Re: RFS: archivemount (new package, 2nd try)
Thanks. On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:02:15PM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Am 09.07.2010 20:44, schrieb Nanakos Chrysostomos: > > On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 08:12:52PM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > >> Am 09.07.2010 20:08, schrieb Nanakos Chrysostomos: > * Why is urgency set to high in the changelog ? > >>> > >>> For faster inclusion to the sid environment. This thing has to be tested > >>> and ten days or more is a loss of time I think. > >> > >> That's wrong. > >> > >> It needs 10 testing days in sid, before it migrates to testing, so that > >> your package could be tested and so that it does not damage testing etc. > >> > >> Bumping the urgency to high is only valid for fixing release critical > >> and security related bugs in _testing_. > > > > I've got it. So it is mistaken to bump the urgency to high for this > > package. Am I supposed to upload it again with urgency to low in mentors > > site or the sponsor can do it? > > Just reupload. > > -- > /* > Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, > Patrick Matthäi > GNU/Linux Debian Developer > > E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org > patr...@linux-dev.org > > Comment: > Always if we think we are right, > we were maybe wrong. > */ > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100710003758.gd8...@dinofilaria.home
RFS: lessfs
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lessfs". * Package name: lessfs Version : 1.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Mark Ruijter * URL : http://www.lessfs.com/ * License : GPL version 3 Section : utils It builds these binary packages: lessfs - an inline data deduplicating filesystem for fuse The upload would fix these bugs: 570439 My motivation for maintaining this package is: I need a deduplicating filesystem for my backup system. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lessfs - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lessfs/lessfs_1.1.0-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Falk Hackenberger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c3798a9.1090...@spam.huckley.de
Re: Help for watch file
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 22:35:40 +0200, David Paleino wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:02:13 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > > I wonder how I might get a watch file for code.google.com working. > > > > Sounds like Google changed their HTML again, which broke the redirector too: > > > > http://googlecode.debian.net/p/freemedform/ > > Nope, it works. You have a typo there: > > http://googlecode.debian.net/p/freemedforms/ (yes, I know, I should make a friendlier "Project not found" page :)) -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: archivemount (new package, 2nd try)
Am 09.07.2010 20:44, schrieb Nanakos Chrysostomos: > On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 08:12:52PM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> Am 09.07.2010 20:08, schrieb Nanakos Chrysostomos: * Why is urgency set to high in the changelog ? >>> >>> For faster inclusion to the sid environment. This thing has to be tested >>> and ten days or more is a loss of time I think. >> >> That's wrong. >> >> It needs 10 testing days in sid, before it migrates to testing, so that >> your package could be tested and so that it does not damage testing etc. >> >> Bumping the urgency to high is only valid for fixing release critical >> and security related bugs in _testing_. > > I've got it. So it is mistaken to bump the urgency to high for this > package. Am I supposed to upload it again with urgency to low in mentors > site or the sponsor can do it? Just reupload. -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Help for watch file
