Re: bad lintian warning?
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:59:02PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > My package: > http://mentors.debian.net/package/resiprocate > > The warning: > http://lintian.debian.org/tags/dev-pkg-without-shlib-symlink.html > > a) I notice the warning is appearing for the lib package and NOT the > -dev package itself Apparently that's intended: the tag is reported against the package containing the library. > b) I notice the verbose output (on the mentors summary page) shows an > SONAME in a slightly different format: > >usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so.0.0.0 usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so > > Notice: librutil-1.8.so, while the -dev package creates a symlink in the > form librutil.so Yes, that's the problem. Lintian cuts out everything after ".so" when searching for the dev symlink while libtool with -release doesn't include the release number in the dev symlink (see also info libtool "7.4 Managing release information"). If you encode the library version in the library name, you are supposed to specify that version when linking, otherwise it's pointless. Note that the libtool example (libbfd-2.9.0.so) doesn't have a soversion while your libs have -version-info 0:0:0 in addition to -release 1.8 and that's why the libs are named libfoo-1.8.so.0.0.0 instead of more common libfoo-1.8.so. > c) If I install the packages manually on my own machine, I find the > symlink is really there after installing the -dev package: There is no librutil-1.8.so. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#671701: marked as done (RFS: autofs/5.0.6-1 [ITA] -- kernel-based automounter for Linux)
Your message dated Mon, 21 May 2012 04:44:20 + with message-id <20120521044419.ga13...@master.debian.org> and subject line closing sponsorship-requests for packages uploaded to unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #671701, regarding RFS: autofs/5.0.6-1 [ITA] -- kernel-based automounter for Linux to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 671701: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671701 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for package "autofs" * Package name: autofs Version : 5.0.6-1 Upstream Author : Transmeta corporation * URL : http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/autofs/v5/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : utils It builds those binary packages: autofs - kernel-based automounter for Linux autofs-hesiod - Hesiod map support for autofs autofs-ldap- LDAP map support for autofs autofs5- transitional dummy package for 'autofs' autofs5-hesiod - transitional dummy package for 'autofs-hesiod' autofs5-ldap - transitional dummy package for 'autofs-ldap' To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/autofs Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/autofs/autofs_5.0.6-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release - "mount(nfs): no hosts available" (Closes: #608459). - "new upstream version available" (Closes: #602933). - "autofs mounted directory are never dismounted" (Closes: #521165). - "autofs5 does not support recursive mount" (Closes: #626473). - "autofs5 crashed in a nested setup in combination with negative lookups on *" (Closes: #617317). - "autofs5-ldap: simple bind auth feature request" (Closes: #595808). - "autofs5-ldap: SASL auth broken" (Closes: #568813). * package rename: dropping '5' from package names (Closes: #655351). * NMU changes acknowledged (Closes: #603491, #583094). * register /etc/default/autofs with ucf (Closes: #556961). * debian/copyright to DEP-5 format; upstream copyright audit. * packaging update: * use debhelper & compat version 9. * standards to 3.9.3 * lintian-override for 'non-standard-file-perm' * install missing autofs_ldap_auth.conf.5 man page * source format to version 3 and .xz compression * debian/rules rewritten in debhelper style * patchworks: + replacing upstream patches with new patchset as of 2012-04-23. + replacing dpatch with quilt (Closes: #668077) + new patch to correct manpages spelling (Closes: #660075) thanks to Oz Nahum Tiram and Javi Merino + updated SYSV init script patch: * removed bashisms (Closes: #626435). * introduce 'status' support to SYSV script (Closes: #651978, #667811, #565507). * adding 'slapd' to Should-Start/Stop (Closes: #600764, #659616). * LSB output (Closes: #567805) thanks to Petter Reinholdtsen. * declare myself as Maintainer (adopting package) -- This package was NMU'ed twice since last maintainer's update in August 2009. Maintainer Jan Christoph Nordholz is MIA, here is what he wrote on another package some months ago: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641867#20 (I will follow the remaining bugs after upload of this package.) Thank you. Regards, Dmitry. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- --- End Message ---
Bug#671665: marked as done (RFS: blackbox-themes/0.5 [ITA] -- Themes for the Blackbox Windowmanager)
Your message dated Mon, 21 May 2012 04:44:20 +
with message-id <20120521044419.ga13...@master.debian.org>
and subject line closing sponsorship-requests for packages uploaded to unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #671665,
regarding RFS: blackbox-themes/0.5 [ITA] -- Themes for the Blackbox
Windowmanager
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
671665: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671665
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "blackbox-themes"
* Package name: blackbox-themes
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : wickedlester
: polachok
: Carlos Oliva G.
