Bug#657428: RFS: surf -- simple web browser (QA upload)
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "surf". This package is orphaned and I've prepared a QA upload for the same. The package can be downloaded with dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/surf/surf_0.4.1-5.dsc This package builds without any lintian warnings. Below is the changelog surf (0.4.1-5) unstable; urgency=low * QA upload. * debian/control: + Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.2 + Vcs-* fields now point to collab-maint repository * debian/watch: + Introduced watch file * debian/surf.postinst: + Reduced the update-alternative priority to 30 as per request from user to the previous maintainer * debian/rules: + Introduced dpkg-buildflags by patching config.mk with dpkg-buildflags.patch * debian/source/local-options: + Introduced local-options to undo the patches -- Vasudev Kamath Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:28:03 +0530 If some one can upload the same for me it would be really helpful. Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cak+nopxvqelrbplnc_1qgb4mvd_y0yfsrbx9eszjxzmtr2k...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: v8cgi (second try)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "v8cgi", for which I'm also the upstream author. v8cgi is a multi-purpose wrapper around V8 Javascript engine: it can be used as a shell-scripting language/environment, CGI/FastCGI binary or Apache module. It resembles Node.js, but comes with a somewhat simplified and more synchronous interface paradigms - somewhat similar to PHP. One of the design goals for this project is also a high CommonJS compliancy (http://wiki.commonjs.org/wiki/Implementations/v8cgi). v8cgi also comes with a rich set of built-in modules, implemented either in C++ or JS. These either wrap common libraries (sockets, mysql, pgsql, gd, tls, ...) or provide features implemented from scratch (websockets, http, session, unit testing, ...). v8cgi itself is implemented in C++ and has libv8 as its only dependency. It is developed at Google Code (http://code.google.com/p/v8cgi/) under New BSD Licence. Ubuntu packages are available from a Launchpad PPA (https://launchpad.net/~ondras/+archive/v8cgi). Thanks for your time! Sincerely, Ondrej Zara -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caagcjpabytyhbao10woy56p6m1hzjvddt7w6bcf5h8xxd1x...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: acsccid (New Upstream Release)
Dear Paul Thank you for your review. I filed #657110 on lintian to check for commented out Vcs-* fields pointing at collab-maint (which is created by dh_make). Please consider implementing a patch for it so that others don't make the same mistake. Done. I removed the comment. You might want to run wrap-and-sort -s so diffs on debian/control are more readable in future. Done. Why do you duplicate src/92_pcscd_acsccid.rules as debian/libacsccid1.udev? I would suggest deleting debian/libacsccid1.udev and just using the upstream file. Done. I created a symbolic link to upstream file. Upstream is hard-coding the path to libpcsclite.pc in configure.ac, please ask them to stop doing that. AC_PREFIX_DEFAULT should not be needed either. Done. I have forwarded your suggestion to Development Team. debian/watch doesn't need the blank line. I would also suggest using [\d\.]+ instead of .* Done. debian/control misses a build-dep on perl. If perl leaves build-essential then your package will FTBFS. Done. Please use --parallel when calling dh, otherwise you don't respect part of Debian Policy 4.9.1. Done. The upstream README file contains installation info and authors/copyright/license info, which is not useful for Debian users. You might want to get upstream to split those out into README.install, AUTHORS or similar. Done. I have forwarded your suggestion to Development Team. The src/openct directory is an embedded code copy. You should ask upstream to remove it and build-depend on openct. If they are not willing to do so, then you should do that for Debian. If that isn't possible for whatever reason, please contact the security team and get it added to the embedded code copies file: http://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies It is not an embedded code copy. acsccid borrowed the internal code from openct to do the smart card protocol (T1). According to the ChangeLog, the source code had been modified. Should ccid be removed from Debian? acsccid seems like a fork of it. If it shouldn't be removed, please also get this documented by the security team, they track forks too. No. How can I get this documented by the security team? One warning from dpkg-shlibdeps: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/libacsccid1/usr/lib/pcsc/drivers/ifd-acsccid.bundle/Contents/Linux/libacsccid.so.1.0.3 contains an unresolvable reference to symbol log_xxd: it's probably a plugin. dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: 1 similar warning has been skipped (use -v to see it). log_xxd is a internal API provided by pcscd. Therefore, dpkg-shlibdeps cannot find the function from other shared libraries. lintian complaints: X: libacsccid1: shlib-calls-exit usr/lib/pcsc/drivers/ifd-acsccid.bundle/Contents/Linux/libacsccid.so.1.0.3 The exit function call is generated automatically by flex (tokenparser.l --> tokenparser.c). It seems to be difficult to modify the code. I have updated the package with the following change log. Please have a look. * New upstream release. * Removed debian/patches/pcsc-lite-1_7_3.patch. * Updated debian/copyright. * Updated debian/libacsccid1.udev with a symbolic link to src/92_pcscd_acsccid.rules. * Removed comment starting with "Vcs-" and added perl to Build-Depends in debian/control. * Added --parallel option to dh in debian/rules. * Removed a blank line and replaced ".*" with "[\d\.]+" in debian/watch. Regards Godfrey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/01509DEEED2944F3BABB080BD94FE5D5@GODFREYPC
Processed: RFS: skstream/0.3.6-1 [ITA] -- IOStream C++ socket Library
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 653977 by 657393 Bug #653977 [wnpp] ITA: skstream -- Isostream C++ socket library Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 653977: 657393 > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 653977: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653977 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132754436321768.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: RFS: skstream/0.3.6-1 [ITA] -- IOStream C++ socket Library
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 657393 + src:skstream Bug #657393 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: skstream/0.3.6-1 [ITA] -- IOStream C++ socket Library Added indication that 657393 affects src:skstream > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 657393: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657393 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132754345716339.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed (with 1 errors): RFS: skstream/0.3.6-1 [ITA] -- IOStream C++ socket Library
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 657393 affects + src:skstream Unknown tag/s: affects, src:skstream. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore lenny lenny-ignore squeeze squeeze-ignore wheezy wheezy-ignore. Bug #657393 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: skstream/0.3.6-1 [ITA] -- IOStream C++ socket Library Requested to add no tags; doing nothing. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 657393: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657393 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132754294913816.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed (with 1 errors): RFS: skstream/0.3.6-1 [ITA] -- IOStream C++ socket Library
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 657393 affects + skstream Unknown tag/s: affects, skstream. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore lenny lenny-ignore squeeze squeeze-ignore wheezy wheezy-ignore. Bug #657393 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: skstream/0.3.6-1 [ITA] -- IOStream C++ socket Library Requested to add no tags; doing nothing. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 657393: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657393 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132754281411753.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#657393: RFS: skstream/0.3.6-1 [ITA] -- IOStream C++ socket Library
On a rebuild it worked.
