RFS: iroffer-dinoex

2010-08-08 Thread Firas Kraiem
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "iroffer-dinoex".

* Package name: iroffer-dinoex
  Version : 3.23-1
  Upstream Author : Dirk Meyer 
* URL : http://iroffer.dinoex.net/
* License : GPLv2
  Section : net

It builds these binary packages:
iroffer-dinoex - IRC file distribution bot

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 580686

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/iroffer-dinoex
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/iroffer-dinoex/iroffer-dinoex_3.23-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
 Firas Kraiem

P.S. : The ITP bug is for version 3.21.  I already sent a RFS for that
version, but got no answer, and I got busy afterwards, so didn't have
the time to get back at it until now, when 3.23 is out.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c5e58e7.3050...@fkraiem.org



Re: RFS: sisc

2010-08-08 Thread David Banks
I have uploaded a new package for sisc in response to Torsten's points.

On 28 July 2010 19:04, Torsten Werner  wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:10 PM, David Banks  wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sisc".
>
> I have some questions / notes:
>
> - Is there a reason for not putting the jar files into /usr/share/java
> to comply to the Debian java policy?

I now install the jars to /usr/share/java in compliance with the policy.

> - May you split the changes to the upstream sources into individual
> patches into debian/patches please?

This is now done.

> - What is means with "Relies on the java2-runtime virtual package,
> which is not by default available in Debian main." in README.Debian?

Ah, that was from the old debian packaging by the maintainer, which I
adapted.  (Statement was probably accurate in those days.)  I have now
removed this file altogether, as it contained nothing else.

> - Please add the full text of the MPL to debian/copyright.

Now done in DEP-5 form.

> - Prerm should only remove alternatives when called with 'remove' as
> the first argument to avoid overwriting user made changes during
> upgrades.

Done.

> - The file seems to have a different license. Please check again.

Not quite sure what you mean here?  which file?

Thanks for your time.

Cheers,
-- 
David Banks  


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=s4tuq+lj3unvox=x=hmp=ygvjwcpgi9wfc...@mail.gmail.com



Re: .deb package for a library generation

2010-08-08 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 2010-08-08 15:45, Zvi Dubitzky wrote:
> I need to generate a Debian package for a library 
> As an exercise I tried it with   libvirt . 
> I am running a Ubuntu 8.10 . and use the libvirt.0.6.1 tar.gz 
> 

Hi,

Thanks for your interest in Debian, unfortunately I do not have a lot of
time so this message will be rather brief.

I have added the mail to debian-ment...@l.d.o which is our dedicated
mailing lists for how to do packaging and put you in CC, since I was
unsure whether you would receive the email otherwise.

> 
> For the library package I followed the Ubuntu instructions at  : 
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Basic
> (I first generated  a .deb for the hello program and it  went ok)
> For the library I did :
> 1.  got the tar of libvirt .  made a copy to orig.tar.gz
> 2. untarred the tared library . cd to the untarred code
> 3.  there ran :  dh_make -e your.maintai...@address . This created the 
> debian directory. Got no bad 
>  commnetsfrom lintian.
> 
> 4. ran : debuild -S -us -uc  (to avoid gpg for now)
> That generated the ../*.dsc and ../*.diff.gz  . Looks ok.
> 
> 5. ran: sudo pbuilder build ../*.dsc  ( changed the debian/rules to have 
> ./configure --with-xen=no otherwise
>it complained about xs_read missing in libxenstore - which exists . 
> libxen3, libxen3-deb are installed ok)
> 
>   But now during the ./confugre run I get the following message :
> 
> .
> checking for pkg-config... no
> checking libxml2 xml2-config >= 2.5.0 ... configure: error: Could not find 
> libxml2 anywhere (see config.log for details).
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1
> dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
> pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package
>  -> Aborting with an error
>  -> unmounting dev/pts filesystem
>  -> unmounting proc filesystem
>  -> cleaning the build env
> ...
> 
> pkg-config is installed and the newest . libxml2 is installed  and newest 
> (/usr/lib/) and  xml2-config --version gives  2.6.32
> 
> so why does the system complain : Could not find libxml2 anywhere  . BTW: 
> config.log was not generated yet .
> 
> Any idea/ help ?
> 
> thanks
> 
> Zvi Dubitzky 
> Email:d...@il.ibm.com
> IBM Haifa Research LaboratoryPhone: +972-4-8296182
> Haifa, 31905, ISRAEL 
> 
> 
> 


dh_make cannot deduce every Build-Dependency of your package, which is
likely to be your problem. As I recall (but I have not used it in a
while) it only generate a set of template files to get you started.
  Also pbuilder builds your package in a "clean chroot" where it only
installs the packages listed in Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep of
your debian/control (+ the "build-essential" packages).

So you probably have to open the debian/control file and add the correct
build dependencies there.

I apologize for the short answer with no reference to relevant
information, but I am really out of time :)
  I am about to leave DebConf10 (like a lot of other Debian people).

