RFS: gnustep-base (updated package)

2011-02-13 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.20.2-1
of my package gnustep-base.

It builds these binary packages:
gnustep-base-common - GNUstep Base library - common files
gnustep-base-doc - Documentation for the GNUstep Base Library
gnustep-base-examples - Examples using the GNUstep Base Library
gnustep-base-runtime - GNUstep Base library - daemons and tools
libgnustep-base-dev - GNUstep Base header files and development libraries
libgnustep-base1.20 - GNUstep Base library
libgnustep-base1.20-dbg - GNUstep Base library - debugging symbols

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 588396

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-base
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-base/gnustep-base_1.20.2-1.dsc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87hbc8p6hg.GNUs_Not_Unix!%ya...@gnu.org



Re: RFS: gnustep-base (updated package)

2011-02-13 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il 13/02/2011 11:35, Yavor Doganov ha scritto:
 I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.20.2-1
 of my package gnustep-base.

Uploaded.

-- 
  .''`.
 :  :' :   Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org
 `.  `'
   `-



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


RFS: haserl (second try)

2011-02-13 Thread Chow Loong Jin
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package haserl.

* Package name: haserl
  Version : 0.9.27-1
  Upstream Author : Nathan Angelacos nan...@users.sourceforge.net
* URL : http://haserl.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-2
  Section : interpreters

It builds these binary packages:
haserl - CGI scripting program for embedded environments

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 611445

My motivation for maintaining this package is: I'm developing a web interface
for configuring an embedded device using Haserl, and having haserl installed as
a package makes testing locally much easier. It can also be used for CGI
scripting in non-embedded environments.

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/haserl
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/haserl/haserl_0.9.27-1.dsc
- git clone git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/haserl.git

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.


P.S. Please CC me in any replies, as I am not subscribed to debian-mentors.

-- 
Kind regards,
Loong Jin





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Which files will be recorded within DEBIAN/conffiles?

2011-02-13 Thread Regid Ichira
I have a Debian source package.
By inspecting its content, how can I tell in advance which files will be
recorded within DEBIAN/conffiles?  Are there documents or URLs  that
discuss that question?


  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/405478.45189...@web120711.mail.ne1.yahoo.com



Re: Which files will be recorded within DEBIAN/conffiles?

2011-02-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Regid Ichira regi...@yahoo.com wrote:

 I have a Debian source package.
 By inspecting its content, how can I tell in advance which files will be
 recorded within DEBIAN/conffiles?  Are there documents or URLs  that
 discuss that question?

It depends on your package's debian/rules file. IIRC by default
debhelper declares everything under /etc to be a conffile and it is
possible to override that if you want to use ucf or similar.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=wkeecs2cc6rtysbum5oyhimnl0+dd1bgow...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Which files will be recorded within DEBIAN/conffiles?

2011-02-13 Thread Wang Lei
Regid Ichira regi...@yahoo.com writes:

 I have a Debian source package.
 By inspecting its content, how can I tell in advance which files will be
 recorded within DEBIAN/conffiles?  Are there documents or URLs  that
 discuss that question?

If you haven't read DebianPolicy and Debian Developer's Reference, there
have something helpful.

-- 
Regards
Lei


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d57ce66.c438e70a.1f4e.4...@mx.google.com



RFS: libapache2-mod-authn-yubikey

2011-02-13 Thread Alexandre De Dommelin
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package libapache2-mod-authn-yubikey.

* Package name: libapache2-mod-authn-yubikey
  Version : 1.0-1
  Upstream Author : Jens Frey
* URL : http://www.coffeecrew.org/software/yubikey-apache-plugin/
* License : Apache-2
  Section : web

It builds these binary packages:
libapache2-mod-authn-yubikey - Yubikey authentication provider for Apache

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 612810

I'd like to see it included in Debian because i'm using my yubikey for
authentication every day, and I it would make my life easier :-)

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authn-yubikey
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
  contrib non-free
- dget
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authn-yubikey/libapache2-mod-authn-yubikey_1.0-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards

--
,''`. Alexandre De Dommelin
: :': http://www.tuxz.net/blog | IRC : adedommelin
. `'  GnuPG : http://www.tuxz.net/adedommelin.asc
`-


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: RFS: gts (updated package)

2011-02-13 Thread Muammar El Khatib
Hi Ruben, 

On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:45:06AM -0500, Ruben Molina wrote:
 Dear mentors,
 
 I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.6+darcs101112-1
 of my package gts.
 

Please, update the Format-Specification field of debian/copyright. Your watch
file is reporting a new version of the package. Do you have an specific reason
for uploading this version instead of the newest one?

More than that your package seems pretty good, and I'd be glad of uploading it
for you after clarifying what I wrote above.

Best Regards,
-- 
Muammar El Khatib.
Linux user: 403107.
Key fingerprint = 90B8 BFC4 4A75 B881 39A3 1440 30EB 403B 1270 29F1
http://muammar.me | http://proyectociencia.org  
  ,''`.
 : :' :
 `. `'
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110213154202.ga28...@prank.debian.org



Re: Re: Rules Makefile, Permission Denied

2011-02-13 Thread Jim sonodrome
Hey Daniel,

Thanks for your help, I have read through a lot of documentation and
manuals but I've found it pretty difficult to find the right answers,
after your explanation I've only just realized that the paths in the
makefile build a kind of mirror of the paths I intend to install to
(except within debian/packagename), I knew I wasn't supposed to be
installing things directly in the makefile, I just didn't fully grasp
how it worked (face palm moment).

Thanks again for your time.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=-D70_XaDCDwaQgHpDidxQ4=wfvwkzpxo3e...@mail.gmail.com



Re: RFS: tintii (updated package) (second try)

2011-02-13 Thread Daniel Echeverry
Hi,

2011/2/7 Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org:
 Hi,

 Daniel Echeverry epsilo...@gmail.com writes:
 I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2.3-3
 of my package tintii.

 Your changes look okay, but a bit nitpicking about the changelog:

  + Bumped standard versions 3.9.1
 Please mention when no changes were done to comply with the new policy.
 It makes reviewing a bit easier :)


Done!

  + Set myself as Maintainer
 Which is more or less the same as New maintainer. in the first line :)


Done!.

  * Switch from override_* targets to files in debian/
 There were no override_* targets in d/rules before.  The only change I
 can see is renaming dirs (docs, manpages) to tintii.dirs.


Removed.

 As the debhelper build-dep was also bumped to 7.0.50, did you maybe
 change the package to use override_* targets and then removed them
 again?


Fixed.

Please checkout
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tintii/tintii_2.2.3-3.dsc

Regards
Daniel

-- 
Epsilon
http://www.rinconinformatico.net
http://www.fitnessdeportes.com
http://www.dragonjar.org
Linux user: #477840
Debian user


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimjyo9v4e+kl+x-jlvb_-rnjyul+vu3x_gjp...@mail.gmail.com



RE: installing an end user editable file

2011-02-13 Thread james frize
Hi,

Got my Debian packages almost fully working now, everything
installs/uninstalls without error.
However, when I try to run the newly installed program it wont work
properly as it lacks permission to save to file.

My program loads a list of hyperlinks from a text file (links.txt),
this text file is currently in usr/share/packagename (I've also
tried to install it directly to home/user/Documents but that didn't
work either)

I want my makefile to install links.txt in a manner that will allow my
end user to write to the file without permission violation.

Cheers.

Here's the makefile so far:

#!/usr/bin/make -f
# Sample debian/rules that uses debhelper.
# This file is public domain software, originally written by Joey Hess.
#
# This version is for packages that are architecture independent.

# Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode.
#export DH_VERBOSE=1

icon = $(CURDIR)/link-lizard-icon.png
script = $(CURDIR)/gtk-link-lizard.py
launcher = $(CURDIR)/gtk-link-lizard.desktop
links = $(CURDIR)/links.txt

DEST1 = $(CURDIR)/debian/gtk-link-lizard/usr/share/gtk-link-lizard-1.4
DEST2 = $(CURDIR)/debian/gtk-link-lizard/usr/share/applications

build: build-stamp

build-stamp:
dh_testdir

# Add here commands to compile the package.
#$(MAKE)

touch build-stamp

clean:
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp

# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
#$(MAKE) clean
#$(MAKE) distclean

dh_clean

install: build clean $(icon) $(script) $(links) $(launcher)
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_prep
dh_installdirs

mkdir -m 777 -p $(DEST1)
mkdir -m 777 -p $(DEST2)

install -m 777 $(icon) $(DEST1)
install -m 777 $(script) $(DEST1)
install -m 777 $(links) $(DEST1)
install -m 777 $(launcher) $(DEST2)

# Add here commands to install the package into debian/packagename.
#$(MAKE) prefix=`pwd`/debian/`dh_listpackages`/usr install

# Build architecture-independent files here.
binary-indep: build install
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_installchangelogs
dh_installdocs
dh_installexamples
#   dh_installmenu
#   dh_installdebconf
#   dh_installlogrotate
#   dh_installemacsen
#   dh_installcatalogs
#   dh_installpam
#   dh_installmime
#   dh_installinit
#   dh_installcron
#   dh_installinfo
#   dh_installwm
#   dh_installudev
#   dh_lintian
#   dh_bugfiles
#   dh_undocumented
dh_installman
dh_link
dh_compress
dh_fixperms
#   dh_perl
dh_installdeb
dh_gencontrol
dh_md5sums
dh_builddeb

# Build architecture-dependent files here.
binary-arch: build install
# We have nothing to do by default.

binary: binary-indep binary-arch
.PHONY: build clean binary-indep binary-arch binary install


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktim+ycpsifcrrsxiarehzdqpm4c1o_jludk2j...@mail.gmail.com



Re: installing an end user editable file

2011-02-13 Thread Lars Buitinck
2011/2/13 james frize jamesfr...@gmail.com:
 Got my Debian packages almost fully working now, everything
 installs/uninstalls without error.
 However, when I try to run the newly installed program it wont work
 properly as it lacks permission to save to file.

 My program loads a list of hyperlinks from a text file (links.txt),
 this text file is currently in usr/share/packagename (I've also
 tried to install it directly to home/user/Documents but that didn't
 work either)

 I want my makefile to install links.txt in a manner that will allow my
 end user to write to the file without permission violation.

Sounds like the file should be installed by the program if it is not
found. A default file can be placed in and copied from
/usr/share/packagename if it is provided. I don't think
/home/user/Documents is a good place for this; prefer
~/.packagename/links.txt instead. You'll probably have to patch up
the source code.

If the upstream package wants to modify something in /usr/share, it
violates the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard.

Regards,
Lars


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik2q0x3+xeveytft4vo3sa3ajtbr--77bsgq...@mail.gmail.com



Re: installing an end user editable file

2011-02-13 Thread Julian Taylor
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 17:11 +0100, Lars Buitinck wrote:
 [...]
 I don't think
 /home/user/Documents is a good place for this; prefer
 ~/.packagename/links.txt instead. You'll probably have to patch up
 the source code.
 [...]
 

shouldn't $XDG_CONFIG_HOME (or $HOME/.config if not set) or
$XDG_DATA_HOME ($HOME/.local/share) be used for this kind of data?
http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-0.6.html

Best Regards,
Julian


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


RE: RFS: Cool Reader

2011-02-13 Thread buggins
Hello Rogério,

I've already updated package (fixed issues suggested by Anton Gladky)

== Start quote ==
I've fixed lintinan pedantic findings, changed target to unstable, wrote
machine-readable copyright.

