Bug#661978: RFS: apt-spy/3.2.2-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "apt-spy" * Package name: apt-spy Version : 3.2.2-1 Upstream Author : Steven Holmes * URL : None * License : BSD Section : admin It builds those binary packages: apt-spy- writes a sources.list file based on bandwidth tests To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/apt-spy Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/apt-spy/apt-spy_3.2.2-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release - Fixes segfault with option -m and special args (Closes: #645839) - Fixes another segfault (Closes: #447232) - Fixes segfault with with -v or -h options (Closes: #491802) - Fixes the region filter (Closes: #617699) - Fixes paths in the man page (Closes: #548591, #551344) - Doesn't get confused by leading blanks (Closes: #457049) - Inlines initialization of defaults (Closes: #317592) - Tests all of the IP addresses for a mirror (Closes: #320112) * Applied patch to copyright and other files (Closes: #645910) Regards, Stefano Canepa -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120303065458.4251.81781.report...@lepre.stefanocanepa.home
Bug#661975: RFS: gearman-interface [NMU] -- fixes 2 RC bugs
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gearman-interface". It fixes two filed RC bugs and one unfiled FTBFS. The intention to NMU was expressed in the BTS, please upload it to the delayed queue. * Package name: gearman-interface Version : 0.13.2-2.1 Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-gearman.libgearman - Python wrapper of libgearman python3-gearman.libgearman - Python 3 wrapper of libgearman To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gearman-interface Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gearman-interface/gearman-interface_0.13.2-2.1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: gearman-interface (0.13.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Fix "FTBFS: SWIG version >= 1.3.31 is required. You have 2.0.4." applying patch from ubuntu (Closes: #631820) * Apply fix for newer libgearman-dev (changes includes) * Fix "python-gearman.libgearman and python-gearman: error when trying to install together" Cherry-picking relevant sections of the attached patch in the bugrport (Closes: #620469) -- Tobias Frost Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:03:30 +0100 Regards, Tobias Frost - -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk9Rr90ACgkQvyUNygvkuQIoKwCfUaUKC4MutW19a7ISVoZUW2Jw 20UAn1eT+la+3MxA4xAE9eFqBOZKnhOH =TENU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120303054501.10609.79970.report...@ithilien.loewenhoehle.ip
Re: Disappearing
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > I have just unsubscribed from debian-mentors. In the unlikely event that I > started reviewing your package AND you feel I should be obliged to continue > the review, please Cc me. I for one am sad to see you go :( Good luck in whatever you are moving on to. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caktje6gshj18ggkzeyotmqcq+kcq0-kvfj+epp62wt6vv0t...@mail.gmail.com
Re: What happens when an architecture independent package won't build on all architectures?
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Paul Elliott wrote:
> When that plan goes into place, will the Architecture: all be built under all
> the different architectures? I have a package that fails to build under some
> archetectures, because of the heavy duty dependancies necessary to build an
> Architecture: all package. I am trying to figure out if it would be a good
> idea to split that source package in two.
Splitting source packages is generally something to talk to upstream
about rather than something that should be done in Debian.
I'm not involved in the buildd stuff, but AFAICT we do not build
Architecture: any packages on all of the buildds for a particular
architecture (because that would be a waste of CPU, disk, network
resources). So I very much doubt we will be building Architecture: all
packages on all available buildds, I guess they will be built on the
first available buildd that matches the requirements
(Build-Depends{,-Indep}, Build-Architecture, etc).
Build-Depends-Indep is definitely not a kludge, thats the standard
Debian interface for building arch-independent stuff only.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6FnwXjGAApq+=ozymirzlypfsuptatkne-zrxeaabr...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#661857: RFS: libre-jigsaw/2012.02.25-1 [ITP]
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > debian/rules refers to your home directory. That will not work for other > people building the package. > > The short description should not just repeat the package name. > Something generic like "jigsaw puzzle" might be better. I'll get those fixed. > I did not see what you install to /usr/games/libre-jigsaw which is > started by the .desktop and menu files. But I might have missed it. /usr/games/libre-jigsaw is a link to /usr/share/games/libre-jigsaw/libre-jigsaw.jar - built by javahelper. > > Regards, > Ansgar Thanks for your feedback, - Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALkGRC8yw1AyTAEN46x95izUF=5gHPs=ojnpob4qghvqcxu...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#658306: preload/0.6.4-2 [ITA] -- adaptive readahead daemon
Since the 3.9.3 release, here's a new mentors.debian.net upload: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/preload/preload_0.6.4-2.dsc Here's the full changelog entry for this revision: * New Maintainer (Closes: #646216) * Switched to 3.0 (quilt) source format. * Corrected the logrotate location. Thanks to Tobias for the patch. (Closes: #619384) * Improved init.d script + Add init.d status support. Thanks to Peter Eisentraut for the patch. (Closes: #645156) + The script now provides itself. * Created debian/watch. * Fixed a spelling mistake in the manpage. * debian/copyright now refers to GPL-2 rather than to the GPL symlink. * Bumped debhelper compatibility up to level 9. * Bumped standards version to 3.9.3. I'd be very glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Thank you, Daniel -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#659522: RFS: prelink/0.0.20111012-1 [ITA] - ELF prelinking
A new package is available at mentors as shown below: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/prelink/prelink_0.0.20111012-1.dsc I've solved these issues: * Errors. * Pedantic and informational complaints are gone as well. * I've added a Closes:LP bug which requests the latest upstream version to be packaged. * Bumped standards version to 3.9.3. There are two W: I have left out for now: W: prelink source: ancient-libtool ltconfig W: prelink source: ancient-libtool ltmain.sh 1.4.2 Since the lintian description tells me to contact upstream before patching with quilt (which would give extra work), I've sent a mail to Jakub about the subject. I'll wait a week or two for his answer. For the time being, the newer upload seems to be fine apart from those two warnings. I'd be very glad if someone sponsored this package for me. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: remove moreinfo tag
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 658426 - moreinfo Bug #658426 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: xfonts-bolkhov/20001007-7 [ITA] -- Cyrillic fonts for X Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 658426: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658426 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133072981531624.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#658426: xfonts-bolkhov/20001007-7 [ITA] -- Cyrillic fonts for X
The package has been re-uploaded to mentors.debian.net as follows: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc It appears to be lintian clean and the orig.tar.gz issues are gone. If anyone could sponsor this upload, I'd be very grateful. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Disappearing
I have just unsubscribed from debian-mentors. In the unlikely event that I started reviewing your package AND you feel I should be obliged to continue the review, please Cc me. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120302212206.ga6...@jwilk.net
Re: RFS: python-gnupg
On 2012-03-01 at 11:54:05 +0100, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: > > > Question to upstream: does random_binary_data need to be _that_ big? > > > Seriously, it takes >97% of space in the tarball. :| > > I've written upstream and asked about it. > I'm still waiting for an answer from upstream, so I haven't done > anything for this issue yet. Upstream answered: the file was generated using os.urandom() or something to be able to test on a non-trivial file and will be removed from future releases to be generated as needed before running the tests. Should I repackage the orig tarball for this release or is it fine to keep it for now? -- Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: What happens when an architecture independent package won't build on all architectures?
