Re: I'm the new developer on parcellite, but the debian maintainer for it hasn't responded
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-03-10 21:14, Doug Springer wrote: Niels, I took over from the original developer, and parcellite is no longer inactive. Hey, That sounds good. There is a fork, it's called clipit, but there were lots of changes occurring, and I thought that parcellite (after a few bugs were addressed) was just fine as it was. I don't mind simple features, but once it looks like klipper, what's the point? Yes, clipit was the fork I was thinking of. As pabs mentioned in a separate email, clipit is currently its own package but there was talk about replacing parcellite with it. My intent it to primarily bug fix/build fix, add bare essentials from time to time, and keep parcellite just as it is - but I've sent Andrew several emails and no response yet. I figured if he doesn't want to maintain it, I'll take over that part as well. How do I go about doing that? As far as I can tell, the maintainer of parcellite is definitely active, since he uploaded a version of parcellite 5 days ago[1]. I have CC'ed Andrew, whom I hope will reply within a couple of days. If you want an active part in maintaining parcellite, your best option right is to offer to become a co-maintainership. [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/parcellite/news/20110306T041708Z.html Best Regards, Doug Springer On 03/10/2011 12:53 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2011-03-10 15:40, doug Springer wrote: Hi, I started developing parcellite because I didn't want it to disappear from the repositories. I've been developing parcellite for several months now and have a new release that's been tested and packaged to i386 and amd64. I'd like to see this make it into main stream. Where do I go from here? I'll can take over the maintenance if I need to. Thanks, Doug Springer Hey, I remember parcellite from a while back; as I recall I managed to reach the maintainer via his other email: andrewsometh...@ubuntu.com That being said; the last I heard was that parcellite was being replaced by a fork, since parcellite was inactive. Unfortunately the name of the fork eludes me at the time. ~Niels -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNed/3AAoJEAVLu599gGRCMIEQAKh2gxbWftckB0/iSkGOcy/v ItL+CX2/EKKVAJUWS+wrnIihJBu5NQnv2LAp/HQT51h/l1CIbwYA0VnKVZ6lwzuT Za74JrDcai+AG/e76an2Nuru3UxJGscUVS5UP0WZ82FWBGWneVwn51GOpY6K7HHg LoMnQaoPQ3MjpfWN8r6tqbMXIAPbbXsmu9S1mHWvWvarNrdan3+xsTlpWccRvr+B 5kgvKbFJjfcROo/nZ4iApD/4Pj6W7M5ujlNjncIYulEJtOpdQHMUU1eX+P/KyB1e I0wVav15Ego/sbRKBxaZ3izkt1pSxmJAlBfP6kKVJS7Df6X2h1sgzkBpnbRfgyJ5 o7VeAME7ZsczK8JFXiqpdat/DkZODYiBMLQwi2IJ3PwieqorYfp/CyU1299ELcfw lasbJ9mfTampI/XGE3CIF5no4VJE5GgJJrEzTQ81Dj7FmjvWLy2dwIG8vlm005qg 1GLfXhhCm32SDTkQcFSH9GrIu40hexCAs2IJc51ByUjDJGp28Uh3mKr5PuWKU/de lVsOFg+P6zBjCojS7E+dVdQnsUH3GJ1MhlZ3hM35Z4T4Yhp6wRoT6dw6skDGk4HL btG7hul1zpoq2RY7mRpUFQ8P18swGWtbfqWd3gHUMyUrxNnUwA+O88yZLd76foRV Sh2DKff5MjU64ayQymPn =CqKP -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d79dff8.6020...@thykier.net
RFS: pysolfc (replacement for removed package: pysol)
Hello mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pysolfc. * Package name: pysolfc Version : 2.0-1 * URL : http://pysolfc.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL * Programming Lang: Python * Description : A Python solitaire game collection It builds the binary package: pysolfc The package appears to be lintian and pbuilder clean. A previous version has already been included in Ubuntu. The upload would fix this bug: 519752 My motivation for maintaining this package is: Its (unmaintained) predecessor pysol dropped out of debian a while ago; pysolfc is considered one of the best versatile solitaire collections. It is already part of Ubuntu, but I'd rather maintain it via Debian. Package location(s): - Git: git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-games/pysolfc.git - Git-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-games/pysolfc.git - URL: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/pysolfc (with link to .dsc file) - Games team queue: http://wiki.debian.org/Games/Sponsors/Queue I would be glad if someone sponsored this package for me. I've also prepared a transitional package pysol, found at: - URL: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/pysol (with link to .dsc file) There's also the supplementary pysolfc-cardsets (and transitional pysol-cardsets) packages in the respective locations which I'd glady see reviewed. Kind regards, Bernhard signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RFS: java-xmlbuilder (new package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package java-xmlbuilder. * Package name: java-xmlbuilder Version : 0.4-1 Upstream Author : James Murty * URL : http://code.google.com/p/java-xmlbuilder/ * License : Apache-2.0 Section : java It builds these binary packages: libjava-xmlbuilder-java - XML Builder Java library for creating XML documents libjava-xmlbuilder-java-doc - Documentation for XML Builder Java library for creating XML documents The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 617526 My motivation for maintaining this package is: this package is a dependency of jets3t (which currently bundles it) and of jclouds (yet to be packaged). jets3t used by the Jenkins ec2 Plugin (which I intend to package alongside Jenkins). The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/java-xmlbuilder - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/java-xmlbuilder/java-xmlbuilder_0.4-1.dsc - Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/pkg-java/java-xmlbuilder.git I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Cheers James -- James Page Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Team signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Looking for sponsor or mentor for package crtmpserver
Hi, I'm looking for sponsor or mentor to my package crtmpserver. Here is ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617641 and package on mentors.debian.net: http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=crtmpserver In two words: crmpserver is high performance streaming server. It support several protocols family like: RTMP, RTSP/RTCP/RTP, MPEG-TS, plain flv publishing. Also it is generic network platform, and creating custom protocols with it is really easy. In future plans are implement next protocols: gearman(already exist but not too clean, so not included yet), memcached, possible redis. Also there is some implementation of RTMFP protocol, but still not clean. This allow use crtmpserver as universal network media streaming platform. Licensed under GNU GPLv3. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110311161106.gc9...@img.jet.kiev.ua
Re: I'm the new developer on parcellite, but the debian maintainer for it hasn't responded
Niels, Thanks for getting back to me. The trouble with the packages is they are a bit old. Parcellite is on 1.0.1, and I think I've made things a little easier for any debian maintainter since I've fixed a few build problems regarding debian packages. I've recently removed all the bogus dependencies (in svn trunk), since parcellite only needs GTK+. I'd be glad to be a co-maintainer. In order to do that I just have to ask? Not sure the protocol here. Thanks for everyone's patience. Andrew, would you like for me to become a co-maintainer? I wonder if it would be useful to maintain key files like control, changelog copyright (or copying) under SVN for parcellite? I think I've killed most of those dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on xxx could be avoided if xxx were not uselessly linked against it in the trunk revision. I've built an amd64 and a i386 deb package, so perhaps as a start (if you are willing) you could take a look at those and see what I did wrong/right? Parcellite only needs to link against Gtk+, so that long list of dependencies can go away. Kind Regards, Doug Springer On 03/11/2011 01:40 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-03-10 21:14, Doug Springer wrote: Niels, I took over from the original developer, and parcellite is no longer inactive. Hey, That sounds good. There is a fork, it's called clipit, but there were lots of changes occurring, and I thought that parcellite (after a few bugs were addressed) was just fine as it was. I don't mind simple features, but once it looks like klipper, what's the point? Yes, clipit was the fork I was thinking of. As pabs mentioned in a separate email, clipit is currently its own package but there was talk about replacing parcellite with it. My intent it to primarily bug fix/build fix, add bare essentials from time to time, and keep parcellite just as it is - but I've sent Andrew several emails and no response yet. I figured if he doesn't want to maintain it, I'll take over that part as well. How do I go about doing that? As far as I can tell, the maintainer of parcellite is definitely active, since he uploaded a version of parcellite 5 days ago[1]. I have CC'ed Andrew, whom I hope will reply within a couple of days. If you want an active part in maintaining parcellite, your best option right is to offer to become a co-maintainership. [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/parcellite/news/20110306T041708Z.html Best Regards, Doug Springer On 03/10/2011 12:53 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2011-03-10 15:40, doug Springer wrote: Hi, I started developing parcellite because I didn't want it to disappear from the repositories. I've been developing parcellite for several months now and have a new release that's been tested and packaged to i386 and amd64. I'd like to see this make it into main stream. Where do I go from here? I'll can take over the maintenance if I need to. Thanks, Doug Springer Hey, I remember parcellite from a while back; as I recall I managed to reach the maintainer via his other email: andrewsometh...