~Niels

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEAREIAAYFAkxewlcACgkQVCqoiq1YlqykKACfTId9Pw0Q2yerPPeuUXnyZbFU
QIAAoMV8gYAjuecmaHjkN8bdvPdwENWX
=GAMJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c5ec258.8080...@thykier.net



Re: .deb package for a library generation

2010-08-08 Thread vincent carmona
2010/8/8, Niels Thykier :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2010-08-08 15:45, Zvi Dubitzky wrote:
>> I need to generate a Debian package for a library
>> As an exercise I tried it with   libvirt .
>> I am running a Ubuntu 8.10 . and use the libvirt.0.6.1 tar.gz
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your interest in Debian, unfortunately I do not have a lot of
> time so this message will be rather brief.
>
> I have added the mail to debian-ment...@l.d.o which is our dedicated
> mailing lists for how to do packaging and put you in CC, since I was
> unsure whether you would receive the email otherwise.
>
>>
>> For the library package I followed the Ubuntu instructions at  :
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Basic
>> (I first generated  a .deb for the hello program and it  went ok)
>> For the library I did :
>> 1.  got the tar of libvirt .  made a copy to orig.tar.gz
>> 2. untarred the tared library . cd to the untarred code
>> 3.  there ran :  dh_make -e your.maintai...@address . This created the
>> debian directory. Got no bad
>>  commnetsfrom lintian.
>>
>> 4. ran : debuild -S -us -uc  (to avoid gpg for now)
>> That generated the ../*.dsc and ../*.diff.gz  . Looks ok.
>>
>> 5. ran: sudo pbuilder build ../*.dsc  ( changed the debian/rules to have
>> ./configure --with-xen=no otherwise
>>it complained about xs_read missing in libxenstore - which exists .
>> libxen3, libxen3-deb are installed ok)
>>
>>   But now during the ./confugre run I get the following message :
>>
>> .
>> checking for pkg-config... no
>> checking libxml2 xml2-config >= 2.5.0 ... configure: error: Could not find
>>
>> libxml2 anywhere (see config.log for details).
>> make: *** [config.status] Error 1
>> dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
>> pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package
>>  -> Aborting with an error
>>  -> unmounting dev/pts filesystem
>>  -> unmounting proc filesystem
>>  -> cleaning the build env
>> ...
>>
>> pkg-config is installed and the newest . libxml2 is installed  and newest
>> (/usr/lib/) and  xml2-config --version gives  2.6.32
>>
>> so why does the system complain : Could not find libxml2 anywhere  . BTW:
>> config.log was not generated yet .
>>
>> Any idea/ help ?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> Zvi Dubitzky
>> Email:d...@il.ibm.com
>> IBM Haifa Research LaboratoryPhone: +972-4-8296182
>> Haifa, 31905, ISRAEL
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> dh_make cannot deduce every Build-Dependency of your package, which is
> likely to be your problem. As I recall (but I have not used it in a
> while) it only generate a set of template files to get you started.
>   Also pbuilder builds your package in a "clean chroot" where it only
> installs the packages listed in Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep of
> your debian/control (+ the "build-essential" packages).
>
> So you probably have to open the debian/control file and add the correct
> build dependencies there.
>
> I apologize for the short answer with no reference to relevant
> information, but I am really out of time :)
>   I am about to leave DebConf10 (like a lot of other Debian people).
>
> ~Niels
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEAREIAAYFAkxewlcACgkQVCqoiq1YlqykKACfTId9Pw0Q2yerPPeuUXnyZbFU
> QIAAoMV8gYAjuecmaHjkN8bdvPdwENWX
> =GAMJ
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c5ec258.8080...@thykier.net
>
>

Hi.

I think you need libxml2-dev package to build your package and not only libxml2.

-- 
Vincent Carmona


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimto2nu2agjqg2rmm-5mx8x6xx_wwuq2tdcd...@mail.gmail.com



Re: RFS: service-wrapper-java

2010-08-08 Thread tony mancill
On 08/06/2010 07:58 AM, Rémi Debay wrote:
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "service-wrapper-java".
> 
> * Package name : service-wrapper-java
> Version : 3.5.3-1
> Upstream Author : Tanuki Software Ltd
> * URL : http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/
> * License : GPLv2
> Section : java
> 
> It builds these binary packages:
> service-wrapper-java - Jar daemon wrapper
> 
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
> The upload would fix these bugs: 591758

Hello Rémi,

I've taken a look at this package and have a few questions:

1)  The package isn't lintian clean from what I can see.  The
/usr/sbin/wrapper command doesn't include a manpage, which should be a
warning for any recent version of lintian.  There is also a warning
about the standards version; the current standards version is 3.9.1.
These are both minor and easily addressed.

2)  You are installing the JNI libraries in /usr/lib/service-wrapper/.
According to Java policy, you should be installing the C compiled bits
under /usr/lib/jni/.  Specifically see
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/c43.html.  I
think ideally your packaging would produce (2) binary packages, one
arch: all package that contains the wrapper script and the JAR, and then
another arch: any package that contains the JNI libraries per platform.

3)  I was curious about setting -Dbits=32 in Debian rules.  Will this
work on all architectures, or does it imply a 32-bit JVM?

4)  You may also want to review the information about javahelper here:
http://wiki.debian.org/Java/Packaging

Regards,
tony



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature