No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so' (Was: Failed to build Ginko CADx)

[Andreas Tille]

On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:28:52PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:26:22AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so', needed by 
> > `src/cadxcore/libCADxCore.so.2.4.1.1'.  Stop.
> 
> I suspect removing the --parallel in
> 
>dh $@ --buildsystem=cmake --parallel
> 
> will solve this problem.

This has turned out as not successful.

However, the problem I was facing in the not yet released package
ginkocadx[1] seems to be quite common currently.  It is in #629815 and
some similar case happens in #618094 and thus I'm suspecting a general
problem somehow.  So I'm moving the discussion to debian-mentors and
hope for some clever advise what to do now.

Kind regards

  Andreas.

[1] svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/packages/ginkgocadx/trunk/

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110609061110.gb27...@an3as.eu

Re: RFS: RHash - Utility for computing hash sums and magnet links

[Arno Töll]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Alexey,

On 08.06.2011 11:55, rhash.admin wrote:
> Hello! I need a sponsor for the rhash package!
> http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=rhash

a few notes about your package you may want to consider (I'm no DD, so I
can't sponsor you though):

* debian/changelog: Please don't explain in the changelog what your
package is for. We have a short and a long description for that. See [1]
for some hints. You should neither mention the SONAME change there
unless you changed it for the Debian package exclusively. If the latter
you might want to elaborate the reason in a README.Debian file.
* Please push debhelper compatibility to version 8 (debian/compat,
debian/control), see debhelper(7).
* debian/control: It is considered a best practice to have VCS links in
debian/control which point to the repository where you develop the
Debian package. See [2].
* Do you really need the minor version in the SONAME (and hence
correctly reflected in the package name)? It is not wrong to do so, but
since your package is new and your both, major and minor version are 0
you could probably just use the major version instead of an odd name
like librhash0.0.
* You replicate the package priority for your binary packages when
compared to the source package in debian/control. No need for that
unless you change priorities for binary packages.
* I'm not sure what I should think about debian/Makefile-rhash-1.2.6rc1.
Why didn't you merge those changes with your upstream Makefile, since
you are upstream yourself? If you really want to keep it out of your
upstream source, please use a quilt patch [3] instead.
* Your upstream sources are missing copyright headers. Please consider
adding them.
* You could earn some bonus points for shipping a symbol file, see
dpkg-gensymbols(1)
* Your package synopsis should not start with an upper case letter, see
[4]. Long description is fine, but I'm not entirely happy with the
synopsis lines for each package. Tastes may vary.
* Your debian/copyright provides conflicting license headers. I'm aware
yor package is dual-licensed, see DEP-5 on how to specify such use
cases, "Syntax" in [5]. Also consider the MIT hint mentioned in DEP-5.
Moreover don't use hash marks like programming style comments, use the
"Comment" header instead.
* You ship some cryptographic algorithms, I hope you checked all legal
issues with that?

[1]
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-debian-changelog
[2]
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-vcs
[3] http://wiki.debian.org/UsingQuilt, among others
[4]
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-desc-basics
[5] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/
- -- 
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=xfL6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4df00371.8000...@toell.net

RFS: freeplane (updated package)

[Eric Lavarde]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.3-1
of my package "freeplane".

It builds these binary packages:
freeplane  - Java program to create and edit mind maps.
libjortho-freeplane-java - Java spell-checking library.

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 626187

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freeplane
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable 
main contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freeplane/freeplane_1.1.3-1.dsc


I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
 Eric Lavarde

PS: Lintian currently complains about the class-path manifest, but we 
agreed on the Debian Java list that this is a special case (due to OSGi 
specifics) that Lintian might be able to catch in the future.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4def8e0b.8030...@zorglub.s.bawue.de

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

[Stephen Kitt]

On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 04:22:13PM +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote:
> What's the best practice to fix things up? Should I bump the debian
> revision of the package and re-upload it? I don't want to be blamed for
> hijacking packages by accident ;)

No hard feelings ;-)

It's a native package, so I suppose either incrementing it to 0.0.6 or
something like 0.0.5+fix would work...

Regards,

Stephen


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

[Bruno Kleinert]

Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 14:55 +0100 schrieb Simon McVittie:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 at 15:39:34 +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote:
> > It seems as if sbuild exchanges the Maintainer field in the binary
> > package. If I schroot into my build environment and use
> > dpkg-buildpackage instead of sbuild the Maintainer field in the
> > resulting binary package remains unchanged.
> 
> When sbuild is behaving like a maintainer or sponsor (as opposed to behaving
> like a buildd) make sure you leave $maintainer_name and $uploader_name unset,
> assuming your sbuild is recent.
*Argh* $uploader_name was set in my .sbuildrc. Many thanks for pointing
this out, Simon!

