Processed: retitle to RFS: leechcraft/0.5.70+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- modular internet-client
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 671731 RFS: leechcraft/0.5.70+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- modular internet-client Bug #671731 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: leechcraft/0.5.65+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- modular internet-client Changed Bug title to 'RFS: leechcraft/0.5.70+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- modular internet-client' from 'RFS: leechcraft/0.5.65+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- modular internet-client' > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 671731: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671731 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13381784575927.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#673096: RFS: figlet/2.2.4-1
Hi Jonathan, The information in debian/copyright is not complete. One example is that Edward B. Hamrick is the copyright holder of inflate.c and the license differs from the one in LICENSE. The package contains material that must not be distributed. One example is that the file fonts/8859-3.flc contains a license contains a license which "specifically excludes the right to re-distribute". Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120528041654.ga...@master.debian.org
Bug#673096: RFS: figlet/2.2.4-1
[I've uploaded a new version 2.2.4-1 [1] to mentors.d.o]
On 23/05/12 18:33, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Jonathan McCrohan , 2012-05-16, 00:27:
> .diff.gz of the previous package touches some upstream files. What
> happened to this delta? (This should be documented in the changelog.)
I've re-added it now, and added a changelog entry.
> I see you added makefile_set_debian_paths.patch, but this is not
> mentioned in the changelog.
This is documented in the changelog now.
> What's up with figlist_man_hyphen-used-as-minus-sign.patch? It's not
> listed in debian/patches/series.
I've fixed this, and removed the now useless override.
>>- Update debian/copyright (closes: #436302)
>
> You need to indent the enumerated list by an extra space. (Or
> alternatively: make all lines of the list indented by exactly one space,
> and then add (escaped) empty lines between the points.)
I've indented these.
>>- Fix moolets bashism (closes: #530082)
>
> You introduced a dashism instead... Oh, and it you are at fixing this,
> please also fix the security hole (insecure creation of temporary files).
Fixed.
>>- Move figlet manpage to alternatives system (closes: 403665)
>
> I'd add a # here, for consistency with the other "closes" lines.
Fixed.
> Shouldn't you use --slave here?
Yes, slave would be neater alright. I've switched to that.
>>- Add watchfile
>
> Does ftp.figlet.org support only passive mode? (That would be very odd.) If
> this is not the case, I would not put "opts=pasv" in debian/watch.
Yes, it only supports passive, hence "opts=pasv".
>>- Remove references to depreciated figfonts(-cjk) packages
>
> s/depreciated/deprecated/ maybe?
Fixed.
Jon
[1]
figlet (2.2.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release. (closes: #617422)
- Relicensed as BSD; figlet can move back to main \o/
- New upstream makefile does not support variables from d/rule; Added
makefile_set_debian_{buildflags,paths}.patch accordingly.
