Processed: yamcha: block ITP 668873 by RFS 684434

2012-08-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 668873 by 684434
Bug #668873 [wnpp] ITP: yamcha -- General purpose chunker annotator
668873 was not blocked by any bugs.
668873 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 668873: 684434
> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
668873: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668873
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134457241524458.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#684434: RFS: yamcha/0.33-1 [ITP] -- General purpose chunker annotator

2012-08-09 Thread Giulio Paci
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yamcha"

* Package name: yamcha
  Version : 0.33-1
  Upstream Author : Taku Kudo 
* URL : http://chasen.org/~taku/software/yamcha/
* License : LGPL-2+
  Section : misc

It builds those binary packages:

  libyamcha1 - YamCha shared library
  libyamcha1-dbg - YamCha debug symbols
  libyamcha1-dev - YamCha development files
  yamcha - General purpose chunker annotator

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/yamcha


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yamcha/yamcha_0.33-1.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from
http://chasen.org/~taku/software/yamcha/.

Regards,
 Giulio Paci


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50243d48.5060...@gmail.com



Re: RFS: xinetd

2012-08-09 Thread Salvo Tomaselli
Just reupload for experimental:

http://galileo.dmi.unict.it/~ltworf/xinetd/

Bye


-- 
Salvo Tomaselli


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: logkeys in Debian

2012-08-09 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Vedran Furač wrote on 2012-08-09 01:57:

> OK, I'll do as you say. But do you know how does one removes a package
> from mentors? Dcut?

Simple way:

Login in mentors and select your package.
Then click in the header: "delete this package".

---
Have a nice day.

Joachim (Germany)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120809230348.03471...@jupiter.home



Bug#669565: RFS: gammaray/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Tool for examining the internals of Qt application

2012-08-09 Thread Felix Geyer
Hi,

Here is a quick review of the package:

debian/rules:

> .PHONY: override_dh_strip

Seems a bit inconsistent to only add dh_strip.

> dh $@

Please enable parallel building.

> override_dh_auto_test:
> # Do not perform test suite as it requires X11 running

You can run the tests by build-depending on xvfb and calling
xvfb-run dh_auto_test


debian/patches/debian-multiarch.patch:

This one is not really needed since you can't co-install gammaray for
multiple architectures anyway.


debian/patches/gammaray-probe-versioned-soname.patch:

Why do you set a SONAME for gammaray_probe?
When gammaray changes the ABI custom plugins will break anyway
since you can't install different versions of gammaray.


debian/patches/harfbuzz-search-path.patch:

What does this patch do?
libqt4-private-dev doesn't contain the harfbuzz headers and that won't
change at least until wheezy is released.

Felix


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50240b17.1070...@debian.org



Bug#684220: RFS: tinysvm/0.09-1 [ITP] -- SVM trainer and classifier toolkit

2012-08-09 Thread Giulio Paci
Il 09/08/2012 19:22, Jakub Wilk ha scritto:
> * Giulio Paci , 2012-08-08, 00:26:
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tinysvm/tinysvm_0.09-1.dsc
> 
> Your *.orig.tar.gz is not byte-to-byte identical with the one that
> upstream provides:
> 
> $ md5sum TinySVM-0.09.tar.gz tinysvm_0.09.orig.tar.gz
> 22d80bdd94c3c8373062761de0d27fde  TinySVM-0.09.tar.gz
> ee155f6577f99fca1f730ba39211f480  tinysvm_0.09.orig.tar.gz

Good catch. As far as I know there was no difference in content. I do
not know when I regenerated the tarball. However I just reuploaded the
package with the original tarball. :-)

Thank you,
Giulio.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50240b93.5030...@gmail.com



Bug#684220: RFS: tinysvm/0.09-1 [ITP] -- SVM trainer and classifier toolkit

2012-08-09 Thread Jakub Wilk

* Giulio Paci , 2012-08-08, 00:26:

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tinysvm/tinysvm_0.09-1.dsc


Your *.orig.tar.gz is not byte-to-byte identical with the one that 
upstream provides:


$ md5sum TinySVM-0.09.tar.gz tinysvm_0.09.orig.tar.gz
22d80bdd94c3c8373062761de0d27fde  TinySVM-0.09.tar.gz
ee155f6577f99fca1f730ba39211f480  tinysvm_0.09.orig.tar.gz

--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120809172237.ga...@jwilk.net



Bug#664669: RFS: moserial/3.0.6-1 [ITP] -- gtk3-based serial terminal

2012-08-09 Thread Rodolphe Pelloux-Prayer
Le mardi 07 août 2012 à 16:07 +, Bart Martens a écrit :
> Hi Rodolphe,

Hi,

> I see that the package at mentors is no longer there.  Are you still working 
> on
> this ? Or can this RFS be closed ?

Well I don't really working on this package mostly because it look good
(to me!) and I didn't get any comments on it until now.
I've just upload a refreshed version with the patch that I sent
upstream, on gitorious.

I'd like to integrate it in debian but I guess freeze is not the best
moment for new packages.

I plan to contact pkg-gnome's team to see if they can sponsor me but
after Wheezy's release.

Regards,
Rodolphe


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#683871: RFS: pyskein/0.7.1-1 [ITP] -- Skein hash for Python3

2012-08-09 Thread Jakub Wilk

* Jason Gerard DeRose , 2012-08-08, 23:17:

How is this?

override_dh_auto_build:
sphinx-build -b html doc doc/_build/html
set -ex; for python in $(shell py3versions -r); do \
$$python setup.py build \
--executable=/usr/bin/python3; \
done


Looks good to me.


https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening#dpkg-buildflags
Okay, after reading those docs, I got the impression that the most 
modern/correct way to do this is probably to Build-Depend on debhelper 
(>= 9.20120417) and use compat=9, so that's what I did.


(>= 9) should be enough, shouldn't it?


What do you think of using compat=9 here?


It's all right.


is there anything else you spot that needs work?


I noticed this is the build log:

/build/pyskein-xIFws6/pyskein-0.7.1/doc_src/index.rst:2: WARNING: Title 
underline too short.

It looks like something that should be fixed upstream.

--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120809145339.ga1...@jwilk.net



Bug#684106: New LedgerSMB Debian package, v1.3.21-1

2012-08-09 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012, Robert James Clay wrote:
>Also;  my inclination now is to do a 1.3.21-2 package with any
> necessary changes and upload that (instead of removing the existing
> 1.3.21 package on mentors and uploading a new version of it after any
> neccessary corrections).  Doing it that way does mean that I need to
> take care to include the information about the closed bugs with
> 1.3.21-1.

You don't need to move bug closure information. I must just take care to
build it with -v1.3.18-1 to include both changelog entries.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook:
→ http://debian-handbook.info/get/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120809130006.gd14...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com



Bug#684106: New LedgerSMB Debian package, v1.3.21-1

2012-08-09 Thread Robert James Clay
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 20:00 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 18:20 -0400, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Here's my review of your package:
> 
>I'll be working on these issues tomorrow.

   Also;  my inclination now is to do a 1.3.21-2 package with any
necessary changes and upload that (instead of removing the existing
1.3.21 package on mentors and uploading a new version of it after any
neccessary corrections).  Doing it that way does mean that I need to
take care to include the information about the closed bugs with
1.3.21-1.






RJ Clay ('Jame')
j...@rocasa.us


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1344516932.29272.7.camel@svrpc