Something odd's going on here.
-T
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Howdy!
>
> INADD, so I can't sposor
>
> I did try a test-build, and got the following result in a sid pbuilder env --
>
>
> ## --- ##
> ## confdefs.h. ##
> ## --- ##
>
> /* confdefs.h */
> #define PACKAGE_NAME "skstream"
> #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "skstream"
> #define PACKAGE_VERSION "0.3.8"
> #define PACKAGE_STRING "skstream 0.3.8"
> #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "alridd...@googlemail.com"
> #define PACKAGE_URL ""
> #define PACKAGE "skstream"
> #define VERSION "0.3.8"
>
> configure: exit 1
> dh_auto_configure: ./configure --build=i486-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr
> --includedir=${prefix}/include --mandir=${prefix}/share/man
> --infodir=${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var
> --libexecdir=${prefix}/lib/skstream --disable-maintainer-mode
> --disable-dependency-tracking returned exit code 1
> make: *** [build] Error 25
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
> E: Failed autobuilding of package
>
> I didn't get a chance to look over / test the rest.
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Stephen M. Webb
> wrote:
>> Package: sponsorship-requests
>> Severity: normal
>>
>>
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "skstream":
>>
>> dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/skstream
>> /skstream_0.3.8-1.dsc
>>
>>
>> It builds these binary packages:
>> libskstream-0.3-6 - iostream-based C++ socket library
>> libskstream-0.3-6-dbg - iostream-based C++ socket library - debugging
>> symbols
>> libskstream-0.3-dev - iostream-based C++ socket library - development
>> files
>>
>> More information about hello can be obtained from
>> http://www.worldforge.org/
>>
>> Changes since the last upload:
>>
>> skstream (0.3.8-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
>> .
>> * new maintainer (closes: #653977)
>> * new upstream release
>> * renamed binary packages due to SONAME change
>> * moved to debhelper 8
>> * updated Standards-Version to 3.9.2 (no changes required)
>> * added debian/symbols file
>> * added VCs- fields to debian/control
>> * debian/copyright: convert to DEP-5 format
>>
>> Regards,
>> Stephen M. Webb
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
>> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
>> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f208497.3050...@bregmasoft.ca
>>
>
>
>
> --
> All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors.
>
> #define sizeof(x) rand()
> :wq
--
All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors.
#define sizeof(x) rand()
:wq
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAO6P2QR8bmESvO_pn-GE7nKkYkr6hGO+Nu9Xht=5wcydzxm...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#657393: RFS: skstream/0.3.6-1 [ITA] -- IOStream C++ socket Library
Howdy!
INADD, so I can't sposor
I did try a test-build, and got the following result in a sid pbuilder env --
## --- ##
## confdefs.h. ##
## --- ##
/* confdefs.h */
#define PACKAGE_NAME "skstream"
#define PACKAGE_TARNAME "skstream"
#define PACKAGE_VERSION "0.3.8"
#define PACKAGE_STRING "skstream 0.3.8"
#define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "alridd...@googlemail.com"
#define PACKAGE_URL ""
#define PACKAGE "skstream"
#define VERSION "0.3.8"
configure: exit 1
dh_auto_configure: ./configure --build=i486-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr
--includedir=${prefix}/include --mandir=${prefix}/share/man
--infodir=${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var
--libexecdir=${prefix}/lib/skstream --disable-maintainer-mode
--disable-dependency-tracking returned exit code 1
make: *** [build] Error 25
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
E: Failed autobuilding of package
I didn't get a chance to look over / test the rest.
Cheers,
Paul
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Stephen M. Webb
wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "skstream":
>
> dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/skstream
> /skstream_0.3.8-1.dsc
>
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> libskstream-0.3-6 - iostream-based C++ socket library
> libskstream-0.3-6-dbg - iostream-based C++ socket library - debugging
> symbols
> libskstream-0.3-dev - iostream-based C++ socket library - development
> files
>
> More information about hello can be obtained from
> http://www.worldforge.org/
>
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> skstream (0.3.8-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> .
> * new maintainer (closes: #653977)
> * new upstream release
> * renamed binary packages due to SONAME change
> * moved to debhelper 8
> * updated Standards-Version to 3.9.2 (no changes required)
> * added debian/symbols file
> * added VCs- fields to debian/control
> * debian/copyright: convert to DEP-5 format
>
> Regards,
> Stephen M. Webb
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f208497.3050...@bregmasoft.ca
>
--
All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors.