: artwiz
: qbik.root
: Volkan YAZICI
* URL : (no home page)
* License : GPL
Section : x11
It builds those binary packages:
blackbox-themes - Themes for the Blackbox Windowmanager
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/blackbox-themes
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/blackbox-themes/blackbox-themes_0.5.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
blackbox-themes (0.5) unstable; urgency=low
* New maintainer (Closes: #553348)
* Bumped Standards-version to 3.9.3
* Dependency for ${misc:Depends}
* Added empty build-arch and build-indep rules
Regards,
Juhani Numminen
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
--- End Message ---
Bug#662035: marked as done (RFS: vorbisgain/0.37-1 [ITA] -- add Replay Gain volume tags to Ogg Vorbis files)
Your message dated Mon, 21 May 2012 04:44:20 + with message-id <20120521044419.ga13...@master.debian.org> and subject line closing sponsorship-requests for packages uploaded to unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #662035, regarding RFS: vorbisgain/0.37-1 [ITA] -- add Replay Gain volume tags to Ogg Vorbis files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 662035: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662035 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vorbisgain" * Package name: vorbisgain Version : 0.37-1 * URL : http://sjeng.org/vorbisgain.html * License : GPL-2 Section : sound It builds those binary packages: vorbisgain - add Replay Gain volume tags to Ogg Vorbis files To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/vorbisgain Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vorbisgain/vorbisgain_0.37-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: vorbisgain (0.37-1) unstable; urgency=low * New Maintainer (Closes: #547233) * New upstream release. - Refreshed all patches. * Bumped debhelper compat level to 8. * debian/copyright is now in DEP-5 format version 1.0. * debian/rules now removes automake's .log and .status in "clean". * Bumped standards version to 3.9.3. * debian/patches/0006-manpage_hyphens.patch: - Corrected many hyphen-used-as-minus-sign lintian complaints in the manpage. * debian/patches/0007-recursively_spelling.patch: - Corrected a spelling mistake, "recursivly". (Closes: #661999) * debian/patches/0008-manpage_recursion_mistake.patch: - The manpage no longer shows examples which don't work. (Closes: 447402) * debian/watch has been fixed. Regards, Daniel Martí -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- --- End Message ---
bad lintian warning?
My package: http://mentors.debian.net/package/resiprocate The warning: http://lintian.debian.org/tags/dev-pkg-without-shlib-symlink.html a) I notice the warning is appearing for the lib package and NOT the -dev package itself b) I notice the verbose output (on the mentors summary page) shows an SONAME in a slightly different format: usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so.0.0.0 usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so Notice: librutil-1.8.so, while the -dev package creates a symlink in the form librutil.so c) If I install the packages manually on my own machine, I find the symlink is really there after installing the -dev package: root@wheezy1:/tmp# dpkg -i libresiprocate-1.8_1.8.0~pre2-1_amd64.deb Selecting previously unselected package libresiprocate-1.8. (Reading database ... 151644 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libresiprocate-1.8 (from libresiprocate-1.8_1.8.0~pre2-1_amd64.deb) ... Setting up libresiprocate-1.8 (1.8.0~pre2-1) ... root@wheezy1:/tmp# dpkg -i ^C root@wheezy1:/tmp# ls -l /usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so.0* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 May 20 20:32 /usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so.0 -> librutil-1.8.so.0.0.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 556400 May 20 20:32 /usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so.0.0.0 root@wheezy1:/tmp# dpkg -i libresiprocate-1.8-dev_1.8.0~pre2-1_amd64.deb Selecting previously unselected package libresiprocate-1.8-dev. (Reading database ... 151659 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libresiprocate-1.8-dev (from libresiprocate-1.8-dev_1.8.0~pre2-1_amd64.deb) ... Setting up libresiprocate-1.8-dev (1.8.0~pre2-1) ... root@wheezy1:/tmp# ls -l /usr/lib/librutil* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 May 20 20:32 /usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so.0 -> librutil-1.8.so.0.0.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 556400 May 20 20:32 /usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so.0.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 May 20 20:32 /usr/lib/librutil.so -> librutil-1.8.so.0.0.0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fb95b16.4000...@pocock.com.au
