Re: Dependency on lib32foo vs libfoo on amd64

[Paul Wise]

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Igor Pashev wrote:

> I'm building a package with:
>
> 64-bits app (foo),
> 64-bits lib (libfoo) and
> 32-bits lib (lib32foo).

Please use multiarch instead of doing that.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caktje6gvu_o92wsdrpddrg6cba7lxy4ej0kcdrrdf54h8s7...@mail.gmail.com

Dependency on lib32foo vs libfoo on amd64

[Igor Pashev]

I'm building a package with:

64-bits app (foo),
64-bits lib (libfoo) and
32-bits lib (lib32foo).

foo is linked with libfoo, but dependency in DEBIAN/control
is set to li32foo.

What's the matter?

dpkg 1.16.1
DH 8.9.8


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e9899bb.2090...@gmail.com

RFS: spice-vdagent (2nd try)

[Liang Guo]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spice-vdagent".

 * Package name: spice-vdagent
  Version : 0.8.1-1
  Upstream Author : Gerd Hoffmann 
 * URL : http://www.spice-space.org/
 * License : GPL-3+
  Section : x11

It builds those binary packages:

spice-vdagent - Spice agent for Linux

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

 http://mentors.debian.net/package/spice-vdagent

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

 dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spice-vdagent/spice-vdagent_0.8.1-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Thanks and Regards,
--
Liang Guo
http://bluestone.cublog.cn


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

dmaths: 30 days waiting for sponsor (package already in Debian)

[Innocent De Marchi]

Hi!

I have updated the package dmaths to close a bug report
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620942) so as to fix
some lintian messages.

Now we just need someone encourage to review the package and upload the file.

Best regars!

I. De Marchi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAPo0x0fJCJ1B2prwBn1==FGjOTeKatjhv5HQSO6dC8=ohdk...@mail.gmail.com

RFS: gentoo (New upstream version of a package already in Debian)

[Innocent De Marchi]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gentoo".

 * Package name: gentoo
   Version : 0.19.12-1
   Upstream Author : Emil Brink 
 * URL : http://www.obsession.se/gentoo/
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : x11

It builds those binary packages:

gentoo - fully GUI-configurable, two-pane X file manager

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/gentoo

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gentoo/gentoo_0.19.12-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards,

I. De Marchi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/capo0x0cge4jnfckpge_yyyto_e2axktnlqfryegamrgrjvr...@mail.gmail.com

Re: RFS: ESO Common Pipeline Library

[Ole Streicher]

Am 13.10.2011 20:55, schrieb Julian Taylor:
> On 10/13/2011 06:04 PM, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> Am 12.10.2011 20:20, schrieb Julian Taylor:
>>> Else the package looks nice, good work.
>>
>> I implemented all changes from you and Sylvestre and re-uploaded the
>> package:
>>
> 
> it still does not build. Its missing a dependency on libltdl-dev for
> ltdl.m4 as you now use autoreconf.
> Please test if your package builds in a clean environment.
> E.g. with pbuilder:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto
> 

Oops, sorry for that. I added the missing dependency now and
successfully tested the package build in a clean pbuilder environment.

I have reuploaded it to mentors.debian.net;


I also successfully tested the "esorex" package in the pbuilder:


I would be glad if they could be reviewed again, and possibly uploaded.

Best regards

Ole


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e986ea7.4030...@liska.ath.cx

Re: RFR: devilspie2

[Andreas Rönnquist]

On 14/10/11 08:26, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> 
>> I could (amongst other stuff) take some hints regarding the short/long
>> descriptions.
> 
> Both of your descriptions focus on explaining how devilspie2 does
> things. A user first looking at your package wants to know what your
> package does. Your short description explains that devilspie2 can match
> windows, but the use - acting on them - is only implied. Maybe your long
> description could give a specific use case? The information about LUA
> and the origin of this package are clearly useful, but I would put them
> to the end of the description.
> 

Thank you! I have updated the long description according to your comments.

> debian/docs: I think you shouldn't ship the GPL-3, because you already
> correctly reference /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-3 from
> debian/copyright.

fixed.

> 
> debian/rules: Maybe you can also clean up the dh_make comments?

done.

Thank you for your review, much appreciated - I have updated the package
fixing the details you have commented on.
New version uploaded to mentors:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/devilspie2
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/devilspie2/devilspie2_0.09-1.dsc

best regards
/Andreas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e986bac.3020...@gusnan.se

Re: Anybody to package new Bitten version?

[W. Martin Borgert]

Quoting "anatoly techtonik" :

What does this testing implies? If there is a reference document on
testing - somebody else may do this. This doc should exists even just
to tell which parts can possibly go wrong as well as history of
previous problems and mistakes. I'm running unreleased 0.6b3 for about
6 months now, and can't remember any problems.


There is no testing method defined or documented.
I just install it and do some builds, that's it.


I'd like to see 0.6b3 released first, and then 0.6, because if there
is problem with 0.6 - you can at least revert to a version that is not
so old.


Given that the upstream changes between 0.6b3 and 0.6 are
small (if I'm not mistaken), I would leave out this step.


I traced the imports and so far haven't found any that require Bitten
slave to import Trac components.


Same for me.


Let's hope for your time to grant you an inspiration to complete this quest.
Thanks. =)


:~)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20111014131006.15481znx9woyl...@webmail.in-berlin.de

Re: Anybody to package new Bitten version?

[anatoly techtonik]

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:20 PM, W. Martin Borgert  wrote:
> Quoting "anatoly techtonik" :
>>
>> It's 9 months since the patch to upgrade trac-bitten was committed to
>> Debian repository and it's not packaged yet. Can anybody release it?
>
> Problem is: I can't (currently) test new versions properly - no time.

What does this testing implies? If there is a reference document on
testing - somebody else may do this. This doc should exists even just
to tell which parts can possibly go wrong as well as history of
previous problems and mistakes. I'm running unreleased 0.6b3 for about
6 months now, and can't remember any problems.

I'd like to see 0.6b3 released first, and then 0.6, because if there
is problem with 0.6 - you can at least revert to a version that is not
so old.

> Second issue: I really want to have two packages: Master (trac-bitten)
> and slave (trac-bitten-slave), with the bitten slave not depending on
> trac. It's not too difficult, I believe, but without proper testing
> (see 1) it will fail. Maybe I can do something in the next days...

I traced the imports and so far haven't found any that require Bitten
slave to import Trac components.

Let's hope for your time to grant you an inspiration to complete this quest.
Thanks. =)
--
anatoly t.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/capkn8xjgcsgojkx-nn6fgkkr2ctemvb3_4ze4ackwnk1dfb...@mail.gmail.com

RFS: jabber-querybot

[Marco Balmer]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for a my new debian package:

 * Package name: jabber-querybot
   Version : 0.0.1-1
   Upstream Author : Marco Balmer 
 * URL : http://github.com/micressor/jabber-querybot
 * License : GPLv2
   Description : Modular xmpp/jabber bot

 jabber-querybot is a Jabber bot framework for Perl that enables you to
 easily write simple Jabber bots.
 .
 This bot is from swissjabber team and now under opensource license available.
 .
 It's a simple concept with a lot of experiences implemented to this nice pice
 of code.

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/jabber-querybot

ITP bug is available:

  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645266

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards,

Marco Balmer


signature.asc
Description: GnuPG Signature

RFS: aspsms-t

[Marco Balmer]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for a my new debian package:

 * Package name: aspsms-t
   Version : 1.3.0-1
   Upstream Author : Marco Balmer 
 * URL : http://github.com/micressor/aspsms-t
 * License : GPLv2
   Description : xmpp/jabber to sms transport for aspsms

 Which allows you to send sms messages over the jabber network through the
 gateway-system of aspsms.com.
 .
 A lot of networks are supported. Normal TextSMS messages usually costs 1
 aspsms Credit.
 .
 aspsms-t deliver very fast and will send you a jabber status message. A
 second message will receive,If your sms was successfully delivered to the
 mobile device.
 .
 It supports simple text SMS with a maximum of 160 characters. If your message
 is >160 characters, aspsms-t will split it automatically in more than one
 part.
 .
 Support for Arabic and other oriental characters up to 87 characters each
 sms.
 .
 Delivery notification for each sms with a unique transaction number
 It can set alphanumeric originator of every sms. This can be a mobile phone
 or a short text with a maximum of 11 characters.

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/aspsms-t

ITP bug is available:

  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645103

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards,

Marco Balmer


signature.asc
Description: GnuPG Signature