#define sizeof(x) rand()
:wq
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/cao6p2qtybo8uh_j43qqxxgu0jr9uw6mhqkppcuranabus_7...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: bibtool
Dear mentors, dear TeX maintainers: I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bibtool". * Package name: bibtool Version : 2.53-1 Upstream Author :Gerd Neugebauer * URL :http://www.gerd-neugebauer.de/software/TeX/BibTool/index.en.html * License : GPL-1+ Section : tex It builds those binary packages: bibtool- tool for BibTeX database manipulation To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/bibtool Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bibtool/bibtool_2.53-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Jerome BENOIT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f208a04.1020...@rezozer.net
Bug#657393: RFS: skstream/0.3.6-1 [ITA] -- IOStream C++ socket Library
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "skstream": dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/skstream /skstream_0.3.8-1.dsc It builds these binary packages: libskstream-0.3-6 - iostream-based C++ socket library libskstream-0.3-6-dbg - iostream-based C++ socket library - debugging symbols libskstream-0.3-dev - iostream-based C++ socket library - development files More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.worldforge.org/ Changes since the last upload: skstream (0.3.8-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low . * new maintainer (closes: #653977) * new upstream release * renamed binary packages due to SONAME change * moved to debhelper 8 * updated Standards-Version to 3.9.2 (no changes required) * added debian/symbols file * added VCs- fields to debian/control * debian/copyright: convert to DEP-5 format Regards, Stephen M. Webb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f208497.3050...@bregmasoft.ca
Re: dput interferences
Thanks for the prompt reply: the re-upload finally succeeded. Now I will step forward: find a sponsor. Jerome On 25/01/12 23:23, Arno Töll wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 25.01.2012 23:21, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Package has already been uploaded to debexpo on mentors.debian.net Nothing more to do for bibtool_2.53-1_amd64.changes Remove the .upload file or pass -f to dput. That's a local error. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPIIDrAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt49AP/2lWc2MCInSrkcoSUCtsIFjf RhwRYDEnFuAFOeYrne8Cm6jV7onk29KRWRSo+BTHlP685M6MGn+g0NMLRMqekym4 SnmXbvThomvrXjksw8eeok0nqpUBVTeqO3tZwHxVJOlzj2v8+isAbU+WW2XfxWrl RjfVd0qejKSksMKBnEXqGwu3080nVT1JQAhb7uZ/90vSoyMZ4u5iUrM7sqhOWXEH kcjkYfAWZMcCR5DnSNhfwm8gIEHhYTZzk+SQBoN+q7Z6KziKlu7u+j8pTTopqsbW if1/DU3zeQ7WxLjn8ZFX1dloXcX6gznIB6tv8NivgWAh3KgzcSYsZys5/+K6t+H9 yUXA1LkMGsgpc5KzbabO/o5reWoWI3Q5uYdtuUsmFsdJBrMK/+oGmVZSboaTA2BJ +fvdSd0yatnP5oILPAYdssBGOulZzldFK6DFCqpxnLHxjw1M6hKDd4NMkl9ywKol wd/pE9qSzZlQvigAb75UJk8MOzqzizlgO69ihlU6vBURdfBi9J9Ez0ypJKYyWuUx R/w6h6xqrdVBkN0CWGkJ9Z2uEPeDzxXHgwCK3nebsJD8HzSq5XtvdWpZmpjTwx// QQps3yc5MCWZcjqqx1AbD9TvQ+82LuwPIgU2ceydGfev6hrzQuwOJeRul9hVEmxX wmJjlSXXXQCqG3NLy7og =fLag -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2083f5.6090...@rezozer.net
Re: dput interferences
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 25.01.2012 23:21, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Package has already been uploaded to debexpo on mentors.debian.net > Nothing more to do for bibtool_2.53-1_amd64.changes Remove the .upload file or pass -f to dput. That's a local error. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPIIDrAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt49AP/2lWc2MCInSrkcoSUCtsIFjf RhwRYDEnFuAFOeYrne8Cm6jV7onk29KRWRSo+BTHlP685M6MGn+g0NMLRMqekym4 SnmXbvThomvrXjksw8eeok0nqpUBVTeqO3tZwHxVJOlzj2v8+isAbU+WW2XfxWrl RjfVd0qejKSksMKBnEXqGwu3080nVT1JQAhb7uZ/90vSoyMZ4u5iUrM7sqhOWXEH kcjkYfAWZMcCR5DnSNhfwm8gIEHhYTZzk+SQBoN+q7Z6KziKlu7u+j8pTTopqsbW if1/DU3zeQ7WxLjn8ZFX1dloXcX6gznIB6tv8NivgWAh3KgzcSYsZys5/+K6t+H9 yUXA1LkMGsgpc5KzbabO/o5reWoWI3Q5uYdtuUsmFsdJBrMK/+oGmVZSboaTA2BJ +fvdSd0yatnP5oILPAYdssBGOulZzldFK6DFCqpxnLHxjw1M6hKDd4NMkl9ywKol wd/pE9qSzZlQvigAb75UJk8MOzqzizlgO69ihlU6vBURdfBi9J9Ez0ypJKYyWuUx R/w6h6xqrdVBkN0CWGkJ9Z2uEPeDzxXHgwCK3nebsJD8HzSq5XtvdWpZmpjTwx// QQps3yc5MCWZcjqqx1AbD9TvQ+82LuwPIgU2ceydGfev6hrzQuwOJeRul9hVEmxX wmJjlSXXXQCqG3NLy7og =fLag -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2080ec.5090...@toell.net
Re: dput interferences
Hello List: I have just tried to re-upload my package, but without success: I get the message: Package has already been uploaded to debexpo on mentors.debian.net Nothing more to do for bibtool_2.53-1_amd64.changes I guess that something has to be reset. Jerome On 25/01/12 22:11, Arno Töll wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 25.01.2012 18:15, Jerome BENOIT wrote: So I feel stuck: is there a way to fix this issue ? despite it, can I begin to look for a sponsor ? I just fixed that. Please re-upload your package and you will be the owner of it. Of course this does not prevent you to look for sponsors nonetheless. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPIG/0AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt/Y8QALDcruQIwqphhft0SrADX+bH 4W2ZdPSTwnbvplhY75rA1Zk9Woj4rVMGdXF/ivv2zPS3tFgJR+eFSMi+c0AccCna 9wLNgzGL5sbh+RK+ON7tCxGujCh0Zg9AdjiEUZwFiPZ8bGpcsibi8jzaoVXMDLEI 0buBYKzUPn4ylsGqc/iqFczKXDbvHsTNJw+N25ecCW2tVp6/2wl9N9rIFVNLscW5 CeAVFicjGqekVrx/sbAEKHAT1OfEa2a0vM7pyBJwBPXGx5JsqSJKbhmdhZfSV809 juQlREdbnPSIhELb7ILFJkd1tEsKMn2FkZ7t2utr/cdkpSOpVu91ej+v2wpw1QMJ CRJRJWCvuBWYhj3NwowbpNCfEV0Yc/Z+jkBiZrjIKkMaux2RuGrBwHKOMvahKvWd XmcD8d3WR7DzhhY6zM9qhS6k7XiSROE0SIBT2gUc6J7TH2qA37gP6TgOlxM3kpNC DKNAHkss2VY+g/T9moFErv6HOtVlwbMWhJytgXtuXM/kjjfc11uB02+sIITJ4Aad hpHHYq9JJIFiryMNc32OzIB3Qn4pZyL2b2pBTRjfQWqZ9yJF5cjVXYZJi1hPOIqQ XN+VRJnEgvNpLm5fyMkT40kyExg4oZrY983tZIUtCihhQe533Gy9cxFDbGPtX/Ai KsjV4jT51my/6LmBQBTt =eZR5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f208076.7000...@rezozer.net