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cr3
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cr3/cr3_3.0.43-12.dsc

 * code compilation complains about warnings, some of them can be
serious (it is up to you)
I've checked warnings and found nothing serious. Will clean them up later.

I have some questions.
Some parts of source package are really not used for debian build (e.g.
wxWidgets frontend, Android frontend, snapshots of zlib, libjpeg, libpng,
libfreetype libraries).
Is it ok to leave them in source package?
Should I add licensing details to debian/copyright for zlib, libjpeg,
libpng, libfreetype libraries? (not used in debian build)
== End quote ==

== Start quote ==
* Formats: epub (non-DRM), fb2, txt, rtf, html, chm, tcr formats
supported, can read books directly from zip archives
* Most complete FB2 format support: styles, tables, footnotes
* Styles can be customized in wide range using external CSS (subset of
CSS2 and CSS3)
* Hyphenation dictionaries (from AlReader or FBReader)
* Pages or scroll view
* Table of contents
* Text search
* Recent books list
* Bookmarks (including comments or corrections for text range)
* Automatic reformatting of .txt files (autodetect headings etc.)
* Customizable look  feel, font face/size/weight, colors for text and
background, images for backgrounds (tiled or stretched)
* Font kerning, anti-aliasing
* Optional floating punctuation on right text bound for justified text
(punctuation and hyphenation signs moved outside right text block bound, for
better visual alignment)
* Formatted book is swapped/cached to file, and can be reopened very
fast. Also, this feature allows to open books larger than available RAM
size.

CoolReader can be considered as competitor of FBReader.
Provides features missing in FBReader: tables, footnotes, CSS styles.

Screenshots are available on http://www.coolreader.org/
== End quote ==

 You should state the version of the GPL that you are using.
It uses GPL-2. Should I repost RFS? Wouldn't it be considered as spam/flood?

 As another point that the potential sponsors would, perhaps, 
 want to know is the
 language in which the program was written, 
 because many have restrictions to some languages.

 A quick glance at the git repository that you informed shows 
 that it is written
 in C++.

Yes, it's written in C++.
Main part is XML/CSS rendering engine, CREngine, used by different
frontends.

There are Qt and wxWidgets frontends for desktop.
(Qt version is under development, wxWidgets is not supported).

Also, there is GUI for e-ink based devices (actually used in Hanlin
V3/V5/V3+ devices, and in Azbooka (aka Hanvon n516) - OpenInkpot.
It uses its own GUI toolkit, and requires only simple wrapper for screen and
keyboard access (currently, supports nanoX and xcb backends).

There is also Android port (uses CRengine as JNI library, and frontend
written in Java for Android).

For Symbian smartphones there is SmartReader - port of coolreader.



I'll try to fix cppcheck findings and compilation warnings.

Once it's done, should I repost RFS for the package?




Best regards,
Vadim


-Original Message-
From: Rogério Brito [mailto:rbr...@ime.usp.br] 
Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2011 2:43 PM
To: bugg...@fromru.com
Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFS: Cool Reader

Dear Vadim,

On 02/02/2011 07:33 AM, bugg...@fromru.com wrote:
 I am looking for a sponsor for my package cr3 (Cool Reader 3).
 
   Package name: cr3
   Version : 3.0.43-2
   License : GPL

You should state the version of the GPL that you are using.

 It builds these binary packages:
 cr3 - e-book reader

As I very recently bought a Nokia N900 and the current ebook readers are
very,
very slow with some books that I purchased from O'Reilly, I am on the
market
for an alternative and yours sounds promising.

But you, perhaps, forgot to include the debian.tar.gz file that contains the
packaging itself:


http://sourceforge.net/projects/crengine/files/CoolReader3/cr3-3.0.43/cr3_3.
 0.43.orig.tar.gz/download

http://sourceforge.net/projects/crengine/files/CoolReader3/cr3-3.0.43/cr3_3.
 0.43-2.dsc/download 

http://sourceforge.net/projects/crengine/files/CoolReader3/cr3-3.0.43/cr3_3.
 0.43-2_i386.changes/download
(...)

As another point that the potential sponsors would, perhaps, want to know is
the
language in which the program was written, because many have restrictions to
some languages.

A quick glance at the git repository that you informed shows 

RFS: archivemount (updated package)

2011-02-13 Thread Nanakos Chrysostomos
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.1-2
of my package archivemount.

It builds these binary packages:
archivemount - mounts an archive for access as a file system

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 613119

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/archivemount
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 
contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/archivemount/archivemount_0.6.1-2.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
 Nanakos Chrysostomos


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: RFS: gts (updated package)

2011-02-13 Thread Ruben Molina
El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 16:42 +0100, Muammar El Khatib escribió:
 On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:45:06AM -0500, Ruben Molina wrote:
  I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.6+darcs101112-1
  of my package gts.
 Please, update the Format-Specification field of debian/copyright. Your watch
 file is reporting a new version of the package. Do you have an specific reason
 for uploading this version instead of the newest one?

Hi Muammar,
Thanks for your review. 

I updated the format of debian/copyright to DEP-5 Rev. 166, and I also
packaged the latest upstream tarball. I hadn't noticed this new release,
but in fact is just including a patch we forwarded from Debian.

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gts/gts_0.7.6+darcs110121-1.dsc

Kind regards
 Ruben


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: RFS: tintii (updated package) (second try)

2011-02-13 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi,

Daniel Echeverry epsilo...@gmail.com writes:
 I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2.3-3
 of my package tintii.

