Re: Upgrade rar Package Version
It was refused by the maintainers of that for being to non-free On 19 Oct 2012 01:10, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Martin Meredith wrote: The problem with updating the rar package is not a problem with the complexity of the package, it's a case of it takes a while for me to put together the upload for both amd64 and i386 simultaneously, due to the autobuilders not liking non-free packages. You want to read this. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/11/msg00012.html -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh
Bug#664165: Het bijhouden van uw verbruik
U heeft overschreden de limiet van uw mailbox ingesteld door onze IT-service, en vanaf nu kan je niet ontvangen van alle inkomende e-mails en ook enkele van uw uitgaande e-mails zullen niet worden geleverd en ten slotte, uw account zal worden 'gedeactiveerd' binnen 24 uur vanaf nu. Om dit te voorkomen, wordt u geadviseerd om te klikken op de onderstaande link om uw account opnieuw in te stellen. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dFJzSzg0UE1CWXF0WHdncHlkTDNneUE6MQ Doet u dit niet, zal leiden tot een beperkte toegang tot uw mailbox terwijl uw account wordt IN-actief blijven binnen de komende 24 uur. Bedankt dat we beter van dienst te u! Met vriendelijke groet, Management. Upgrade-afdeling. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/c87f3bca6ed6d94a8dba389c4525f0dc0528ca12b...@exnr01.ba.nyenrode.campus
RFS: l2tp-ipsec-vpn (updated package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, My sponsor is kil...@debian.org. I just uploaded the new version 1.0.9-1 of my package l2tp-ipsec-vpn. This upload contains RC bug fix #684962 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684962) * Package name: l2tp-ipsec-vpn Version : 1.0.9-1 Upstream Author : Werner Jaeger werner_jae...@web.de * URL : https://launchpad.net/l2tp-ipsec-vpn * License : GPL 3 Section : net It builds those binary packages: l2tp-ipsec-vpn - control your L2TP IPsec VPN connections To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/l2tp-ipsec-vpn Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/l2tp-ipsec-vpn/l2tp-ipsec-vpn_1.0.9-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Please CC me when replying to this message! Kind regards, Werner Jäger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQgQ3tAAoJEPiVeYU7qUIy46EH/1/t1nUfcJNFi/xj798mJ3fC CMjScdhQuYfldROTFd8vWGh3W54f5p+Gbvv59d+a71qhY4TQrq3IIZr0Oye5DOA7 FxzUDRQWXyQO/OvvIzgE/fnpXd3ZFbHpmvfVXWB4f1yRmcAQ7qFeR1P7P2R89Vt1 HirHvM7kc+aOUJi4/c45YFC4cTDXm7f2t9atVs/RxE7Aker41lD2HGE3c5HshOYq t+/OiYntkjUtMIwoHGLFAFTuZGYTiFrcMQyEWQUSelCwSeXppRvQXgq/WXzM3mvO 3LjY1rHHa5fIiOmIl11yxRRavd5EnISD89MhTlMzZmIlUn+rKzy/mLlLLoBAoM0= =ZHKp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50810df4.8000...@web.de
Re: Upgrade rar Package Version
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012, Martin Meredith wrote: It was refused by the maintainers of that for being to non-free I see. Well, it was worth a shot. BTW, using pbuilder to set up i386 and amd64 chroots helps a lot, at least here it has made it easy for me to do dual-arch uploads, with two pbuilder calls, each one for a different arch (and the second one with --binary-arch) and a mergechanges call... -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121019111928.ga12...@khazad-dum.debian.net
Re: Upgrade rar Package Version
Ma Xiaojun damage3...@gmail.com writes: RAR is not open source software, they offers binaries for i386 and amd64 on Linux. http://rarlabs.com/download.htm Just out of curiousity, why is this needed? The unar package in Debian seems to work for all of the RAR files I have received recently and is open source. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84ehkuptys@sauna.l.org
Re: Upgrade rar Package Version
* Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi [121019 13:46]: Ma Xiaojun damage3...@gmail.com writes: RAR is not open source software, they offers binaries for i386 and amd64 on Linux. http://rarlabs.com/download.htm Just out of curiousity, why is this needed? The unar package in Debian seems to work for all of the RAR files I have received recently and is open source. It still does not support RAR 3.0 archives (#312552). -- Etienne Millon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121019114755.GB15929@klow
Re: Upgrade rar Package Version
