Re: Need help for watch file
Le Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 04:21:33PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > version=3 > opts=\ > dversionmangle=s/[~\+]dfsg//,\ > downloadurlmangle=s/VolView-([\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh/VolViewSrc.tar.gz/,\ > filenamemangle=s/VolView(-[\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh/VolViewSrc$1.tar.gz/ \ > http://www.kitware.com/products/vvdownload.html \ > http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolView-([\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh > -- Downloading updated package > http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolViewSrc-3.4.tar.gz > uscan warning: ../http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolViewSrc-3.4.tar.gz > does not appear to be a compressed file; > the file command says: ERROR: cannot open > `../http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolViewSrc-3.4.tar.gz' (No such file > or directory) > Hi Andreas, the problem here is that uscan sees the file name as: http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolView-3.4-Linux-x86_64.sh Your filenamemangle regular expression turns it into: http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolViewSrc-3.4.tar.gz A second expression is needed to remove the URL part. With the following, filenamemangle=s/VolView(-[\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh/VolViewSrc$1.tar.gz/;s|http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/|| Uscan now sees the file name as VolViewSrc-3.4.tar.gz Have a nice week-end, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120915004102.ga31...@falafel.plessy.net
Another watch file problem
Hi, I stumbled upon another watch file problem for package visad which is available via ftp. I considered the following watch file a good idea opts=downloadurlmangle=s?$?/visad_src.jar?,filenamemangle=s?$?/visad_src.jar? \ ftp://ftp.ssec.wisc.edu/pub/visad-([\d\.]+) but got the following warning: uscan warning: downloadurlmangle option invalid for ftp sites, so it seems there is no real chance to obtain an unversioned file from a versioned ftp directory. As always I can confirm: I know that asking upstream is most probably the better way to fix this but in this case the chances to get a quick fix are low. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120914190728.ga19...@an3as.eu
Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1
On 7 September 2012 16:44, Thomas Leonard wrote:
> On 7 September 2012 16:38, Bart Martens wrote:
[...]
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> The upstream source package name is still zeroinstall-injector.
>> http://0install.net/install-source.html
>> http://downloads.sf.net/project/zero-install/injector/1.11/zeroinstall-injector-1.11.tar.bz2
>>
>> I have not yet looked any further than that.
>
> I can rename it if necessary (1.12 will have the new name upstream),
> but I don't think this needs to hold up the Debian package split, does
> it?
>
> Note that this bug is linked from the front page of
> http://0install.net ("we need a sponsor from Debian to approve the
> change") if you need confirmation that upstream agrees with the
> rename.
Hi Bart,
Just to clarify: are you dealing with this package rename request, or
do I need to ask on the mentors list?
Thanks,
--
Dr Thomas Leonardhttp://0install.net/
GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1
GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAG4opy8md9QaRdLnC=ZQ+GAU=ZSVGGvQgyb04az9xoi=dUwc=a...@mail.gmail.com
Processed: retitle to RFS: feedgnuplot/1.22-2 [ITP]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 686417 RFS: feedgnuplot/1.22-2 [ITP] Bug #686417 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: feedgnuplot/1.22-1 [ITP] Changed Bug title to 'RFS: feedgnuplot/1.22-2 [ITP]' from 'RFS: feedgnuplot/1.22-1 [ITP]' > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 686417: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686417 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.1347634563341.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#670589: marked as done (RFS: newlisp/10.4.0-4 ITP)
Your message dated Fri, 14 Sep 2012 14:56:02 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: newlisp/10.4.0-4 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #670589, regarding RFS: newlisp/10.4.0-4 ITP to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 670589: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670589 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "newlisp" * Package name: newlisp Version : 10.4.0-4 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License : [fill in] Section : lisp It builds those binary packages: newlisp- general-purpose scripting language To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/newlisp Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/newlisp/newlisp_10.4.0-4.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://newlisp.org Changes since the last upload: newlisp (10.4.0-4) unstable; urgency=low * Fixed hyphen-used-as-minus-sign error and missing patch descriptions Regards, Nathan Owens --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package newlisp has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Processed: udpxy: block ITP 687543 by RFS 687620