I just uploaded the package from mentors.d.n.  Thanks for your work :)

Regards,
Ansgar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8739nretqf@marvin.43-1.org



Re: installing an end user editable file

2011-02-13 Thread Lars Buitinck
2011/2/13 Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com:
 On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 17:11 +0100, Lars Buitinck wrote:
 [...]
 I don't think
 /home/user/Documents is a good place for this; prefer
 ~/.packagename/links.txt instead. You'll probably have to patch up
 the source code.
 [...]


 shouldn't $XDG_CONFIG_HOME (or $HOME/.config if not set) or
 $XDG_DATA_HOME ($HOME/.local/share) be used for this kind of data?
 http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-0.6.html

Ah, yes, excuse me.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTikRn5kDKmJNrg1FynWjAy-A1U-_=jziqc+5z...@mail.gmail.com



Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package)

2011-02-13 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi,

Nanakos Chrysostomos nana...@wired-net.gr writes:
 I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.1-2
 of my package archivemount.

Please use linux-any in the Architecture field if this should be built
only on the Linux ports.  Hurd doesn't have fuse-utils either so it
should also be dropped.

Also the formatting of the list in the package description was changed
and lots of trailing whitespace added.  It might no longer be displayed
correctly due to these changes.  See also [1] for the reason the leading
two spaces.

Regards,
Ansgar

[2] 
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Description


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y65jde85@marvin.43-1.org



Re: RFS: liblastfmlib

2011-02-13 Thread Andreas Noteng
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 02/13/2011 08:38 AM, Peter Miller wrote:
 On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 19:25 +0100, Andreas Noteng wrote:
 The package appears to be lintian clean.
 
 I am not a DD, but I see no other responses.  In my experience, it is
 worth trying for 'lintian --pedantic' clean, not just lintian clean.

The package seems to be --pedantic clean too..

 
 I read somewhere that library packages should be named lib*,
 
 This is correct, you must name library packages lib*.
 I can't quote the exact Policy section, tho.

I've renamed the package. It's available on mentors here:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/liblastfmlib/liblastfmlib_0.4.0-1.dsc
Git: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/liblastfmlib.git;a=summary

Can I just ssh in and delete the folder to get rid of the old package in
the collab-maint git repo??
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=5uS1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d581c62.8080...@noteng.no



Re: RFS: ulatencyd - Daemon to minimize latency on a linux system using cgroups

2011-02-13 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Alessandro Ghedini wrote:

 Dear mentors,
 
 I am looking for a sponsor for my package ulatencyd.

Hi Alessandro,

I am willing to review and sponsor your package, but don't have time right 
now for the actual review. I will make sure to send an answer to you during 
next week.

Cheers, 

OdyX



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ij96jr$tep$1...@dough.gmane.org



Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package)

2011-02-13 Thread Nanakos Chrysostomos
Hi,

On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 06:41:14PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Nanakos Chrysostomos nana...@wired-net.gr writes:
  I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.1-2
  of my package archivemount.
 
 Please use linux-any in the Architecture field if this should be built
 only on the Linux ports.  Hurd doesn't have fuse-utils either so it
 should also be dropped.

Fixed.

 
 Also the formatting of the list in the package description was changed
 and lots of trailing whitespace added.  It might no longer be displayed
 correctly due to these changes.  See also [1] for the reason the leading
 two spaces.

I think its better that way. Do you agree?

Re-uploaded to mentors.d.n.

Cheers,
Chris.

 
 Regards,
 Ansgar
 
 [2] 
 http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Description
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y65jde85@marvin.43-1.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110213181321.ga3...@dinofilaria.home



Re: RFS: poedit (updated package)

2011-02-13 Thread Pedro Ribeiro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

Any progress with this package ?

Should i make more changes ?

Pedro m42 Ribeiro

On 26-01-2011 09:04, Ryan Niebur wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 08:06:53AM +, Pedro Ribeiro wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Hi there,

 Thanks for the revision.

 Should I correct this and upload a new 1.4.6.1-4 package or keep the
 1.4.6.1-3 version number ?

 
 Keep the previous version number with reuploads to mentors.
 
 My lack of response to the bug ownership changing should be taken as 
 permission.
 Pedro is the only owner of that ITA since me.
 
 Cheers,
 Ryan
 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=MtYQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d5822f0.6080...@gmail.com



Re: Re: installing an end user editable file

2011-02-13 Thread james frize
Cheers Lars,

I'm looking at installing the links.txt file to
~/.packagename/links.txt, but I don't seem to be able to use the
~wildcard.

Using this line in my makefile:

DEST3 = $(CURDIR)/debian/gtk-link-lizard/~/.gtk-link-lizard

It just creates a directory called ~ on the destination drive? It
doesn't seem to want to replace the wildcard with /home/user

I'm also unsure what you mean by patch up the source code?

Thanks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTin1Bdh67Aq0df5QhFzNboDvkSrnen=dh-lug...@mail.gmail.com



Re: RFS: ulatencyd - Daemon to minimize latency on a linux system using cgroups

2011-02-13 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 07:06:50PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
 Hi Alessandro,

Hello

 I am willing to review and sponsor your package, but don't have time right 
 now for the actual review. I will make sure to send an answer to you during 
 next week.

Thank you for your interest. Please note that I've just updated the package
to the latest upstream version.

The new package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/ulatencyd/ulatencyd_0.4.6-1.dsc

And on git.debian.org (same links).

Take the time you need for the review :)

Cheers

-- 
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;inidehG ordnasselA;eg;say~~reverse'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110213191321.GA28386@PC-Ale



Re: RFS: poedit (updated package)

2011-02-13 Thread Tobias Quathamer
Am Sonntag, den 13.02.2011, 18:29 + schrieb Pedro Ribeiro:
 Hi all,
 
 Any progress with this package ?
 
 Should i make more changes ?

Hi Pedro,

you've got a wrong bug number in your changelog. For closing the ITA
bug, you want #543856. Moreover, it would be great if you could add a
debian/watch file.

With regard to using quilt, you might want to remove the
Build-Dependency on quilt, since you're using the source format 3.0. You
need to remove the patch/unpatch logic in debian/rules for that, too.
See http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 for more information.

It would be nice to have a short description of the patch, see
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/quilt-patch-missing-description.html
and
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/

The last nitpick would be that you're using an unnecessary lintian
override, so please remove it.