RFS: not-yet-commons-ssl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "not-yet-commons-ssl". * Package name: not-yet-commons-ssl Version : 0.3.9-1 Upstream Author : Julius Davies * URL : http://juliusdavies.ca/commons-ssl/ * License : Apache 2.0 Section : java It builds those binary packages: libnot-yet-commons-ssl-java - Not-yet-commons-SSL is a library to make SSL and Java easier To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/not-yet-commons-ssl Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/not-yet-commons-ssl/not-yet-commons-ssl_0.3.9-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Dennis van Dok - - -- D.H. van Dok :: Software Engineer :: www.nikhef.nl :: www.biggrid.nl Phone +31 20 592 22 28 :: http://www.nikhef.nl/~dennisvd/ - -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8gF1QACgkQIITq5lEwLHd9vgCdF5Bi80VWWwTPSiMjI41fhq6b 2VkAnRlQqiqeUIYO5TljhdapO6U0tJ6c =3O7S - -END PGP SIGNATURE- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8gcHQACgkQIITq5lEwLHfDuQCfRVwdiduLa2uC1F8xpVrlWxSS CKMAn0gDBBvMnp2VenDjKKvCq3V3N9kg =6kkT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f20707c.7020...@nikhef.nl
Re: dput interferences
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 25.01.2012 18:15, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > So I feel stuck: > is there a way to fix this issue ? > despite it, can I begin to look for a sponsor ? I just fixed that. Please re-upload your package and you will be the owner of it. Of course this does not prevent you to look for sponsors nonetheless. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPIG/0AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt/Y8QALDcruQIwqphhft0SrADX+bH 4W2ZdPSTwnbvplhY75rA1Zk9Woj4rVMGdXF/ivv2zPS3tFgJR+eFSMi+c0AccCna 9wLNgzGL5sbh+RK+ON7tCxGujCh0Zg9AdjiEUZwFiPZ8bGpcsibi8jzaoVXMDLEI 0buBYKzUPn4ylsGqc/iqFczKXDbvHsTNJw+N25ecCW2tVp6/2wl9N9rIFVNLscW5 CeAVFicjGqekVrx/sbAEKHAT1OfEa2a0vM7pyBJwBPXGx5JsqSJKbhmdhZfSV809 juQlREdbnPSIhELb7ILFJkd1tEsKMn2FkZ7t2utr/cdkpSOpVu91ej+v2wpw1QMJ CRJRJWCvuBWYhj3NwowbpNCfEV0Yc/Z+jkBiZrjIKkMaux2RuGrBwHKOMvahKvWd XmcD8d3WR7DzhhY6zM9qhS6k7XiSROE0SIBT2gUc6J7TH2qA37gP6TgOlxM3kpNC DKNAHkss2VY+g/T9moFErv6HOtVlwbMWhJytgXtuXM/kjjfc11uB02+sIITJ4Aad hpHHYq9JJIFiryMNc32OzIB3Qn4pZyL2b2pBTRjfQWqZ9yJF5cjVXYZJi1hPOIqQ XN+VRJnEgvNpLm5fyMkT40kyExg4oZrY983tZIUtCihhQe533Gy9cxFDbGPtX/Ai KsjV4jT51my/6LmBQBTt =eZR5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f206ff4.7040...@toell.net
Asking for a review and suggestion
Dear all, I uploaded to mentors a new version of apt-spy [1]. After the Paul Wise's kind review [2] [3] I reworked the package and switched to git.debian.org both for upstream work and debian work. I need a review of the package before going on with the upload. I know the package is not lintian clean and I override the warning about the file in unusual position but I don't know if it is worth to override also the one about the absence of a watch file as I will continue to use g.d.o as upstream and gbp for packaging. TIA Stefano [1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/apt-spy [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/12/msg00433.html [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/12/msg00452.html -- Stefano Canepa aka sc: s...@linux.it - http://www.stefanocanepa.it Three great virtues of a programmer: laziness, impatience and hubris. Le tre grandi virtù di un programmatore: pigrizia, impazienza e arroganza. (Larry Wall) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877h0fa4fp@lepre.stefanocanepa.home
Re: Fwd: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > Samuel, thanks for doing this. However, I'm trying to get gcc-4.5 removed > from unstable soonish, so I would like to see this for gcc-4.6 (and 4.7 as > found in experimental). Could you do this? Nikita, could you sponsor the > package? Sure, that was my real goal anyway; gcc-4.5 just looked lonely without its documentation, and it didn't seem like it would be much more work to do them both than to just do gcc-4.6. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cajyzjmde7omjo5+-rgdvj6tgec1vvajkrkucn-ftzn5gej8...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Fwd: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg
Samuel, thanks for doing this. However, I'm trying to get gcc-4.5 removed from unstable soonish, so I would like to see this for gcc-4.6 (and 4.7 as found in experimental). Could you do this? Nikita, could you sponsor the package? Matthias On 25.01.2012 19:05, Samuel Bronson wrote: Dear GCC Maintainers, Perhaps I should have CC'd you in the first place, but here's a copy now: -- Forwarded message -- From: Samuel Bronson Date: Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:38 AM Subject: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg". It provides the manuals for GCC 4.5, including its many compilers, and paves the way for "gcc-4.6-doc-non-dfsg". (Figuring out what this package will do is left as an excercise for the reader.) * Package name: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg Version : 4.5.3-1~naesten4 Upstream Author : Free Software Foundation * URL : http://gcc.gnu.org/ * License : GFDL with invariant sections Section : non-free/doc It builds those binary packages: cpp-4.5-doc - documentation for the GNU C preprocessor (cpp) gcc-4.5-doc - documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc, gobjc, g++) gcc-doc-base - several GNU manual pages gcj-4.5-doc - documentation for the GNU Java tools (gcj, gij) gfortran-4.5-doc - documentation for the GNU Fortran Compiler (gfortran) gnat-4.5-doc - documentation for the GNU Ada 95 Compiler (gnat) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/g/gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg/gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg_4.5.3-1.dsc It would be nice if someone could upload the package or, failing that, tell me what I must still change before it can be uploaded. Thanks, Samuel Bronson -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2053a5.5020...@debian.org
Re: Bug#657100: Please add a sponsorship-requests pseudo-package
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Arno Töll wrote: > > >> Hence, please add a "sponsorship-requests" pseudo-package with > > >> debian-mentors@lists.debian.org as a package owner and we can get > > >> started. > > > > This seems like a good name to me as well. > > > > > I still need the text of the explanation of what the pseudopackage is > > > for. See http://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages for an example. > > > > Would something as simple as "Requests for package review and > > sponsorship" be appropriate? > > That's fine for me, assuming it's ok with everyone else. The pseudopackage: sponsorship-requests with the description "Requests for package review and sponsorship" and maintainer address "Debian Mentors " has been created. Don Armstrong -- It was a very familiar voice. [...] It was a voice you could have used to open a bottle of whine. -- Terry Pratchett _The Last Continent_ p270 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120125182749.gt21...@rzlab.ucr.edu
Fwd: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg
Dear GCC Maintainers, Perhaps I should have CC'd you in the first place, but here's a copy now: -- Forwarded message -- From: Samuel Bronson Date: Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:38 AM Subject: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg". It provides the manuals for GCC 4.5, including its many compilers, and paves the way for "gcc-4.6-doc-non-dfsg". (Figuring out what this package will do is left as an excercise for the reader.) * Package name : gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg Version : 4.5.3-1~naesten4 Upstream Author : Free Software Foundation * URL : http://gcc.gnu.org/ * License : GFDL with invariant sections Section : non-free/doc It builds those binary packages: cpp-4.5-doc - documentation for the GNU C preprocessor (cpp) gcc-4.5-doc - documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc, gobjc, g++) gcc-doc-base - several GNU manual pages gcj-4.5-doc - documentation for the GNU Java tools (gcj, gij) gfortran-4.5-doc - documentation for the GNU Fortran Compiler (gfortran) gnat-4.5-doc - documentation for the GNU Ada 95 Compiler (gnat) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/g/gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg/gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg_4.5.3-1.dsc It would be nice if someone could upload the package or, failing that, tell me what I must still change before it can be uploaded. Thanks, Samuel Bronson -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cajyzjmenunsxw9d6q8b1pz7z673osx5wy+g-jup0wvlmsmm...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: sqlbuddy
Hello, On Wed, January 25, 2012 5:01 pm, harish badrinath wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Medhamsh wrote: > complains, only about a missing changelog. Upstream does not seem to ship > a changelog with the distribution tarball/zip file. There seems a changelog in the upstream's website though they dont ship it in the tarball at the following location. http://sqlbuddy.com/releasenotes Tried to patch the changelog file. Though lintian at my end dint spot out the error, the page at mentors gave out the following warning W:sqlbuddy source:format-3.0-but-debian-changes-patch Is this OK? Do I have any work around? > File: debian/changelog:Trailing space in line 3 > File: debian/control:Empty lines from 19-21 > File: debian/copyright: Trailing spaces in lines 18-22,25,26,29-34 Fixed all these trailing space issues. Sincerely, -- Medhamsh Hacktivist | http://medhamsh.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/10650.122.169.174.238.1327512652.squir...@mail.medhamsh.org
Re: RFS dhcp-probe
Hi! "lguignard.deb...@gmail.com" writes: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dhcp-probe". > > * Package name: dhcp-probe >Version : 1.3.0-10 >Upstream Author : Irwin Tillman > * URL : http://www.net.princeton.edu/software/dhcp_probe/ > * License : GPL >Section : net > > It builds those binary packages: > > dhcp-probe - network DHCP or BootP server discover Just uploaded! I've noticed two things on the way (in no way critical): c25796bbf70ecffd285ce40ec8bb9956e4654ad1 ../tmp/dhcp-probe_1.3.0.orig.tar.gz dd48d6605e02583d8cd5f2aeff67c1320c2bc2cf ../dhcp-probe_1.3.0.orig.tar.gz Your tarball diverges from the one distributed by the upstream website but there's no get-orig-source target in debian/rules. What happened? P: dhcp-probe source: unneeded-build-dep-on-quilt You might want tofix that one day ;-) Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ehunpvjq@hepworth.siccegge.de
dput interferences