On Thursday, March 01, 2012 11:26:01 PM Paul Wise wrote: > > The Debian buildds do not (yet) build any Architecture: all packages, > they are currently all built on developer machines. > > IIRC there is a plan to build all packages on the buildds but that > isn't yet in place. > > Part of that is adding a Build-Architecture field for packages that > are Architecture: all but can only build on certain architectures. > > I guess the procedures for an Architecture: all package will be > approximately the same as for Architecture: any packages where an > architecture has multiple buildds. Give the package to one of the > available buildds to try and if it fails, give it to another one. When that plan goes into place, will the Architecture: all be built under all the different architectures? I have a package that fails to build under some archetectures, because of the heavy duty dependancies necessary to build an Architecture: all package. I am trying to figure out if it would be a good idea to split that source package in two. I am aware of Build-Depends-Indep and this kludge: http://asylum.madhouse-project.org/blog/2012/01/26/buildd-workarounds/ but it feels too kludgy. -- Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096 pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#659522: RFS: prelink/0.0.20111012-1 [ITA] - ELF prelinking utility to speed up dynamic linking
* Daniel Martí , 2012-02-11, 21:15: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/prelink/prelink_0.0.20111012-1.dsc Lintian report errors and warnings: W: prelink source: ancient-libtool ltconfig W: prelink source: ancient-libtool ltmain.sh 1.4.2 E: prelink source: ancient-autotools-helper-file config.sub 2002-09-05 E: prelink source: ancient-autotools-helper-file config.guess 2002-09-03 …and a few other minor issues: I: prelink: possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration P: prelink: maintainer-script-without-set-e postrm -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120302133535.ga5...@jwilk.net
Bug#661857: RFS: libre-jigsaw/2012.02.25-1 [ITP]
On 03/02/2012 12:33 AM, Jon Hulka wrote: > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libr/libre-jigsaw/libre-jigsaw_2012.02.25-1.dsc > > Libre Jigsaw is written in Java I'm not familiar with Java so I only took a brief look at the package: debian/rules refers to your home directory. That will not work for other people building the package. The short description should not just repeat the package name. Something generic like "jigsaw puzzle" might be better. I did not see what you install to /usr/games/libre-jigsaw which is started by the .desktop and menu files. But I might have missed it. Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f50adac.4040...@debian.org
Re: How to tell users that ia32-libs will go away
On 2012-03-02 10:43 +0100, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> Also >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Nov 13 2010 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 -> >> /lib32/ld-linux.so.2 >> and >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Nov 13 2010 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 -> >> /lib/i486-linux-gnu/ld-linux.so.2 >> conflict. >> >> Currently libc6:i386 only Replaces libc6-i386. Which means that >> installing libc6:i386 and then removing it again leaves biarch in a >> non-functioning state. If the two packages do no Break/Conflict then >> diversions or alternatives need to be used. Both of which I don't like >> for what is a transtion. > > I see. Is this filed as a bug? Does not seem so. > I'm surprised the Replaces is needed. Symlinks act like directories > in dpkg most of the time, Only symlinks to directories, not symlinks to regular files. > and multiple packages are allowed to share a directory. They can share a symlink if the target is the same in all packages and is a directory. Neither is the case here. Cheers, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877gz39ulj@turtle.gmx.de
Re: How to tell users that ia32-libs will go away
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Also > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Nov 13 2010 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 -> > /lib32/ld-linux.so.2 > and > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Nov 13 2010 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 -> > /lib/i486-linux-gnu/ld-linux.so.2 > conflict. > > Currently libc6:i386 only Replaces libc6-i386. Which means that > installing libc6:i386 and then removing it again leaves biarch in a > non-functioning state. If the two packages do no Break/Conflict then > diversions or alternatives need to be used. Both of which I don't like > for what is a transtion. I see. Is this filed as a bug? I'm surprised the Replaces is needed. Symlinks act like directories in dpkg most of the time, and multiple packages are allowed to share a directory. Thanks, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120302094330.GN5248@burratino