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:02:13 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > I wonder how I might get a watch file for code.google.com working. > > Sounds like Google changed their HTML again, which broke the redirector too: > > http://googlecode.debian.net/p/freemedform/ Nope, it works. You have a typo there: http://googlecode.debian.net/p/freemedforms/ I would've had tons of emails from angry users asking why it didn't work, if the redirector was actually broken :) David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: archivemount (new package, 2nd try)
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 08:12:52PM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Am 09.07.2010 20:08, schrieb Nanakos Chrysostomos: > >> * Why is urgency set to high in the changelog ? > > > > For faster inclusion to the sid environment. This thing has to be tested > > and ten days or more is a loss of time I think. > > That's wrong. > > It needs 10 testing days in sid, before it migrates to testing, so that > your package could be tested and so that it does not damage testing etc. > > Bumping the urgency to high is only valid for fixing release critical > and security related bugs in _testing_. I've got it. So it is mistaken to bump the urgency to high for this package. Am I supposed to upload it again with urgency to low in mentors site or the sponsor can do it? Best ragards, Chris. > > -- > /* > Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, > Patrick Matthäi > GNU/Linux Debian Developer > > E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org > patr...@linux-dev.org > > Comment: > Always if we think we are right, > we were maybe wrong. > */ > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100709184437.gb8...@dinofilaria.home
Re: RFS: archivemount (new package, 2nd try)
Am 09.07.2010 20:08, schrieb Nanakos Chrysostomos: >> * Why is urgency set to high in the changelog ? > > For faster inclusion to the sid environment. This thing has to be tested > and ten days or more is a loss of time I think. That's wrong. It needs 10 testing days in sid, before it migrates to testing, so that your package could be tested and so that it does not damage testing etc. Bumping the urgency to high is only valid for fixing release critical and security related bugs in _testing_. -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: archivemount (new package, 2nd try)
Hi, On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 12:22:23PM -0500, Romain Beauxis wrote: > Le vendredi 9 juillet 2010 04:33:49, Nanakos Chrysostomos a écrit : > > Hi, > > Hi ! > > Thanks for the fixes. > > I have built and tested the software, it works great ! > > I will upload the package but I have some remarks that need to be adressed > before: > > * Is it possible to list the archive formats that are supported ? Yes of course. · old-style tar archives, · most variants of the POSIX “ustar” format, · the POSIX “pax interchange” format, · GNU-format tar archives, · most common cpio archive formats, · ISO9660 CD images (with or without RockRidge extensions), · Zip archives. · two different variants of shar archives. > * Why is urgency set to high in the changelog ? For faster inclusion to the sid environment. This thing has to be tested and ten days or more is a loss of time I think. > > > Romain Best regards, Chris. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201007091222.25560.to...@rastageeks.org > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100709180839.ga8...@dinofilaria.home
Re: RFS: archivemount (new package, 2nd try)
Le vendredi 9 juillet 2010 04:33:49, Nanakos Chrysostomos a écrit : > Hi, Hi ! Thanks for the fixes. I have built and tested the software, it works great ! I will upload the package but I have some remarks that need to be adressed before: * Is it possible to list the archive formats that are supported ? * Why is urgency set to high in the changelog ? Romain -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201007091222.25560.to...@rastageeks.org