@ubuntu.com That being said; the last I heard was that parcellite was being replaced by a fork, since parcellite was inactive. Unfortunately the name of the fork eludes me at the time. ~Niels -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNed/3AAoJEAVLu599gGRCMIEQAKh2gxbWftckB0/iSkGOcy/v ItL+CX2/EKKVAJUWS+wrnIihJBu5NQnv2LAp/HQT51h/l1CIbwYA0VnKVZ6lwzuT Za74JrDcai+AG/e76an2Nuru3UxJGscUVS5UP0WZ82FWBGWneVwn51GOpY6K7HHg LoMnQaoPQ3MjpfWN8r6tqbMXIAPbbXsmu9S1mHWvWvarNrdan3+xsTlpWccRvr+B 5kgvKbFJjfcROo/nZ4iApD/4Pj6W7M5ujlNjncIYulEJtOpdQHMUU1eX+P/KyB1e I0wVav15Ego/sbRKBxaZ3izkt1pSxmJAlBfP6kKVJS7Df6X2h1sgzkBpnbRfgyJ5 o7VeAME7ZsczK8JFXiqpdat/DkZODYiBMLQwi2IJ3PwieqorYfp/CyU1299ELcfw lasbJ9mfTampI/XGE3CIF5no4VJE5GgJJrEzTQ81Dj7FmjvWLy2dwIG8vlm005qg 1GLfXhhCm32SDTkQcFSH9GrIu40hexCAs2IJc51ByUjDJGp28Uh3mKr5PuWKU/de lVsOFg+P6zBjCojS7E+dVdQnsUH3GJ1MhlZ3hM35Z4T4Yhp6wRoT6dw6skDGk4HL btG7hul1zpoq2RY7mRpUFQ8P18swGWtbfqWd3gHUMyUrxNnUwA+O88yZLd76foRV Sh2DKff5MjU64ayQymPn =CqKP -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d7a6697.4040...@dnkdesigns.net
Re: RFS: pysolfc (replacement for removed package: pysol)
On 03/11/2011 05:32 AM, Bernhard Reiter wrote: The package appears to be lintian and pbuilder clean. A previous version has already been included in Ubuntu. The upload would fix this bug: 519752 This should be noted in the changelog. Package location(s): - Git: git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-games/pysolfc.git - Git-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-games/pysolfc.git - URL: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/pysolfc (with link to .dsc file) - Games team queue: http://wiki.debian.org/Games/Sponsors/Queue The package in REVU is a native build; it does not have an original tarball. You note that you conflict with pysol ( 10). I'm confused as to why, since your package does not actually conflict with pysol; they can certainly be unpacked at the same time. Is there a reason they cannot be installed concurrently as well? (if so, you want Breaks+Replaces, see the conflicts-with-version lintian warning) I would be glad if someone sponsored this package for me. I've also prepared a transitional package pysol, found at: - URL: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/pysol (with link to .dsc file) There's also the supplementary pysolfc-cardsets (and transitional pysol-cardsets) packages in the respective locations which I'd glady see reviewed. Why not just add these as dummy binary packages to the pysolfc source package? -- Luke Faraone;; Debian Ubuntu Developer; Sugar Labs, Systems lfaraone on irc.[freenode,oftc].net -- http://luke.faraone.cc PGP fprint: 5189 2A7D 16D0 49BB 046B DC77 9732 5DD8 F9FD D506 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: gadmin-rsync (adopted, updated package)
Looks good overall, some comments follow. On 03/09/2011 03:48 PM, Mahyuddin Susanto wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.7-1 of my package gadmin-rsync. this package is unmaintained, having upstream release and this package very useful for studying rsync. I have added d/watch, fixing typos, fixing desktop-file, and refreshed old patches It builds these binary packages: gadmin-rsync - GTK+ configuration tool for rsync gadmin-rsync-dbg - GTK+ configuration tool for rsync (debug) The upload would fix these bugs: 605299, 608251 Please change bug 605299 from O to ITA as indicated in http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o. Your entry in Vcs-Browser contained a superfluous space at the end. Please consider using collab-maint on alioth for hosting your package. See http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/PackagingProject for details. You should add yourself to debian/copyright. Of the above, only the bug status was critical; I would have otherwise fixed the spacing, and use of collab-maint is not required. -- Luke Faraone;; Debian Ubuntu Developer; Sugar Labs, Systems lfaraone on irc.[freenode,oftc].net -- http://luke.faraone.cc PGP fprint: 5189 2A7D 16D0 49BB 046B DC77 9732 5DD8 F9FD D506 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
extra licenses
Hello, I'm trying to fix dozens of lintian warnings and errors, and the one I'm on, now, says there are three extra licenses in the source package; and the Debian Policy Manual Chapter 12.5 didn't tell me if I'm supposed to sum up all of those licenses in the copyright file and remove them or what. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/929694.41365...@web111906.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
Re: extra licenses