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 687543 by 687620 Bug #687543 [wnpp] ITP: udpxy -- udpxy is a UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon 687543 was not blocked by any bugs. 687543 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 687543: 687620 > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 687543: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687543 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.1347634563320.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Need help for watch file
Hi, to enable properly downloading the volview sources I tried the following watch file: version=3 opts=\ dversionmangle=s/[~\+]dfsg//,\ downloadurlmangle=s/VolView-([\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh/VolViewSrc.tar.gz/,\ filenamemangle=s/VolView(-[\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh/VolViewSrc$1.tar.gz/ \ http://www.kitware.com/products/vvdownload.html \ http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolView-([\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh $ /usr/bin/uscan --verbose --force-download -- Scanning for watchfiles in . -- Found watchfile in ./debian -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line: opts=dversionmangle=s/[~\+]dfsg//,downloadurlmangle=s/VolView-([\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh/VolViewSrc.tar.gz/,filenamemangle=s/VolView(-[\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh/VolViewSrc$1.tar.gz/ http://www.kitware.com/products/vvdownload.html http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolView-([\d\.]+)-Linux-x86_64.sh -- Found the following matching hrefs: http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolView-3.4-Linux-x86_64.sh http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolView-3.4-Linux-x86_64.sh http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolView-3.4-Linux-x86_64.sh Newest version on remote site is 3.4, local version is 3.4+dfsg (mangled local version number 3.4) => Package is up to date Newest version on remote site is 3.4, local version is 3.4+dfsg (mangled local version number 3.4) => Forcing download as requested -- Downloading updated package http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolViewSrc-3.4.tar.gz uscan warning: ../http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolViewSrc-3.4.tar.gz does not appear to be a compressed file; the file command says: ERROR: cannot open `../http://www.kitware.com/VolView/files/VolViewSrc-3.4.tar.gz' (No such file or directory) Not processing this file any further! -- Scan finished If I leave out the filenamemangle option the correct file is downloaded - but it is named *.sh which is a bit stupid for a tar.gz. Any hint (besides bothering upstream ... somebody from kitware in CC - Luis it would help if you could care for a properly numbered downloadable tarball.) Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120914142133.ga14...@an3as.eu
Re: Plugin Sub-Packaging
Looks much better. Thanks! -- *Braga, Bruno* www.brunobraga.net bruno.br...@gmail.com On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Gergely Nagy wrote: > "BRAGA, Bruno" writes: > > > The "hack" I am doing to get this working is to basically to alter the > main > > package bash_completion file, which is created with a variable prepared > to > > be tempered with by plugin installations: > > > > ... > > opts="option1 ... optionN" > > plugin_opts= > > ... > > Would it not be better if you did something like: > > for f in /etc/somewhere/else.d/*.completion; do > . $f > done > > Where files in /etc/somewhere/else.d/ would be like this: > > plugin_opts="$plugin_opts option-plugin1" > > That way, plugins could drop a file in said dir, and the bash completion > would pick it up, hopefully, and you don't have to modify any file from > another package (which would be a horrible thing to do anyway). > > -- > |8] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87a9wuf8ry.fsf@algernon.balabit > >
Bug#687620: RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear Mentors, I'm looking for sponsor for package 'udpxy' -- a UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon. Main purpose of this package - allow use of multicasted stream behind NAT, without configuring igmp forwarding on router. WNPP request are here : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687543 Package uploaded just now : https://mentors.debian.net/package/udpxy Package name: udpxy Version : 1.0.23 URL : http://www.udpxy.com License : GPL-3+ Section : net Upstream author : Pavel V. Cherenkov -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120914102246.10889.6838.report...@balthasar.home.lan