Re: RFS: cba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/09/2010 12:31 PM, Jordan Metzmeier wrote: > Your package fails to build from source. > > First we get this called from the Makefile: > > gcc `wx-config --cflags` -Wall -g -Os-c -o > /home/jordan/build/cba/cba-0.3.6/src/gui/cbeam_class.o > /home/jordan/build/cba/cba-0.3.6/src/gui/cbeam_class.cpp > /bin/sh: wx-config: command not found > > apt-file does not show a package containing this file, but a quick > google search shows that it is an alternative provided by > libwxgtk2.8-dev. This seems to be mentioned in the upstream README: > > "there are makefiles provided in /src for linux, > try make (you will need wxwidgets-dev libraries for the gui)" > > In your build-depends you only have: > > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7) > > There is also one lintian warning: > > W: cba source: newer-standards-version 3.8.4 (current is 3.8.0) > > > > After installing libwxgtk2.8-dev, the package builds. > > Sorry, it was pointed out to me on IRC that my lintian was out of date. The current standards version is 3.9.0. W: cba source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.4 (current is 3.9.0) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMN1UjAAoJEKj/C3qNthmTO18P/j3DzNP8xz36G1fXMX9u6jPL i96E6YwxVPvRA6KbQYlnLHEqpVpjR4b/lJH+JlLKMoWyD6tJx4VR2DoX72z8f9u1 7RWPIOZ12NF2inNeCS+7A/eCJMm0oSF5j9cHCol55/xgpfU2ct4jI0Zw11tD6jIR C8ZRKdnFENzIFSwqzTdhmGBkMmRgQvqK7W8at/2uHTHsdbzT440LF50J6GBw/J9J VYqxhLFhdLXPoOMuunMZFUGkmx3/py6fmV63L++QZh31ynIJrS0i4lQpBJdDy6I4 CqM7AIx1F3ojrPAjLnFLnO+IC8/H/D5hsYVSlkAfNX2RiM2xOg6ynsOieBCy8JQA wzjUI88V99YPbqWsNJTdlOlQrbRwEKfBJrneo8FDRBoSvnxJD/A+evII7AkG5BCc KioPVaVP7WGwr2kT88sUpxin8e8ZBPO0pNoWHqpbmV8+lBmW0Vz31qhU6rGE+Ybf qISWnZJNelUvUe9AspGR1eO/BZ1CU/+evqsNum3/SwpzHMhEeF+s9JHntvW3Xt8R DVXPX32P/yAavdRcwKdnDGLXlXzK4kZMrv8vSgFOOnv+r46r2y8XPHIVFQFehZvn 2cs4vdhRXT9qA8Zon7WVDGrew3VZ3es3wTwcdQePU213bKq0PznzzStzwSI0FaS5 A1scIZfYsKG1FZYZgsvz =1DY9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c375523.5090...@gmail.com
Re: RFS: cba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/09/2010 08:17 AM, pierrot wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cba". > > * Package name: cba > Version : 0.3.6-1 > Upstream Author : pierrot > * URL : http://cbeam.sourceforge.net > * License : gpl > Section : science > > It builds these binary packages: > cba- continuous beam analysis > > The upload would fix these bugs: 561090 > > My motivation for maintaining this package is: small but useful > engineering tool. > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cba > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable > main contrib non-free > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cba/cba_0.3.6-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > Kind regards > > pierrot > > Your package fails to build from source. First we get this called from the Makefile: gcc `wx-config --cflags` -Wall -g -Os-c -o /home/jordan/build/cba/cba-0.3.6/src/gui/cbeam_class.o /home/jordan/build/cba/cba-0.3.6/src/gui/cbeam_class.cpp /bin/sh: wx-config: command not found apt-file does not show a package containing this file, but a quick google search shows that it is an alternative provided by libwxgtk2.8-dev. This seems to be mentioned in the upstream README: "there are makefiles provided in /src for linux, try make (you will need wxwidgets-dev libraries for the gui)" In your build-depends you only have: Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7) There is also one lintian warning: W: cba source: newer-standards-version 3.8.4 (current is 3.8.0) - After installing libwxgtk2.8-dev, the package builds. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMN07+AAoJEKj/C3qNthmTBb8QAKnpifFOPFpUB2ovw1n7eTbu 7VxtGc76cweFC8TwfMAhpEMJXhNYnML4y4mKSP8h45ajexbNX+MM0u6inlBSEaTK lOXf0NiPKdrbr9P4Ha/CkXDuzygfVXCC+hNsoDJdS9YZqyulglYmKyj639BaVDFs v1mcmC+Xwj8Bl+d3iGwF0AvtwE480/Hcy40DoIf+zw8isUdgdNLsCdMz9EmZtAvg UoFn3uk1sF7rfk2ejh7Bhm94G3QhA/afq+do0TTECvDzByXfBN5kDVCm5HRsLoBN tll2zX6yP0wCucP3KTR2qaNqoEKZ7LG42Uu0kDnFh8eKA/PzE505v6iC6mfchyow AVjSiZ6rntFlCE2Hnx9J3wuF7zEzfiwb2rFrusruSBs27GaVXB2jEr+zJZ/Ujm/e KI/nlpJ//nDChAbb7TYs1YoCsapS6694gUtgj59kcrkHV6YsRVEL3R2pGEKbuy9f 3JK707mGe+x+V4/92NmP2TjPB+En2bRw9vZwSdRYMzxw3fXqQYAb9zTu2u0jG4g9 Gs0IsqEkVrp5LjOupcyGXXm43oHb+TdGHaleC0Z5pLtnu2eSIzhNZD9Xr4o2RvKg ZpNV9xhiOmd0Xr10Q7nBZ2OEF4X4SSyQShrHkDPe0pI7wvOzarMuPFgHohT5QzCp CQXc+8FEJemCg7Mwvs/5 =GIMd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c374efe.8080...@gmail.com