Etienne Millon etienne.mil...@gmail.com writes: It still does not support RAR 3.0 archives (#312552). unrar-free and unar are two different packages. If you read the full bug report you see my comment: unar (not unrar!) 0.99-1 in debian wheezy seems to have rar3 support. -- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=312552#44 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84a9vipt71@sauna.l.org
Re: Upgrade rar Package Version
* Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi [121019 14:02]: Etienne Millon etienne.mil...@gmail.com writes: It still does not support RAR 3.0 archives (#312552). unrar-free and unar are two different packages. If you read the full bug report you see my comment: Ooos, my bad. I had read the bug report but thought that your message in this thread was about about unrar-free. In that case I totally agree with your point. -- Etienne Millon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121019120603.GA31631@klow
Re: Upgrade rar Package Version
Ma Xiaojun damage3...@gmail.com writes: However, rar is offered for long and now it is staying in a broken state. So we still need to maintain it. Sure, I was just suggesting that it could also be removed since there now is an open source solution. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/846266pm7o@sauna.l.org
Bug#690589: RFS: libdigest-md6-perl/0.11-1
Hi, On 10/15/12, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote: Besides that: - The two entries in debian/changelog should probably be collapsed into one. Updated debian/changelog file. - The (build-)dependencies on hardening-wrapper, perl-base and perl-modules look wrong. Why are they there? perl-base and perl-modules removed from dependencies. - I would use just Perl interface to the MD6 algorithm as the short description. Most Perl modules use that scheme. Fixed. - debian/copyright is wrong. Some parts are distributed under the same terms as perl, ie. Artistic or GPL-1+; other parts use BSD-like licenses. There are also additional copyright holders. See [2] for an example how to document the Artistic or GPL-1+ part. [2] http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/libc/libcatalyst-action-rest-perl/current/copyright Updated debian/copyright file. Added expat license. - README should not be installed as documentation as it contains only installation information that is of no use when you installed the Debian package. Added get-orig-source rule. README file removed. New version uploaded to mentors.debian.net. Source package: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libd/libdigest-md6-perl/libdigest-md6-perl_0.11-1.dsc. Thank you. -- Best regards, Oleg Gashev. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ca+0auqhwayo3gkn27d_y20nmqpcswahfvdbmf0gd0nv8eyx...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#663916: New phonetisaurus package available
Hi! Il 17/10/2012 16:19, Jakub Wilk ha scritto: * Giulio Paci giuliop...@gmail.com, 2012-10-17, 00:05: How can I set Built-Using field? Should I set it by hand? Is it possible to set it automatically? Value of this field must be generated at build time. Unfortunately, there are currently no convenient tools to help you with this task; see bug #689062. [...] Thank you very much. I read the bug thread and I added a Built-Using field (I used mednafen as a base). It looks good. Support for ${source:Package} and ${source:Version} variables was added to dpkg in 1.16.2, so please bump the version in Build-Depends. Bumped. I just tried to collect the list of maintainers for the package that you suggested are using utf8-cpp (drizzle fife gdcm gource librime libvoikko love md5deep megaglest mkvtoolnix paraview ruby-passenger supertuxkart vtk), however I have problems obtaining the list: The following command: for i in drizzle fife gdcm gource librime libvoikko love md5deep megaglest mkvtoolnix paraview ruby-passenger supertuxkart vtk; do echo $i; LANG=C apt-cache show $i | grep Maintainer; done [...] How did you get the list? http://http.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/Contents-source.gz is an index of files in all source packages. IIRC I searched for /unchecked.h and then manually filter out false-positives. (I was told that you can also use apt-file to search through these files.) Thank you very much, this file will make my life easier. fife, gdcm, librime and libvoikko seem not to exist, while vtk seems to be a virtual package. These were source package names, not binary package names. s/show/showsrc/ should help. :) There's also a dedicated tool to make lists of package maintainers: dd-list in devscripts. And this command even more. :-) I just had a look to the already opened bugs and I found that there is an RFP bug for utfcpp: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=552618 Do you think I should do anything else (e.g., reply to the bug with the maintainers of the packages you identified in CC)? Files: src/3rdparty/utfcpp/utf8/* src/3rdparty/utfcpp/utf8.h could be simplified to: Files: src/3rdparty/utfcpp/* Done. Bests, Giulio. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5081cd7f.9090...@gmail.com