* Improve packaging
- Update S-V to 3.9.3
- Bump Debhelper to v9
- Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format (Closes: #672320)
- Added 2.2.2-1 delta as fix-chkfont-coredump.patch
- Switch to dh-style debian/rules
- Various lintian fixes
- Update package description (closes: #557254)
- Update debian/copyright (closes: #436302)
- Fix moolets bashism (closes: #530082)
- Move figlet manpage to alternatives system (closes: #403665)
- Add watchfile
- Add Homepage to debian/control
- Remove references to deprecated figfonts(-cjk) packages
- Remove local copies of man pages (merged upstream)
* Add myself as co-maintainer
-- Jonathan McCrohan Mon, 28 May 2012 01:07:24 +0100
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fc2c718.3060...@gmail.com
Bug#660314: package marked "needs sponsor = no" at mentors
Hi, done. Thanks for pointing. regards -- Slavko http://slavino.sk signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#674789: marked as done (RFS: amavisd-milter/1.5.0-5)
Your message dated Sun, 27 May 2012 18:46:38 +0200 with message-id <20120527164638.ge3...@harald-has.a-little-linux-box.at> and subject line Re: Bug#674789: RFS: amavisd-milter/1.5.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #674789, regarding RFS: amavisd-milter/1.5.0-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 674789: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674789 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "amavisd-milter" which fixes some small cosmetic issues for Wheezy. As I know that there are packages which need much more attention I tried to ease the review process as much as possible. Package name: amavisd-milter Version : 1.5.0-5 Upstream Author : Petr Rehor URL : http://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/ License : BSD-like Section : mail It builds those binary packages: amavisd-milter - amavisd-new interface for milter-capable MTAs amavisd-milter-dbg - amavisd-new interface for milter-capable MTAs - debugging symbols To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/amavisd-milter Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/amavisd-milter/amavisd-milter_1.5.0-5.dsc More information about amavisd-milter can be obtained from http://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/. Changes since the last upload: amavisd-milter (1.5.0-5) unstable; urgency=low * debian/copyright: - Changed format specification URL from svn to released version 1.0. - Corrected file listing to use spaces instead of commas to comply with DEP-5 and satisfy lintian. - Added 2012 to the copyright years for the debian packaging. * debian/control: - Bumped Standards to 3.9.3 (changed to copyright-format 1.0). - Removed hardening-includes from Build-Depends and instead add a versioned build depedency on dpkg-dev >= 1.16.1~ (needed for getting hardened compile flags through dpkg-buildflags). - Build-Depend on debhelper >= 9. - Removed version constraints from Build-Depends, Depends and Recommends where requirements are already fulfilled in Squeeze. * debian/rules: - Switched from manual usage of hardening-includes to dpkg-buildflags. * debian/compat: - Bumped Version to 9. Further information for potential sponsors: * package builds correct and clean according to: - cowbuilder --build --configfile pbuilderrc-amd64-sid.config amavisd-milter_1.5.0-5.dsc - qemubuilder --build --configfile qemubuilderrc-i386-sid.config amavisd-milter_1.5.0-5.dsc * package is built with full hardening enabled (CPPFLAGS are respected in the build process) * versioned dependencies on dpkg and debhelper are set according to minimal required versions to ease backporting * package is clean according to: lintian --show-overrides -E -I --pedantic amavisd-milter_1.5.0-5_amd64.changes (confirmed by mentors site) * standards version is 3.9.3 * copyright is DEP-5 and clean according to: cme check dpkg-copyright * patches are DEP-3 * software is currently running on i386 and amd64 testing machines The following warnings will be seen while building the package: configure: WARNING: Unrecognized options: --disable-maintainer-mode * AM_MAINTAINER_MODE in configue.ac was commented out by the upstream maintainer for the following reason: http://www.gnu.org/s/hello/manual/automake/maintainer_002dmode.html /tmp/buildd/amavisd-milter-1.5.0/aclocal/missing: line 54: aclocal-1.10: command not found WARNING: `aclocal-1.10' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.ac'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. /tmp/buildd/amavisd-milter-1.5.0/aclocal/missing: line 54: automake-1.10: command not found WARNING: `automake-1.10' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.ac'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. /tmp/buildd/amavisd-milter-1.5.0/aclocal/missing: line 54: autoconf: command not found WARNING: `autoconf' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified
Bug#674789: RFS: amavisd-milter/1.5.0-5