Re: Help for watch file
On 07/09/2010 09:58 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder how I might get a watch file for code.google.com working. > For FreeDiams I tried > > version=3 > http://code.google.com/p/freemedforms/downloads/list \ > http://freemedforms.googlecode.com/files/freediams_([.\d]+).*\.tar\.gz > > but uscan does not find any matching entry - probably because all this > JavaScript which is now injected in this page. Some time ago the watch > file worked this way. version=3 opts=\ downloadurlmangle=s|.*[?]name=(.*?)&.*|http://freemedforms.googlecode.com/files/$1|,\ filenamemangle=s|[^/]+[?]name=(.*?)&.*|$1| \ http://code.google.com/p/freemedforms/downloads/detail[?]name=freediams_([0-9.]+).orig.tar.gz&.* Taken from #581622 "[qa.debian.org] Please provide a code.google.com redirector" Regards, Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c374039.4020...@kvr.at
Re: RFS: sunpinyin - Simplified Chinese Input Method from SUN
Hi, Thomas, On 星期一 05 7月 2010 00:52:47 Thomas Goirand wrote: > Liang Guo wrote: > > Hi, Thomas, > > > > Sorry for not reply until now, and Thank you for your kindly review. > > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sunpinyin/sunpinyin_2.0.2~gi > > t20100627-1.dsc > > Your debian/copyright is still lacking of a copyright notice for the > LGPL-2.1. Added, > > I saw you request, but then that answers ONE of the TWO questions above. > Can you please answer to the 2nd one as well: if they wish to become > maintainer after the first upload, why don't they do the package review > and sponsoring too? I didn't see you asking if they would like to review > your > package... > LI Daobing said he would like sponsor next time, would you like continue to sponsor this time? > >> Replacing the dependency by 0.46.7~ by 0.46-8~bpo50+1 made it work, and > >> should be ok. > > > > I change debian/control to depends on quilt (>= 0.48-7~), 0.48-7 is the > > current git version I use. > > I still couldn't compile it on Lenny. Please set the dependency to: > > quilt (>= 0.46-8~) > > which is enough for the patch feature of Quilt. > > > I resolved almost all lintian warning except > > package-contains-empty-directory, usr/lib/sunpinyin/data is usually used > > to store compiled data from open-gram, but users can use data from other > > sources too, so I think this directory should belongs to libsunpinyin3. > I've re-uploaded my package to mentors.d.n, - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sunpinyin/sunpinyin_2.0.2~git20100627-1.dsc For this package will be uploaded to experimental distribution, would you like check it in a unstable environment ? Regards, -- Liang Guo http://bluestone.cublog.cn signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Can a package be uploaded to unstable before it works correctly in stable ?
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:09:48PM +0800, Liang Guo wrote: > It looks a little hard to make sunpinyin be compiled and packaged in lenny, > so > before I do, I want to know can a package be uploaded to unstable before it > works correctly in stable? If No, I'll fix this problem as soon as possible. New packages aren't uploaded to stable at all. Packages are uploaded to unstable, we gradually assemble them all in testing and then when we make a release, they all move to stable together. So, prepare and test your package for unstable and have it sponsored, and ignore stable. It will reach there eventually. -- Jonathan Wiltshire 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Can a package be uploaded to unstable before it works correctly in stable ?