Re: Workflow documentation [was: Re: Bug#665980: RFS: evilvte/0.5.1-1 [updated package]]
Hi Sven, On 20.05.2012 16:21, Sven Hoexter wrote: > Arno: Could you link that page from mentors.d.n? > I'd add it in mentors.d.n/qa in the "Getting > started" section as "What does the current workflow > look like?" we do already include our own copy of these guidelines at [1], which is also shown (mostly) filled-out to sponsorees for their respective packages. Of course we could still add another reference to it in the QA section. [1] http://mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Workflow documentation [was: Re: Bug#665980: RFS: evilvte/0.5.1-1 [updated package]]
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:53:01PM +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: Hi, > This is my first upload after debian-mentors started using BTS. > Below are documents I dug: > > [1] Wiki for sponsorship-requests BTS workflow > http://wiki.debian.org/Mentors/BTS Ah great, thank you. That's what I've been looking for. :) Arno: Could you link that page from mentors.d.n? I'd add it in mentors.d.n/qa in the "Getting started" section as "What does the current workflow look like?" Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120520142106.GD2985@marvin
Bug#665980: marked as done (RFS: evilvte/0.5.1-1 [updated package])
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2012 16:14:40 +0200 with message-id <20120520141440.GC2985@marvin> and subject line already uploaded - just closing has caused the Debian Bug report #665980, regarding RFS: evilvte/0.5.1-1 [updated package] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 665980: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665980 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1,SHA512 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "evilvte": * Package name: evilvte Version : 0.5.1-1 Upstream Author : Wen-Yen Chuang * URL : http://www.calno.com/evilvte/ * License : GPL-2 Section : x11 Language: C It builds this binary package and is lintian clean: evilvte - lightweight terminal emulator based on VTE To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/evilvte Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/evilvte/evilvte_0.5.1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: evilvte (0.5.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release - update to new style of hotkey configuration * Update debian/copyright - follow DEP-5 copyright-format 1.0 - update copyright year to 2012 - add icon modifier info to satisfy lintian * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3 Kind regards Wen-Yen Chuang (caleb) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAk9x1IYACgkQdEpXpumNYVkF5gCfXz5JfstAfYjatBdBEwaVt0k/ edcAnApWa06y5SiQPwcHCAx/za2qF4PeiQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPcdSGAAoJELc3H0m+ i6gZ51QP/jqcKTooduPtUkypx+wOVpm9h7gCJmWD7sXD9PoIxKMFFb3WiDxKrApt 1UBVYlotmsp/DaMJVV9P/sWuDgWpqW3FyEf1cQVUb9gYvNfurYWQyoFIakWtxXAS kfMiXUsXWa1lmKeyVylJdm9/sR1h7Xi7wplM70roKBWog2V4WMmO7E8YMwG7C6lU DA4loMGmLQQdXBgiRNnCaxRwPbXLhaRAJIVGN7r/IKs3d428Tb7oSqIfMCgu4Dsa jGq6NChsqijJ/zzD/UVlV000zd5auUUWYDYuE+V1eiO2vfC1gjoA7wwJ85KEzdXZ +OIvRVVvCBSGELci2t4YHZpD9sHp2CvkSTG1njT/P9q3cWT7ahOiAW+m0xsmoLMW AlaWtJyhWWyDESPSoVfobrphNXYYzEU0Rp9Sy1fiAuwBOFiSQ6YlMDLkYljEjXfH LeDbdvWWe8o9Orm/5rfdbit0AbuQaIuDxjRLOZ98Js388qUu9iYri3e4NYi7AG87 T5jlR5pGSEfRHyMJcgV2usCtiUCTc8jwiqgyAj5vSBeIF798V/yloUFYsHrWGELk UrhDgGgXi+EumpaRrcCvE+GwQfQBOBsUtj9TFN/BshhSCFYN6t7Rq31hBdrkqnj2 5jbfftRDuKONjQ5aAw427DeStg6rpbPtCWXLCKLQ7jmxMgqvzNDn =XdH+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Uploaded, just wasn't aware of the closing procedure. Ref: http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/evilvte/news/20120520T103226Z.html -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] --- End Message ---