Other than that, I would be happy to sponsor that package for you. Feel
free to ping me directly when your package is ready.

Regards,
Tobias

-- 
Tobias Quathamer | If God had really intended men to fly,
Hamburg, Germany | he'd make it easier to get to the airport.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: RFS: Cool Reader

2011-02-13 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi, Vadim.

Please, just continue keeping me CC'ed. I am not currently subscribed to
-mentors.

On Feb 13 2011, buggins wrote:
 Hello Rogério,
 
 I've already updated package (fixed issues suggested by Anton Gladky)

Great.

 == Start quote ==
 I've fixed lintinan pedantic findings, changed target to unstable, wrote
 machine-readable copyright.
 
 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
 - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cr3
 - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
 contrib non-free
 - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cr3/cr3_3.0.43-12.dsc

Great. I just downloaded it.

  * code compilation complains about warnings, some of them can be
 serious (it is up to you)
 I've checked warnings and found nothing serious. Will clean them up later.

Some of the problems with reallocating a larger piece of memory may be
critical, especially with embedded computers or phones.

BTW, a new version of cppcheck was just uploaded to unstable and it would be
nice if you could run those.

 I have some questions.
 Some parts of source package are really not used for debian build (e.g.
 wxWidgets frontend, Android frontend, snapshots of zlib, libjpeg, libpng,
 libfreetype libraries).

Right.

 Is it ok to leave them in source package?
 Should I add licensing details to debian/copyright for zlib, libjpeg,
 libpng, libfreetype libraries? (not used in debian build)

Yes, it is OK to leave them in the source package, but you have to state the
license in debian/copyright and, in any case that you have sources with
conflicting licenses, state that what you are doing is OK, since you are not
using them.

 * Formats: epub (non-DRM), fb2, txt, rtf, html, chm, tcr formats
 supported, can read books directly from zip archives
 * Most complete FB2 format support: styles, tables, footnotes
 * Styles can be customized in wide range using external CSS (subset of
 CSS2 and CSS3)
 * Hyphenation dictionaries (from AlReader or FBReader)
 * Pages or scroll view
 * Table of contents
 * Text search
 * Recent books list
 * Bookmarks (including comments or corrections for text range)
 * Automatic reformatting of .txt files (autodetect headings etc.)
 * Customizable look  feel, font face/size/weight, colors for text and
 background, images for backgrounds (tiled or stretched)
 * Font kerning, anti-aliasing
 * Optional floating punctuation on right text bound for justified text
 (punctuation and hyphenation signs moved outside right text block bound, for
 better visual alignment)
 * Formatted book is swapped/cached to file, and can be reopened very
 fast. Also, this feature allows to open books larger than available RAM
 size.

You should add those features to the long description. They are very useful
to know when deciding which package one should install.

 CoolReader can be considered as competitor of FBReader.
 Provides features missing in FBReader: tables, footnotes, CSS styles.

You may tell that in the long description also, but such a comment may
become 

 Screenshots are available on http://www.coolreader.org/

Perhaps you may want to use that page in the Homepage field of the control
file instead of the one from sourceforge?

Also, when your package gets accepted, you may want to choose one screenshot
and upload it to http://screenshots.debian.net.

  You should state the version of the GPL that you are using.
 It uses GPL-2. Should I repost RFS? Wouldn't it be considered as
 spam/flood?

Yes, you *will* have to repost a RFS whenever you update the package. Just
keep in mind that some sponsors *don't* like to see the debian revision
incremented until the package reaches the main Debian repository.

Regarding the license, is it GPL-2 or GPL-2+? If a sponsor runs the
licensecheck program on the crengine directory, he/she will get a lot of No
copyright or UNKNOWN messages.

Just stick some boilerplate in those files and you're done.

  As another point that the potential sponsors would, perhaps, want to
  know is the language in which the program was written, because many have
  restrictions to some languages.
 
  A quick glance at the git repository that you informed shows that it is
  written in C++.
 
 Yes, it's written in C++.  Main part is XML/CSS rendering engine,
 CREngine, used by different frontends.

OK. Please, put the indication of the language in the RFS, so potential
sponsors can decide if they want to upload or not.

 There are Qt and wxWidgets frontends for desktop.
 (Qt version is under development, wxWidgets is not supported).

As a side comment: It's great to have a Qt frontend, especially since the
Nokia N900 comes with it and that would mean one fewer dependency to
install.

 I'll try to fix cppcheck findings and compilation warnings.

Great.

 Once it's done, should I repost RFS for the package?

Yes, definitely.


Hope this helps,

-- 
Rogério Brito : 

Re: Re: installing an end user editable file

2011-02-13 Thread Craig Small
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 06:24:06PM +, james frize wrote:
 I'm looking at installing the links.txt file to
 ~/.packagename/links.txt, but I don't seem to be able to use the
 ~wildcard.
Is this in  rules file? If so you cannot do that at all.  It doesn't
make any sense for a package to install a file in the users home
directory.

Generally there is a /etc/package/whatever file for defaults and any
user specific files would be in /usr/share/doc/package/examples
The file in examples should really tell people what to do, e.g.:

# This is an example file for whatever, you can copy this to
# ~/.whatever/myfile

There are many problems with getting a package installer to install
files in a user's home directory. Perhaps the first one I can think of
is, which user's directory?

 - Craig
-- 
Craig Small VK2XLZhttp://www.enc.com.au/   csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux  http://www.debian.org/   csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint:   1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE  95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110213213840.ga32...@enc.com.au



RFS: volumeicon

2011-02-13 Thread Andrew Gainer
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package volumeicon.