Hello List: Yesterday I upload my package with dput at http://mentors.debian.net : the uploading worked fine, and mentors.debian.net sent me a email. But it appeared that the URL of my package, http://mentors.debian.net/package/bibtool , is somehow wrong as there is some kind of interference: the announced `Uploader' is not me and I am not the one who sent the previous packages. The associated dsc file is fine: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bibtool/bibtool_2.53-1.dsc On the other hand, the ``Template for an RFS'' is wrong too: http://mentors.debian.net/package/rfs/bibtool I submitted the issue to supp...@mentors.debian.net , but I have not yet received any answer. So I feel stuck: is there a way to fix this issue ? despite it, can I begin to look for a sponsor ? Thanks, Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f203895.8080...@rezozer.net
Re: RFS: suckless-tools 39-1
Hello, On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Michael Stummvoll wrote: > I uploaded a new version of the suckless-tools package: > * dropped st now, cause its maintained by the stterm-packe. > * included sprop and lsx from the suckless-upstream into the package. > * changed slock to not suid root but setgid shadow > * changed to quilt sourceformat with multiple tarballs > > It would be fine if somebody can take a look at it. I'm not a DD and only did a shallow review, but it looks good to me. There are good alternatives to slock that use PAM (such as i3lock). Perhaps in the future you might want to drop slock entirely, I'm not sure how much inconvenience that would be. I noticed that some earlier reviews were all done in the BTS (precisely replies to your ITA, #647090). It would be nice if those reviews were Cc'ed to mentors, as I actually was in the middle of a review when I noticed some stuff had already been talked about there. :-) It would also be better if you posted the .dsc URL again, in special because you're not replying to the original e-mail that mentioned the URL. If someone wants to review it: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/suckless-tools/suckless-tools_39-1.dsc Some more nitpicking: * The slock_shadow patch is not in DEP-3 format. * There's trailing whitespace in README.slock.Debian. * You might want to set more hardening flags (such as hardening+=all) to DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS. * Typo in debian/changelog: Updatet. Thanks for working on this. Regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANVYNa9eU2GiONBgGgNXfRc-Lh1gRx=jnoeg5+c1sdbnntw...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Help with architecture not supporting SSE (Was: Bug#656755: libhmsbeagle FTBFS on everything except amd64)
Hi Peter, many thanks for the patch which was in fact helpful to solve the problem. On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:04:13AM +, peter green wrote: > Ok I took pity on you and took a look at the Makefile.am in that > directory, turns out it wasn't that hard to disable building of the > CPU with SSE plugin. You should really be able to do this kind of > build-system modification yourself though, it's not like the package > is using an exotic build system it's bog standard autotools. I agree that this was not to hard. However, I did not understand your motivation to work behind a perfectly working clean target which was fully functional by using autotools-dev, dh-autoreconf. So I deleted your part of debian/rules changes. > I have tested that the resulting package builds on i386, I have not > tested whether it actually works. I noticed that now the plugin for amd64 is not builded and needed to tweak debian/rules a bit by detecting the build architecture. Hope this will work now for all archs. > The attatched patch makes the aforementioned change and also makes > debian/rules clean actually work. As I said, this was unnecessary. Thanks in any case for your help Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120125135028.gw8...@an3as.eu
Re: RFS: sqlbuddy
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Medhamsh wrote: > Hi, > > I have done possible changes. Hoping for more help. Hello, DISCLAIMER: I don't know if i am supposed to "review" packages since (a)I cant upload to debian. (b)I myself am a maintainer of just one package :). My intention is to help out. My "review" consists of auditing the submitted proposed package only for trailing spaces and empty lines. This is mainly because lintian -IiE --pedantic sqlbuddy_1.3.3-1_all.deb sqlbuddy_1.3.3-1_i386.changes complains, only about a missing changelog. Upstream does not seem to ship a changelog with the distribution tarball/zip file. File: debian/changelog:Trailing space in line 3 File: debian/control:Empty lines from 19-21 File: debian/copyright: Trailing spaces in lines 18-22,25,26,29-34 Regards, Harish Badrinath -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAFUoqbdRGiHRpHPzC4=wxfnews+qxp9lhpzs6uym+9druhe...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#656755: Help with architecture not supporting SSE (Was: Bug#656755: libhmsbeagle FTBFS on everything except amd64)
Hi Andreas, Shall we have a crack at this on Saturday? > > If you can't handle this then I don't think you are competant to be > > maintaining this package in debian. Knowing how the components of > > the software they are packaging fit together and how to fix the > > build systems to produce packages suitable for debian is IMO a > > pretty key part of a maintainers job. Ouch! Cheers, TIM -- To Err is human. To Arrr is Pirate! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1327489737.3915.17.ca...@barsukas.nwl.ac.uk
Re: Help with architecture not supporting SSE (Was: Bug#656755: libhmsbeagle FTBFS on everything except amd64)