Dear Mentors, I'm packaging sunpinyin, a Chinese input method, and Thomas Goirand is sponsoring it. sunpinyin can be compiled and packaged in my Debian unstable environment, but it fails when build in lenny environment[1] I build a clean lenny environment, and try to compile and package sunpinyin, but dpkg-buildpackage failed in build dependency check, sunpinyin need debhelper (>= 7.0.50~) and quilt (>= 0.0.46-7). debehelper(>=7.0.50~) is added by dh_make, and quilt (>= 0.0.46-7) is added to eliminate a lintian warning. But the versions in lenny is debhelper 7.0.15 and quilt 0.46-6, so sunpinyin failed in build dependency check stage. The versions in lenny-backports is debhelper 7.4.11~bpo50+1 and quilt 0.46-8~bpo50+1, they fit the build dependency. But is backports.org a part of debian NOW? should it be used in a clean room environment ? It looks a little hard to make sunpinyin be compiled and packaged in lenny, so before I do, I want to know can a package be uploaded to unstable before it works correctly in stable? If No, I'll fix this problem as soon as possible. [1]http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2010/07/msg00042.html Regards, -- Liang Guo http://bluestone.cublog.cn signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
RFS: cba
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cba". * Package name: cba Version : 0.3.6-1 Upstream Author : pierrot * URL : http://cbeam.sourceforge.net * License : gpl Section : science It builds these binary packages: cba- continuous beam analysis The upload would fix these bugs: 561090 My motivation for maintaining this package is: small but useful engineering tool. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cba - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cba/cba_0.3.6-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards pierrot -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c371359.8010...@gmx.net
Re: RFS: archivemount (new package, 2nd try)
Hi, On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 05:40:06PM -0500, Romain Beauxis wrote: > Le jeudi 8 juillet 2010 11:28:09, Nanakos Chrysostomos a écrit : > > Dear mentors, > > Hi ! > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "archivemount". > > > > * Package name: archivemount > > Version : 0.6.1-1 > > Upstream Author : [Andre Landwehr ] > > * URL : [http://www.cybernoia.de/software/archivemount/] > > * License : [LGPL] > > Section : utils > > > > It builds these binary packages: > > archivemount - mounts an archive for access as a file system. > > > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > Not here, though it is minor: > N: Processing source package archivemount (version 0.6.1-1) ... > W: archivemount source: timewarp-standards-version (2010-06-24 < 2010-06-28) > N: > N:The source package refers to a Standards-Version that was released after > N:the date of the most recent debian/changelog entry. Perhaps you forgot > N:to update the timestamp in debian/changelog before building the package? > N: > N:Severity: normal, Certainty: certain > N: Fixed. > N: > N: Processing binary package archivemount (version 0.6.1-1) ... > I: archivemount: description-synopsis-might-not-be-phrased-properly > N: > N:The synopsis (first line in the package "Description:" field, the short > N:description) ends with a full stop "." character. This is not necessary, > N:as the synopsis doesn't need to be a full sentence. It is recommended > N:that a descriptive phrase is used instead. > N: > N:Note also that the synopsis is not part of the rest of the > N:"Description:" field. > N: > N:Refer to Debian Developer's Reference section 6.2.2 (The package > N:synopsis, or short description) for details. > N: > N:Severity: minor, Certainty: possible > N: > N: Removing /tmp/bOng9fFHNZ ... > > Fixed. Lintian v2.4.2 used. > > The upload would fix these bugs: 587029 > > > > My motivation for maintaining this package is: > > It is a very useful tool for mounting archives with the > > use of FUSE and accessing it as a file system. > > Indeed, this looks interesting. Building seems fine and the debian packaging > looks ok. > > Two remarks though: > * Minor: You don't need to list README.Debian in the docs, it is installed > anyway Fixed. > * Major: You got the license version wrong. The licence claimed by the > author > is LGPL version 2 and not 3 as mentioned in the debian/copyright file. Fixed also. > > Also, as a side note, since the build system is pretty standard, I would look > at some tool like cdbs of dh to simplify debian/rules, but that's your call > here :) > > In the next version?? -:) Thanks, Chris. > Romain > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201007081740.06960.to...@rastageeks.org > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100709093349.ga2...@dinofilaria.home
Re: Help for watch file