Re: Bug#665980: RFS: evilvte/0.5.1-1 [updated package]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1,SHA512 On 05/20/12 18:30, Sven Hoexter wrote: > Uploaded but I've lost track of the current sponsoring procedures > about closing/taging the bugs. Couldn't find a documentation ad-hoc > but I didn't search that hard. ;) Thank you! :-) (This mail is not CCed to BTS, but to debian-mentors.) This is my first upload after debian-mentors started using BTS. Below are documents I dug: [1] Wiki for sponsorship-requests BTS workflow http://wiki.debian.org/Mentors/BTS [2] Initial proposal / mailing list thread http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/01/msg00365.html [3] BTS for updated packages http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/01/msg00385.html Kind regards Wen-Yen Chuang (caleb) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAk+46S0ACgkQdEpXpumNYVkKdQCfR7HU46nANJkPo1zuvnYAHWVj /64An0BKPqEf2WFWWQnyEQ9xFIELURtDiQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPuOktAAoJELc3H0m+ i6gZOfwQALVt4Q6clP5ERwT7/6ZXtZAYieErFXz7xtDYW1yOp1aGoNK2w6UJU6fi eEb5VMLMYVvAs0GF8o7deARgd56ZS6nac+E3gu/KjgC6tl1wnkvl42YoTGLyXfHD wl46xKYEuSHEwx+7KNHj3KNiSQG/QX+MN03gYPSEwzI/CefLNUKLaUI3bQRZqNv8 Jqe246OHNil6W6DbDWL/iojgedYay8m+ciR5SLdDs3O1suipBEAaEmdqNcWE2Mhz drS8SpjQJeVjnwJOGzj9UGoXk+6z2+EEQQmhusNt0g8In5sowP2qR0YnGfvzv9rk rvdUWUMByjLv9WkfnoWBAE5auncOmNlg28BsZFryiEoj08OF+NrFWAf4tc6sJAcS X4A8AzD14sSMPumJRWq4ZMj6cw4rdPOblHCR8sC8yALUI9AHtjY4DBt2PY0YHLY4 ae9upFRq+whzklBHFjfUfLLRqyxOLnR4xNEeGbiHOjk4yLRakOIIj74L3F3C08KA 7Xd5YuMfw6lisFg+QiYo/iKbnJiSpf1xrStfm8AgUrC1iawlznghqhdZuTwAvOcl etYFp+/+1umD5YOL+dEalnH4J0yCWJwItUoAtqeu1h5ie22c+/IViyjwkHQuKqYt 8YfktUD8HZxz+TUJNnhd0Hc4cOb7YLRxVZqvYuxXLqNJusiV7eoB =gvg3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fb8e92d.9050...@calno.com
Bug#670375: marked as done (RFS: chromaprint/0.6-2 -- Minor fixes)
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2012 12:47:05 +0200 with message-id <20120520104705.4321.30274@mithrandir> and subject line Chromaprint upload has caused the Debian Bug report #670375, regarding RFS: chromaprint/0.6-2 -- Minor fixes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 670375: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670375 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "chromaprint", the previous one having made it clear that he wouldn't sponsor me further. * Package name: chromaprint Version : 0.6-2 Upstream Author : Lukáš Lalinský * URL : http://acoustid.org/chromaprint * License : LGPL 2.1+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libchromaprint-dev - audio fingerprinting library - development files libchromaprint-tools - audio fingerprinting library - tools libchromaprint0 - audio fingerprint library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/chromaprint Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/chromaprint/chromaprint_0.6-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: * debian/control: Fix Suggests: field from libchromaprint-bin to libchromaprint-tools (Closes: #668624) * Bump Standard-Version to 3.9.3 + Change the Format: URL in debian/copyright. * Update copyright year. Regards, Simon Chopin --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Thanks for the upload, I'm closing the s-r bug now :-) Cheers, Simon signature.asc Description: signature --- End Message ---
Bug#665980: RFS: evilvte/0.5.1-1 [updated package]
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 01:55:25PM +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: Hi, > I fixed the "hardened build flags" which lintian did not check when I > uploaded last deb-src. > > Hope this version could be uploaded before frozen of wheezy. Uploaded but I've lost track of the current sponsoring procedures about closing/taging the bugs. Couldn't find a documentation ad-hoc but I didn't search that hard. ;) Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120520103050.GA2985@marvin