tags 656755 +patch thanks While I really agree to this statement I think there is few chance that somebody else will step in. We are just needing to maintain this as a predependency for two important packages of the Debian Med team. Ok I took pity on you and took a look at the Makefile.am in that directory, turns out it wasn't that hard to disable building of the CPU with SSE plugin. You should really be able to do this kind of build-system modification yourself though, it's not like the package is using an exotic build system it's bog standard autotools. I have tested that the resulting package builds on i386, I have not tested whether it actually works. The attatched patch makes the aforementioned change and also makes debian/rules clean actually work. diff -urN libhmsbeagle-1.0/debian/patches/disable_cpu_sse_plugin.patch libhmsbeagle-1.0.new/debian/patches/disable_cpu_sse_plugin.patch --- libhmsbeagle-1.0/debian/patches/disable_cpu_sse_plugin.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ libhmsbeagle-1.0.new/debian/patches/disable_cpu_sse_plugin.patch 2012-01-25 11:00:07.0 + @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +Description: Disable CPU_SSE plugin when building without SSE + The CPU_SSE plugin does not build without -msse +Author: Peter Green +Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/656755 + +--- +The information above should follow the Patch Tagging Guidelines, please +checkout http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ to learn about the format. Here +are templates for supplementary fields that you might want to add: + +Origin: , +Bug: +Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/ +Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/ +Forwarded: +Reviewed-By: +Last-Update: + +Index: libhmsbeagle-1.0.new/libhmsbeagle/CPU/Makefile.am +=== +--- libhmsbeagle-1.0.new.orig/libhmsbeagle/CPU/Makefile.am 2012-01-25 10:09:40.0 + libhmsbeagle-1.0.new/libhmsbeagle/CPU/Makefile.am 2012-01-25 10:09:40.0 + +@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ +-lib_LTLIBRARIES=libhmsbeagle-cpu.la libhmsbeagle-cpu-sse.la ++lib_LTLIBRARIES=libhmsbeagle-cpu.la + + BEAGLE_CPU_COMMON = Precision.h EigenDecomposition.h \ + EigenDecompositionCube.hpp EigenDecompositionCube.h \ +@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ + # + # CPU plugin with custom SSE code + # ++if HAVE_SSE ++lib_LTLIBRARIES += libhmsbeagle-cpu-sse.la + libhmsbeagle_cpu_sse_la_SOURCES = $(BEAGLE_CPU_COMMON) \ + SSEDefinitions.h BeagleCPU4StateSSEImpl.hpp BeagleCPU4StateSSEImpl.h \ + BeagleCPUSSEImpl.hpp BeagleCPUSSEImpl.h \ +@@ -26,6 +28,7 @@ + + libhmsbeagle_cpu_sse_la_CXXFLAGS = $(AM_CXXFLAGS) + libhmsbeagle_cpu_sse_la_LDFLAGS= -version-info $(GENERIC_LIBRARY_VERSION) ++endif + + # + # CPU plugin with OpenMP parallel threads +Index: libhmsbeagle-1.0.new/configure.ac +=== +--- libhmsbeagle-1.0.new.orig/configure.ac 2012-01-25 10:41:40.0 + libhmsbeagle-1.0.new/configure.ac 2012-01-25 10:41:59.0 + +@@ -222,6 +222,9 @@ + if test "$enable_sse" = yes; then + SSE_CFLAGS+="-DENABLE_SSE" + AM_CXXFLAGS="$AM_CXXFLAGS -msse2" ++AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_SSE,true) ++else ++AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_SSE,false) + fi + + # -- diff -urN libhmsbeagle-1.0/debian/patches/series libhmsbeagle-1.0.new/debian/patches/series --- libhmsbeagle-1.0/debian/patches/series 2012-01-21 16:36:24.0 + +++ libhmsbeagle-1.0.new/debian/patches/series 2012-01-25 10:41:51.0 + @@ -1 +1,2 @@ enable_static.patch +disable_cpu_sse_plugin.patch diff -urN libhmsbeagle-1.0/debian/rules libhmsbeagle-1.0.new/debian/rules --- libhmsbeagle-1.0/debian/rules 2012-01-21 12:54:33.0 + +++ libhmsbeagle-1.0.new/debian/rules 2012-01-25 10:53:59.0 + @@ -42,6 +42,61 @@ $(MAKE) -f Makefile distclean || true rm -rf doc .config configure rm -rf lib build + rm -f acinclude.m4 + rm -f INSTALL + rm -f libhmsbeagle/config.h.in + rm -f examples/*/Makefile.in + rm -f examples/Makefile.in + rm -f examples/*/*.o + rm -rf examples/*/.libs + rm -rf libhmsbeagle/*/.libs + rm -rf libhmsbeagle/.libs + rm -rf libhmsbeagle/*.o + rm -rf libhmsbeagle/*/*.o + rm -f Makefile + rm -f config.log + rm -f config.status + rm -f examples/Makefile + rm -f examples/complextest/Makefile + rm -f examples/complextest/complextest + rm -f examples/fourtaxon/Makefile + rm -f examples/fourtaxon/check_lnL_using_paup.nex + rm -f examples/fourtaxon/fourtaxon + rm -f examples/fourtaxon/fourtaxonrun.sh + rm -f examples/genomictest/Makefile + rm -f examples/genomictest/genomictest + rm -f examples/genomictest/genomictest.sh + rm -f examples/matrixtest/Makefile + rm -f examples/matrixtest/matrixtest + rm -f examples/oddstatetest/Makefile + rm -f examples/oddstatetest/oddstatetest + rm -f examples/tinytest/Makefile + rm -f examples/tinytest/tinytest + rm -f hmsbeagle
Re: RFS: sqlbuddy
Hi, I have done possible changes. Hoping for more help. On Mon, January 23, 2012 7:49 pm, Tanguy Ortolo wrote: > debian/control: > * Homepage: There is an extra space after the website URL, better to > remove it. You could add the final / too, although that is not required Fixed this. > should remove the commented Vcs-* fields, or update them and uncomment > them if you are using a public VCS for maintaining that package (which > would be a good thing, by the way). * Description: SQLite it the correct > capitalization, not sqlite. Using gitorious for packaging. I hope this shouldn't be a problem. Can I use collabmaint? Is it OK for such small packages? Also fixed the case of SQLite. > debian/watch: The upstream release practice prevents you to have a watch > file indeed, I think you should ask them if they could publish versionned > tarballs. I have put a mail and awaiting reply. For now using a commented watch file. > There is also the empty /usr/share/sqlbuddy/exports/ which is detected > by Lintian. I guess that is intentional, but if this is a directory where > database dumps will be placed, then it is at a wrong place, and it should > be under /var instead, with the appropriate configuration, patch or > symlink. Fixed this by linking to /var/lib/sqlbuddy Sincerely, -- Medhamsh Hacktivist | http://medhamsh.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/45161.14.139.82.6.1327485282.squir...@mail.medhamsh.org