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "amavisd-milter" which fixes some small cosmetic issues for Wheezy. As I know that there are packages which need much more attention I tried to ease the review process as much as possible. Package name: amavisd-milter Version : 1.5.0-5 Upstream Author : Petr Rehor URL : http://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/ License : BSD-like Section : mail It builds those binary packages: amavisd-milter - amavisd-new interface for milter-capable MTAs amavisd-milter-dbg - amavisd-new interface for milter-capable MTAs - debugging symbols To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/amavisd-milter Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/amavisd-milter/amavisd-milter_1.5.0-5.dsc More information about amavisd-milter can be obtained from http://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/. Changes since the last upload: amavisd-milter (1.5.0-5) unstable; urgency=low * debian/copyright: - Changed format specification URL from svn to released version 1.0. - Corrected file listing to use spaces instead of commas to comply with DEP-5 and satisfy lintian. - Added 2012 to the copyright years for the debian packaging. * debian/control: - Bumped Standards to 3.9.3 (changed to copyright-format 1.0). - Removed hardening-includes from Build-Depends and instead add a versioned build depedency on dpkg-dev >= 1.16.1~ (needed for getting hardened compile flags through dpkg-buildflags). - Build-Depend on debhelper >= 9. - Removed version constraints from Build-Depends, Depends and Recommends where requirements are already fulfilled in Squeeze. * debian/rules: - Switched from manual usage of hardening-includes to dpkg-buildflags. * debian/compat: - Bumped Version to 9. Further information for potential sponsors: * package builds correct and clean according to: - cowbuilder --build --configfile pbuilderrc-amd64-sid.config amavisd-milter_1.5.0-5.dsc - qemubuilder --build --configfile qemubuilderrc-i386-sid.config amavisd-milter_1.5.0-5.dsc * package is built with full hardening enabled (CPPFLAGS are respected in the build process) * versioned dependencies on dpkg and debhelper are set according to minimal required versions to ease backporting * package is clean according to: lintian --show-overrides -E -I --pedantic amavisd-milter_1.5.0-5_amd64.changes (confirmed by mentors site) * standards version is 3.9.3 * copyright is DEP-5 and clean according to: cme check dpkg-copyright * patches are DEP-3 * software is currently running on i386 and amd64 testing machines The following warnings will be seen while building the package: configure: WARNING: Unrecognized options: --disable-maintainer-mode * AM_MAINTAINER_MODE in configue.ac was commented out by the upstream maintainer for the following reason: http://www.gnu.org/s/hello/manual/automake/maintainer_002dmode.html /tmp/buildd/amavisd-milter-1.5.0/aclocal/missing: line 54: aclocal-1.10: command not found WARNING: `aclocal-1.10' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.ac'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. /tmp/buildd/amavisd-milter-1.5.0/aclocal/missing: line 54: automake-1.10: command not found WARNING: `automake-1.10' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.ac'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. /tmp/buildd/amavisd-milter-1.5.0/aclocal/missing: line 54: autoconf: command not found WARNING: `autoconf' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `configure.ac'. You might want to install the `Autoconf' and `GNU m4' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. /tmp/buildd/amavisd-milter-1.5.0/aclocal/missing: line 54: autoheader: command not found WARNING: `autoheader' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `acconfig.h' or `configure.ac'. You might want to install the `Autoconf' and `GNU m4' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. * These warnings presumably result from patching configure and/or aclocal/ax_path_milter.m4 and are only present during the first build, subsequent builds do not show these problems. Attached to this mail you will find a: debdiff amavisd-milter_1.5.0-4.dsc amavisd-milter_1.5.0-5.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Harald
Bug#673499: marked as done (RFS: libdumb/1:0.9.3-5.3 [NMU] -- enable hardening flags and multiarch)
Your message dated Sun, 27 May 2012 16:14:38 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libdumb/1:0.9.3-5.3 [NMU] -- enable hardening flags and multiarch has caused the Debian Bug report #673499, regarding RFS: libdumb/1:0.9.3-5.3 [NMU] -- enable hardening flags and multiarch to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 673499: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673499 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libdumb". * Package name: libdumb Version : 1:0.9.3-5.3 Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libaldmb1 - dynamic universal music bibliotheque, Allegro version libaldmb1-dev - development files for libaldmb1 libdumb1 - dynamic universal music bibliotheque libdumb1-dev - development files for libdumb1 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libdumb Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libd/libdumb/libdumb_0.9.3-5.3.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Non-maintainer upload. * Also enable hardening LDFLAGS, patch from Simon Ruderich. (Closes: #658965) * Enable multiarch. Regards, Tobias Hansen --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package libdumb version 1:0.9.3-5.3 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/libdumb --- End Message ---
Processed: retitle to RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 661309 RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP] Bug #661309 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: task-spooler/0.7.2-1 [ITP] Changed Bug title to 'RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS: task-spooler/0.7.2-1 [ITP]' > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 661309: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661309 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.1338135280610.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#661309: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP] (new upstream)
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 09:43:44AM -0300, David Bremner wrote: > Alexander Inyukhin writes: > > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "task-spooler" > > It builds those binary packages: > > > > task-spooler - personal job scheduler > > I'll have a look at this. > > Alexander, please fix the expiry date on your gpg key; either make a new > key or bump the expiry date on the one you have. The latter will > preserve the signature, although since I couldn't retrieve key > 53487F0A, that might not matter. Thanks for reminder. I removed expiry date from this key a while ago, but it seems hard to track already distributed copies. For now I re-upload the key to mentors.debian.net and to keys.gnupg.net. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120527143642.ga29...@shurick.grid.su
Re: Bug#661309: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP] (new upstream)
David Bremner writes: > I'll have a look at this. I sent a separate mail about some warnings from cppcheck and compilation. These might not be blockers, but the following is, your package currently violates policy 10.1 Two different packages must not install programs with different functionality but with the same filenames. ( http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-binaries ) In particular your package ships /usr/bin/ts, which is also present in moreutils. Note that conflicts are not appropriate to resolve this problem; it is perfectly plausible for people to want both moreutils and task-spooler installed. Since your package is the new one, the obvious thing is for you to rename your version. I leave that to you and Joey Hess (the moreutils maintainer) to sort out. d -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vcjh3e8b.fsf@zancas.localnet
hardening with non-C compilers
Hi all, I am currently working on including the last necessary changes into my package Winff before the freeze. Although I already saw quite some traffic about hardening, it seemed (to me) to relate to C compilers. Of course I was wrong, but I have no clue where to start to figure out how to get all the proper hardening options into my "free pascal compiler" based package. (I am not so much into coding that I really understand what hardening means, applying it to c code is properly documented thou). Can somebody point me at relevant information about hardening of non-c based compilers (in Debian). I have read http://wiki.debian.org/Hardening but as far as I can see it assumes C. Something specifically about FPC/Lazarus would be even better of course. Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#661309: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP] (new upstream)
Alexander Inyukhin writes: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "task-spooler" > It builds those binary packages: > > task-spooler - personal job scheduler I'll have a look at this. Alexander, please fix the expiry date on your gpg key; either make a new key or bump the expiry date on the one you have. The latter will preserve the signature, although since I couldn't retrieve key 53487F0A, that might not matter. d -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zk8t3ibj.fsf@zancas.localnet
Re: Kamailio for Debian 7 - deadline