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 01:34:20PM -0800, Kete wrote: Hello, I'm trying to fix dozens of lintian warnings and errors, and the one I'm on, now, says there are three extra licenses in the source package; and the Debian Policy Manual Chapter 12.5 didn't tell me if I'm supposed to sum up all of those licenses in the copyright file Yes, see DEP-5 http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ and remove them No or what. Fix and see if Lintian still complains, I don't know if current ones care much though. What's the exact error message ? Nick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110311225918.gb13...@leverton.org
uswsusp package
Dear mentors, this week suspend-utils 1.0 was released. Now includes support for KMS systems. I am updating the uswsusp from v0.8 to v1.0. * Package name: uswsusp * Version : 1.0 * URL : http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/rafael/suspend-utils.git;a=tree * License : GNU GPL * Section : admin The package can be found here: - URL:http://www.kix.es/src/suspend-utils/debian/ The package has some minor errors about templates and others wishlist about minus sing in manpages. The errors about templates are because the splash package is not included in the stable dist (libsplash has problems) and I compiled the package without splash but I didn't remove the files for future usage. This version solves these bugs: uswsusp (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * New 1.0 version [Closes: #589743, #578496, #617534] * A lot of new machines. [Closes: #552484, #576803, #528483] [Closes: #495111, #595125, #486352, #433872, #590233] * A new length for addressing [Closes: #550725, #549118] (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/3/377) * Support for Kernel Mode Set (KMS) [Closes: #437094, #586674, #547158, #567604] * Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format * Compiled without splash support. libsplash is not included in stable, many bugs. * Moved the manpage file suspend.conf.8 to manual section 5. [Closes: #520705] The package has many bugs yet (some are easy, some are duplicated, other have patches,...) Kind regards. kix
Re: uswsusp package
Am 12.03.2011 00:15, schrieb Rodolfo kix Garcia: Dear mentors, this week suspend-utils 1.0 was released. Now includes support for KMS systems. I am updating the uswsusp from v0.8 to v1.0. The package has not been officially orphaned yet, so just taking over the Maintainer field is not considered polite. Have you contacted the previous maintainer, Tim? Just in case I CCed him. That said, your package contains a .git directory and seems to have been turned into a native package, so I stopped any further review right there. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: uswsusp package
On 03/12/11 00:31, Michael Biebl wrote: Am 12.03.2011 00:15, schrieb Rodolfo kix Garcia: Dear mentors, this week suspend-utils 1.0 was released. Now includes support for KMS systems. I am updating the uswsusp from v0.8 to v1.0. The package has not been officially orphaned yet, so just taking over the Maintainer field is not considered polite. Have you contacted the previous maintainer, Tim? Just in case I CCed him. I tryed previously to talk with Tim (when I try to create the v 0.9 (this version was not released)). But yes, I forgot to include in my mail. That said, your package contains a .git directory and seems to have been turned into a native package, so I stopped any further review right there. I cloned the suspend-utils and then create the package. I didn't have idea about native and not native packages. I need to remove the .git directory. something more? Thanks kix -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d7ab509.6040...@kix.es
RFS: udisks-glue
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package udisks-glue. * Package name: udisks-glue Version : 1.3.0-1 Upstream Author : Fernando Tarlá Cardoso Lemos fernando...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/fernandotcl/udisks-glue * License : 2-clause BSD Section : utils It builds these binary packages: udisks-glue - associates udisks events to user-configurable actions The package is lintian pedantic clean, provides a decent manual page, uses source format 3.0 (quilt) and has DEP-5 formatted copyright (validated by libconfig-model-perl). The upload would fix these bugs: 594746 My motivation for maintaining this package is: HAL is probably going away sooner or later and so will tools that depend on it for automounting and similar use cases will be gone as well (halevt, ivman, etc.). udisks-glue can be a replacement for some uses of those tools. It's actively developed upstream and has seen a few releases already, with more planned. I'm upstream and I think others could benefit from this package. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/udisks-glue - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/udisks-glue/udisks-glue_1.3.0-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimknqxzmfaxitnnmay5zf-cy57mrg7alsnns...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Looking for sponsor or mentor for package crtmpserver