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 04:13:55PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > You'll need a downloadurlmangle too: > > version=3 > opts=downloadurlmangle=s_^.*name=([^&]*).*_http://freemedforms.googlecode.com/files/$1_ > \ > http://code.google.com/p/freemedforms/downloads/list \ > .*name=freediams_([\d\.]+)\.orig\.tar\.gz.* $ uscan --verbose --verbose -- Scanning for watchfiles in . -- Found watchfile in ./debian -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line: opts=downloadurlmangle=s_^.*name=([^&]*).*_http://freemedforms.googlecode.com/files/$1_ http://code.google.com/p/freemedforms/downloads/list .*name=freediams_([\d\.]+)\.orig\.tar\.gz.* -- Found the following matching hrefs: detail?name=freediams_0.4.2.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.4.2.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.4.2.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.4.2.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.4.2.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.3.0.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.3.0.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.3.0.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.3.0.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.3.0.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.1.4.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.1.4.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.1.4.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.1.4.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.1.4.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= detail?name=freediams_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz&can=2&q= Newest version on remote site is 0.4.2, local version is 0.4.0 => detail already in package directory -- Scan finished Unfortunately no downloads are happening (but see my last mail because of the orig.tar.gz naming issue). Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100709084037.gb6...@an3as.eu
Re: Help for watch file
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 06:10:16PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > I just did it for irqbalance. > > cat debian/watch > version=3 > http://code.google.com/p/irqbalance/downloads/list \ > .*irqbalance-([\d\.]+).tbz2.* According to this example this works ersion=3 http://code.google.com/p/freemedforms/downloads/list \ .*freediams_([.\d]+).*\.tar\.gz.* for *detecting* that there is actually a new version, but it does not download from the server. Is this possibly connected to the problem that upstream names his tarball just orig.tar.gz (I told him not to do this - but this might take just some more releases ;-))? Newest version on remote site is 0.4.2., local version is 0.4.0 => detail already in package directory -- Scan finished Thanks for your help anyway Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100709083644.ga6...@an3as.eu
Re: Help for watch file
2010/7/9 Aníbal Monsalve Salazar : > I just did it for irqbalance. > > cat debian/watch > version=3 > http://code.google.com/p/irqbalance/downloads/list \ > .*irqbalance-([\d\.]+).tbz2.* You'll need a downloadurlmangle too: version=3 opts=downloadurlmangle=s_^.*name=([^&]*).*_http://freemedforms.googlecode.com/files/$1_ \ http://code.google.com/p/freemedforms/downloads/list \ .*name=freediams_([\d\.]+)\.orig\.tar\.gz.* -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikmukpa5jl3pzttfund2xbogyhc26poxoz7y...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Help for watch file
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 09:58:20AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi, > >I wonder how I might get a watch file for code.google.com working. >For FreeDiams I tried > >version=3 >http://code.google.com/p/freemedforms/downloads/list \ > http://freemedforms.googlecode.com/files/freediams_([.\d]+).*\.tar\.gz > >but uscan does not find any matching entry - probably because all this >JavaScript which is now injected in this page. Some time ago the watch >file worked this way. > >Any idea? I just did it for irqbalance. cat debian/watch version=3 http://code.google.com/p/irqbalance/downloads/list \ .*irqbalance-([\d\.]+).tbz2.* >Kind regards Cheers! >Andreas. > >-- >http://fam-tille.de signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Help for watch file
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I wonder how I might get a watch file for code.google.com working. Sounds like Google changed their HTML again, which broke the redirector too: http://googlecode.debian.net/p/freemedform/ -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimxsxsrcp_kzwkq47dt-cgrmfwcqwnwi_kju...@mail.gmail.com
Help for watch file
Hi, I wonder how I might get a watch file for code.google.com working. For FreeDiams I tried version=3 http://code.google.com/p/freemedforms/downloads/list \ http://freemedforms.googlecode.com/files/freediams_([.\d]+).*\.tar\.gz but uscan does not find any matching entry - probably because all this JavaScript which is now injected in this page. Some time ago the watch file worked this way. Any idea? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100709075820.ga5...@an3as.eu
Re: Help with autoconf / libtool
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 10:16:35AM +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote: > > and @GENERIC_LIBRARY_VERSION@ is not a standard name, but rather > > something the other projects that use it have defined in their > > configure.ac (and I'd hardcode it in the Makefile.am). > > Yep. In this case, that's already defined in configure.ac, though. I can confirm that the solution works and upstream is happy. Thanks for your help Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100709073813.gh2...@an3as.eu