On 25/05/12 13:23, Victor Seva wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > 2012/5/25 Daniel Pocock : >> I can see some things very quickly: >> >> debian/control, build-depends: >> you need: debhelper (>= 9.0.0) >> and maybe: Standards-Version: 3.9.3 >> >> debian/compat >> must be 9 (not 8) >> >> debian/copyright: >> `see AUTHORS file' might be unacceptable: Debian ftpmasters may >> reject the package. Better to be safe and copy stuff from the AUTHORS >> file into debian/copyright > > Ok. > >> debian/rules: >> - I haven't looked too closely, I can see it started in 2006 and may >> not follow the current practices with debhelper, if you are not >> confident with this file, you could just try making a fresh one, e.g. >> just copy the rules file from my resiprocate package, study it carefully >> as you would probably need to change a few details, or you can use the >> command `dh_make' to create a fresh rules file > > I'm not too confident but the rules do their job. > >> - the `get-orig-source' stuff - maybe it shouldn't be there, not sure >> about this > > From the README of pkg-voip team: "To download the *.orig.tar.gz to > the ../tarballs directory, most of the pkg-voip packages have a > "get-orig-source" target in their debian/rules. Further, there is a > "print-version" target showing the upstream version used for the > current packaging. You can run the get-orig-source directly from > trunk/ or tags/$version/." > > So, this is fine. > That should be ok - I saw it and I didn't look closely enough to see if it gets called during the build phase - Debian policy says something about no downloads during the build phase Some other things that sponsors will check before accepting the package (or asking you to do more work), have you tried building it with pbuilder? In particular, you should verify it with --twice, something like this I think (I've put -j12 for faster build on a multi-core CPU): cd kamailio-x.y.z /usr/bin/pdebuild --debbuildopts -j12 -- --twice >> Are you also participating in the debian-mentors list? There are many >> very helpful people there, someone always seems to respond to questions >> there within a short period of time. You can also upload packages to >> the mentors site and it makes it very easy for people to evaluate them >> and give more feedback. > > I'm already member of the pkg-voip team so I hope someone of team will > sponsor the upload when it will be ready. > But yeah, maybe I need to ask on mentors about this problem. Ok, great, all you have to do is register at http://mentors.debian.net and then you can upload the package there for potential sponsors to review Although I have some packages in Debian, I am still at an early phase of the Debian signup process and sponsor's upload them for me, so I can't offer to help the kamailio upload but I'm happy to try the packages after you put them on the mentors site. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fc20b8f@pocock.com.au
Bug#674477: marked as done (RFS: frogatto{-data}/1.2+dfsg-1.1 [NMU] -- 2D platformer game starring a quixotic frog)
Your message dated Sun, 27 May 2012 03:50:36 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: frogatto{-data}/1.2+dfsg-1.1 [NMU] -- 2D platformer
game starring a quixotic frog
has caused the Debian Bug report #674477,
regarding RFS: frogatto{-data}/1.2+dfsg-1.1 [NMU] -- 2D platformer game
starring a quixotic frog
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
674477: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674477
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages "frogatto" and
"frogatto-data". Maintainer is listed on the "Low Threshold NMU" wiki
page, so I've taken the liberty of packaging a new upstream version,
in addition to fixing a number of bugs and lintian warnings in the
packages.
* Package name : frogato
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : David White
* URL : http://www.frogatto.com/
* License : GPL3 (game engine); data is under a non-DFSG
(non-commercial) license
Programming Lang : C++
Description : A 2D platformer game starring a quixotic frog
I'm bundling two RFS's into one, as frogatto and frogatto-data should
be uploaded together. src:frogatto builds binary package "frogatto"
and src:frogatto-data builds binary package "frogatto-data".
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/frogatto
http://mentors.debian.net/package/frogatto-data
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/f/frogatto/frogatto_1.2+dfsg-1.1.dsc
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/f/frogatto-data/frogatto-data_1.2+dfsg-1.1.dsc
More information about frogatto can be obtained from http://www.frogatto.com.
Changes since the last upload:
frogatto (1.2+dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New upstream release. (Closes: #662580)
- Fix FTBFS with -Wl,--as-needed due to bad link order. (Closes: #641570)
* Drop +ssh protocol in debian/control Vcs-* fields. (Closes: #669295)
* Enable build hardening using dpkg-buildflags.
- Add debian/patches/enable-build-hardening.patch.
* Remove deprecated Encoding field from desktop menu file (lintian tag
desktop-entry-contains-encoding-key).
* Fix debian/watch file to point to latest release hosted on Github.
* Update to Standards version 3.9.3, no changes required.
-- Vincent Cheng Sun, 20 May 2012 16:31:37 -0700
frogatto-data (1.2+dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New upstream release.
* Drop +ssh protocol in debian/control Vcs-* fields.
* Update to Standards version 3.9.3, no changes required.