2011/3/12 Andriy Beregovenko j...@jet.kiev.ua: I'm looking for sponsor or mentor to my package crtmpserver. .. In two words: crmpserver is high performance streaming server. It support several protocols family like: RTMP, RTSP/RTCP/RTP, MPEG-TS, plain flv publishing. You might be interested to join the multimedia team: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinxjmrigab5blqdu27+td1eqvk_vnbyfp+tt...@mail.gmail.com
Re: extra licenses
These are actually warnings: W: icecat: extra-license-file usr/lib/icecat-3.6.15/LICENSE W: icecat: extra-license-file usr/lib/icecat-3.6.15/extensions/https-everywh...@eff.org/LICENSE.txt W: icecat: extra-license-file usr/lib/icecat-3.6.15/extensions/privacy_featu...@gnuzilla.gnu.org/COPYING Thanks, Nick, by the way, this is my first attempt at building a deb, and since it's near the end of my spring break, it will probably be the last one for a while. --- On Fri, 3/11/11, Nick Leverton n...@leverton.org wrote: From: Nick Leverton n...@leverton.org Subject: Re: extra licenses To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Date: Friday, March 11, 2011, 10:59 PM On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 01:34:20PM -0800, Kete wrote: Hello, I'm trying to fix dozens of lintian warnings and errors, and the one I'm on, now, says there are three extra licenses in the source package; and the Debian Policy Manual Chapter 12.5 didn't tell me if I'm supposed to sum up all of those licenses in the copyright file Yes, see DEP-5 http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ and remove them No or what. Fix and see if Lintian still complains, I don't know if current ones care much though. What's the exact error message ? Nick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110311225918.gb13...@leverton.org
Re: RFS: gadmin-rsync (adopted, updated package)
Hello, On 03/12/2011 03:14 AM, Luke Faraone wrote: The upload would fix these bugs: 605299, 608251 Please change bug 605299 from O to ITA as indicated in http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o. Sorry but that was 605305, i'm wrong by put wrong bug in changelog and fixed now Your entry in Vcs-Browser contained a superfluous space at the end. Please consider using collab-maint on alioth for hosting your package. See http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/PackagingProject for details. Moved to collab-main now http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/gadmin-rsync.git You should add yourself to debian/copyright. Of the above, only the bug status was critical; I would have otherwise fixed the spacing, and use of collab-maint is not required. Fixed and uploaded http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gadmin-rsync Thanks! -- [ Mahyuddin Susanto ] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Change source code will break translations
Hi, I just found lintian complaints about typos in source code, but if i change/fix it i will break many translations (~5 lines per language). How can i do for it? make it override or just change it? -- [ Mahyuddin Susanto ] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: extra licenses
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Kete frenzf...@yahoo.com wrote: These are actually warnings: W: icecat: extra-license-file usr/lib/icecat-3.6.15/LICENSE W: icecat: extra-license-file usr/lib/icecat-3.6.15/extensions/https-everywh...@eff.org/LICENSE.txt W: icecat: extra-license-file usr/lib/icecat-3.6.15/extensions/privacy_featu...@gnuzilla.gnu.org/COPYING Thanks, Nick, by the way, this is my first attempt at building a deb, and since it's near the end of my spring break, it will probably be the last one for a while. Those tags are in the binary package, not the source package. See: http://lintian.debian.org/tags/extra-license-file.html It's saying that you are installing a license file into usr/lib/icecat-2.6.15/LICENSE Unless there is some clause in the license requiring that it be present there, we usually use the debian/copyright files to be the one source of all copyright information of a package. If your copyright info is in debian/copyright, you don't have to install the COPYING, LICENSE, and LICENSE.txt files at all. something like dh_install -XLICENSE would do to make sure you aren't installing it. Cheers, Scott -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimgky+1kevc1nczrau17kc6hk6valfdl4rci...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: abcl, new upstream release 0.25.0
Dear mentors, A new version of abcl 0.25.0 has been released upstream. This is the updated package, the URL of my package is at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/abcl The respective dsc file can be dget at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/abcl/abcl_0.25.0-1.dsc This package builds lintian clean. I wish someone could upload it for me. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTin05UF_LqL5_op3FV=qjdkalclzyotkn8nju...@mail.gmail.com
