- Poverty must have its satisfactions, else there would not be so many poor people. -- Don Herold -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: zynjacku
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Od: Asheesh Laroia ashe...@asheesh.org * Package name: zynjacku It looks like a cool package -- I hope you get a sponsor! If not, I'll be freer in a fortnight. Re-ping the list then. Hello, It would be great if you can upload zynjacku for me ... best regards mira Sorry -- not yet. Super busy. Ask again in another 10 days or so. -- Asheesh. -- Sic transit gloria mundi. [So passes away the glory of this world.] -- Thomas `a Kempis
Re: RFS: gtml (QA upload)
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:26:17PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote : * Vincent Legout vinc...@legout.info, 2010-02-11, 19:56: - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtml/gtml_3.5.4-3.dsc Your *.orig.tar.gz is not the same as the one which is in the archive. Yes, I took the archive which is on sourceforge. The only difference between the two archives is that the project url is not the same. I've uploaded another version on mentors with the tarball which is currently in the archive. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtml/gtml_3.5.4-3.dsc Regards, Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: zynjacku
Od: Asheesh Laroia ashe...@asheesh.org * Package name: zynjacku Sorry -- not yet. Super busy. Ask again in another 10 days or so. Ok ... I will .. thanks best regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