-- Vincent Cheng Sun, 20 May 2012 17:14:17 -0700
Regards,
Vincent Cheng
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Bart,
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> I'm not sure whether an entry on the "Low Threshold NMU" list makes it OK to
> package a newer upstream release via NMU.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bart Martens
Dmitry has contacted me in private and uploaded frogatto and
frogatto-data for me (thanks Dmitry!), so this RFS bug can be closed
now.
Regards,
Vincent
--- End Message ---
Bug#665354: RFS: viennacl/1.2.1-1
On 05/26/2012 05:53 PM, Bart Martens wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Why not 1.3.0 ? > http://viennacl.sourceforge.net/ > http://sourceforge.net/projects/viennacl/files/ > > Regards, > > Bart Martens > > > Hi Bart 1. I didn't know that 1.3.0 has been released. Must have missed it on the list... 2. I filed the RFS long before 1.3.0 has been released. I will update the package to 1.3.0 as soon as I find the time. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fc204a5.6080...@users.sourceforge.net
Bug#661309: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP] (new upstream)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "task-spooler" * Package name: task-spooler Version : 0.7.3-1 Upstream Author : Lluís Batlle i Rossel * URL : http://vicerveza.homeunix.net/~viric/soft/ts/ * License : GPLv2+ Section : misc It builds those binary packages: task-spooler - personal job scheduler To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/task-spooler Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/task-spooler/task-spooler_0.7.3-1.dsc Regards, Alexander Inyukhin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120527092115.ga13...@shurick.grid.su
Re: RFS: flashcache
Hi, On 27.05.2012 10:18, Liang Guo wrote: > Do you still use it ? to some extent: yes. I was using it mostly as a file system read cache but I found kFreeBSD + ZFS does a much better job. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: flashcache
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 09:32:14AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > Hi, > > On 27.05.2012 08:12, Liang Guo wrote: > > When the new package is ready, I'd like to sponsor your package. > > I have currently no intentions to maintain flashcache anymore and > everyone else interested to pick it up may do so. The package was ready > to use in November, so updating it to a newer version shouldn't be much > of a deal. See RFP #635504 for details and [1] for the corresponding > repository. > > If you care enough, you can just pick it up yourself. I do not need a > sponsor anymore by the way. Well, I'll take over. Do you still use it ? Thanks and Regards, -- Liang Guo http://bluestone.cublog.cn signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: new powertop version
Hi, On 26.05.2012 20:11, Julian Wollrath wrote: >> Also, I'm not sure about new upstream releases via NMU. Have you offered to >> co-maintain ? > No I have not, because I was under the impression, that it is not possible > for > a non Debian developer to co-maintain a package. But if this impression was > wrong I would willingly offer to co-maintain. > > Since I am new to all of this, please accept my apologies if I offended > somebody with the approach I have taken, which now seems kind of rude in my > view. Everyone - including you - can maintain packages. You are not only allowed to co-maintain them, but also all alone. You still need a Debian Developer to sponsor your packages, but that person is not responsible for the package. Having that said, it is fine to NMU a package when doing so fixes two release critical bugs and there is no need to apologize if that makes Debian better(tm). Co-maintaining the package is even better, but this requires an acknowledge by the current maintainer(s) and if they are not responsive that's not going to help you. Therefore I would suggest you, that you can try to get in touch with Patrick and offer your help with the package but you still prepare a NMU meanwhile. If you obey the NMU rules [*] I do not see a problem in doing so. [*] See the document bremner linked. Basically you are supposed to make minimally invasive changes only. Do not change packaging style, do not do cosmetic changes which are a matter of taste and try to keep the differences low. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: flashcache
Hi, On 27.05.2012 08:12, Liang Guo wrote: > When the new package is ready, I'd like to sponsor your package. I have currently no intentions to maintain flashcache anymore and everyone else interested to pick it up may do so. The package was ready to use in November, so updating it to a newer version shouldn't be much of a deal. See RFP #635504 for details and [1] for the corresponding repository. If you care enough, you can just pick it up yourself. I do not need a sponsor anymore by the way. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/flashcache.git -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