Re: Bug#657100: Please add a sponsorship-requests pseudo-package
Don Armstrong writes: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, Michael Gilbert wrote: >> Would something as simple as "Requests for package review and >> sponsorship" be appropriate? > > That's fine for me, assuming it's ok with everyone else. It's fine for me as well. Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871uqo5ei8@deep-thought.43-1.org
Re: What to do if FTBFS bug is not reproducible?
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:28:49 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > I'm working on to prepare QA upload for surf which is orphaned by its > previous maintainer. There is a FTBFS bug reported against this > package [1]. But I'm not able to reproduce this bug. Package builds > fine on the pbuilder clean chroot. I've already reported this on the > bug and also have provided my build log. How can I proceed shall I > manually close this bug and prepare a normal QA upload or I need to > wait for some reply on the bug. This was a bug filed after a mass-rebuild on Grid'5000. On Lucas' advice [0], what I do in these cases is to check if the build failure is still present in the most recent rebuild run [2], and if it's not there and I can't reproduce it myself, I close it. > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646474 [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2011/11/msg00024.html [2] currently: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/collab-qa/archive-rebuilds/2012-01-12-lsid64-amd64/failed.2012-01-12.txt?view=markup&pathrev=2130 Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- You're dead, Jim. -- McCoy, "Amok Time", stardate 3372.7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120125091055.gb30...@colleen.colgarra.priv.at
Re: Bug#657100: Please add a sponsorship-requests pseudo-package
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:24:27 +0100, Michael Stummvoll wrote: > On 24.01.2012 02:55, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > As for the usertag names, I came up with the following when writing > > support for this into reportbug: [..] > How would I tag a sponsorship request of an ITA-Package? It matches neither > new nor update description. The current proposal [0] does not use usertags but only "normal" tags for tracking the status and abbreviations in the subject. Cheers, gregor [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/01/msg00365.html -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- You're dead, Jim. -- McCoy, "Amok Time", stardate 3372.7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120125084822.ga30...@colleen.colgarra.priv.at
Re: What to do if FTBFS bug is not reproducible?
Hi! Am 25.01.2012 08:58, schrieb Vasudev Kamath: > I'm working on to prepare QA upload for surf which is orphaned by its > previous maintainer. There is a FTBFS bug reported against this > package [1]. But I'm not able to reproduce this bug. Package builds > fine on the pbuilder clean chroot. I've already reported this on the > bug and also have provided my build log. How can I proceed shall I > manually close this bug and prepare a normal QA upload or I need to > wait for some reply on the bug. I just tried it, and verified, that the package indeed builds in pbuilder. You could try to compare your build log, and one from the build that failed (haven't taken a look at them). If you can't find any significant differences, which could explain the FTBFS, I would downgrade the bug to important (so it's no longer considered release critical) and tag it unreproducible, till the submitter confirms the problem has been solved somehow (and the bug can be closed). If you are going to do an QA upload keep an eye on the build logs: You'll see if the package can be build by the autobuilders. Best regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f1fc3b8.8060...@schmehl.info
Re: Bug#657100: Please add a sponsorship-requests pseudo-package
On 24.01.2012 02:55, Michael Gilbert wrote: > As for the usertag names, I came up with the following when writing > support for this into reportbug: > > 'new': "a sponsorship request for a brand new package", > 'update': "a sponsorship request for an update to a > package you've gotten sponsored and uploaded previously", > 'release-critical': "a sponsorship request for a package > fixing a release-critical bug", > 'proposed-update': "a sponsorship request for a > proposed-update to stable/oldstable", > 'nmu': "a sponsorship request for a > non-maintainer upload to unstable", > 'security': "a sponsorship request for a package > fixing a security issue", > 'backport': "a sponsorship request for a backport to > stable/oldstable", > 'other' : "none of the other options", > > I'm not sure if that is as comprehensive as it could be, so I'm > certainly open to suggestions. > How would I tag a sponsorship request of an ITA-Package? It matches neither new nor update description. Kind Regards, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f1fbc3b.3010...@stummi.org