* Package name: volumeicon
  Version : 0.3.0-1
  Upstream Author : Maato (I have contacted upstream to see if he has a 
preferred name, but have not yet heard back)
* URL : http://www.softwarebakery.com/maato/volumeicon.html
* License : GPLv3
  Section : sound

It builds these binary packages:
volumeicon - systray volume icon for alsa

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 586522

My motivation for maintaining this package is: although there are 
volume-control applets for several of the major panels already in Debian, 
nothing is available for Tint2 (my panel of choice) and other more bare-bones 
panel systems. Volumeicon sits in the system tray and is panel-agnostic, so it 
provides this functionality for those who don't use one of the major panels.

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/volumeicon
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 
contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/volumeicon/volumeicon_0.3.0-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Thanks!
-- Andrew Gainer


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Re: installing an end user editable file

2011-02-13 Thread james frize
Hey Craig,

thanks for the help,

Basically I'm copying over a text file that has a list of web links
in, after the program is installed the file needs to be edited by the
end user, so I'm trying to put the file in a place where a regular
user would have permission to both read and write to the text file.

Some people have suggested putting it in home/user/.packageName
but I can't seem to be able to do that, been trying to use ~/ and
$XDG_CONFIG_HOME but I just end up with everything being installed in
folders called ~ or DG_CONFIG_HOME

I need a way of finding the correct user path, I've been reading the
info on this page:
http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-0.6.html
But I can't get my head round that either??

Here's the part of my make file where I specify the destination paths:

# Icon and script go here
DEST1 = $(CURDIR)/debian/gtk-link-lizard/usr/share/gtk-link-lizard-1.4
# Desktop launcher goes here
DEST2 = $(CURDIR)/debian/gtk-link-lizard/usr/share/applications
# Links.txt goes here
DEST3 = $(CURDIR)/debian/gtk-link-lizard/SOMEHOW I NEED THE
HOME/USER PATH HERE??/.gtk-link-lizard

Thanks again.

Jim.

On 13 February 2011 21:38, Craig Small csm...@debian.org wrote:
 On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 06:24:06PM +, james frize wrote:
 I'm looking at installing the links.txt file to
 ~/.packagename/links.txt, but I don't seem to be able to use the
 ~wildcard.
 Is this in  rules file? If so you cannot do that at all.  It doesn't
 make any sense for a package to install a file in the users home
 directory.

 Generally there is a /etc/package/whatever file for defaults and any
 user specific files would be in /usr/share/doc/package/examples
 The file in examples should really tell people what to do, e.g.:

 # This is an example file for whatever, you can copy this to
 # ~/.whatever/myfile

 There are many problems with getting a package installer to install
 files in a user's home directory. Perhaps the first one I can think of
 is, which user's directory?

  - Craig
 --
 Craig Small VK2XLZ    http://www.enc.com.au/       csmall at : enc.com.au
 Debian GNU/Linux      http://www.debian.org/       csmall at : debian.org
 GPG fingerprint:       1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE  95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTikBeVcyM4H
3-xfu4pnihq9qkczp7mlae3...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Re: installing an end user editable file

2011-02-13 Thread james frize
Sorry forgot to clarify, yeah it's in my rules makefile.

On 13 February 2011 21:55, james frize jamesfr...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hey Craig,

 thanks for the help,

 Basically I'm copying over a text file that has a list of web links
 in, after the program is installed the file needs to be edited by the
 end user, so I'm trying to put the file in a place where a regular
 user would have permission to both read and write to the text file.

 Some people have suggested putting it in home/user/.packageName
 but I can't seem to be able to do that, been trying to use ~/ and
 $XDG_CONFIG_HOME but I just end up with everything being installed in
 folders called ~ or DG_CONFIG_HOME

 I need a way of finding the correct user path, I've been reading the
 info on this page:
 http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-0.6.html
 But I can't get my head round that either??

 Here's the part of my make file where I specify the destination paths:

 # Icon and script go here
 DEST1 = $(CURDIR)/debian/gtk-link-lizard/usr/share/gtk-link-lizard-1.4
 # Desktop launcher goes here
 DEST2 = $(CURDIR)/debian/gtk-link-lizard/usr/share/applications
 # Links.txt goes here
 DEST3 = $(CURDIR)/debian/gtk-link-lizard/SOMEHOW I NEED THE
 HOME/USER PATH HERE??/.gtk-link-lizard

 Thanks again.

 Jim.

 On 13 February 2011 21:38, Craig Small csm...@debian.org wrote:
 On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 06:24:06PM +, james frize wrote:
 I'm looking at installing the links.txt file to
 ~/.packagename/links.txt, but I don't seem to be able to use the
 ~wildcard.
 Is this in  rules file? If so you cannot do that at all.  It doesn't
 make any sense for a package to install a file in the users home
 directory.

 Generally there is a /etc/package/whatever file for defaults and any
 user specific files would be in /usr/share/doc/package/examples
 The file in examples should really tell people what to do, e.g.:

 # This is an example file for whatever, you can copy this to
 # ~/.whatever/myfile

 There are many problems with getting a package installer to install
 files in a user's home directory. Perhaps the first one I can think of
 is, which user's directory?

  - Craig
 --
 Craig Small VK2XLZ    http://www.enc.com.au/       csmall at : enc.com.au
 Debian GNU/Linux      http://www.debian.org/       csmall at : debian.org
 GPG fingerprint:       1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE  95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTin_5DvwgAS==spfpatdqdvog7jgcy8iajjap...@mail.gmail.com



Re: RFS: volumeicon

2011-02-13 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
I'm not a DD, no sponsorship here! :)

On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Andrew Gainer gainer.and...@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package volumeicon.

 * Package name    : volumeicon
  Version         : 0.3.0-1
  Upstream Author : Maato (I have contacted upstream to see if he has a 
 preferred name, but have not yet heard back)
 * URL             : http://www.softwarebakery.com/maato/volumeicon.html
 * License         : GPLv3
  Section         : sound

 It builds these binary packages:
 volumeicon - systray volume icon for alsa

 The package appears to be lintian clean.