Bug#690010: marked as done (RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Fri, 19 Oct 2012 22:50:21 + with message-id e1tplox-0002nn...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #690010, regarding RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 690010: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690010 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 689980 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package sweethome3d-furniture-editor * Package name: sweethome3d-furniture-editor Version : 1.8-1 Upstream Author : Emmanuel Puybaret, eTeks i...@eteks.com * URL : http://www.sweethome3d.com/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : java sweethome3d-furniture-editor - Sweet Home 3D Furniture Library Editor To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-furniture-editor Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d-furniture-editor/sweethome3d-furniture-editor_1.2-1.dsc Regards, Gabriele Giacone ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package sweethome3d-furniture-editor has been removed from mentors.---End Message---
Re: Upgrade rar Package Version
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: Sure, I was just suggesting that it could also be removed since there now is an open source solution. I don't think unar supports RAR file creation, I guess some people are using that. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caktje6hio47kftr4n9ny5_i1xcf4lxdtsg6sk2-m-5xeywr...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#690366: marked as done (RFS: gmpc/11.8.16-5)
Your message dated Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:07:07 -0400 with message-id 5081f93b.8030...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#690366: RFS: gmpc/11.8.16-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #690366, regarding RFS: gmpc/11.8.16-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 690366: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690366 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Tags: l10n Hello, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gmpc. This version only updates translations and I believe that it is fit for wheezy. It builds those binary packages: gmpc - Gnome Music Player Client (graphical interface to MPD) gmpc-data - Gnome Music Player Client - data files gmpc-dbg - Gnome Music Player Client - debugging symbols gmpc-dev - Gnome Music Player Client (plugin development files) Here is the last changelog entry : gmpc (11.8.16-5) unstable; urgency=low . * Update translations : - [ca] add Catalan translation - [ru] fix translation for volume (Closes: #687999) - [fr], [oc] import from Launchpad The diffstat with the version in wheezy : debian/changelog |9 + debian/patches/0010-Update-translations.patch | 3314 ++... debian/patches/series |1 + 3 files changed, 3324 insertions(+) And a link to the .dsc: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gmpc/gmpc_11.8.16-5.dsc Thanks in advance ! -- Etienne Millon ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Etienne, Le 13/10/2012 06:37, Etienne Millon a écrit : I am looking for a sponsor for my package gmpc. This version only updates translations and I believe that it is fit for wheezy. Uploaded, thanks. Don't forget to submit an unblock request once it's built on every architecture. Regards David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQgfk7AAoJELgqIXr9/gnyNNEQAKJLkPGq9WzJ8O8SZ6SwWJZ6 U2EY/tWzLwTxGQk6F69HleSYjJtM2a0MssVp3eqT/Uxn/6Tbp4VzUIkAJzzFgIxn bu6u4nhuZ7jvfd77sqQ8iBj2iMchNPepi3mPeyYW+dpbM5ZOO0t0+UgDftcL8kyx 5R0jv3KZVkq+pzbPp6JGnOxruw484sc+xLuE9zJLe5T9tIDjjG0fPF/QxkiDnZsR UsA+oIiqfcpxfyIPDxmZePhWKQxKGHtRzhWpieyuHmJ1OKZGNwRWnOEzT7fwPX/z 7egAQXBeckxIM5qR/XWWZflU3ZlIR+ne7oDN606iJIlj+LtUdKf51pcyiRILyMX+ f4vdkgXVLDebbo65frw1A4v4A4JBj0EEurr+GAR3gBaT/BgOJTUTlT2EmGD/seiP URCYqWBZmkiZheRgGP5tRcwZqQhxBVcwDAyuq3bFr3cIV5bR3e+EJwfsVZ1K1kU0 osR8fJJfnisJ6URNw4AndHLtjZLfjAD4XSRJrMGN3kpxdhW0jB6HqSXdnK7EdSFz ukCgWjoayVALORxfqyEFdw7rDushY4WZ4efhYWcCKfob1a+RZfxLuoQfm39IIzJI hgdXEs+n98lU+Pp0g0uQtNonmttOZu/LA60eaOcMx1YnSiIroEO/0MK4By2C3K4B IIOXtgztg2h0R2nhO+Jt =GXjA -END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---