> In older versions of sbuild, which insisted on having at least one of
> $maintainer_name, $uploader_name or $key_id, it was necessary to
> set $key_id, and also set $pgp_options so that $key_id wasn't used (assuming
> you want to test the package before signing it): see
> .


> That page also indicates how to check the .changes file for a sponsored upload
> to check that the right things happened.
Bookmarked! :)

What's the best practice to fix things up? Should I bump the debian
revision of the package and re-upload it? I don't want to be blamed for
hijacking packages by accident ;)

Greetings - Fuddl


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

[Simon McVittie]

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 at 15:39:34 +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote:
> It seems as if sbuild exchanges the Maintainer field in the binary
> package. If I schroot into my build environment and use
> dpkg-buildpackage instead of sbuild the Maintainer field in the
> resulting binary package remains unchanged.

When sbuild is behaving like a maintainer or sponsor (as opposed to behaving
like a buildd) make sure you leave $maintainer_name and $uploader_name unset,
assuming your sbuild is recent.

In older versions of sbuild, which insisted on having at least one of
$maintainer_name, $uploader_name or $key_id, it was necessary to
set $key_id, and also set $pgp_options so that $key_id wasn't used (assuming
you want to test the package before signing it): see
.

That page also indicates how to check the .changes file for a sponsored upload
to check that the right things happened.

S


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110608135501.ga27...@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

[Bruno Kleinert]

Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 14:48 +0200 schrieb Bruno Kleinert:
> Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 14:57 +0300 schrieb Peter Pentchev:
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > > > Dear mentors,
> > > > 
> > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
> > > > "oss-compat", which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this
> > > > makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are 
> > > > old
> > > > Linux games.)
> > > 
> > > Looks like we've another case of duplicated work here:
> > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/oss-compat/news/20110608T100624Z.html
> > 
> > Nope, not duplicated work; the changelog entry is identical to the one
> > that Stephen Kitt worked on in the pkg-games Git repository:
> > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/oss-compat.git;a=blob;f=debian/changelog;h=d8b7ea6d6b79bf5125ade0d8f775856d535b40ee;hb=HEAD
> > (argh, yep, ugly URL - just the latest rev of the debian/changelog file in
> > the pkg-games/oss-compat.git repository on Alioth Reborn)
> > 
> > I'm not really sure why Fuddl reset the maintainer field when uploading;
> > the usual practice is to set it to the Debian Games Team (as Stephen did)
> > and, if necessary, put the uploader's name in the, well, Uploaders field :)
> Oops, did I break or change anything? If anything changed in the package
> it was unintentionally! Could sbuild or dpkg-buildpackage have tricked
> me to touch the Maintainer field?

It seems as if sbuild exchanges the Maintainer field in the binary
package. If I schroot into my build environment and use
dpkg-buildpackage instead of sbuild the Maintainer field in the
resulting binary package remains unchanged.

Greetings - Fuddl


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

[Bruno Kleinert]

Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 14:57 +0300 schrieb Peter Pentchev:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > > Dear mentors,
> > > 
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
> > > "oss-compat", which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this
> > > makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are old
> > > Linux games.)
> > 
> > Looks like we've another case of duplicated work here:
> > http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/oss-compat/news/20110608T100624Z.html
> 
> Nope, not duplicated work; the changelog entry is identical to the one
> that Stephen Kitt worked on in the pkg-games Git repository:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/oss-compat.git;a=blob;f=debian/changelog;h=d8b7ea6d6b79bf5125ade0d8f775856d535b40ee;hb=HEAD
> (argh, yep, ugly URL - just the latest rev of the debian/changelog file in
> the pkg-games/oss-compat.git repository on Alioth Reborn)
> 
> I'm not really sure why Fuddl reset the maintainer field when uploading;
> the usual practice is to set it to the Debian Games Team (as Stephen did)
> and, if necessary, put the uploader's name in the, well, Uploaders field :)
Oops, did I break or change anything? If anything changed in the package
it was unintentionally! Could sbuild or dpkg-buildpackage have tricked
me to touch the Maintainer field?


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: lugaru (new package)

[Arand Nash]

On 08/06/11 13:37, Bruno Kleinert wrote:

Hi Arand,

at a quick review of lugaru I found the following issues:

The desktop-file-validate utility (package desktop-file-utils) spit out:
lugaru.desktop: error: value "1.1" for key "Version" in group "Desktop
Entry" is not a known version

Ah, right, I was reading the FD 1.1 *draft*, missing the hint in the 
word draft :) changed.



lugaru.desktop and lugaru.menu:
Please supply the full path to the binary or wrapper script like
Exec=/usr/games/lugaru to avoid messing with users' PATH environment
variable.

Ok, I was going by the example here 
http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/apa.html 
which did not have this.


I've changed Exec to use /usr/games/lugaru and TryExec to 
/usr/lib/games/lugaru/lugaru (the actual binary), I'm not sure if this 
makes perfect sense, but it made some to me.



In lugaru-data debian/control says Section: contrib/games. I didn't
notice any dependency or build-dependency on a package from the non-free
section, so lugaru-data goes either into main or into non-free.

Yeah, I noticed that before and it should already be changed. The -data 
package should be non-free (due to the "non-revenue" license).



The binary package lugaru-data has a circular dependency on lugaru. It
should be Enhances: lugaru.


Oops, Changed.


Cheers - Fuddl


Thanks for reviewing! I've uploaded new packages to mentors with these 
changes.


--
arand


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4def71d8.7000...@gmail.com

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

[Sven Hoexter]

On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:57:58PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:

Hi,
with so many replies, I guess I should write one more. :-/

> I'm not really sure why Fuddl reset the maintainer field when uploading;
> the usual practice is to set it to the Debian Games Team (as Stephen did)
> and, if necessary, put the uploader's name in the, well, Uploaders field :)

That's what obviously made me write the mail, I didn't even look at the
package itself, just checked the qa page first for bugs et al and found
the upload - from a different maintainer. Just after sending my reply I
received the 'Thanks' mail and thought that they've worked that out in
private and everyone else would ignore my now pointless mail.

So thanks to the involved people to ack that everything went smooth and in
agreement.

Sven
-- 
And I don't know much, but I do know this:
With a golden heart comes a rebel fist.
 [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110608122120.GF2362@marvin

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

[Stephen Kitt]

Hi Sven,

On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
> > "oss-compat", which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this
> > makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are old
> > Linux games.)
> 
> Looks like we've another case of duplicated work here:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/oss-compat/news/20110608T100624Z.html

Not quite, that's my package but with a mixed-up Changed-By (which
should be me) and Maintainer (which should be the games team). See
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/oss-compat.git;a=blob;f=debian/changelog;h=d8b7ea6d6b79bf5125ade0d8f775856d535b40ee;hb=f937da6d054dc2cc29a6605f2abba7ad22a03ae6
for the original changelog!

Regards,

Stephen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110608115127.gz31...@sk2.org

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

[Peter Pentchev]

On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> > 
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
> > "oss-compat", which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this
> > makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are old
> > Linux games.)
> 
> Looks like we've another case of duplicated work here:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/oss-compat/news/20110608T100624Z.html

Nope, not duplicated work; the changelog entry is identical to the one
that Stephen Kitt worked on in the pkg-games Git repository:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/oss-compat.git;a=blob;f=debian/changelog;h=d8b7ea6d6b79bf5125ade0d8f775856d535b40ee;hb=HEAD
(argh, yep, ugly URL - just the latest rev of the debian/changelog file in
the pkg-games/oss-compat.git repository on Alioth Reborn)

I'm not really sure why Fuddl reset the maintainer field when uploading;
the usual practice is to set it to the Debian Games Team (as Stephen did)
and, if necessary, put the uploader's name in the, well, Uploaders field :)

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
Peter Pentchev  r...@ringlet.net r...@freebsd.org pe...@packetscale.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
If this sentence didn't exist, somebody would have invented it.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: lugaru (new package)

[Bruno Kleinert]

Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 19:04 +0200 schrieb Arand Nash:
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my packages "lugaru" and "lugaru-data".
> 
> * Package names   : lugaru
>: lugaru-data
>Versions: 0~20110520.1+hge4354+dfsg-1
>: 0~20110520.1+hge4354-1
>Upstream Authors: Wolfire Games 
>: Neal Gompa 
>: Alexander Monakov 
>: Côme BERNIGAUD 
>: sf17k
> * URL : http://code.google.com/p/lugaru/
>: http://www.wolfire.com/lugaru
> * License : GPL-2+, CC-BY-SA, "freeware"
>Section : contrib/games
>: non-free/games
> 
> They build these binary packages:
> lugaru - third-person action game
> lugaru-data - data for the third-person action game lugaru
> 
> The packages appears to be lintian clean.
> 
> The upload would fix the ITP bug: 626156 (and partly the RFP bug: 607965)
> 
> My motivation for maintaining this package is: It being a great indie 
> game, having an active upstream, and being something one would expect to 
> be packaged, being famously (though partly) Open Sourced.
> 
> History lesson:
> Icculus  did the initial porting 
> to GNU/Linux an was the initial repository when the source was released, 
> the main hub has now moved to  from 
> where the current packaging stems (with major contributions from the 
> "r/amonakov-lugaru" an "p/lugaru-experimental" repositories).
> Inititally Only the source was freely licensed, Wolfire later licensed 
> the game data as freeware, and recently a large chunk of it under 
> CC-BY-SA. Not enough to package the whole into main currently though.
> 
> The packages can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> 
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/l/lugaru
>   : http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/l/lugaru-data
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable 
> main contrib non-free
> : deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable 
> main contrib non-free
> - dget 
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/l/lugaru/lugaru_0~20110520.1+hge4354+dfsg-1.dsc
>dget 
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/l/lugaru-data/lugaru-data_0~20110520.1+hge4354-1.dsc
> 
> The VCS for lugaru is up for inspection at 
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-games/lugaru.git
> 
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
> 
>   - arand