 The upload would fix these bugs: 586522

 My motivation for maintaining this package is: although there are 
 volume-control applets for several of the major panels already in Debian, 
 nothing is available for Tint2 (my panel of choice) and other more bare-bones 
 panel systems. Volumeicon sits in the system tray and is panel-agnostic, so 
 it provides this functionality for those who don't use one of the major 
 panels.

 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
 - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/volumeicon
 - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 
 contrib non-free
 - dget 
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/volumeicon/volumeicon_0.3.0-1.dsc

 I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

 Thanks!
 -- Andrew Gainer


debian/rules
  I'd remove all the extra comments from the top.
  You can make that file three lines long :)

debian/copyright
  Consider switching to DEP5

patches/fix-oss-reference.patch
  Consider using DEP3
  Why are you including this patch? It looks like if the
  system does not support OSS, it won't use it. Is there
  a bug with the detection?

debian/control
  Please wrap your lines at 80 on the build-depends, it's
  perfectly OK to do that, just bump it in :)

  consider using the Vcs-* control fields, they are quite helpful
  to people looking at the package, or apt-get source folks.
  Also, the PTS picks up on it, which is nice.

  The Suggests line is also for applications that work well with this
  package, not applications that do similar things. I'd remove that line
  ( unless of course, volumeicon may use those in some way, in which
  case it's OK to keep ).

My internet is quite nasty right now, I'll run the build and lintian
when I have a moment on my netbook later in the day ( if no one else
gets back )

Cheers!
Paul

P.S. I recall someone wanting this package in Debian a while back,
thanks for doing it!




-- 
All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors.

#define sizeof(x) rand()
:wq


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikfefpmvsqtkfep-wsg7gjemvnklagsihnmo...@mail.gmail.com



Re: RFS: gts (updated package)

2011-02-13 Thread Muammar El Khatib
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:13:50PM -0500, Ruben Molina wrote:
 El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 16:42 +0100, Muammar El Khatib escribió:
  On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:45:06AM -0500, Ruben Molina wrote:
   I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.6+darcs101112-1
   of my package gts.
  Please, update the Format-Specification field of debian/copyright. Your 
  watch
  file is reporting a new version of the package. Do you have an specific 
  reason
  for uploading this version instead of the newest one?
 
 Hi Muammar,
 Thanks for your review. 
 
 I updated the format of debian/copyright to DEP-5 Rev. 166, and I also
 packaged the latest upstream tarball. I hadn't noticed this new release,
 but in fact is just including a patch we forwarded from Debian.


I see. So, it is OK. 
 
 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
 - dget 
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gts/gts_0.7.6+darcs110121-1.dsc

Uploaded. 

Thanks for your contribution. 

Regards, 

-- 
Muammar El Khatib.
Linux user: 403107.
Key fingerprint = 90B8 BFC4 4A75 B881 39A3 1440 30EB 403B 1270 29F1
http://muammar.me | http://proyectociencia.org  
  ,''`.
 : :' :
 `. `'
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110213223320.ga1...@prank.debian.org



Re: Re: installing an end user editable file

2011-02-13 Thread PJ Weisberg
On 2/13/11, Craig Small csm...@debian.org wrote:
 On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 06:24:06PM +, james frize wrote:
 I'm looking at installing the links.txt file to
 ~/.packagename/links.txt, but I don't seem to be able to use the
 ~wildcard.
 Is this in  rules file? If so you cannot do that at all.  It doesn't
 make any sense for a package to install a file in the users home
 directory.

 Generally there is a /etc/package/whatever file for defaults and any
 user specific files would be in /usr/share/doc/package/examples
 The file in examples should really tell people what to do, e.g.:

 # This is an example file for whatever, you can copy this to
 # ~/.whatever/myfile

 There are many problems with getting a package installer to install
 files in a user's home directory. Perhaps the first one I can think of
 is, which user's directory?

An obvious answer is ALL users' directories, but the question
arises, even users that don't exist yet?  That's why Lars suggested
creating a default file in /usr/share and having the program copy it
to the user's directory when it's run.  You can't do that in the
Debian installer, though, so you would have to patch (i.e. modify) the
source code of the application itself.

Why must this file be user-modifiable?  Must all users of the system
be able to modify it such that everyone then uses the modified file?
What are the possible consequences if one user is an asshole and makes
modifications with the intent of doing damage?

This can be done; many games store a high-score list that anyone can
modify by playing the game.  But have you thought about those issues?
Is it necessary?
-- 

-PJ


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=u3ygyspgo9454jq+w+wf9v2mhfciodhmfh...@mail.gmail.com



Re: installing an end user editable file

2011-02-13 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In AANLkTikBeVcyM4H=0d3-xfu4pnihq9qkczp7mlae3...@mail.gmail.com, james frize 
wrote:
Basically I'm copying over a text file that has a list of web links
in, after the program is installed the file needs to be edited by the
end user, so I'm trying to put the file in a place where a regular
user would have permission to both read and write to the text file.

Which user?  All users?  Should each user have a separate copy?

Normally, per-user configuration files would be created by that user.  An 
example could go into /usr/share/packagename where a user could copy it into 
their home directory.  You could also install something into /etc/skel; the 
contents of this directory are normally copied into a new user's home 
directory when the user is created.

Keep in mind that that while many Debian installations are effectively single-
user, that Debian is designed to support multiple users and to move cleanly 
from having one real user to many real users.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: RFS: volumeicon

2011-02-13 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
[snip]

 debian/copyright
   Consider switching to DEP5

 Hadn't heard of this, but it looks both fancy and good. Done.

Great! :) It's nice for making stuff machine parse-able.

[snip]

 The source can be built *either* for OSS or for ALSA; when built for OSS, one 
 of the library references doesn't line up with Debian's file structure, so 
 this patch changed it. Presently, however, I'm building only the ALSA 
 version, so this patch is unnecessary. Removed.