Hi Arand,

at a quick review of lugaru I found the following issues:

The desktop-file-validate utility (package desktop-file-utils) spit out:
lugaru.desktop: error: value "1.1" for key "Version" in group "Desktop
Entry" is not a known version

lugaru.desktop and lugaru.menu:
Please supply the full path to the binary or wrapper script like
Exec=/usr/games/lugaru to avoid messing with users' PATH environment
variable.

In lugaru-data debian/control says Section: contrib/games. I didn't
notice any dependency or build-dependency on a package from the non-free
section, so lugaru-data goes either into main or into non-free.

The binary package lugaru-data has a circular dependency on lugaru. It
should be Enhances: lugaru.

Cheers - Fuddl


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

[Bruno Kleinert]

Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 01:06 +0200 schrieb Stephen Kitt:
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
> "oss-compat", which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this
> makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are old
> Linux games.)
> 
> It builds these binary packages:
> oss-compat - Open Sound System (OSS) compatibility package
> 
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
> 
> The upload would fix these bugs: 390747, 594376
> 
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/oss-compat
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
> contrib non-free
> - dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/oss-compat/oss-compat_0.0.5.dsc
> 
> It also has a VCS at http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-games/oss-compat.git
> 
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
> 
> Kind regards
>  Stephen Kitt
Hi,

I uploaded the package.

Cheers - Fuddl


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

RFS: RHash - Utility for computing hash sums and magnet links

[rhash.admin]

Hello! I need a sponsor for the rhash package!
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=rhash

  Package name: rhash
  Version : 1.2.5
  Upstream Author : Alexey 
  URL : http://rhash.sourceforge.net/
  License : MIT http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php
  Programming Lang: C

RHash is powerful professional utility, supporting a wide range of 
hashing algorithms, such as CRC32, MD4, MD5, SHA1/SHA2, Tiger, TTH, 
BitTorrent BTIH, AICH, ED2K, GOST R 34.11-94, RIPEMD-160, HAS-160, 
EDON-R 256/512, Whirlpool, Snefru.


Features:
 * Output in a predefined (SFV, BSD) or a user-defined format.
 * Can calculate Magnet links and EDonkey 2000 links.
 * Updating hash files (adding hash sums of files missing in the 
hashfile).

 * Ability to process directories recursively.
 * Portability: the program works the same on Linux, *BSD or Windows.

The LibRHash library is lightweight, thread-safe and easy to learn.
It is used by several open source applications.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4def471e.9070...@gmail.com

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

[Sven Hoexter]

On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
> "oss-compat", which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this
> makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are old
> Linux games.)

Looks like we've another case of duplicated work here:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/oss-compat/news/20110608T100624Z.html

Sven
-- 
And I don't know much, but I do know this:
With a golden heart comes a rebel fist.
 [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110608101048.GD2362@marvin

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

[Stephen Kitt]

Hi,

On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:03:24PM +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote:
> I uploaded the package.

Thanks!

Stephen


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

RFS: cl-launch, cl-asdf (updated packages)

[Faré]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for
the new version 3.011-1 of my package "cl-launch", and
the new version 2:2.016-1 of my package "cl-asdf".

They build these respective binary packages:
cl-launch  - uniform frontend to running Common Lisp code from the shell
cl-asdf    - Another System Definition Facility

The packages appear to be lintian clean.

The package cl-launch can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-launch
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-launch/cl-launch_3.011-1.dsc

The package cl-asdf can also be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-asdf
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-asdf/cl-asdf_2.016-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded these packages for me.

Kind regards,

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
There is only one way to console a widow. But remember the risk.
— Robert Heinlein, "Time Enough For Love"


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=BMNZBB0_+-A7=fv1yhnwxp1d...@mail.gmail.com