Cool. Upstream might want to know about the bug so that it can be
fixed for someone actually trying to use OSS ( but you're right,
secondary to your role as a debian packager ) :)

[snip]


   consider using the Vcs-* control fields, they are quite helpful
   to people looking at the package, or apt-get source folks.
   Also, the PTS picks up on it, which is nice.

 Upstream doesn't have any sort of version control for this project. A quick 
 Googling suggests that this is, however, for version control on the Debian 
 site, which is neat. However, it looks like only DD's get accounts on 
 collab-maint. Should I go ahead and include the git link, then ask my future 
 sponsor to turn on the repository?

You can have it created for you -- I'm not sure ( now that I think
about it ) if you need the package uploaded or not to have it made.
Worth looking into ( your future sponsor will let you know ;) ) for
sure.


   The Suggests line is also for applications that work well with this
   package, not applications that do similar things. I'd remove that
 line ( unless of course, volumeicon may use those in some way, in
 which case it's OK to keep ).

 Volume Icon just provides a status icon and a single volume slider. However, 
 it has the option to invoke a real mixer application on click, so I SUGGESTed 
 a few of these.

100% perfect rational :)

 I did notice one problem with the build system that I don't know how to
 diagnose, which I expect you will see too. Perhaps you can comment on
 it: dpkg-shlibdeps throws a slew of warnings of the form warning:
 dependency on libfontconfig.so.1 could be avoided if
 debian/volumeicon/usr/bin/volumeicon were not uselessly linked
 against it (they use none of its symbols). There are no explicit references
 to the many, many libraries it mentions in the code, so I'm not
 sure where these links are coming from.


Ah, that means that you're doing a -lfontconfig, but it's not being
called anywhere in the code. It's a warning from your linker, just
letting you know that the ELF will be linked against something that
can (and should) be removed.

You can tweek the build flags for that guy (totally worth doing!)


 Thanks again for taking the time to take a look!

 --Andrew


Did the build, I did not see the error. Logs here[1]. Still worth
looking into :)

Built with pbuilder -- 0.198ubuntu2, with a natty chroot, on maverick, i686

[1]: http://pastebin.com/sWmAi9KJ


Good luck ( and keep up the great attitude! )

-Paul

-- 
All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors.

#define sizeof(x) rand()
:wq


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTinnmZWp1d=u_ibyiixqkpg48sn_vhzqa+jpf...@mail.gmail.com



Re: installing an end user editable file

2011-02-13 Thread james frize
Cheers PJ and Boyd,

To be honest I never thought about having multiple users, just
learning about the packaging process and I'm experimenting with what I
can do. But I guess it's a much better idea to have a template and a
copy for each user, will have to add it to the source.

Thanks for the responses.

Jim.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikjh9x_knp-u719qd2ykp0ffn8owbjiz32xs...@mail.gmail.com



Re: RFS: volumeicon

2011-02-13 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
CC'ing -mentors


On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Andrew Gainer gainer.and...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks once again for your help. Just one question, now:

 Ah, that means that you're doing a -lfontconfig, but it's not being
 called anywhere in the code. It's a warning from your linker, just
 letting you know that the ELF will be linked against something that
 can (and should) be removed.

 You can tweek the build flags for that guy (totally worth doing!)


 On investigation, it appears that the problem comes from these three lines in 
 the Makefile.in files:
 GTK_CFLAGS = @GTK_CFLAGS@
 GTK_LIBS = @GTK_LIBS@
 LIBS = @GTK_LIBS@ @ALSA_LIBS@
 where $(LIBS) and $(GTK_CFLAGS) are used later in the actual invocations of 
 the compiler and linker. The variables @GTK_CFLAGS@ and @GTK_LIBS@ are being 
 replaced with calls to lots of libraries, most of which are not needed.
 I don't know much about the Automake system or GTK, so I'm not sure what the 
 correct fix is. For now, I've simply added a patch which replaces the above 
 lines with
 GTK_CFLAGS = -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include
 -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
 GTK_LIBS = -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0
 LIBS = $(GTK_LIBS) $(ALSA_LIBS)
 This seems to represent a minimal subset of the included libraries which are 
 actually required (at least on my system). With this patch in place, debuild 
 runs cleanly and without the warnings. However, I have no idea whether this 
 is the correct response or a fragile/system-specific/generally awful patch. 
 Can you comment?

 --Andrew


Yeah, that can be a bit finikey. It's not the end of the world for
sure, but you might want to look into `pkg-config' to do some of the
work for you :)

It might also be good to test with binutils-gold. I think I have that
on my system -- could be why it worked without error here :)

Cheers!
Paul

-- 
All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors.

#define sizeof(x) rand()
:wq


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik8p2m_o-yawwzedddq3v67puw2pfrvbgbyb...@mail.gmail.com



Re: RFS: volumeicon

2011-02-13 Thread Scott Howard
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 Upstream doesn't have any sort of version control for this project. A quick 
 Googling suggests that this is, however, for version control on the Debian 
 site, which is neat. However, it looks like only DD's get accounts on 
 collab-maint. Should I go ahead and include the git link, then ask my future 
 sponsor to turn on the repository?

 You can have it created for you -- I'm not sure ( now that I think
 about it ) if you need the package uploaded or not to have it made.
 Worth looking into ( your future sponsor will let you know ;) ) for
 sure.


You can get access to the collab-maint git repo without being a DD.
Get a public alioth account (one with -guest appended onto a user
name), upload your ssh key, and then apply for membership with the
collab-maint team [1]. Your ssh key that you upload to alioth will get
you onto alioth.debian.org. From their you can get to the git repo and
set one up for your project [2]. The wiki at [2] has great
instructions on how to do that.

Cheers,
Scott

[1] https://alioth.debian.org/projects/collab-maint/
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/Git


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinl6nsddbhspjdlxkk1ev+epnu1xww8uajn_...@mail.gmail.com